I guess I just can't see why you continually dispute the relevance of these economic principles which apply in every other business model in America.
I make a point that competition between firms is good for athletes. You attack the new competitor. An athletes rep in ANY other sport would be thrilled to have a competing org. appear out of nowhere. A bargaining chip falling out of the sky!
I guess I just see this as an opportunity that you can't shoot in the foot fast enough, and I don't get it.
And I (and many others) have continuously pointed out that it may NOT be good for the athletes, which you choose to ignore.
So far...it's not remotely close to being a "competing" organization, and there is certainly no bargaining chip. The WBF was a bargaining chip as they were PAYING their athlete's a good chunk of change to switch to their federation...
Whats the great bargaining chip I have at my disposal? "Better give us more money, IFBB...or the ONE athlete that is interested is going to jump ship...!" Let's try this one..."Better give us more money, IFBB...or the amateurs that weren't pro anyway are going to jump ship...!"