If the IFBB can run a fair contest with good criteria and the winner is the best guy there then that will be something to be proud of. From my out of touch position I read about the controversies every year at the Olympia and at many other contests. For example, what is the position re judging about the weighting to deduct for guys with bitch tits? Seems to me they should be disqualified. That might be an extreme position but why should guys with breasts or remnants of breasts win men's bodybuilding contests? What is more important in a contest, size or cuts? How do you weigh each of these components in judging? How should you score a guy who has no cuts in his calves? Answer: place him last. If a guy is cut up and has no cuts in his calves something major is wrong. I might need glasses to see my computer screen clearly but I can easily detect gynocomastia and lack of cuts in the calves. You talk about progress in bodybuilding. I haven't seen it. Why worry about bodybuilding being an entertainment when you have work to do re valid judging of contests. Beauty should be a component in judging but how on earth are you going to specify what that means? Why has the number of judges in the Olympia been so low over the years? Again, Ben discarded a good judging system in NAABA where they used more judges and did comparisons for the main part. No silly rounds standing front side and back. Heck, modern guys cannot even stand normally anymore. It is ludicrous and you are doing nothing to alter this. The idea that you can stand relaxed with your arms way out is plain ridiculous. Who enforces how bodybuilders should stand on stage. Disqualify cheaters and maybe your organization and the sport will be accepted and respected. Why should anyone respect the IFBB today despite the progress you claim to be part of?