If child services shows up at a house and it's ridden with trash, the children are dirty, etc, etc, etc then yes, it usually leads to arrests.
First off, child services do not just
"show up" at a house. They are summoned there.
Secondly, deadbeat parents who fail to pay child support do not have custody of their kids. that's why they are paying child support to the custodial parent.
Are they not "profiling" these criminal parents? Do you think those parents are getting an unfair shake? I mean, they were only investigated based on physical appearances. Does that bother you? Doubt it does.
The physical appearances of an environment (unsafe / unsanitary home) is a far cry from the physical appearances of a person.
Again, this law has nothing to do with visual representation. So you can try to parlay your interpretation of it (which is just wrong) into some all encompassing police state bullshit but your little example holds no water.
So again I ask... what would be the criteria? that's something neither you, 333, the proponents of this discriminatory legislation including Sherriff Arpaio refuse to answer.
And if you're not willing to welcome illegal immigrants to your country then you should shut the fuck up and stop telling us how to treat them in ours. Talk about a hypocritical dirtbag.
You've clearly missed the point. I'm NOT advising you on how to handle illegals.
I'm advising you of how NOT to handle legal American citizens and law enforcement.
In the quest to catch illegals, you will be infringing on the 4th amendment rights of citizens with NAZI tactics...
...at the personal discretion of cops. That's a kettle of worms you don't want. It's rife with opportunity for abuse, and it opens up police officers to too much liability in the form of civil charges. The cops are put in a no-win catch 22 situation requiring them to violate the 4th amendment rights of everyone in order to cover their asses from potential civil suits... which opens their asses up on federal charges of violating a citizens constitutional rights. if he doesn't violate a citizens constitutional rights... he opens himself up to civil charges. The biggest losers in this proposed scenario are legal American residents and cops. The consequences for them far outweigh the consequences for the few illegals that could potentially be ferreted out, and it's enforcement would prove a far greater drain on resources than the illegals presently pose.
If there are any cops on here, please speak up and tell me if you think I'm off base in my assessment.
