then post the entire criteria that states density is separate from conditioning. I have a feeling you are taking what you read out of context just like you do with everything else.
I have no problem with you choosing a version of Dorian. Just specify which one you pick otherwise your posts are meaningless. It would be like me using Ronnie's conditioning at the 01 ASC, his size at the 03 Mr. Olympia, and symmetry in the 02 BFTO to argue why he's a better bodybuilder.
When assessing a competitor’s physique, a judge should follow a
routine procedure which will allow a comprehensive assessment of
the physique as a whole. During the comparisons of the
compulsory poses, the judge should first look at the primary
muscle group being displayed. The judge should then survey the
whole physique, starting from the head, and looking at every part
of the physique in a downward sequence, beginning with general
impressions, and looking for muscular bulk, balanced
development,
muscular density and definition. The downward
survey should take in the head, neck, shoulders, chest, all of the
arm muscles, front of the trunk for pectorals, pec-delt tie-in,
abdominals, waist, thighs, legs, calves and feet. The same
procedure for back poses will also take in the upper and lower
trapezius, teres and infraspinatus, erector spinae, the gluteus
group, the leg biceps group at the back of the thighs, calves, and
feet. A detailed assessment of the various muscle groups should
be made during the comparisons, at which time it helps the judge
to compare muscle shape,
density, and definition while still
bearing in mind the competitor’s overall balanced development.
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development,
muscular density and
definition.
Go away now before I
own you some more

I have no problem with you choosing a version of Dorian. Just specify which one you pick otherwise your posts are meaningless. It would be like me using Ronnie's conditioning at the 01 ASC, his size at the 03 Mr. Olympia, and symmetry in the 02 BFTO to argue why he's a better bodybuilder.
it doesn't matter what Year I pick Ronnie was NEVER as dry or hard as Yates lol or as balanced