Author Topic: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs  (Read 15542 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #100 on: August 25, 2006, 11:13:25 PM »
Monster traps.

All Shrugs?

I love to rhyme.

JKDMan

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1498
  • The G.O.A.T.
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #101 on: August 25, 2006, 11:55:06 PM »
Quote
Andre are you suggesting that "sarcasm" spends every waking hour posting on Getbig because he's an unemployed, unmarried, 35 year old wannabe neo-nazi who relies on his mom for money and is bitter at the world because he could never develop any real size or strength even after years of steroid use? Furthermore, are you suggesting that sarcasm acts like an obnoxious attention whore on the Internet because he lacks the social skills to make friends with people in real life?

Let me know if this was indeed what you were suggesting.

;D
Epic owning of Sarcasm. Oh, brother. hahahaha
Lee

bic_staedtler

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
  • That is all.
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #102 on: August 26, 2006, 03:00:38 AM »
What PROOF does anyone have that Lance used drugs? It's my understanding that he's been tested more than any other athlete and he has never failed a single test - despite the best efforts of the French.



....if you need drug tests to issue 'proof' then you're a PERFECT fan for bodybuilding....and by the way, many pro's have tested negative under very stringent drug tests...but hey, if you really think Lance is some super human then have fun....and keep waiting up for the Great Pumpkin while you're at it!

Cycling couldn't nail down their golden goose....but why do you think all the sudden NOW the cheaters are being found out?  AFTER Lance?  I don't care how many tests he's beaten....he's a druggie like the top 12 (and the current bozo, Landis) of his sport.  How can you ignore this?

Think of the Ben Johnson case.  It's well known that EVERY sprinter in that race was on juice....and so was the victor, Ben!  You think that cycling is any different?..you're mistaken, friend.

But to each his own.  I think Lance is an amazing human being for beating cancer and winning 7 tours, but as far as being a sportsman, he's a drug using cheat, just like the rest of them. 

phreak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5084
  • Food is amazing
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #103 on: August 26, 2006, 05:42:02 AM »
Armstrong beat TESTICULAR cancer. Does anyone know what the normal procedure is? Removing the cancerous tissue, i.e., neutering him. Neutering means NO ENDOGENOUS TEST. Consequently, he received a prescription for HRT for the rest of his life. So almost certainly he was monitored daily by his physician to see that his test/epi-test values were always close to the legal max. And assuming they are not tested minutes before a race, then a shot of test suspension would raise it even higher for a few hours, and no evidence to be found after the finish, when the levels were back down to a legal (but still very high) 6:1 ratio.


Almost makes me wish I had his "problem".

Gordon_Gekko

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 413
  • All drugs!
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #104 on: August 26, 2006, 07:20:02 AM »
in his dvd he said he sold used cars . . .

Thanks for the correction. I was going off the questionable info that was in a small biographical article on him many years ago in the ever-truthful MMI. I always suspected it was bullshit.
Greed is good!

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #105 on: August 26, 2006, 07:33:33 AM »
Thanks for the correction. I was going off the questionable info that was in a small biographical article on him many years ago in the ever-truthful MMI. I always suspected it was bullshit.

LOL - monster journalistic integrity

no harm done though - we're cool

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #106 on: August 26, 2006, 08:50:13 AM »
Is this what a man's supposed to look like? I see these wankers everywhere with their i-pods strapped to their 10 inch arm checking their heart-rate monitors to see if they're in that "cardio zone". And it's not like they have fit looking physiques. They're bony and flabby! Every year they just get bonnier and flabbier. If you're doing all that cardio you'd think they'd be cut but no. No physical presence - nothing to show for their efforts.

I'd rather be able to squat a car and die before 60 then live to 100 being weak, defenceless, and completely lacking a physical presence.



I have to defend McConaughey here, he's always had some decent lean muscle mass, check out any one of his movies.  He may not be "action star big," but for most actors, he's got a decent build.

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #107 on: August 26, 2006, 10:53:25 AM »
Lance needs to come out of the closet.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #108 on: August 26, 2006, 11:07:55 AM »
One thing is for sure....I have more balls than Lance. hahahahahah

tleilaxutank

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2006
  • If it feels good twitter it
Re: Lance Armstrong: recent pics without drugs
« Reply #109 on: August 26, 2006, 11:10:03 AM »
Armstrong beat TESTICULAR cancer. Does anyone know what the normal procedure is? Removing the cancerous tissue, i.e., neutering him. Neutering means NO ENDOGENOUS TEST. Consequently, he received a prescription for HRT for the rest of his life. So almost certainly he was monitored daily by his physician to see that his test/epi-test values were always close to the legal max. And assuming they are not tested minutes before a race, then a shot of test suspension would raise it even higher for a few hours, and no evidence to be found after the finish, when the levels were back down to a legal (but still very high) 6:1 ratio.


Almost makes me wish I had his "problem".

Pretty sure they only took one ball.  When you lose one the other does double duty and you don't see a drop testosterone levels...