Minneapolis protester gets blown away by ICE

[chaos]

Ilan Omar was sprayed with something.

She is a POS, but I don’t see the point of this.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/man-lunges-ilhan-omar-town-hall-try-spray-unknown-substance-rcna256247

That might be the fakest, most set up "attack" ever caught on video.

[wes]

Fuck all these Somali scammers........deport them all now.... we surely don`t need more immigrant scum who offer nothing to our country except to scam billions of  U.S. taxpayer dollars under the false pretense of helping children who don`t exist
with empty day care centers !

Pond Scum Of Peace   

[wes]

That might be the fakest, most set up "attack" ever caught on video.

Looked pretty bogus to me !

[loco]

Ha ha, that's pretty good

[Humble Narcissist]

Fuck all these Somali scammers........deport them all now.... we surely don`t need more immigrant scum who offer nothing to our country except to scam billions of  U.S. taxpayer dollars under the false pretense of helping children who don`t exist
with empty day care centers !

Pond Scum Of Peace   

Send Omar with the first batch of deportations.

[Coach is Back!]

My mind goes a million miles an hour every day. That being said, here’s something that I haven’t heard from anyone regarding Pretti’s altercation the week before he got smoked.

He had no firearm on his person during that altercation the previous week. Besides it was his constitutional right to carry (note: He didn’t have his ID which by law makes it illegal anyway). What was his motive to carry with full mags on the day he was s*ot? Revenge from the previous week? Suicide by cop? or just because? 🤔

[Irongrip400]

The report that just came out by the justice department said that they yelled he’s got a gun then five seconds later two agents shot him. Nothing about him brandishing a weapon or anything. Those two clowns should be put on leave and investigated. At best they’re bad at their job. This whole situation sucks. These ice agents should be deporting illegals not walking the streets with fucking assault rifles. It’s a bad look.

[Coach is Back!]

The report that just came out by the justice department said that they yelled he’s got a gun then five seconds later two agents shot him. Nothing about him brandishing a weapon or anything. Those two clowns should be put on leave and investigated. At best they’re bad at their job. This whole situation sucks. These ice agents should be deporting illegals not walking the streets with fucking assault rifles. It’s a bad look.

He didn't have to brandish it. They found it on his person. Another cop yelled "Gun" and they reacted. He was a perceived threat. Even if he did brandish it, they still more than likely wouldn't have shot him. But he reaches for it and they command him "don't reach for it" and he even flinches towards it. He'll get smoked.

[Rambone]

.

[Coach is Back!]

Well well well

https://fb.watch/EWfWFBlV9G/?mibextid=wwXIfr&fs=e

[GymnJuice]

If they impede a Federal investigation, then yes. If warranted they could be charged. Anything that's a local or state investigation, they have no jurisdiction

I watch a lot of police auditor videos like Long Island Audit, Amagansett Press, etc. I hope they do not call a bystander videotaping them "impeding an investigation" or "public disturbance." When I watch those videos a lot of the local cops try to use that to intimidate the public from recording them during the course of their duties, which is our right.

[Coach is Back!]

I watch a lot of police auditor videos like Long Island Audit, Amagansett Press, etc. I hope they do not call a bystander videotaping them "impeding an investigation" or "public disturbance." When I watch those videos a lot of the local cops try to use that to intimidate the public from recording them during the course of their duties, which is our right.

I'm around cops almost everyday. I was told even if someone does't comply even with a traffic stop and they refuse lawful commands such as asking them to get out a vehicle and they refuse, it's technically impeding an investigation.

[joswift]

Well well well

https://fb.watch/EWfWFBlV9G/?mibextid=wwXIfr&fs=e

should have shot him then

[Lartinos]

should have shot him then

The leftists in the thread can admit they were wrong now, right?

He is looking pretti guilty here..

[Irongrip400]

He didn't have to brandish it. They found it on his person. Another cop yelled "Gun" and they reacted. He was a perceived threat. Even if he did brandish it, they still more than likely wouldn't have shot him. But he reaches for it and they command him "don't reach for it" and he even flinches towards it. He'll get smoked.

He didn’t have the gun though, the other agent took it from him and disarmed him. It was a bad shoot. I get that they probably felt they were in danger hearing that, but the threat had been neutralized by the time they opened fire. Bad shoot.

[loco]

Well well well

https://fb.watch/EWfWFBlV9G/?mibextid=wwXIfr&fs=e

Mostly peaceful protester.

[Grape Ape]

He didn’t have the gun though, the other agent took it from him and disarmed him. It was a bad shoot. I get that they probably felt they were in danger hearing that, but the threat had been neutralized by the time they opened fire. Bad shoot.

But this is what those causing the chaos want to happen.

The reality is, if you carry, your obligation in doing so is to avoid confrontation, not jump into it.

So, the more they get folks to act this way, the more inevitable a "bad shoot" becomes (if that's what it turns out to be).

[Brenda Steunbeer]

Such a peaceful guy, he never meant to escalate things! After all, Alex Pretti is a progressive bridge-builder hahaha

Fuck him and all his communist friends

[ProudVirgin69]

Such a peaceful guy, he never meant to escalate things! After all, Alex Pretti is a progressive bridge-builder hahaha

Fuck him and all his communist friends

You're not actually allowed to kill someone because they broke your tail light a week ago.

[chaos]

You're not actually allowed to kill someone because they broke your tail light a week ago.

You're not allowed to get your ass handed to you for breaking a taillight then come back armed a week later and fight those guys again. 

[IroNat]

FAFO!!!!

[Coach is Back!]

As usual the lefts entire fake narrative is falling apart

[Grape Ape]

You're not actually allowed to kill someone because they broke your tail light a week ago.

You're also not supposed to take a loaded firearm, without proper identification, into a volatile situation involvement federal officials who have guns doing their jobs.

This won't have the traction you want.

Don't fret though, if they keep pressing, they'll get the person they want killed to fulfil their motives.

[Humble Narcissist]

As usual the lefts entire fake narrative is falling apart

It always does but not before the MSM can create unrest.

[Van_Bilderass]

I just have to plug this article, just in the unlikely case someone finds it as enjoyable as me. Very academic and dry. No rambling and no outrageous immature language.

https://www.unz.com/aanglin/jews-deliver-a-gay-and-retarded-new-world-order-for-fat-people-and-women/

Snippet

Jews Deliver a Gay and Retarded New World Order for Fat People and Women
Andrew Anglin • January 29, 2026

It is a reality that a fat dyke and a Jew-face got killed by the cops. As a reality isolated in itself, most would likely chuckle at this, or perhaps ironically pour out a few sips of Coors Light. One would not have trouble arguing that as an isolated reality, it’s probably better those two are no longer with us, and certainly, anyone crying about these deaths could rightly be labeled a homo.

The fact that these two disreputable fiends were murdered by totally untrained morons in such a slapstick manner only makes it all the more attractive. There is a Looney Tunes vibe to all of it.

But what do the deaths mean? If we start with the deaths, then unwind the abstractions and connect them back to the reality situation? Is it just two random people you don’t like getting what they deserve? Or is it something much more important than that?

I believe it is something much more important than that, and yet I have found it virtually impossible to say that without people accusing me of defending fat dyke and Jew-face. It is so emotionally charged. It is like talking to rocks. But I will do my best to explain why I am against the federal government unleashing masked paramilitary forces to execute people in the streets, even if for the time being, I personally do not like the people they are executing.

...


Regardless, these things are major issues for me:

People should not be talking about ICE as if it is a serious thing. The immigrants could be self-deported, very quickly, by simply giving draconian prison sentences to the people who house and employ them. Trump is not doing that because he doesn’t actually want to remove immigrants, he just wants to look like he’s trying to do that. ICE is a circus show. It is not a real attempt to remove immigrants. You can’t remove tens of millions of people by grabbing them one at a time. Talking about this thing at all as if it is serious deeply confuses the issue, and gives room for the neo-boomer commentators to push this fed line about “immigration enforcement” as if it makes sense. (If Tucker Carlson was constantly pointing out that arresting housers and employers would solve the issue, no ICE supporter would be able to respond to that, because there is no response.)