Osama Bin Laden - Conspiracies, staged, caught then shot

[freespirit]

Look at the funnies....

Meltdown so soon?   

[Heywood]

I think we've spent more than a trillion.

[Playboy]

Until I see a dead body, I rule it out as propaganda.

[polychronopolous]

All I care about when passing an Indian road side stand is getting my Dream Catcher and seasoned corn on the cob and getting the fuck out of there.

It's like I tell them when I leave..."Look at your skin color and then look at mine, I don't like you...your different than I am".

[Jadeveon Clowney]

Until I see a dead body, I rule it out as propaganda.

lol, I'm sure BO won't sleep knowing you would like to put a finger in OBL's wounds, doubting thomas.

[tu_holmes]

Meltdown so soon?

Apparently a single sentence to fagspirit is a meltdown.

That's getbig for you.

Any more cliches you got tucked away in that apparent 170 IQ?

Try sticking to a topic.

ps. Now you could get away with "meltdown"

pps. A serious topic is allowed to be serious... oh right. It's the internet. Where googling for photos and posting them in 2 separate threads isnt a meltdown but a sentence is.

[Jadeveon Clowney]

word on the street is that they wanted to use Hieronymus, but it turned out to be the name of Hillary's lover so she vetoed it.

[noc]

Quoting error meltdown.

[Tito24]

not worth it. we havent seen shit. fucking lyers in the black house

[tu_holmes]

Quoting error meltdown.

HAHA!!! True! That's what I get for typing it on my phone.

[body88]

Until I see a dead body, I rule it out as propaganda.

Forget the DNA, forget Pakistan's confirmation, forget eye witness accounts, screw the pictures that will not be realeased immediately because of the violence that they will cause (several dead after that yahoo burned a Quaran down in Florida), forget OBL wife's confirmation of of her husbands death.

Yes, Obama got up in front of the world and lied, because that could never blow up in his face, lol.

Lmao, the conspiracy theorists are always good for a chuckle.

[GRACIE JIU-JITSU]

epic uncredited cut & paste.

 Wow!! thanks for open our eyes.


 

[Heywood]

Until I see a dead body, I rule it out as propaganda.

I'd be happy if any independent 3rd party had seen the body, but it had to be thrown off the ship, or else we'd insult the terrorists.......

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

It's just a question.. please don't get me wrong.



 As you likely know,  it was announced last night that earlier in the week Osama Bin Laden was killed by a small U.S. Navy SEAL team in a luxury compound in Pakistan.

I won’t pull punches – this makes me extremely happy. I’m not overly gung-ho about war, but in this case, I’m proud his life was ended by an American bullet to the head.

As I took a break to watch some television and internet coverage last night, the issue of the “cost” of the war and effort to find Bin Laden was brought into light.

The best research I could do found these statistics:

    1,000+ Coalition troops & contractors killed
    1,100+ U.S. Soldiers killed in Afghanistan
    2,974 American civilians killed in 9/11.
    3,000+ Injured American troops
    15,000+ Afghan troops & civilians killed
    45,000+ Injured Afghan troops
    $400,000,000,000+ spent.

These rough estimates only account for Afghanistan. By all accounts, when you add in the Iraq war, the numbers just get bonkers.

$400 billion dollars. That’s a lot of money, but doesn’t even come close to the value of the lives lost along the way.

No matter how you do the math, over the last nine and a half years we’ve paid a hefty price tag.

This begs the question… Was it worth it?

How do we define worth in a situation like this? How do you measure value? Is this a pyrrhic victory or cause for true celebration?

In my opinion, this had to happen. Bin Laden needed to be found and killed.

Because there’s only one question scarier than asking about the cost of killing Bin Laden…

What’s the cost of not killing Osama Bin Laden?

Thanks to an elite group of Navy SEALS, we no longer have to ponder that question.

For this POS murdering son of a bitches's face being blown off and being dumped into the ocean, that's priceless.  You can even keep the change.

[Soul Crusher]

Yes - we got that scum bag!

i live in NYC and finally we took that animal out.   

[Nails]

LOL at all the white people being mind slaves of this black prez

Circle of life - karma's a bitch

[Howard]

Benny, I asked you this before and you ignored me so I'll ask again. Obama has a failed record, what do you think he's going to win on besides idiots like you that vote for him on his color or because he can read a teleprompter well. What's he going to run on?

I'll be happy to chime in here on this one coach.
For whatever reason(s), you won't sit back and make an objective evaluation of Pres Obama.
No matter what he does , you are going to find somehing to put a negative spin on it.

