Author Topic: APOLOGY FROM CHICK  (Read 26906 times)

Big N

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5564
  • Veteran Fella
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #50 on: August 03, 2006, 09:37:14 PM »
I'll join your board.



Also, I'll throw in my hat for a MOD job..........


If you take your hat off, keep your pants on among the bros  ;D
#

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #51 on: August 03, 2006, 09:43:34 PM »
As a thank-you to Chick for a kick-ass thread...



Is that you, Private Pyle??!!

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #52 on: August 03, 2006, 09:45:10 PM »
Thanks!  Hopefully you will post the stuff over there banned on getbig for legal reasons.  ;D

Yeah, as long as they are not deleted, I'll post it!
HAHA, RON.....

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #53 on: August 03, 2006, 10:19:15 PM »
To Jack and all BB fans:

To those that have been witness to the ongoing dispute of Jacks victory, I must take this opportunity to express my sincere apology...It seems I may have erred in my perception of the seemingly lack of evidence supporting Jack's claim of winning the 1996 NABBA N. American championships.

I didn't realize at the time of engaging in a sometimes heated discussion, that there could be factors I may have overlooked in my pursuit to "win" the argument.

Here are a few of those factors:

1. camera's, video's, or police schetch artists MAY have been prohibited from said contest.

2. If said show took place, no one else MAY have been entered, or even aware of the contest.

3. Jack MAY have been in a state of R.E.M., and really believes the show took place...thus, he's not really making it up, but has a perceived notion of reality.

4. Judges, officials and fans MAY ALSO have been prohibited from entering said contest.

5. There is a glitch in the world wide internet that makes it impossible to record the contests information...kind of like an old typewriter that the "R" is stuck and no matter how hard you hit the key, nothing comes out on paper.

6. His dog ate his trophy.

7. Jack MAY be a vampire, and all the photo's show is a stage with a pair of trunks and a trophy next to them.

8. Being that the show was allegedly in Atlantic City, Jack MAY have won the show, then lost the trophy  with a bad run at the blackjack table.

9. Jack MAY have been the ONLY contestant in said show, thus the reluctance to show a picture...(also explains the win).

10. The "NABBA" that Jack is referring to is different than the NABBA show HE won...that NABBA stood for: N.o  A.ctual  B.ody  B.uilders  A.llowed

 I'm sure there are other things I may have overlooked...feel free to add to my list of reasons of why I should be apologizing....

Sincerely.

Bob Cicherillo
IFBB PRO
IFBB Athletes Rep





I'm sorry, I didn't quite catch when your next show was?

Wombat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2873
  • Your name tattooed to my ass!
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #54 on: August 03, 2006, 10:27:34 PM »
As a believer in "String Theory" i have come to the conclusion that maybe he won the show in another dimension...String Theory says their are 11 dimension's...Maybe he can prove "String Theory" for us and then we will be able to check out the show...

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #55 on: August 03, 2006, 10:28:10 PM »
I just can't believe Jack had the gull to suggest Bob owed him an apology for not believing in a claim which he made with no proof available.

I don't understand your position in this at all.  Jack provided confirmation from Bob Gruskin.   Why isn't that good enough for you?  As Bob Gruskin provided much of the early info for my site, perhaps you should also remove all the stuff on your site that you grabbed from mine.

dorkeroo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1403
  • I need steroids for the brain.
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #56 on: August 03, 2006, 10:31:44 PM »
I don't understand your position in this at all.  Jack provided confirmation from Bob Gruskin.   Why isn't that good enough for you?  As Bob Gruskin provided much of the early info for my site, perhaps you should also remove all the stuff on your site that you grabbed from mine.

Arguments that refute those that people on here want to believe will be ignored. It isn't your fault.

McFarland

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7930
  • Tastes Like WINNING
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #57 on: August 03, 2006, 10:35:18 PM »
As a believer in "String Theory" i have come to the conclusion that maybe he won the show in another dimension...String Theory says their are 11 dimension's...Maybe he can prove "String Theory" for us and then we will be able to check out the show...

That's one of 240's cached Limewire downloads on his "Getbig Computer."  

"String_theory_proof.doc. ...LOOKING FOR MORE SOURCES IN GETBIG GOSSIP & OPINIONS"

Beener

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #58 on: August 03, 2006, 10:36:09 PM »

Hey guys - I won the NWOABBA (North Western Ontario Amateur Bodybuilding Association) 2006 Mr. Northwestern Ontario.


LIIAAAAAAAAAR!!! i won that one. honest ::)

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #59 on: August 03, 2006, 10:36:40 PM »
I don't understand your position in this at all.  Jack provided confirmation from Bob Gruskin.   Why isn't that good enough for you?  As Bob Gruskin provided much of the early info for my site, perhaps you should also remove all the stuff on your site that you grabbed from mine.

No he didn't, he provided a email allegedly from Bob Gruskin, which he could've added his own name into...much like Mickey Mouse and Frankie Fraud's names are listed also...

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #60 on: August 03, 2006, 10:39:19 PM »
okay, i finally have a chance to chime in---

From Bob Gruskin at NAABA, at the 1996 NABBA USA, Jack London indeed won the following:
NORTH AMERICAN-MEN'S OPEN-OVERALL
Jack was then qualified for the World Championships in Greece.
I think some might be looking at 1997, where he took 3rd, or at 2004 Keystone, after he had a long layoff.

