Author Topic: Most impressive front lat spread ever. (Read 16062 times)

The Ugly · « **Reply #50 on:** May 20, 2006, 08:49:40 AM »

Hulkster,

Do you think Ronnie can take Giant Robot in a no-holds-barred cage match?

Hulkster · « **Reply #51 on:** May 20, 2006, 08:54:16 AM »

Ronnie would smoke that Robot-ass

The Ugly · « **Reply #52 on:** May 20, 2006, 09:05:32 AM »

The Gargantuas?

Brown one, man, one spiteful sonofabitch!

MisterMagoo · « **Reply #53 on:** May 20, 2006, 09:09:16 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 20, 2006, 08:36:47 AM

at least show a shot where Ronnie is flexing..

Remember all the times ND has aruged that even though a bodybuilder might have inferior upper back, arms, lower back, glutes and hams, when compared to Ronnie, he would lose the back double biceps pose because of the calves?!?

Again, I think Dorian has the best looking lats when viewed from the front in a front lat spread. But the rest of entire pose (chest, arms, delts, legs) SUCKS.

well i couldn't find one where he was. my point there was that if you don't focus solely on his unflexed triceps i defy you to find a single bodybuilder who looks better in that pose. look at his goddamn legs for example, or how far his chest sticks out beyond his stomach.

people look at the single aspects too much. just the lats in a front lat, just the triceps in a side tricep. every pose is full body and you have to look at it like that.

The Ugly · « **Reply #54 on:** May 20, 2006, 09:13:43 AM »

You're dodging the question, friend.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #55 on:** May 20, 2006, 09:55:55 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 20, 2006, 08:36:47 AM

at least show a shot where Ronnie is flexing..

Remember all the times ND has aruged that even though a bodybuilder might have inferior upper back, arms, lower back, glutes and hams, when compared to Ronnie, he would lose the back double biceps pose because of the calves?!?

Again, I think Dorian has the best looking lats when viewed from the front in a front lat spread. But the rest of entire pose (chest, arms, delts, legs) SUCKS.

I never said they would lose because if inferior calves , where the F did you get that nonsense ? its you who think Ronnie is superior to everyone in every bodypart and its nonsense , I said using your dumb logic he has the best parts therefore he looks the best in all the poses and he doesn't , its you who insists that seeing Ronnie has the better parts then all of Dorian's are automatically inferior and sucks lol its nonsense logic , you can go on and on about how many better parts Ronnie has but in no way does he look better in the front latspread not even close , Dorian's shot looks like a puzzle with parts that all fit together to create one pic picture and Ronnie's looks like a collection of impressive parts that were scrambled together , Ronnie's impressive parts actually hurt his mandatory poses ontop of refusing to learn how to accutrately pose .

Louis Cipher · « **Reply #56 on:** May 20, 2006, 10:46:58 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 19, 2006, 04:04:14 PM

Better

Agreed!

LLES · « **Reply #57 on:** May 20, 2006, 10:55:05 AM »

Anyone remember Brian Bucannon from England? Pretty awesome front lat-spread & Mo-Mo Bennazza(?) was pretty good too. In fact,Dorian put his pix on his fridge after Mo-Mo beat him at the Night of Champions to remind him of how he looked. My picks for best front-lat spread
1-Dorian
2-Haney
3-Mo Mo
4-Bucannon
5-Dennis James

NotMrAverage · « **Reply #58 on:** May 20, 2006, 10:58:45 AM »

You guys are blind, Ronnie is by far the best bodybuilder out there. The best one to ever have lived period. He´s got eight Mr.O wins and still has more in him. Noone can ever match that record. And offcourse he looks better than all others, he´s like 300 pounds, 40 pounds heavier than the next guy. I could´nt care less about his gut, abs are for gay people anyway.

Ex Coelis · « **Reply #59 on:** May 20, 2006, 11:02:33 AM »

Ruhl owned that contest silly

Here he is owning Flex

NotMrAverage · « **Reply #60 on:** May 20, 2006, 11:09:21 AM »

Yeah that sure is some female muscle Ruhls got

That ownage of Flex in that last shot makes me laugh each and every time. His legs together measure the size of Ruhls right calf. Flex says "miiiiaaauuuu" and Ruhls answers "Roooooooooorrrrrrrraaaaa aaaaarrrgghhh".

alexxx · « **Reply #61 on:** May 20, 2006, 12:17:31 PM »

Quote from: Mr. Intenseone on May 19, 2006, 11:33:26 PM

Who edited his lats out?

delta9mda · « **Reply #62 on:** May 20, 2006, 02:48:08 PM »

Quote from: Bones on May 19, 2006, 03:18:41 PM

Not many can match this

do not post the photoshopped rear lat spread of yates.

BallzDeep69 · « **Reply #63 on:** May 20, 2006, 03:00:06 PM »

Quote from: HERACLES on May 19, 2006, 04:31:26 PM

Definately DOrian Yates. He is MR BACK. ROnnie can match him/beat him maybe from the rear, but I think YAtes is the Champ of the Front lat spread, dont you guys agree?

It's science. Yates had the best front lat spread in the history of BBing. He looked like he had two beach balls under his arm-pits. Never seen that amount of back beef since.

bailey · « **Reply #64 on:** May 20, 2006, 03:03:27 PM »

Of course that pic is of Flex's last Mr O appearance and he did that show natural. 8th place finish. I'd love to see what that lump of shit ( Ruhl ) looks like with no drugs.

Hulkster · « **Reply #65 on:** May 20, 2006, 03:31:22 PM »

dorian's lats look even bigger because his arms are small for his frame.

seriously. It helps with the effect.

delta9mda · « **Reply #66 on:** May 20, 2006, 06:17:27 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 20, 2006, 03:31:22 PM

dorian's lats look even bigger because his arms are small for his frame.

seriously. It helps with the effect.

hulkster hulkster, you talk aboutyates lack of quad separation, hes got ronnie on this one.

and he owns the front lat spread even at a smaller bodyweight

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #67 on:** May 20, 2006, 06:27:22 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 20, 2006, 03:31:22 PM

dorian's lats look even bigger because his arms are small for his frame.

seriously. It helps with the effect.

No the ' small ' arms theory would be negated by your wide waist theory , if his lats only appear wide because his arms are small , then his lats would also appear small due to his wide waist , so you're back to square one .

MisterMagoo · « **Reply #68 on:** May 20, 2006, 06:49:44 PM »

straight up width was never ronnie's strong suit. pretty much everyone can beat him on pure width. his shoulders aren't very wide structurally and his thickness leaves him with his muscles looking very compacted which destroys his front lat spread. there's not a lot of room to see lats under his arms. it actually makes a few of his poses awkward.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #69 on:** May 20, 2006, 06:57:26 PM »

Quote from: MisterMagoo on May 20, 2006, 06:49:44 PM

straight up width was never ronnie's strong suit. pretty much everyone can beat him on pure width. his shoulders aren't very wide structurally and his thickness leaves him with his muscles looking very compacted which destroys his front lat spread. there's not a lot of room to see lats under his arms. it actually makes a few of his poses awkward.

Great obsevation , when he does his most muscular his massive arms make his delts look small and narrow , this is exactly why he looks odd in a lot of mandatory poses .

Bones · « **Reply #70 on:** May 20, 2006, 07:30:52 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on May 20, 2006, 02:48:08 PM

do not post the photoshopped rear lat spread of yates.

I had that saved on my computer from some time back from this site and to tell you the truth I didn't know that it was shopped...someone posted the the unshopped version a couple posts back...not too much of a differants.