240 wrote: Intriguing.
My guess is that there won't be enough evidence for anything. but it does lead to a bigger concept - Are, and should, nutritionists held responsible for the extremes their athletes go to? Obvously it's the athlete who chooses to dehydrate to the point where it becomes dangerous. It's not like he's working at the library and somebody slipped a diuretic in his morning coffee.
Very interesting question though, TA.
I say, drug advisors are not NUTRITIONISTS, nutrititions advise strictly on diet, dietary supplementa s and what not, not how to use drugs. Let's be clear, anyone advising some suppossed athlte on how to "rip up" for a show using speed, thyroid hormones, winny and what not is a drug advisor (with or without an education or medical background). Therefore, both parties (as they are adults) who take and use one on one advice of a "druggist" are responsible. However, unless you have an explicit paper trail, no crime can be traced...