Author Topic: Over developed Rear delts (Read 38757 times)

dr.chimps · « **Reply #100 on:** July 12, 2012, 02:41:40 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on July 12, 2012, 02:33:03 PM

This will go underappreciated!

Uh Oh. The patrons at Goudy's establishment are really gonna get carded tonight.

Ursus · « **Reply #101 on:** July 12, 2012, 02:43:58 PM »

King Billy crossed the Boyne but he never crossed Ardoyne...

Thanks for kind words folks.

EH · « **Reply #102 on:** July 12, 2012, 02:51:05 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on July 11, 2012, 02:06:54 PM

Ive stopped working read delts directly years ago as i find it gives that blocky square look a la
king kamali,claude groulx, nasser etc

shoulders to big just ruin the physique IMO
what do you think

I think that's the absolute dumbest fucking thing i've EVER read on any board EVER!... and I've been reading this non-sense since all there was was misc.fitness.weights

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #103 on:** July 12, 2012, 03:11:24 PM »

Quote from: EH on July 12, 2012, 02:51:05 PM

I think that's the absolute dumbest fucking thing i've EVER read on any board EVER!... and I've been reading this non-sense since all there was was misc.fitness.weights

ok.

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #104 on:** July 12, 2012, 03:14:58 PM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on July 12, 2012, 02:41:40 PM

Uh Oh. The patrons at Goudy's establishment are really gonna get carded tonight.

X2 I am going to watch One Adam 12 instead.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #105 on:** July 12, 2012, 05:09:59 PM »

horrible

DroppingPlates · « **Reply #106 on:** July 12, 2012, 05:18:30 PM »

Yes, Markus loves the rear delt machine a little too much...

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #107 on:** July 12, 2012, 05:52:19 PM »

tremendous delts genetically before he did whatever to them
and very pooooor triceps.....
better if the imbalance was the other way.... IMO

Man of Steel · « **Reply #108 on:** July 12, 2012, 06:17:55 PM »

No such thing as shoulders being too big.

Ursus · « **Reply #109 on:** July 12, 2012, 06:20:20 PM »

Quote from: Man of Steel on July 12, 2012, 06:17:55 PM

No such thing as shoulders being too big.

I agree!

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #110 on:** July 12, 2012, 06:31:23 PM »

Quote from: Man of Steel on July 12, 2012, 06:17:55 PM

No such thing as shoulders being too big.

explain.. please
i have seen guys with delst to big that it over shadows there arms...... any bodyprt can be to big

eg mohamed mustafa quade were too big overshadowed his upper boddy, branh hd tht problem....
i dont see whts so hard to comprehend .. rhuls delts too big whatever hes done to the so is kamalis.... to big for their arms

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #111 on:** July 12, 2012, 06:52:32 PM »

vs

kevin has huge delts but has the arms to offset or match those delts

kamali has huge delts and poor arms...
so therefore we can concluke kamalis delts are to big for his body ..... which throws off his symmetry
what so hard to understand

Master Blaster · « **Reply #112 on:** July 12, 2012, 09:50:14 PM »

Quote from: Nirvana on July 11, 2012, 02:32:40 PM

as long as you don't put oil in them, you'll never get over-big delts

Quote of the year

ChristopherA · « **Reply #113 on:** July 12, 2012, 10:02:33 PM »

I'm on the same page Mes. Doesn't look good when the delts are so big they taper down to the arms as opposed to the tri blowing out at the tie-ins

Man of Steel · « **Reply #114 on:** July 13, 2012, 05:05:40 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on July 12, 2012, 06:31:23 PM

explain.. please
i have seen guys with delst to big that it over shadows there arms...... any bodyprt can be to big

eg mohamed mustafa quade were too big overshadowed his upper boddy, branh hd tht problem....
i dont see whts so hard to comprehend .. rhuls delts too big whatever hes done to the so is kamalis.... to big for their arms

With Kamali it's easy.....he has weak tris for a pro. Kevin balanced his huge shoulders (which were larger than Kamalis) with huge arms. Really it's about the triceps cause every fool on planet earth does curls to get the girls for bis. Huge rear delts required huge tris for balance. Kamali doesn't have huge tris (for a pro).

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #115 on:** July 13, 2012, 06:15:39 AM »

Quote from: BigBuehl on July 12, 2012, 10:02:33 PM

I'm on the same page Mes. Doesn't look good when the delts are so big they taper down to the arms as opposed to the tri blowing out at the tie-ins

Thank you finally someone gets it

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #116 on:** July 13, 2012, 06:18:38 AM »

Quote from: Man of Steel on July 13, 2012, 05:05:40 AM

With Kamali it's easy.....he has weak tris for a pro. Kevin balanced his huge shoulders (which were larger than Kamalis) with huge arms. Really it's about the triceps cause every fool on planet earth does curls to get the girls for bis. Huge rear delts required huge tris for balance. Kamali doesn't have huge tris (for a pro).

So we can conclude kamalis delta are too big for HIS physique
Which is what Ive been basically saying shoulders CAN be to big

DroppingPlates · « **Reply #117 on:** July 13, 2012, 06:47:45 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on July 13, 2012, 06:18:38 AM

So we can conclude kamalis delta are too big for HIS physique
Which is what Ive been basically saying shoulders CAN be to big

You constantly post examples with Syntholized delts. This won't help you to make a point.

Man of Steel · « **Reply #118 on:** July 13, 2012, 07:54:43 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on July 13, 2012, 06:18:38 AM

So we can conclude kamalis delta are too big for HIS physique
Which is what Ive been basically saying shoulders CAN be to big

Well actually I meant his arms (specifically triceps) are under-developed (IMHO), but assuming he's arms ain't changing then yep his shoulders are disproportional (specifically rear delts).

Megalodon · « **Reply #119 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:14:50 AM »

This is the acceptable limit for rear delt 'development'. Any more than this would be disproportionate.

njflex · « **Reply #120 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:33:44 AM »

Quote from: Megalodon on July 13, 2012, 08:14:50 AM

This is the acceptable limit for rear delt 'development'. Any more than this would be disproportionate.

THAT'S supposed to be the mountaintop to muscle greatness pose ,,,talk about nuts...

240 is Back · « **Reply #121 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:34:16 AM »

inspirational

Ursus · « **Reply #122 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:34:24 AM »

Unless you are a competitive bodybuilder the 'flow' of the physique IMO is not important.

If you are just a gym rat who trains for fun etc do not hold back on your strengths at all work on them just as hard as anything else - that is my view on things. Plus if natural it is not as if anything will ever drastically overpower anything!

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #123 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:36:26 AM »

Quote from: Ursus on July 13, 2012, 08:34:24 AM

Unless you are a competitive bodybuilder the 'flow' of the physique IMO is not important.

If you are just a gym rat who trains for fun etc do not hold back on your strengths at all work on them just as hard as anything else - that is my view on things. Plus if natural it is not as if anything will ever drastically overpower anything!

Ok skinny

DroppingPlates · « **Reply #124 on:** July 13, 2012, 08:43:25 AM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on July 13, 2012, 08:36:26 AM

Ok skinny

He's twice your size, kiwi cutie