Yes!!! Trump declassifies the Epstein files - 01-23-25

[Humble Narcissist]

It is well established he was an Israeli spy so they might as well admit it.

[Van_Bilderass]

There's are Jews, in general good and decent peeps, and there are zionists, those shitstainns need to be tortured and have grave bodily harm inflicted upon them

Fact of the matter is that most Jews are Zionists essentially. You need to read up on the definition of it. In Israel 80+% of the Jews approve of ethnically cleansing the Palestinians, through extermination or displacement. Now they are essentially building a concentration camp for them, only they say "we are concentrating them into a humanitarian zone." Of course Palestine was always an open air concentration camp. But yes, there are good Jews. Like Sachs, the fellas on the Grayzone on YT, I think Finkelstein is good also, many others, all of whom other Jews call self-hating Jews naturally. Trump has effectively made antisemitism the supreme crime, and the definition includes criticism of Israel and Zionism. "Righteous Jews" is open to interpretation of course, this is just IMHO.

My grandmother married my grandfather at 14. He was 35. She said they went on one date and he proposed sbe said yes and 30+ years they were married and had 4 kids. I do not think my grandma was raped repeatedly for years, until the magical night of her 18th birthday, nor was my grandfather a pedophile. He had a farm and needed kids, my grandmother told me thats how it was back then.

I think what can be said is that morals and the idea of the "good" changes with with times.
The best bet for many fathers was often marrying off the little girls into a secure situation for their futures. But like I said, I think it's good that children are more protected nowadays, letting them be children for longer. OTOH girls are more exposed to other types of harmful sexuality these days. Parents can't keep the girls locked up and chaste. They are free to dream of big black dong, the ideal being fed to them through music and other "tribal" media.

It is well established he was an Israeli spy so they might as well admit it.

Can't "just" admit it. Think of the blowback, enormous

[dj181]

Fact of the matter is that most Jews are Zionists essentially. In Israel 80+% of the Jews approve of ethnically cleansing the Palestinians, through extermination or displacement. Now they are essentially building a concentration camp for them, only they say "we are concentrating them into a humanitarian zone." Of course Palestine was always an open air concentration camp. But yes, there are good Jews. Like Sachs, the fellas on the Grayzone on YT, I think Finkelstein is good also, many others, all of whom other Jews call self-hating Jews naturally. Trump has effectively made antisemitism the supreme crime, and the definition includes criticism of Israel and Zionism. "Righteous Jews" is open to interpretation of course, this is just IMHO.

I think what can be said is that morals and the idea of the "good" changes with with times.
The best bet for many fathers was often marrying off the little girls into a secure situation for their futures. But like I said, I think it's good that children are more protected nowadays, letting them be children for longer. OTOH girls are more exposed to other types of harmful sexuality these days. Parents can't keep the girls locked up and chaste.

Do you know who David Icke is?

He believes in complete and total freedom of speech just like I do

He says.... "freedom of speech is just that, freedom to say anything you damn well please"

[Van_Bilderass]

Do you know who David Icke is?

He believes in complete and total freedom of speech just like I do

He says.... "freedom of speech is just that, freedom to say anything you damn well please"

I'm only superficially familiar. The question for me was always if it was mostly performance art, if you will, hinting at things through fantasy concepts. And there are ALWAYS ideas you can't discuss, everyone pulls their punches, so you have to "step over it" out of necessity. Like naming the Jew explicitly so you find ways around it, like Rothbard of the Mises institute did, a Jew himself. There are other subjects too which have to be left alone and only hinted at, in (((Straussian))) manner. Heavy use of dog-whistles in many cases

[Grape Ape]

Saw a different take on it today, just sharing.

https://x.com/AlexBerenson/status/1944728430068592708

[Phantom Spunker]

Absolutely love this gentleman. What do the Brits here think of George Galloway? On Epstein at the beginning...

I like him. Not that I always agree with him, and he has his character faults, but he's an incredibly eloquent and articulate speaker, and I admire his commitment to trolling and antagonizing his peers. He knows how to pander to an audience, but he does do it with flair, and he's always remained consistent on challenging the evils of Zionism and British imperialism. You might enjoy his debate with Christopher Hitchens from years ago.

[Van_Bilderass]

I like him. Not that I always agree with him, and he has his character faults, but he's an incredibly eloquent and articulate speaker, and I admire his commitment to trolling and antagonizing his peers. He knows how to pander to an audience, but he does do it with flair, and he's always remained consistent on challenging the evils of Zionism and British imperialism. You might enjoy his debate with Christopher Hitchens from years ago.

Have to check it out, thanks, I was just so impressed with his delivery in US congress decades ago, it was a thing of beauty

Saw a different take on it today, just sharing.

https://x.com/AlexBerenson/status/1944728430068592708

Yeah, but what do you make of Bongino supposedly wanting to resign over it?

Like I've said, the child sex might only be a relatively minor part of the resistance to look into him more. The financials and the associations, the intelligence connections, him being a CIA and Mossad asset. Trump lambasting people for wanting to look into JFK more is really rich, but I think again there's certain uncomfortable connections there...

[dj181]

I'm only superficially familiar. The question for me was always if it was mostly performance art, if you will, hinting at things through fantasy concepts. And there are ALWAYS ideas you can't discuss, everyone pulls their punches, so you have to "step over it" out of necessity. Like naming the Jew explicitly so you find ways around it, like Rothbard of the Mises institute did, a Jew himself. There are other subjects too which have to be left alone and only hinted at, in (((Straussian))) manner. Heavy use of dog-whistles in many cases

At bout 22 minutes

I don't give a damn what people think of.me (sound familiar 😉😂) but I want them to have the right to.say.what they want to say even if I don't agree with it

Fuck yes! Exactly

[Van_Bilderass]

At bout 22 minutes

I don't give a damn what people think of.me (sound familiar 😉😂) but I want them to have the right to.say.what they want to say even if I don't agree with it

Fuck yes! Exactly

I'll try to watch later. But...

"Who controls the world?"

"Elite shape-shifting lizards!"

Again, is this to point the finger while trying to appear insane for deniability purposes? Hopefully... for his sake.

No nation, government or leader has ever believed in absolute freedom of speech and never will. Control of speech and information is the name of the game... forever. Building national narratives is where it's at. Look at Trump, his site is called "Truth Social" and he believes in "free speech" which is a howler. He's working extremely hard to control information, can't even ask if the Iran sites were "totally obliterated." No questions about Epstein, JFK, MLK and on and on should ever even be asked. Above all else, never question The Tribe. Many members on here like The Coach can't even handle some humorous short posts by the likes of funk, nevermind "communist" or "socialist" or "liberal" ideas disseminated in Universities. Whenever someone is able to his first instinct is censorship and control of information Thankfully Ron has let this ship run relatively wild, it's a tiny pocket still left on the internets...

dj, you don't have to, not pressing you, but what is "Zionist" to you?

[joswift]

At bout 22 minutes

I don't give a damn what people think of.me (sound familiar 😉😂)but I want them to have the right to.say.what they want to say even if I don't agree with it

Fuck yes! Exactly

But blocks everyone who disagrees with him...

[dj181]

I'll try to watch later. But...

"Who controls the world?"

"Elite shape-shifting lizards!"

Again, is this to point the finger while trying to appear insane for deniability purposes? Hopefully... for his sake.

No nation, government or leader has ever believed in absolute freedom of speech and never will. Control of speech and information is the name of the game... forever. Building national narratives is where it's at. Look at Trump, his site is called "Truth Social" and he believes in "free speech" which is a howler. He's working extremely hard to control information, can't even ask if the Iran sites were "totally obliterated." No questions about Epstein, JFK, MLK and on and on should ever even be asked. Above all else, never question The Tribe. Many members on here like The Coach can't even handle some humorous short posts by the likes of funk, nevermind "communist" or "socialist" or "liberal" ideas disseminated in Universities. Whenever someone is able to his first instinct is censorship and control of information Thankfully Ron has let this ship run relatively wild, it's a tiny pocket still left on the internets...

dj, you don't have to, not pressing you, but what is "Zionist" to you?

A Zionist is someone who denies freedom of speech in the name of "protecting" isreal/Judaism just like Icke says

[joswift]

A Zionist is someone who denies freedom of speech in the name of "protecting" isreal/Judaism just like Icke says

Really, I thought it was someone who supported an independant state of Israel

Where did you get the "freedom of speech" bit from?

PS, Semantics are very important of you want to have a serious conversation about a topic, try not to make up your own definitions.
I thought an English teacher would know about the importance of words and their meaning.

[Grape Ape]

but I want them to have the right to.say.what they want to say even if I don't agree with it

Blocking joswift or others here is a direct contradiction to this.

[joswift]

Blocking joswift or others here is a direct contradiction to this.

hes a walking contradiction

Oh and hes mentally ill as well.

[dj181]

Blocking joswift or others here is a direct contradiction to this.

Not really

I don't block.others from.seeing the shit.they spew

So it's still freedom of speech

What the zionists do is block everyone from seeing what someone says

[funk51]

 

   If untrue Trump should [would[ sue him.

[joswift]

Not really

I don't block.others from.seeing the shit.they spew

So it's still freedom of speech

What the zionists do is block everyone from seeing what someone says

Reality vs dj181

[joswift]

 

   If untrue Trump should [would[ sue him.

clickbait, no photos at all

[funk51]

clickbait, no photos at all

  But an actual eyewitness to the alleged activities on Epstein's fantasy island.

[joswift]

  But an actual eyewitness to the alleged activities on Epstein's fantasy island.

clickbait all the same.

[Grape Ape]

clickbait, no photos at all

Mind you, everything funk gets in his feed is what the algorithm sends him based on his TDS/anti Trump searches.

So often, it's easily proven wrong - it's just stuff to keep the echo chamber echoin', the confirmation bias biasin', and to sow dissent and conflict.

I used to watch the videos and debunk, but when so many are lies, deception, or take creative liberty to bend the truth and cause a reaction, the odds say it's better to just assume they're wrong, and save the angst.

But for the heck of it, I clicked on the source of the videos, and THIS is what's in the poster's bio:

I help elect democrats for a living

So yeah, I'm sure this is on the up and up. 

[chaos]

I still think if Trump was on that list the dems would have figured out a way to release that info during the last decade of their witch hunt. Now Ghislane will be set free and disappear and we will never know the truth.

[Grape Ape]

I still think if Trump was on that list the dems would have figured out a way to release that info during the last decade of their witch hunt.

They tried russiagate, partisan impeachments, lawfare, a weaponized agency, and assassination.

Of course they would have released it if they had it.