Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3551825 times)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39800 on: January 21, 2008, 10:27:18 AM »
reading this thread is like watching a moron being stoned to death. ND cant even form an argument nor can he deduce substance from any of the quotes. He often misinterprets meaning and context of quotes and when wrong on a point will never admit.

possible autism? i kid you not, there is some learning disability not, i see it all the time. ND try dexedrine, this amphetamine salt may be able to correct your learning disadvantage.




GOLD bwahahahahaahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahha

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39801 on: January 21, 2008, 10:51:43 AM »
reading this thread is like watching a moron being stoned to death. ND cant even form an argument nor can he deduce substance from any of the quotes. He often misinterprets meaning and context of quotes and when wrong on a point will never admit.

possible autism? i kid you not, there is some learning disability not, i see it all the time. ND try dexedrine, this amphetamine salt may be able to correct your learning disadvantage.




Coming  from you this carries NO weight . I can't form an argument ? maybe you have ADD and can't pay attention or maybe you're just a casual poster and haven't seen my argument because none of these dummies can counter it and you gave it a noble try and fell flat on your face , here is the argument try and follow it if you can  ;)

Dorian would beat Ronnie because he has better conditioning , better density , he also has better balance & proportion and depending on the year he also carries more muscular bulk , couple that with Dorian being a better poser and he's more complete that would equal a Yates victory , a simplified argument for a simpleton  ;)

The official IFBB judging

The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.


Now how do I come to my conclusions Dorian is better conditioned? Dorian himself on more than one occasion has said specifically compared to Ronnie Coleman he's better conditioned and he would know seeing he's a IFBB judge now couple that with these Peter McGough's quote

Peter Mcgough

  "These words should not be taken lightly, because no bodybuilder has ever been as hard and dry as the man who won six Sandows."


While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.

On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.


4. A lot of people say that you are the only pro bodybuilder that could go head to head with Ronnie Coleman.  Like him, you were the only other to be able to gain so much mass in one year. What are your thoughts on this?


Dorian Yates : A. I get asked that question all the time, and I can’t really give an answer.  I have actually beaten Ronnie, but then he wasn’t at the stage he is now.  He is probably carrying more muscle than I did, but I feel I had better conditioning than him.  It would be close but that’s down to the judge’s decision as always.  All the things that we have in common – Lee Haney, Ronnie Coleman and myself – is that we are all stable mentally, training hard, not messing around partying.  You have to keep the focus and it’s usually the mind that is the deciding factor, over physical capabilities.



I think this pretty much proves my point's he's the better conditioned bodybuilder , now lets move onto balance & proportion , again Yates has stated that he has better balance & proportion than Ronnie , again he would know he's a IFBB judge and here's another judge commenting of his symmetry with balance & proportion is a part of

Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?

The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .


No weak bodyparts almost perfect symmetry the same can't be said for Ronnie , Dorian is a better poser I don't think many are in disagreement with this statement , but this can be seen in his side chest and front latspread which he always looks awkward in , but I digress posing & presentation isn't Ronnie's strong point but neither is it Yates' however Dorian's mandatories are better . so how that for a cognizant argument?  ;) all the bases are covered Dorian beats Ronnie because he simply satisfies the criteria better .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39802 on: January 21, 2008, 10:52:40 AM »

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39803 on: January 21, 2008, 11:37:52 AM »
Coming  from you this carries NO weight . I can't form an argument ? maybe you have ADD and can't pay attention or maybe you're just a casual poster and haven't seen my argument because none of these dummies can counter it and you gave it a noble try and fell flat on your face

why do your words carry any more weight than his? You're just an internet nobody trying to win the affection of his high school crush, Dorian Yates.

Quote
here is the argument try and follow it if you can

Dorian would beat Ronnie because he has better conditioning , better density , he also has better balance & proportion and depending on the year he also carries more muscular bulk , couple that with Dorian being a better poser and he's more complete that would equal a Yates victory , a simplified argument for a simpleton

if conditioning is synonymous with definition (according to you) and density is a separate category (also according to you), then Ronnie's advantage in definition cancels out Dorian's superior density. So you can stop saying Dorian had better conditioning. On the subject of balance, neither man has the advantage. Here is balance as defined by Dorian Yates himself.