Now for the Obama record and his possible re-election:
He just proved he is a competent commnader -in -chief and can make good judgements when it comes to national security.
It would tough for the right wing to now say Obama is weak of national security now.
The numbers in the market ( DOW, S & P, etc) keep inching up since the fall of 2007-8.
This seems to be leading to job growth and may keep interest rates low.
If the republicans run away from the Ryan $$ plan, and get on board with job growth, that will help their cause. If, they keep talking about medicare vouchers for everyone under 55, they are screwed .
If the economy keeps showing some real improvement that the avg person sees in their own life, he wins in 2012 by a landslide.
However, if gas prices keep creeping up and unemployment rates don't get under 8% , he is at risk in 2012 depending on who the GOP nominates.

I would say my assessment on 2012 is pretty fair and objective.

[JOCKTHEGLIDE]

FIAR ASSEMESENT,,BUT COACH WONT SEE IT THAT WAY,,,JUST LIKE 333383 DOES NOT SEE IT,,,THE ECONOMGY CAN RECOVER AND MAKE TRILLIONS IN DOLARS AND NOT BE IN DEBT,,,BUT COACH WILL SEE IT OTHERWISE,,,,

I'll be happy to chime in here on this one coach.
For whatever reason(s), you won't sit back and make an objective evaluation of Pres Obama.
No matter what he does , you are going to find somehing to put a negative spin on it.

Now for the Obama record and his possible re-election:
He just proved he is a competent commnader -in -chief and can make good judgements when it comes to national security.
It would tough for the right wing to now say Obama is weak of national security now.
The numbers in the market ( DOW, S & P, etc) keep inching up since the fall of 2007-8.
This seems to be leading to job growth and may keep interest rates low.
If the republicans run away from the Ryan $$ plan, and get on board with job growth, that will help their cause. If, they keep talking about medicare vouchers for everyone under 55, they are screwed .
If the economy keeps showing some real improvement that the avg person sees in their own life, he wins in 2012 by a landslide.
However, if gas prices keep creeping up and unemployment rates don't get under 8% , he is at risk in 2012 depending on who the GOP nominates.

I would say my assessment on 2012 is pretty fair and objective.

[Jadeveon Clowney]

LOL at all the white people being mind slaves of this black prez

Circle of life - karma's a bitch

Your envy of AMericans is unhealthy.

[wes]

Worth every fucking cent !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

Worth every fucking cent !!

[Nails]

Your envy of AMericans is unhealthy.

i'm scratching my balls sack on venice beach california right now watching the blond bitches in bikines right now, as i throw done a couple sam adam beer

Yea i have such an unhealthy life

[GRACIE JIU-JITSU]

For this POS murdering son of a bitches's face being blown off and being dumped into the ocean, that's priceless.  You can even keep the change.

Worth every fucking cent !!

 

 Even knowing that most of that money went straight to the 1% that rules the country?

[_bruce_]

Way lower damage than in wars of the past.

[G_Thang]

It's just a question.. please don't get me wrong.



 As you likely know,  it was announced last night that earlier in the week Osama Bin Laden was killed by a small U.S. Navy SEAL team in a luxury compound in Pakistan.

I won’t pull punches – this makes me extremely happy. I’m not overly gung-ho about war, but in this case, I’m proud his life was ended by an American bullet to the head.

As I took a break to watch some television and internet coverage last night, the issue of the “cost” of the war and effort to find Bin Laden was brought into light.

The best research I could do found these statistics:

    1,000+ Coalition troops & contractors killed
    1,100+ U.S. Soldiers killed in Afghanistan
    2,974 American civilians killed in 9/11.
    3,000+ Injured American troops
    15,000+ Afghan troops & civilians killed
    45,000+ Injured Afghan troops
    $400,000,000,000+ spent.

These rough estimates only account for Afghanistan. By all accounts, when you add in the Iraq war, the numbers just get bonkers.

$400 billion dollars. That’s a lot of money, but doesn’t even come close to the value of the lives lost along the way.

No matter how you do the math, over the last nine and a half years we’ve paid a hefty price tag.

This begs the question… Was it worth it?

How do we define worth in a situation like this? How do you measure value? Is this a pyrrhic victory or cause for true celebration?

In my opinion, this had to happen. Bin Laden needed to be found and killed.

Because there’s only one question scarier than asking about the cost of killing Bin Laden…

What’s the cost of not killing Osama Bin Laden?

Thanks to an elite group of Navy SEALS, we no longer have to ponder that question.

excuse my man, gracie, but he'd have a very objective look at this, given his homeland is overrun with german war criminals.  that being said, would it have been easier, just to put a $1B fisher price tag on him and let some douchebag in the mid-east drop his body off for the check vs all the carnage and dead sons and daughters over this one guy.  we're not talking another World War here, so loosing all those kids in the middle-east may not have been a necessary.  then again, presidents and leaders don't put their kids in the line of fire.