Author Topic: whos bigger? (Read 12165 times)

ARMZ · « **Reply #50 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:29:13 PM »

Ronnie= 5'11" 295

Ruhl= 5'10" 280

gibberj2 · « **Reply #51 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:34:10 PM »

competitors always lie about their weight. in certain shows ronnie was bigger and in others Ruhl. And that synthol stuff is stupid.

hillbilly · « **Reply #52 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:35:57 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 07, 2006, 06:34:10 PM

competitors always lie about their weight. in certain shows ronnie was bigger and in others Ruhl. And that synthol stuff is stupid.

synthol

LuciusFox · « **Reply #53 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:46:28 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 07, 2006, 06:34:10 PM

competitors always lie about their weight. in certain shows ronnie was bigger and in others Ruhl. And that synthol stuff is stupid.

If you think synthol is stupid then tell them not to use it

gibberj2 · « **Reply #54 on:** May 07, 2006, 07:40:25 PM »

lucius the more you say things here the dumber i think you are. I meant that he doesn't use synthol.

Hulkster · « **Reply #55 on:** May 07, 2006, 08:10:48 PM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on May 07, 2006, 05:59:25 PM

I wouldn't say he's getting owned in terms of back detail

Where the hell is Jaejonna i need back up here

okay, he's getting owned because of the combo of detail and thickness, which chris lacks.

the shadow · « **Reply #56 on:** May 08, 2006, 01:10:55 AM »

i would say coleman and ruhl look the same size...coleman dwarfs him in legs and a bit for detailed than ruhl..more or less they r of the same size..considering mass ruhl comes closest to coleman in matching in size....and overall detail wise also..i don't think big ruhl is soft.he was soft at the olympia 2005 but prior to that ruhl looked amazing.280 refined pounds...i will say again I DON'T GIVE A SHIT IF HE HAS SYNTHOL OR NOT.it looks amazing wat so ever!!!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #57 on:** May 08, 2006, 07:23:01 AM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 07, 2006, 07:40:25 PM

lucius the more you say things here the dumber i think you are. I meant that he doesn't use synthol.

Sounds like you're covering up for a fellow synthol user $:-\$

gibberj2 · « **Reply #58 on:** May 08, 2006, 04:06:40 PM »

yea! i use synthol! it's in my calves.

WOOO · « **Reply #59 on:** May 08, 2006, 04:07:33 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 08, 2006, 04:06:40 PM

yea! i use synthol! it's in my calves.

and a clipper I hope.....

LuciusFox · « **Reply #60 on:** May 08, 2006, 04:14:30 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 08, 2006, 04:06:40 PM

yea! i use synthol! it's in my calves.

At least you're being honest

gibberj2 · « **Reply #61 on:** May 08, 2006, 04:35:39 PM »

i dont compete in anything and don't plan to so why shave? does it look like synthol? they're not that big. about 17 3/4 last time i checked.

LuciusFox · « **Reply #62 on:** May 08, 2006, 10:04:00 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 08, 2006, 04:35:39 PM

i dont compete in anything and don't plan to so why shave? does it look like synthol? they're not that big. about 17 3/4 last time i checked.

I like the Dorian Yates-like black sock

gibberj2 · « **Reply #63 on:** May 08, 2006, 10:05:44 PM »

you do realize i was joking about the synthol right? what's a 180 pound guy gonna be doing with synthol in his calves? anyway they look real

LuciusFox · « **Reply #64 on:** May 08, 2006, 10:08:56 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 08, 2006, 10:05:44 PM

you do realize i was joking about the synthol right? what's a 180 pound guy gonna be doing with synthol in his calves? anyway they look real

I know, I was just teasing you. I'm sure you don't use synthol

gibberj2 · « **Reply #65 on:** May 08, 2006, 10:12:16 PM »

my calves actually have that split int he middle. with proper lighting you can see it. i shock many people when i lift a pant leg. most people roll up their sleeves but i roll up a pant leg. my arms will never reach my calf size. even with synthol. you know lucius i noticed you're obsessed with synthol. you know if you drink it your eyes will be opened knowing good and evil?

LuciusFox · « **Reply #66 on:** May 08, 2006, 10:14:17 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 08, 2006, 10:12:16 PM

my calves actually have that split int he middle. with proper lighting you can see it. i shock many people when i lift a pant leg. most people roll up their sleeves but i roll up a pant leg. my arms will never reach my calf size. even with synthol. you know lucius i noticed you're obsessed with synthol. you know if you drink it your eyes will be opened knowing good and evil?

That's a good idea. I'll pray tonight and if God doesn't tell me not to drink synthol, I'll have some with my breakfast.

Dnizneer · « **Reply #67 on:** May 09, 2006, 09:55:06 AM »

Quote from: the shadow on May 07, 2006, 05:53:37 AM

coleman or ruhl.....

If they had a child together, I wonder how it would look?

Ruhls wider if you see them at the same angle, Rons got bigger limbs.

ether · « **Reply #68 on:** May 09, 2006, 12:55:56 PM »

Who's bigger?

Derrik Farnsworth

gibberj2 · « **Reply #69 on:** May 09, 2006, 04:20:08 PM »

well ruhl's got a wife that if he had a child with her it would be bord with monster delts and chest. this wife of his is a BEAST my male standards.

Doublemonk · « **Reply #70 on:** May 09, 2006, 07:36:43 PM »

Quote from: IFBBwannaB on May 07, 2006, 01:32:34 PM

BTW Ruhl synthol abuse including the back is obvious and disgusting,in some shots you can actualy see the lumps in the upper part of his lats.So sadly he dosent deserve much credit for improving his back size wise.

The dumbest shit I ever read on this board. And that means alot on getbig. It's not synthol it's a (partial) tear. It's funny, Coleman has a lump on the exact position on his lats, yet I've never read people screaming synthol when seeing it. But when seeing it on Rühl everybody screams synthol.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #71 on:** May 09, 2006, 07:45:45 PM »

as for that scar on ruhl's shoulder, he's had that since he was very young

ARMZ · « **Reply #72 on:** May 09, 2006, 07:49:18 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 09, 2006, 07:45:45 PM

as for that scar on ruhl's shoulder, he's had that since he was very young

Wasn't that where they reattached his torn tricep ??

gibberj2 · « **Reply #73 on:** May 09, 2006, 07:52:30 PM »

no i have seen him when he looked like he weighed 220 and he still had that scar. he's had it for years.

ARMZ · « **Reply #74 on:** May 09, 2006, 07:57:34 PM »

Damn, all this time I thought it was from his tricep surgery.. That's about where it would attach if it was torn from the top tendon..