I think some people missed this.  Show was put on by Joe Tete, and Bob Gruskin at NABBA confirmed that Jack won the nationals overall and then entered the world championships in greece.  You cannot do the world championships without winning a national pro qualifier.

I don't know what I'm missing here.  Gruskin verified it.  He won the overall at the national show in 96- everyone has been looking at the 97 record where he got 3rd.  There wasn't a lot of internet recording going on in 1996.  But it has been verified.

And I don't think ANY of us are too proud of pics we took in 1996 :)  If jack doesn't want ot post them, that's his call.  Wayne DeMilia is very connected to the worldwide contest circuit, he knows who the guys are, he verified Jack won a national show.  

Rhino hasn't posted because he doesn't post at night.  This thread is asinine.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #61 on: August 03, 2006, 10:39:39 PM »
No he didn't, he provided a email allegedly from Bob Gruskin, which he could've added his own name into...much like Mickey Mouse and Frankie Fraud's names are listed also...

Whens your next Masters show?

hifrommike

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 836
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #62 on: August 03, 2006, 10:41:21 PM »
You know, I once had a lot of respect for Bob.  I no longer do.  Pathetic.   ???

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #63 on: August 03, 2006, 10:41:25 PM »
No he didn't, he provided a email allegedly from Bob Gruskin, which he could've added his own name into...much like Mickey Mouse and Frankie Fraud's names are listed also...

Bob, I've verified it too.  

If you want to insult and belittle jack, that's fine.  You're a grown man and that's your perogative.

But if you think you have good information, why not take his offer for a $10,000 wager?

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #64 on: August 03, 2006, 10:47:19 PM »
Bob, I've verified it too. 

If you want to insult and belittle jack, that's fine.  You're a grown man and that's your perogative.

But if you think you have good information, why not take his offer for a $10,000 wager?


OHHHHH!

Heads up everyone.....240 VERIFIED IT!!

Guess we've all been had after all, then......sorry.

warchild

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 904
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #65 on: August 03, 2006, 10:49:48 PM »
well i post during the day also but thanks isnt it refreshing a greek and italian girl yapping her mouth lol

Greek & Italian.....I bet you're one hairy broad

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #66 on: August 03, 2006, 10:51:08 PM »
OHHHHH!

Heads up everyone.....240 VERIFIED IT!!
Guess we've all been had after all, then......sorry.

Bob, let's speak like adults for a moment.  

1) What do you care what another guy in another federation did 10 years ago?
2) Why will you insult him repeatedly but won't accept his wager to verify it?

Bob, i encourage you to contact Mr Gruskin at NABBA if you need proof.  I will provide you his email via PM if you wish.  

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #67 on: August 03, 2006, 10:56:25 PM »
1) I don't, really...Jack likes to make his little comments, I returned in kind.
2.) Why accept his wager? He can't verify it for free...

Even Bob G doesn't have proof, as he stated himself.

games over, bro...at this point any proof he could muster up would be suspect.

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #68 on: August 03, 2006, 10:58:08 PM »
you know...i didn't really care about all this whose on whose side crap...was having some fun...until chick the turd struck...twice

Your posts were removed due to redundancy...didn't you get the hint when there were 25 views and ZERO replies?

Lighten up, Francis...!

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #69 on: August 03, 2006, 10:59:15 PM »
OHHHHH!
Heads up everyone.....240 VERIFIED IT!!
Guess we've all been had after all, then......sorry.

I've verified it too, and have updated MuscleMemory accordingly

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #70 on: August 03, 2006, 11:00:44 PM »
1) I don't, really...Jack likes to make his little comments, I returned in kind.
2.) Why accept his wager? He can't verify it for free...

Even Bob G doesn't have proof, as he stated himself.

games over, bro...at this point any proof he could muster up would be suspect.

I am confused.  "You don't care, really?"  You've started several threads on it and mocked Jack throughout the evening.  You obviously do care.

"Why accept his wager?" - Because you can earn $10,000.   The man is willing to bet ten thousand dollars on the fact he won the 96 NABBA.  You couldn't jump on that Tom Prince bet fast enough, with some anonymous internet kid.  Right now, you have jack London offering the bet, and you pass.

"Any proof he could muster up would be suspect"?  - You ask for evidence then immediately discount its validity.  

I'm wasting my time arguing here.  You don't want a free ten thousand dollars.  You don't want evidence. You do want to insult a man in a rival federation.  Period.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #71 on: August 03, 2006, 11:00:54 PM »
1) I don't, really...Jack likes to make his little comments, I returned in kind.
2.) Why accept his wager? He can't verify it for free...

Even Bob G doesn't have proof, as he stated himself.

games over, bro...at this point any proof he could muster up would be suspect.

Can you prove to us that when you won the Masters that you were legitimately following the rules set forth by the IFBB and Rusty didn't get screwed over purposely?

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #72 on: August 03, 2006, 11:03:02 PM »
Can you prove to us that when you won the Masters that you were legitimately following the rules set forth by the IFBB and Rusty didn't get screwed over purposely?
If you have a problem with the judging...ask the judges.

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #73 on: August 03, 2006, 11:03:59 PM »
6. His dog ate his trophy.

 :D hes mother fucker but entertaining mother fucker :D
fallen angel

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: APOLOGY FROM CHICK
« Reply #74 on: August 03, 2006, 11:06:10 PM »
If you have a problem with the judging...ask the judges.

I have many times, especially when I see their online either here or Mayhem and no one has the balls to confront the question!!