I assure you I'm not insecure about my intelligence, especially not around dumbf*cks who can't read and think rationally like you. The reason I provided my college English grades and GRE verbal score was to back up my claim (something you can't do) about having better reading comprehension than you. You apparently need everything to be laid out for you to spare your peon brain from having to think on its own. "He never explicitly said 03. So he couldn't be referring to that year" even though the quote was featured in the 03 Mr. Olympia review. 
re-read my last response to you. I never said 92 was Dorian's best package.
I assure you I'm not insecure about my intelligence, especially not around dumbf*cks who can't read and think rationally like you. The reason I provided my college English grades and GRE verbal score was to back up my claim (something you can't do) about having better reading comprehension than you. You apparently need everything to be laid out for you to spare your peon brain from having to think on its own. "He never explicitly said 03. So he couldn't be referring to that year" even though the quote was featured in the 03 Mr. Olympia review.
No when you're reduced to posting your resume on an internet message board you're really trying to impress me because you're not doing a very good job at it with your posts . and you backed up your claim? no you didn't you posted a few quotes and none of them said 2003 was his best overall showing , none of them thats backing up your claim? I think not
Backing up your claim would be many quotes explicitly stating 2003 was his best overall showing , I explained exactly why 2003 is not his best overall showing and I backed up my claim via credible sources . I explained to you why 2003 isn't his best overall showing specifically because he's not as hard or as dry in 03 as he was in 1998/2001 and his proportions ( and balance ) are at their all-time worse
The best part of all of this is I have a quote from your own hero saying when posted this very question which year was his best Olympia and this was at the end of his Olympia career and he verifies my claim and my reason why lmfao 1998 because my conditioning was spot-on ! your response " Ronnie isn't the brightest guy " you call this backing up your claim? you'll attempt wrongly at that to use some other people to back up claim ( which failed ) and dismiss the man in question as stupid or his opinion less valid than yours LMFAO and the best part I posted quotes from McGough , Perine , Schmaltz ,DeMillia etc all backing up my claim and verifies Ronnie's statement , which shows your outright wrong and I'm right and you have the balls to question anyones intelligence and comprehension skills?
Again all my claims on this subject have been verified after the fact which proves I know what I'm talking about and you my dim little friend do not , when it comes to competitive bodybuilding you know very little while I may not not everything I sure know a hell of a lot more than you and thats a proven fact.
re-read my last response to you. I never said 92 was Dorian's best package.
Dorian's proportions, definition, symmetry, and overall appearance were better No you sure did say 92 was better , better symmetry , ' definition and overall appearance were BETTER ' thats saying he's better you're a liar and you're wrong ! and I can back that claim up to