Dorian Yates - Flex, October 2006

"Symmetry means one side is shaped the same as the other side--its mirror image. Balance means the mass of one side is equal to that of the other, even though their shapes, or symmetry, might differ. Proportion is nothing more than the relativity of parts and has nothing to do with either symmetry or balance."

as you can see, balance refers to both halves of the body being equal in mass. Since neither Dorian nor Ronnie suffered an injury at their respective primes, it's safe to assume they have equal balance. This leaves proportion and symmetry. I give Dorian the nod in proportion if we use his 93 pre-contest or contest version. That was probably the best he ever looked. However, Ronnie edges him out in symmetry. Ronnie has better correspondence between left and right halves of the body, and has a better v-taper coupled with smaller joints. The latter have traditionally been regarded as the hallmarks of a symmetrical bodybuilder.

Lee Hayward - http://www.leehayward.com/bodybuilding_terms.htm

"Symmetry - If you have good symmetry, you will have relatively wide shoulders, flaring lats, a small waist-hip structure, and generally small joints."

This leaves muscular bulk and shape. Ronnie at the 03 Mr. Olympia was 287 lbs compared to Dorian's 257 lbs and 269 lbs at the 93 Mr. Olympia and 93 pre-contest pics, respectively. This is a considerable size advantage and would be augmented by Ronnie's narrower hip structure and smaller joints. Here are some quotes regarding 03 Ronnie's level of mass.

Shawn Ray – 2003 Year in Review (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)

"Ridiculous" Ronnie Coleman would win his 6th Sandow Trophy in a row looking absolutely ridiculous! This guy was from another planet! Ronnie added about a million pounds of muscle from the previous year and squashed the competition on sheer MASS! Unbelievable is what Ronnie was this night!"

Team Flex – Flexonline.com, November 2004

“For whatever faults he may possess, Ronnie Coleman is quite possibly the most impressive physical specimen walking the earth today. Pictures do not do him justice. When he stands relaxed muscle literally hangs from his frame, as if his skin can no longer support the pendulous masses of flesh he has forged with untold tons of iron and steel. It’s difficult to imagine anyone surpassing Big Ron’s level of mass in this, or any, lifetime.”

Mike Matarazzo - Flex, January 2004

"Ronnie had so much dense muscle that it looked as though his skin could no longer hold it and he'd explode. His quads were so full and dense, they don't look real. He's an amazing individual, an amazing athlete. He's just a freak."

IFBB Official Kenny Kassel - Flex, Janurary 2004

"Ronnie has managed to develop muscles that haven't been identified yet."

On the subject of muscle shape, Ronnie beats Dorian soundly. Ronnie has better bicep peaks, more hang to his triceps, rounder delts, squarer pecs, fuller lats, and better quad sweep.

In conclusion, 03 Ronnie's combination of muscular bulk, symmetry, definition, fullness and shape raised the bar of excellence further, prompting many industry experts to regard him as the best bodybuilder of all-time.

Flex Wheeler - MD, February 2004

"I'll go on record as saying Ronnie is truly the biggest, hardest, most shredded Mr. Olympia in history. No disrespect to anybody at all, but I'd to identify Ronnie Coleman as the greatest Mr. Olympia of all time."

Paul Dillet - MD, February 2004

"Understand that if Ronnie walked away tomorrow, I do not think anyone can measure up to the standards he has set. Just like Sergio Oliva, an awesome bodybuilder way ahead of his time, and like Flex Wheeler, who had an absolutely perfect, beautiful physique. No one will match Serigo or Flex and now Ronnie."

Steve Blechman - MD, Febrary 2004

"Ronnie perseveres and proves continually that, at his best, he is unbeatable."

Dexter Jackson - Flex, January 2004

"As to Ronnie, that dude is by far the best bodybuilder on earth, he is in a class by himself, and no one will be able to touch him for years to come."

John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia - Personal Website

"It would be safe to say that [Ronnie Coleman] presented a physique that has never been seen by the bodybuilding world ever before. Competing at an incredibly massive 287 pounds, Ronnie destroyed the competition with a physique that could not possibly be equaled."

Ryan Mackie - A Fan Perspective: My 2003 Olympia Experience (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)

"Everyone could see that at 287 pounds this was Ronnie's night and that he was back on top of his game and furthermore bodybuilding had just seen the bar of excellence raised even further. Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further leaving all his competitors wonder what they have to do to now catch Ronnie Coleman, let alone beat him."

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39804 on: January 21, 2008, 12:03:45 PM »
why do your words carry any more weight than his? You're just an internet nobody trying to win the affection of his high school crush, Dorian Yates.

LOL priceless.

You just know this keener was in the high school debating society, willing and ready to utilize a need for verbal diarrhea.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39805 on: January 21, 2008, 01:35:15 PM »
This Dorian is just unreal...

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39806 on: January 21, 2008, 02:09:40 PM »
reading this thread is like watching a moron being stoned to death. ND cant even form an argument nor can he deduce substance from any of the quotes. He often misinterprets meaning and context of quotes and when wrong on a point will never admit.

possible autism? i kid you not, there is some learning disability not, i see it all the time. ND try dexedrine, this amphetamine salt may be able to correct your learning disadvantage.




hahahaha so very true. his latest denial of the Peter article is case in point and typical of ND. Here we have Peter showing point blank that he feels that Ronnie 1999 (not 98) advanced the sport (and he came well ahead of dorian 93 -ie he advanced the sport to a level ABOVE dorian) and that his AC form is even better than that..

and yet ND denies this by posting other quotes LOL

Even though we not only have Peter's opinion that he was better in 99 than in 98, we also have all the visual proof too.

and ND still denies it LOL ::)

he has no clue. He relies on quotes because the real life visuals show dorian getting owned (and its no surprise since Ronnie 99 advanced the sport to a new level) and he can't even do that because the quotes bite him in the ass

lol

possible autism? hmm..possible stupidity? maybe. He doesn't seem to be very bright, that is for certain.

well, we know he is incapable of understanding English, thats for sure.

Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39807 on: January 21, 2008, 02:13:27 PM »
why do your words carry any more weight than his? You're just an internet nobody trying to win the affection of his high school crush, Dorian Yates.

if conditioning is synonymous with definition (according to you) and density is a separate category (also according to you), then Ronnie's advantage in definition cancels out Dorian's superior density. So you can stop saying Dorian had better conditioning. On the subject of balance, neither man has the advantage. Here is balance as defined by Dorian Yates himself.

Dorian Yates - Flex, October 2006

"Symmetry means one side is shaped the same as the other side--its mirror image. Balance means the mass of one side is equal to that of the other, even though their shapes, or symmetry, might differ. Proportion is nothing more than the relativity of parts and has nothing to do with either symmetry or balance."

as you can see, balance refers to both halves of the body being equal in mass. Since neither Dorian nor Ronnie suffered an injury at their respective primes, it's safe to assume they have equal balance. This leaves proportion and symmetry. I give Dorian the nod in proportion if we use his 93 pre-contest or contest version. That was probably the best he ever looked. However, Ronnie edges him out in symmetry. Ronnie has better correspondence between left and right halves of the body, and has a better v-taper coupled with smaller joints. The latter have traditionally been regarded as the hallmarks of a symmetrical bodybuilder.

Lee Hayward - http://www.leehayward.com/bodybuilding_terms.htm

"Symmetry - If you have good symmetry, you will have relatively wide shoulders, flaring lats, a small waist-hip structure, and generally small joints."

This leaves muscular bulk and shape. Ronnie at the 03 Mr. Olympia was 287 lbs compared to Dorian's 257 lbs and 269 lbs at the 93 Mr. Olympia and 93 pre-contest pics, respectively. This is a considerable size advantage and would be augmented by Ronnie's narrower hip structure and smaller joints. Here are some quotes regarding 03 Ronnie's level of mass.

Shawn Ray – 2003 Year in Review (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)

"Ridiculous" Ronnie Coleman would win his 6th Sandow Trophy in a row looking absolutely ridiculous! This guy was from another planet! Ronnie added about a million pounds of muscle from the previous year and squashed the competition on sheer MASS! Unbelievable is what Ronnie was this night!"

Team Flex – Flexonline.com, November 2004

“For whatever faults he may possess, Ronnie Coleman is quite possibly the most impressive physical specimen walking the earth today. Pictures do not do him justice. When he stands relaxed muscle literally hangs from his frame, as if his skin can no longer support the pendulous masses of flesh he has forged with untold tons of iron and steel. It’s difficult to imagine anyone surpassing Big Ron’s level of mass in this, or any, lifetime.”

Mike Matarazzo - Flex, January 2004

"Ronnie had so much dense muscle that it looked as though his skin could no longer hold it and he'd explode. His quads were so full and dense, they don't look real. He's an amazing individual, an amazing athlete. He's just a freak."

IFBB Official Kenny Kassel - Flex, Janurary 2004

"Ronnie has managed to develop muscles that haven't been identified yet."

On the subject of muscle shape, Ronnie beats Dorian soundly. Ronnie has better bicep peaks, more hang to his triceps, rounder delts, squarer pecs, fuller lats, and better quad sweep.

In conclusion, 03 Ronnie's combination of muscular bulk, symmetry, definition, fullness and shape raised the bar of excellence further, prompting many industry experts to regard him as the best bodybuilder of all-time.

Flex Wheeler - MD, February 2004

"I'll go on record as saying Ronnie is truly the biggest, hardest, most shredded Mr. Olympia in history. No disrespect to anybody at all, but I'd to identify Ronnie Coleman as the greatest Mr. Olympia of all time."

Paul Dillet - MD, February 2004

"Understand that if Ronnie walked away tomorrow, I do not think anyone can measure up to the standards he has set. Just like Sergio Oliva, an awesome bodybuilder way ahead of his time, and like Flex Wheeler, who had an absolutely perfect, beautiful physique. No one will match Serigo or Flex and now Ronnie."

Steve Blechman - MD, Febrary 2004

"Ronnie perseveres and proves continually that, at his best, he is unbeatable."

Dexter Jackson - Flex, January 2004

"As to Ronnie, that dude is by far the best bodybuilder on earth, he is in a class by himself, and no one will be able to touch him for years to come."

John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia - Personal Website

"It would be safe to say that [Ronnie Coleman] presented a physique that has never been seen by the bodybuilding world ever before. Competing at an incredibly massive 287 pounds, Ronnie destroyed the competition with a physique that could not possibly be equaled."

Ryan Mackie - A Fan Perspective: My 2003 Olympia Experience (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)

"Everyone could see that at 287 pounds this was Ronnie's night and that he was back on top of his game and furthermore bodybuilding had just seen the bar of excellence raised even further. Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further leaving all his competitors wonder what they have to do to now catch Ronnie Coleman, let alone beat him."

Quote
why do your words carry any more weight than his? You're just an internet nobody trying to win the affection of his high school crush, Dorian Yates.

because I can back mine words up thats how  ;) and oh boy I'm an ' internet nobody ' lmfao and I guess all of you are not?  ::) oh thats right you're something in life you've made somebody of yourself , you're  a " certified personal trainer ' the moment you typed this garbage is the moment you played yourself , the same with Hulkster and his ' university ' lol only internet nobodies post their resumes in a pathetic attempt to impress and boy did that back fire .

and more of your latent homosexual tendencies are ' coming out ' ( pun intended ) Dorian isn't as you fantasize my ' high school crush ' and notice I'm not a delusional guy like you and the rest of the cronies I never once claimed Dorian was the greatest bodybuilder ever , I don't follow his training style , I would never want to have a physique that emulated his , I think strictly for the purpose of debate Dorian is the better of the two thats the difference between you and I can can be objective because he's not my hero and you and Hulkster well we all know how you guys feel lol

Quote
if conditioning is synonymous with definition (according to you) and density is a separate category (also according to you), then Ronnie's advantage in definition cancels out Dorian's superior density. So you can stop saying Dorian had better conditioning. On the subject of balance, neither man has the advantage. Here is balance as defined by Dorian Yates himself.


Dorian Yates - Flex, October 2006

"Symmetry means one side is shaped the same as the other side--its mirror image. Balance means the mass of one side is equal to that of the other, even though their shapes, or symmetry, might differ. Proportion is nothing more than the relativity of parts and has nothing to do with either symmetry or balance."

conditioning is synonymous with definition , and density while related to conditioning is judged as a separate entity which isn't according to me , it's according to the IFBB judging criteria it was posted as you were corrected as usual . and NO Ronnie's clear advantage in definition is in your imagination and I will continue to say Dorian is the better conditioned of the two because I backed up my claim , unlike you.

Dorian Yates is an IFBB judge he knows what to look for and he has said on two separate occasions that specific to this debate that he his the better conditioned , now couple that with Peter McGough who says in black & white Ronnie was NEVER as hard or as dry as Yates , in fact he's stated on more than one occasion that NO ONE ( Coleman included ) has been as hard as the man who won six Sandows , now add insult to injury I posted a quote from Lee Priest saying the same thing ! specific to this debate , and what have you done? posted quotes in relation to his competition from a particular year?  ::) nice try

but I have proven my point Dorian is the better conditioned athlete and on the sunject of balance I will continue to say Dorian is better balanced thats painfully obvious to anyone who knows a lick out professional bodybuilding and guess what Neo? Dorian has stated he's has better balance than Ronnie Coleman and he would know because he an IFBB judge , he's unlike us just an ' internet nobody ' lol

Dorian has better dryness & density and he has better balance & proportion

Quote
as you can see, balance refers to both halves of the body being equal in mass. Since neither Dorian nor Ronnie suffered an injury at their respective primes, it's safe to assume they have equal balance. This leaves proportion and symmetry. I give Dorian the nod in proportion if we use his 93 pre-contest or contest version. That was probably the best he ever looked. However, Ronnie edges him out in symmetry. Ronnie has better correspondence between left and right halves of the body, and has a better v-taper coupled with smaller joints. The latter have traditionally been regarded as the hallmarks of a symmetrical bodybuilder.

Lee Hayward - http://www.leehayward.com/bodybuilding_terms.htm

"Symmetry - If you have good symmetry, you will have relatively wide shoulders, flaring lats, a small waist-hip structure, and generally small joints."

again see above Dorian commenting on him having better balance old news and balance & proportion are part of symmetry ( this has been explained to you already ) and here is another IFBB judge commenting on Dorian's near perfect symmetry

Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?

The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .


while Ronnie does have an advantage in PART of symmetry Dorian has a clear advantage in the other , Ronnie does have smaller joints and hips & waist but you're also forgetting torso length , having long legs & arms in relation to the torso all part of symmetry NOT just having a small waist & hips and just to remind you that all rounds are physique rounds including the symmetry round so any advantage in part of the criteria Ronnie has becomes moot when he lags behind in density & conditioning and balance & proportion , and depending on the year muscular bulk that's how the game is played kid

Quote
This leaves muscular bulk and shape. Ronnie at the 03 Mr. Olympia was 287 lbs compared to Dorian's 257 lbs and 269 lbs at the 93 Mr. Olympia and 93 pre-contest pics, respectively. This is a considerable size advantage and would be augmented by Ronnie's narrower hip structure and smaller joints. Here are some quotes regarding 03 Ronnie's level of mass.

That does leave Ronnie's one big advantage muscular bulk , but to quote McGough Dorian at 269 pounds would make Ronnie look soft and thats true Ronnie's conditioning in 2003 is NOT his best not by a country mile he has very good conditioning for a man that size but still leaps & bounds behind 2001 & 1998 and we've already established he was NEVER as hard or as dry as Dorian so what good is the extra weight? sure he looks impressive but that was standing next to Dexter Jackson and Jay Cutler lol he's never faced anyone of Dorian Yates caliber , Dorian has 90% of Ronnie size , better balance & proportion , he's better conditioned and is harder , oh he's also more complete and he's a better poser and you think having a small waist & hips and smaller joints and an extra soft 18 pounds is going to compensate for it? I don't think so , now lets address all these dumb quotes ....again  :-\

Quote
Shawn Ray – 2003 Year in Review (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)

"Ridiculous" Ronnie Coleman would win his 6th Sandow Trophy in a row looking absolutely ridiculous! This guy was from another planet! Ronnie added about a million pounds of muscle from the previous year and squashed the competition on sheer MASS! Unbelievable is what Ronnie was this night!"

blah , blah , blah Ronnie was big old news

Quote
Team Flex – Flexonline.com, November 2004

“For whatever faults he may possess, Ronnie Coleman is quite possibly the most impressive physical specimen walking the earth today. Pictures do not do him justice. When he stands relaxed muscle literally hangs from his frame, as if his skin can no longer support the pendulous masses of flesh he has forged with untold tons of iron and steel. It’s difficult to imagine anyone surpassing Big Ron’s level of mass in this, or any, lifetime.”

see above he's big we get it

Quote
Mike Matarazzo - Flex, January 2004

"Ronnie had so much dense muscle that it looked as though his skin could no longer hold it and he'd explode. His quads were so full and dense, they don't look real. He's an amazing individual, an amazing athlete. He's just a freak."

Wow Ronnie was big in 2003 never heard that before  ::) his density left a lot to be desired especially compared to 1998 & 2001

Quote
IFBB Official Kenny Kassel - Flex, Janurary 2004

"Ronnie has managed to develop muscles that haven't been identified yet."

this has NOTHING to do with his muscular bulk wtf?

Quote
On the subject of muscle shape, Ronnie beats Dorian soundly. Ronnie has better bicep peaks, more hang to his triceps, rounder delts, squarer pecs, fuller lats, and better quad sweep.

In conclusion, 03 Ronnie's combination of muscular bulk, symmetry, definition, fullness and shape raised the bar of excellence further, prompting many industry experts to regard him as the best bodybuilder of all-time.

