« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?  (Read 9911 times)

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« on: May 16, 2007, 12:59:36 AM »
i always read this in flex mags and also on arnies profile on bodybuilding.com,it states arnold had a 57 inch..so is this true or just those old bodybuilding exaggerations?
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2007, 05:08:01 AM »
I tend to believe it's true. The only thing I believe may be exaggerated a bit is maybe his height.


Logged

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2007, 05:13:25 AM »
imo it was more around 63/64 ish.
Logged

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8576
  • TKU
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2007, 05:58:12 AM »
Quote from: davidpaul on May 16, 2007, 05:13:25 AM
imo it was more around 63/64 ish.

bro lol imo bff I rly have him @ maybe 65"
Logged

affy

  • Guest
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2007, 06:22:36 AM »
chest is believable at 57''

but no way his arms were 21-22''
Logged

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2007, 06:25:51 AM »
Arnold is and was THE greatest Bodybuilder in the world... # I think we need a friendly reminder so you don't forget who worship bitches  >:(
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2007, 07:14:46 AM »
Quote from: affy on May 16, 2007, 06:22:36 AM
chest is believable at 57''

but no way his arms were 21-22''

You're right. No way are they at least 21''.  ::)


Logged

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2007, 07:16:06 AM »
Who cares, he looked like a king and fucked anything that walked....and this was just yesterday too! hhahahaha
Logged
L

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2007, 07:22:29 AM »
Quote from: affy on May 16, 2007, 06:22:36 AM
chest is believable at 57''

but no way his arms were 21-22''

ehhhh?
Logged

Weightpit

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Remember Sharon Tate...Carpe Diem
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2007, 07:23:23 AM »
YES!!!!!! This pic should clear it up........and I think his arms were what he said they were....what the fuck does it matter if they were 20 instead of 21....they definitely were bigger than 19.....
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2007, 07:29:10 AM »
Quote from: Weightpit on May 16, 2007, 07:23:23 AM
YES!!!!!! This pic should clear it up........and I think his arms were what he said they were....what the fuck does it matter if they were 20 instead of 21....they definitely were bigger than 19.....

Hell. You can say they were 18''. The look of his arms were phenomenal!  :o
Logged

Weightpit

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Remember Sharon Tate...Carpe Diem
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2007, 07:34:41 AM »
Quote from: Pollux on May 16, 2007, 07:29:10 AM
Hell. You can say they were 18''. The look of his arms were phenomenal!  :o

Absolutely...they guy was ahead of the times......
Logged

sgt. d

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4681
  • Don't tase me bro
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2007, 07:37:28 AM »
Tiny quads and smallish arms


The Myth owns him 8)
Logged

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33072
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2007, 07:41:08 AM »
well the 3 body areas that factor into the chest measurement are: lats, rib Cage, and pecs.

Arnold had the big pecs and rib cage, but I dont think that he had the lat size to measure in the 60" range.



Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2007, 08:10:34 AM »
Quote from: affy on May 16, 2007, 06:22:36 AM
chest is believable at 57''

but no way his arms were 21-22''
That's a bizarre conclusion that one was accurate and not the other. His arms were probably 21-22 pumped.

Whatever his chest was doesn't matter still the best ever chest.
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2007, 08:11:23 AM »
Quote from: sgt. d on May 16, 2007, 07:37:28 AM
Tiny quads and smallish arms


The Myth owns him 8)

Ya, "spaghetti arms"  ::) Your "observations" are brilliant.
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2007, 08:12:52 AM »
Quote from: Royalty on May 16, 2007, 07:41:08 AM
well the 3 body areas that factor into the chest measurement are: lats, rib Cage, and pecs.

Arnold had the big pecs and rib cage, but I dont think that he had the lat size to measure in the 60" range.





I totally agree. His ribcage, especially, gave him a big advantage!
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2007, 08:14:10 AM »
Quote from: sgt. d on May 16, 2007, 07:37:28 AM
The Myth owns him 8)

Well, maybe in 1972, but that's it.  ;D
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #18 on: May 16, 2007, 08:32:39 AM »
Quote from: Pollux on May 16, 2007, 08:14:10 AM
Well, maybe in 1972, but that's it.  ;D

It was always close between them, which made it interesting. Never obviously one-sided.
Logged

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2007, 08:46:36 AM »
Quote from: pumpster on May 16, 2007, 08:10:34 AM
That's a bizarre conclusion that one was accurate and not the other. His arms were probably 21-22 pumped.

Whatever his chest was doesn't matter still the best ever chest.
pumpy do you think that his chest was 57 inches in his prime?
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2007, 08:51:43 AM »
Quote from: the shadow on May 16, 2007, 08:46:36 AM
pumpy do you think that his chest was 57 inches in his prime?
No idea but like the 22" arms, probably partially true, maybe 22" at 250 lb., pumped.

Two of the top chest shots in BB history:
Logged

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2007, 08:53:37 AM »
Quote from: pumpster on May 16, 2007, 08:51:43 AM
No idea but probably like the 22" arms, partially true, 22" at 250 lb., pumped.

Two of the top 4-5 chest shots in BB history:
did he ever tip the scales at 250lbs?..most of the time he competed at 240lbs
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2007, 08:54:31 AM »
Quote from: the shadow on May 16, 2007, 08:53:37 AM
did he ever tip the scales at 250lbs?..most of the time he competed at 240lbs
When he got to Venice, late 60s, early 70s in between contests.
Logged

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17462
  • MAGA
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2007, 08:56:12 AM »
Quote from: sgt. d on May 16, 2007, 07:37:28 AM
Tiny quads and smallish arms


The Myth owns him 8)
allways sticking up for the brothers huh  ::)
Logged

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: do you really think that arnold had a 57 inch chest in his prime?
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2007, 09:03:14 AM »
Quote from: affy on May 16, 2007, 06:22:36 AM

but no way his arms were 21-22''

from 1970 to 1974 in the gym  pumped  they were around 22"

(bigger than big Lou 21")

If Sergio's were 21" at 5'9" tall,Arnold coudn't have less than that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »