Who’s reporrting this? Why should those reports be more valid then the reports that say the bunkers were destroyed ?Who’s been monitoring trucks going in and out of the nuclear site?
Admittedly I didn't fact check it, there so MUCH info LOL, but the analyst, Alexander Mercouris, who said it had mentioned that
satellite photos showed it, it was in the days leading up to the attack. Of course no one can know what was taken out. Even the US military says it's too early to assess the damage. The Iranians must have been really stupid if they left everything there when they
knew this was coming, you gotta admit? Iranians claim, which they would of course even if false, that Fordow was empty. They also claimed damage at the entrances and little to no damage in the deep halls, but how would they know? One analyst I find interesting:
https://simplicius76.substack.com/If you're the reading type it may be some nice reading. Waiting on his analysis. He may or may not be funded by the Kremlin, but the output, the volume, is amazing, can't be just one person

Simplicius says it's estimated Iran has 3000-28,000 ballistic missiles, and that they produce 300 themselves a month. They have burned through 500 so far. But if we go with 3000 inventory, he thinks Iran may start shooting an average of just 10 a day going forward because that's what they can produce without depleting existing stock. He thinks Russia will advice them today at the meeting to not attack US assets, and probably refrain from closing the Strait, just keep on attriting Israel. We'll see.