Ronnie does have the advantage in SOME shape not all and typical of you to list the hits and ignore the misses ( I'm sure you've heard that expression ) wow Ronnie has better biceps , and Dorian has better forearms and according to the criteria its the WHOLE that wins , more hang to his triceps? LMFAO what would Freud have to say about that ? anyway . rounder delts ? NOT compared to Yates at 269 pounds I beg to differ not that means anything Dorian never won because he had a pretty physique but I'll entertain your point of view , squarer pecs that disappear when his arms are raised above , fuller lats lmfao yeah okay fuller you mean softer sure and Yates has a better sweep to his lats than Ronnie sorry , better quad sweep absolutely , Yates has better shaped calves , forearms , abdominals , back in my opinion , glutes because his aren't sticking out and can be seen from the front , side head of the triceps and thats all knitpicking because what matters is all rounds are physique rounds so trying to accumulate parts means nothing when everything is taken into consideration and Ronnie did raise the bar in 03 , he didn't face anyone like Yates  ;)

all those quotes have been addressed before old news Ronnie took it to a new level and he did he competed and won at the highest bodyweight of any Mr Olympia and he destroyed the competition and Dorian wasn't part of it , Dorian never wanted to compete on size alone he always went for the total package he was already bigger than ANYONE ( at his height or around it ) he was 269 pounds in 1993 and could have destroyed everyone ( even more so if thats possible in 93 )

When all things are considered Dorian simply meets the criteria better than Ronnie ( old news ) at 269 pounds he's harder & drier , he has much better balance & proportion , he has NOT weak bodyparts , he's more complete and a better poser , he would beat Ronnie and his extra size advantage .

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39808 on: January 21, 2008, 02:17:07 PM »
Quote
all those quotes have been addressed before old news

and so have the ones you keep posting.. ::)

your autistic mind does not get it.

there are quotes on BOTH sides of the argument, with differing opinions on everything from the severity of dorian's injury to which shape was ronnie's best to which shape was dorian's best to..

etc etc etc.

visuals is the best way to decide this.

and visuals are not your friend in this case.

the superior advancement that Ronnie showed in 99 far eclipses the early 90's winner.

thats progress.

only Jay has sent the sport backwards. (but maybe a step up from dorian LOL)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39809 on: January 21, 2008, 02:20:16 PM »
hahahaha so very true. his latest denial of the Peter article is case in point and typical of ND. Here we have Peter showing point blank that he feels that Ronnie 1999 (not 98) advanced the sport (and he came well ahead of dorian 93 -ie he advanced the sport to a level ABOVE dorian) and that his AC form is even better than that..

and yet ND denies this by posting other quotes LOL

Even though we not only have Peter's opinion that he was better in 99 than in 98, we also have all the visual proof too.

and ND still denies it LOL ::)

he has no clue. He relies on quotes because the real life visuals show dorian getting owned (and its no surprise since Ronnie 99 advanced the sport to a new level) and he can't even do that because the quotes bite him in the ass

lol

possible autism? hmm..possible stupidity? maybe. He doesn't seem to be very bright, that is for certain.

well, we know he is incapable of understanding English, thats for sure.



Quote
hahahaha so very true. his latest denial of the Peter article is case in point and typical of ND. Here we have Peter showing point blank that he feels that Ronnie 1999 (not 98) advanced the sport (and he came well ahead of dorian 93 -ie he advanced the sport to a level ABOVE dorian) and that his AC form is even better than that..

and yet ND denies this by posting other quotes LOL

Again did the quote say ANYTHING about Ronnie being harder & drier in 99 compared to 98? nope  ;) and did he say Ronnie was a better Olympia than Dorian? nope  ;) in fact he specifically states it is IMPOSSIBLE to choose the best Olympia , oh snap you're getting owned left & right lol and the very best part he crushes your claim that Ronnie 1999 was his best ever showing LMMFAO he states specifically that Ronnie's best showing was 2001 ASC lol and then he states Dorian would beat little Ronnie to boot

Quote
he has no clue. He relies on quotes because the real life visuals show dorian getting owned (and its no surprise since Ronnie 99 advanced the sport to a new level) and he can't even do that because the quotes bite him in the ass

lol

possible autism? hmm..possible stupidity? maybe. He doesn't seem to be very bright, that is for certain.

well, we know he is incapable of understanding English, thats for sure.

lmfao Ronnie 99 advanced jack Dorian was bigger , harder and drier in 1993 at 269 pounds where did Ronnie advance the sport? yeah I thought so  ;)  the quotes certainly kicked your ass didn't they lol

and you're about to get owned again lol you're on record praising my intelligence , please show me where I ever said you were smart? lol oh thats right I never did . sucker.


SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39810 on: January 21, 2008, 02:23:38 PM »
ND, when you sleep with men are you usually on the top or bottom?  I am guessing the bottom twink
Here comes the money shot

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39811 on: January 21, 2008, 02:24:32 PM »
and so have the ones you keep posting.. ::)

your autistic mind does not get it.

there are quotes on BOTH sides of the argument, with differing opinions on everything from the severity of dorian's injury to which shape was ronnie's best to which shape was dorian's best to..

etc etc etc.

visuals is the best way to decide this.

and visuals are not your friend in this case.

the superior advancement that Ronnie showed in 99 far eclipses the early 90's winner.

thats progress.

only Jay has sent the sport backwards. (but maybe a step up from dorian LOL)

No my quotes have been dismissed because they CRUSH your stupidity  ;) again how did Ronnie advance the sport in 1999? Dorian was bigger , harder & drier in 1993 what advancement is that? lol oh he also has better balance & proportion , and he's more complete where is the advancement? there is none  ;)

the quotes silence your bull shit Ronnie is harder & drier in 1998 & 2001 than in 1999 all of these quotes proved you wrong flat out wrong , in fact NO ONE is claiming that 1999 is his best showing other than you and bizzy , Neo thinks its 2003 as does usmoke , Ronnie , McGough , Perine all say 98/01 you're wrong on all accounts .  ;)


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39812 on: January 21, 2008, 02:25:21 PM »
ND, when you sleep with men are you usually on the top or bottom?  I am guessing the bottom twink

lmfao talk about self onwage lol boy what on your mind? see Freud he'll tell you

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39813 on: January 21, 2008, 02:30:12 PM »
Quote
again how did Ronnie advance the sport in 1999?


he was more shapely than dorian, better aesthetics, way better detail and vasularity, with equal size, and a better back.

no one has EVER had that combo before or since.

after all, Peter McGough agrees competely, remember?

lol

Peter feels ronnie 99 advanced the sport foward (above that set by dorian) and its driving you crazy, isn't it?

hahahahaha

Quote
Instead of choosing a best-ever Mr. Olympia, maybe all one can do is reflect on 40 years of Olympia history and highlight those instances where the winner advanced the sport on that particular day. With that in mind, I would nominate the following.


Dorian Yates | 1993

then

Ronnie Coleman | 1999

Ronnie 99>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dorian 93

LOL you can't change Peter's opinion ND, is right here and you are in damage control as you have been for 1600 pages now LOL





Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39814 on: January 21, 2008, 02:34:34 PM »

he was more shapely than dorian, better aesthetics, way better detail and vasularity, with equal size, and a better back.

no one has EVER had that combo before or since.

after all, Peter McGough agrees competely, remember?

lol

Peter feels ronnie 99 advanced the sport foward (above that set by dorian) and its driving you crazy, isn't it?

hahahahaha



Peter also feels Ronnie 2001 crushed Ronnie 1999  ;) Peter feels Dorian at 269 pounds would walk all over Ronnie 2001 lmfao

you have NOTHING as usual for every advantage you just claimed McGough said they are useless and would fall under Yates' strengths  ;)

Dorian 1993 didn't even need to be including in the muscularity round LMFAO did this happen in 1999? nope  ;) advance what? yeah I thought so lol

TrapsMcLats

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2801
  • Lift Heavy. Lift Hard.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39815 on: January 21, 2008, 02:35:22 PM »
i missed this quote hulk (mcgough talking so highly of 99 coleman), can you please post it again for me?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39816 on: January 21, 2008, 02:38:16 PM »
Quote
you have NOTHING as usual for every advantage you just claimed McGough said they are useless and would fall under Yates' strengths 

according to you and you only.

not peter. Peter feels Ronnie 99 advanced the sport above and beyond dorian and any of the other winners.

he is last on the list.

notice, he also puts Ronnie 99 above ronnie 2003 as well. the article was from 2005.




Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39817 on: January 21, 2008, 02:42:26 PM »
i missed this quote hulk (mcgough talking so highly of 99 coleman), can you please post it again for me?

in this article, McGough lists in chronological order, the Mr. O physiques that advanced the sport on that particlar day.

He lists dorian 93 followed by Ronnie 99 and its driving ND crazy.

here is the article:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614


he specifically mentions how much better ronnie was in 99 than in 98, and since its contrary to what ND has been claiming (and it supports the visuals showing ronnie 99 being better than 98) its driving ND crazy yet again.

ND wishes that article had never been written.

ND is getbig's resident Rain Man lol
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39818 on: January 21, 2008, 02:47:25 PM »
according to you and you only.

not peter. Peter feels Ronnie 99 advanced the sport above and beyond dorian and any of the other winners.

he is last on the list.

notice, he also puts Ronnie 99 above ronnie 2003 as well. the article was from 2005.






