I want the uneducated nuthuggers to answer a few simple questions.
throughout this thread we have quotes with opinins ALL OVER the place.
and what is apparent is this:
the ronnie side uses visual evidence to support their posted quotes.
the dorian side does not.
tell us, do you AGREE WITH RONNIE THAT DORIAN WOULD HAVE WON IN HIS 97 FORM AGAINST RONNIE'S 98 FORM?
and if so,
do you feel it would be because of POLITICS or because his physique was ACTUALLY BETTER?
Please explain.
because you uneducated morons seem to feel that you can pick and choose any quote (even if there are tons of contradictory ones) and it MUST be true, the fact that it has NO SUPPORT IN THE FORM OF VISUALS doesn't seem to matter.
which is really really stupid.
We can post Peter's quotes about 99 Ronnie and back it up quite clearly with the visuals from that day. (both the video, pics and screencaps).
Problem is, you cannot do the same with dorian.
especially the abomination known as the 97 version of dorian.
explain yourselves, idiots.
explain in the light of real life: