Of course there's Republicans / Democrats on the list, but I think it's bigger than that. Releasing everyone involved could have catastrophic effects on the market, the economy, the judicial system, etc, and undermine everything Trump wants to accomplish. I think Saagar Enjeti might be onto something when he said the recent messaging around "no list" wasn't to convince anyone, but to tell those compromised that they are safe. To keep the machine going. I listened to the podcast Super Nattie posted yesterday - it's worth a listen - ex CIA guy give pretty great insight into his dealings with the Mossad.
As for Trump/Epstein, is it true or not Trump threw him out of Mar-A-Lago permanently after his first light sentence?
Yes it would be very destabilizing. Saager also said there's no one "list" per se, not that you couldn't compile one. Flight logs also aren't proof of criminality.
He also made a point of saying there's little to indicate Jeffrey had all these girls for is own personal pleasure. And why would you have cameras in every single room.
I predicted they would say they won't release any more detail to protect the victims, and Bondi just did. Another point was that firstit was said the cameras malfunctioned and the guards fell asleep. Turns out they worked just fine. Tucker had asked about the other neighbouring inmates but they wouldn't releasee that due to privacy laws. Both men said lofically he was killed by someone in the other cells. And of course you can release fake video, from another date and so on.
Trump said paraphrased, "Jeffrey
also likes his women on the young side, he sure enjoys his social life." Depending on your politics you could see that as innocuous or somethhing sinister, hard to be objective.
