Flex was an awesome pro in his day - probably one of the very best there ever was.
His reports, however, leave a lot to be desired. I've been to several shows Flex has reported on [I'm not talking about photos here, so please be attentive] and have very [very] rarely agreed with his views on the competitor's placings and their conditioning on the day. In fact, on several ocassions, I've wondered whether we were viewing the same show; that's how out of whack we are. I'm no pro - though I did compete as an amateur back in the day - but somethings are obvious to every and anyone. I have no fuggin clue as to what Flex reports on sometimes.
In fact, read some of the thoughts of the pros and gurus that Flex interviews at these shows. They are often featured on his column. Very rarely do these people agree on Flex's placings and conditioning of the athletes that he reports on. That, my friend, says a lot about Flex Wheeler and what he "percieves."
I've got nothing against Flex Wheeler the person or the bodybuilding legend [he is IMHO]. Flex Wheeler the bodybuilding "legend" was a supurb pro who - with his amazing physique - encouraged me during my amateur competitive days to strive for the very best physique I possibly could. I bet I'm not the only one he did that to . . . Flex Wheeler the person is a gentleman and would be more than happy to stop and chat or give you an autograph. However, Flex Wheeler the contest reporter . . . well, let me just say that he is more suited to clicking away these days at that camera hanging around his neck rather than putting pen-to-paper on that pad he carries.
I wasn't present at The Masters that this thread gist is about, so I will refrain from making comments.