It's not a LIE unless Obama signed this bill with the intent that it would be constitutional under the tax clause. It was their alternative argument, their main argument was the commerce clause...which is most likely what Obama had in mind when he signed this bill. The fact that the issue was complex enough to have 9 legal minds split 5-4 should be enough to tell you that Obama could not have known that this bill would IN FACT be a tax. Unless you have evidence that Obama saw this healthcare plan being found constitutional under the tax clause, (which NO one saw coming or being a legitimate argument) he cannot be deemed a liar.
IT WAS a lie, because he was asked, point blank, if ObamaCare was a tax. He said it was not, as did his supporters.
And, since Obama also claimed he wouldn't raise taxes on the middle class, he LIED about that, too.
Do you really think that the ObamaCare lawyers made their case about this being a TAX, with Obama having no clue as to what they were doing? PLEASE!!