Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[IceCold]

fixed for accuracy.

like Neo said, not as good as Ronnie's - who has better arms, better glutes, better hams, much better back thickness and better thigh sweep..

its a good shot though. Just not up to Ronnie's standard. Much like all of dorian's front shots too..

yates has better conditioning, seperation, calves, and lower back.

take ronnie's word - july FLEX, 2003.

[IceCold]

even at a 'small' 247 pounds, Ronnie's back double bi displayed thickness that Dorian could only dream of.

no wonder the nuthuggers have abandoned their cause. To argue otherwise is stupid and futile..

nice comparison - a 92 shot of yates that is at an angle vs. two pics of ronnie straight on.

you may as well just go back to using your photshopped pics from the 99 olympia.

[Hulkster]

LOL IT'S THE ANGLE!

 

no buddy, its the physique.

[NeoSeminole]

take ronnie's word - july FLEX, 2003.

no thanks.

[Hulkster]

exactly.

I will take 1500+ pages of visual pics and videos shwoing otherwise over a simple opinion that is easily shown to be incorrect any day, thank you.

[IceCold]

exactly.

I will take 1500+ pages of visual pics and videos shwoing otherwise over a simple opinion that is easily shown to be incorrect any day, thank you.

says who?


you still dont get it.

[IceCold]

LOL IT'S THE ANGLE!

 

no buddy, its the physique.

really?

lets see:






no, there's no angle.

 


why didnt yo post a shot of yates straight on like you did of ronnie?

easy - bc yates wins.





(but ronnie's glutes are better)

[Hulkster]

says who?


you still dont get it.

and you still don't get that when 1500+ pages of visuals show that ronnie is better according to everyone who knows anything about bodybuilding, except for you and two others, you are wrong in your opinion.

hope this helps.

[TrapsMcLats]

no angle here and ronnie destroys dorian.

[Hulkster]

no angle here and ronnie destroys dorian.

exactly.

are you reading and seeing this nuthuggers?

even your "leader" ND has given up you guys have been humiliated so badly LOL

[IceCold]

no angle here and ronnie destroys dorian.

maybe in the glutes and biceps.

that's it.

[IceCold]

according to everyone who knows anything about bodybuilding, except for you and two others, you are wrong in your opinion.

hope this helps.

so, ronnie coleman, lee priest, paul dillet, shawn ray, flex wheeler, kevin horton, manion, kevin levrone, samir, lee labarda obviously arent who you are referring to.

you must have been referring to yourself, iceman, and dumpster.

let me know if you want me to post the quotes to own and prove you wrong like i always do - just like when you thought i didnt have the FLEX 99 mags about the olympia.

of course, you were wrong as always.

[IceCold]

notice the striations or details in the traps, lower lats, lower back. - all of which ronnie does NOT have.

yates delts, forearms are also better.

even though ronnie's torso is much shorter, yates still has better seperation and is dryer.

like shawn ray and peter mcgough said (HULKSTER, ARE THESE PEOPLE YOU WERE REFERRING TO WHO DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT BBing - glutes are overrated and is not a sign of overall superior conditioning - certianly not in this case.

[NeoSeminole]

notice the striations or details in the traps, lower lats, lower back. - all of which ronnie does NOT have. yates delts, forearms are also better. even though ronnie's torso is much shorter, yates still has better seperation and is dryer.

Jim Schmaltz – Flex, April 2002

“The 37-year-old Coleman has what many of the sport's analysts feel is the best back ever.”

Peter McGough - Flex, December 2006

"The best back ever lacked its eye-popping detail and fullness."

now couple the "best back ever" with having better arms, glutes, hamstrings and quad sweep, and Ronnie wins the back double biceps.

[delta9mda]

can i get 2000? 

[Hulkster]

you must have been referring to yourself, iceman, and dumpster.

acutally, no, I am referring to just about everyone in the bb community except you, ND, Pubes and Sucky.

you remember the poll results with the excellent comparisons by Iceman.

Dorian hardly got any votes at all..

and by the way, many people feel Ronnie 99 is the greatest ever:

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/99-coleman-everyone-else-4268.html?s=abbe435ff544a21c2714db8e53fcc265&t=4268

read it and weep. LOL

[Hulkster]

glutes are overrated

gee, how convenient of you to say that considering that dorian's suck ass compared to Ronnie's..

 

[RocketSwitch625]

Best backs of all time:

1st Dorian Yates
2nd Ronnie Coleman
3rd Lee Haney
4th Arnold Schwarzenegger
5th Samir Bannout (in 1983)
6th Mike Quinn
7th Franco Columbu (maybe?)

Yates is definitely No. 1 but I had difficulty deciding between Haney and Coleman for 2nd. I also couldn't decide if Columbu should be in there, but he did have a WIDE lat spread. Feel free to add more names to the list.

[delta9mda]

Best backs of all time:

1st Dorian Yates
2nd Ronnie Coleman
3rd Lee Haney
4th Arnold Schwarzenegger
5th Samir Bannout (in 1983)
6th Mike Quinn
7th Franco Columbu (maybe?)

Yates is definitely No. 1 but I had difficulty deciding between Haney and Coleman for 2nd. I also couldn't decide if Columbu should be in there, but he did have a WIDE lat spread. Feel free to add more names to the list.

robbie robinson?

[RocketSwitch625]

robbie robinson?

YES

[Necrosis]

Best backs of all time:

1st Dorian Yates
2nd Ronnie Coleman
3rd Lee Haney
4th Arnold Schwarzenegger
5th Samir Bannout (in 1983)
6th Mike Quinn
7th Franco Columbu (maybe?)

Yates is definitely No. 1 but I had difficulty deciding between Haney and Coleman for 2nd. I also couldn't decide if Columbu should be in there, but he did have a WIDE lat spread. Feel free to add more names to the list.

horrible list, arnold? flex had a better back then arnold, and so does victor , melvin anthony, franco etc..

[RocketSwitch625]

horrible list, arnold? flex had a better back then arnold, and so does victor , melvin anthony, franco etc..

Well, add them to the list then. I don't give a shit who goes on the list but Yates is still No. 1.

[NeoSeminole]

Well, add them to the list then. I don't give a shit who goes on the list but Yates is still No. 1.

Ronnie's back is wider, thicker, more symmetrical, and has better taper. Better detail alone doesn't make for a superior back.

[RocketSwitch625]

Ronnie's back is wider, thicker, more symmetrical, and has better taper. Better detail alone doesn't make for a superior back.

Before posting on here again, remember, opinions are like assholes.

[NeoSeminole]

Before posting on here again, remember, opinions are like assholes.

everything I mentioned is a fact.