Moron HELLO McFly is anyone home? please follow you idiot

On July 4, I found myself in conversation with Lou Ferrigno. No, we weren't talking about Paul Revere and Mad King George; instead, with the 2005 Olympia Weekend looming like a Ronnie Coleman lat spread, the Hulk wanted to know who I thought was the best-ever Mr. Olympia. My response was that it was impossible to choose. All any athlete--in any sport--can do is become the best in his era, and it is futile to try to compare champions from different eras. Imagine trying to convince a modern-day bodybuilding fan that Larry Scott had better guns than Ronnie Coleman does.

nstead of choosing a best-ever Mr. Olympia, maybe all one can do is reflect on 40 years of Olympia history and highlight those instances where the winner advanced the sport on that particular day. With that in mind, I would nominate the following.

NO WHERE in this sentence does he state Ronnie Coleman is the best Olympia NO WHERE stop typing this nonsense he's more advanced he went out of his way to explain that it is impossible to choose  ;)

 Ronnie Coleman | 1999

In his first defense of the Mr. O title, Coleman exhibited size, condition and sinew-splitting fullness he lacked a year earlier. At 257 pounds, he was so separated that he looked like a walking anatomy chart. That being said, I still think he achieved his best-ever physique for the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic.

no where does he say Ronnie is harder & drier in 99 thats another lie you keep typing , and he goes out of way to explain Ronnie's best showing was 2001 ASC and because? you guessed it lol he was harder & drier and even lighter , so again you're wrong on every single point you ever made and I proven you wrong and how does McGough feel about Yates at 269 pounds would do against Ronnie 2001?

While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.

On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.

lmfao I'm going to bury you even more

Peter McGough Ironage Agust 23, 2007

What was the best Olympia you saw? It's close between 1988 and 1993. So many competitors in great shape in both and so many storylines in both.


LMMFAO where is 1999? NO WHERE so much for advancement

owned


Bast000

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 8144
  • Team Malk-Gallon
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39819 on: January 21, 2008, 02:49:12 PM »
can't you assholes 'agree to disagree' and shut the fu_ck up already?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39820 on: January 21, 2008, 02:50:23 PM »
in this article, McGough lists in chronological order, the Mr. O physiques that advanced the sport on that particlar day.

He lists dorian 93 followed by Ronnie 99 and its driving ND crazy.

here is the article:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614


he specifically mentions how much better ronnie was in 99 than in 98, and since its contrary to what ND has been claiming (and it supports the visuals showing ronnie 99 being better than 98) its driving ND crazy yet again.

ND wishes that article had never been written.

ND is getbig's resident Rain Man lol


how is 2001 better than 1999 if according to you Ronnie was bigger , fuller and had identical conditioning?  ;) why does everyone point to Coleman's best showing as 98 or 01 ASC? do I have to explain to you why?  ;)

Peter McGough Ironage Agust 23, 2007

What was the best Olympia you saw? It's close between 1988 and 1993. So many competitors in great shape in both and so many storylines in both.


Where's 1999 Mr Olympia? lol

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39821 on: January 21, 2008, 02:51:41 PM »
LOL ND is trying to discredit Peter's opinion in the article with more quotes from Peter himself. ::)

do you all think he will ever learn the lesson here?

LOL



Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39822 on: January 21, 2008, 02:55:40 PM »
Quote
Where's 1999 Mr Olympia? lol

well, the winner is the last person in the timeline of advancement for the sport of bodybuilding in the opinion of your (former?) best friend Peter McGough

lol

you are fucked.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39823 on: January 21, 2008, 02:58:45 PM »
LOL ND is trying to discredit Peter's opinion in the article with more quotes from Peter himself. ::)

do you all think he will ever learn the lesson here?

LOL





You're a outright liar , where did I try and discredit him? stop running are at least try and articulate your position

again he says its IMPOSSIBLE to choose the best Olympia that means my simple little friend Ronnie isn't it and neither is Dorian  ;)

and again your point he was his best ever in 1999 is corrected ( by everyone lol ) but he says specifically 99 Olympia is NOT his best showing ever 2001 is and he also states Dorian at 269 pounds would crush Ronnie 2001 and he further elaborates that the two best Olympias he's ever seen was 1988 and 1993 lol where is 1999 Mr Olympia? lol

its not the best Olympia , its not Ronnie's best showing , he's not harder or drier in 99 than 98 or 01 every single point you made is worthless .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83401
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #39824 on: January 21, 2008, 03:00:45 PM »
well, the winner is the last person in the timeline of advancement for the sport of bodybuilding in the opinion of your (former?) best friend Peter McGough

lol

you are fucked.

again please show me where he said Ronnie Coleman is the greatest Mr Olympia ever? please do  ;) and again he says Ronnie 1999 gets owned by 2001 and 2001 gets owned by Yates and the best Olympias he's seen is 88/93 lol

this is exactly why I stopped responding to you , you're just being contrary now and ignorant , seriously stop trolling.