Author Topic: Jay Cutler Before & After (Read 19321 times)

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #25 on:** December 27, 2005, 01:24:52 AM »

He had a Schwarzennegeresque physique and a detailed lower back.

blaster · « **Reply #26 on:** December 27, 2005, 02:01:55 AM »

Quote from: Tha Dogg on December 26, 2005, 07:16:27 AM

$:-\$

OMG! Is that a pitty Jay has with him in that pic? It looks like my dog! Pittys r the best!

phyxsius · « **Reply #27 on:** December 27, 2005, 04:26:20 AM »

Quote from: mansonvier on December 27, 2005, 12:43:36 AM

What happened to his back detail?

That's what happened when you play mass game..

Beyond Genetics · « **Reply #28 on:** December 27, 2005, 08:30:39 AM »

Quote from: phyxsius on December 26, 2005, 02:57:14 AM

Your wish is my command..

HeHe,,, I actually created that picture...

I'm so proud to see it prestigiously displayed...

rufjunk · « **Reply #29 on:** December 27, 2005, 07:32:21 PM »

I think a lot of the face "progression" is overblown.

Jay's face doesn't look THAT different comparing both pictures. It's also hard to tell because certain chemicals make you bloat more than others, he could've just had a few bowls of oatmeal and it looks like his face got stung by a bunch of bees.

Anyway, I still do think some of these newer compounds alters these guys faces, but it's also hard to tell because more comparison pics are judging between them at 18 and them at 40, there's obviously going to be a structural difference.

As for Kevin Levrone, you can tell his face is much more slender. That could be related to water intake and the fact that he doesn't consume as much, he does more cardio, he doesn't take gear, etc.

phyxsius · « **Reply #30 on:** December 27, 2005, 07:35:13 PM »

Quote from: Beyond Genetics on December 27, 2005, 08:30:39 AM

HeHe,,, I actually created that picture...

I'm so proud to see it prestigiously displayed...

it's a national treasure mate.. no worries.. Great work by the way

phyxsius · « **Reply #31 on:** December 27, 2005, 07:39:36 PM »

Stop the hate on Jay Cutler people.. Jay is by far the most marketable bodybuilder in current time..

Borracho · « **Reply #32 on:** December 27, 2005, 07:50:37 PM »

Judging from the pics the guys always had a huge chin. If anything he should start taking more GH.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #33 on:** December 27, 2005, 07:59:34 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 25, 2005, 07:02:05 PM

I look at these pics and say what the facial alterations worth the extra cash & the extra 30lbs ? it boggles my mind how Jay can look at past pics and then look in the mirror and not be freaked-the-f**k-out !! I guess its happens on a day-to-day basis so he & his wife never noticed it but man this is freaky and not in a good sense.

What's your point?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

haider · « **Reply #34 on:** December 27, 2005, 09:43:25 PM »

Quote from: mansonvier on December 27, 2005, 01:24:52 AM

Schwarzennegeresque

wow, how long did it take u to type that out

phyxsius · « **Reply #35 on:** December 28, 2005, 03:46:08 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 27, 2005, 09:24:13 PM

Gunter is by far. Lee is also quite marketable. Jay is up there but I doubt to the degree of those two.

I agree with ya Matt C but Jay gets more recognition due to his achievements on the stage.

pumpster · « **Reply #36 on:** December 28, 2005, 05:41:20 AM »

Except for the first pic, which could be the angle, i don't see much difference.

The only way to know is to see pics of him in a few years when he's dropped weight following retirement. The extra fullness is likely due to the added bodyweight and will go away to a large extent when he's lighter.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #37 on:** December 28, 2005, 06:11:12 AM »

ronnie jay gus ronnie jay gus ronnie jay gus

graphite, charcoal, black graphite charcoal black

jay is awesome
as is ronnie
as is gus

Mars · « **Reply #38 on:** December 28, 2005, 06:32:28 AM »

Damn he looked much better when he turned pro.
Now he's too blocky.

Double XL · « **Reply #39 on:** December 28, 2005, 03:15:53 PM »

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #40 on:** December 28, 2005, 03:29:34 PM »

that looks like art atwood

TonyNuthian · « **Reply #41 on:** December 29, 2005, 03:14:05 AM »

Quote from: Double XL on December 28, 2005, 03:15:53 PM

.

I see this happening in reality in about 10 years! lol!

Zugzwang · « **Reply #42 on:** December 29, 2005, 03:43:17 AM »

Quote from: body88 on December 27, 2005, 12:36:46 AM

Ronnie may have shown less signs of this??? Maybe he is just a mutant but i also think pics of Ron from 99 compared to now face wise there is a difference.....

There's a massive difference; FLEX runs this monthly advert peddling their t-shirts etc and it has a picture of a t-shirt wearing Ronnie (it's also front-on, so you only focus on his head really) and a vest-wearing Troy Alves. Pick up a recent Flex (this might be in the UK-only edition, though) and LOOK at Coleman's head, and then compare it to pictures in 1998. His head is easily 25 per cent wider. His body probably is, too, but that's the point.

If anyone can scan the advert I'm talking about, and put it next to a 1998 Ronnie, you'll see an incredible difference in head size.

Quote from: Matt C

Gunter is by far. Lee is also quite marketable. Jay is up there but I doubt to the degree of those two.

The proof is in the pudding. Everyone keeps saying how marketable Gunter is, but how many adverts do you see him in? Maybe one a magazine. Same for Lee. Jay's always in 2-3, particularly as he's Muscletech.

phyxsius · « **Reply #43 on:** December 29, 2005, 04:18:18 AM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on December 28, 2005, 03:29:34 PM

that looks like art atwood

He looked better than Art

bald · « **Reply #44 on:** December 29, 2005, 07:29:22 AM »

I see very little (if any) change in Jays face.

jem123 · « **Reply #45 on:** December 29, 2005, 03:09:59 PM »

Quote from: bald on December 29, 2005, 07:29:22 AM

I see very little (if any) change in Jays face.

I dont know about face shape but I have noticed massive differences in both arm and leg size between the left and right sides of Jays body. Chad Nichols wrote that this could be down to injury. Maybe but in both arms and legs at the same time on the same side of the body? This is very evident when he has dieted down. (Especially Arnold 04).

EL Mariachi · « **Reply #46 on:** May 19, 2007, 01:20:42 PM »

Quote from: phyxsius on December 26, 2005, 02:57:14 AM

Your wish is my command..

ribonucleic · « **Reply #47 on:** May 19, 2007, 03:11:03 PM »

Maybe the long pointed jaw is the next stage in the skeletal evolution of homo sapiens.

Think about it.

Before everyone started walking upright, someone had to be the one who did it first.

donrhummy · « **Reply #48 on:** May 19, 2007, 08:35:54 PM »

First two, there's not much difference but the second two pics - wow, that's a big difference.

SirTraps · « **Reply #49 on:** May 19, 2007, 08:39:36 PM »

Author Topic: Jay Cutler Before & After (Read 19321 times)

Beyond Genetics

suckmymuscle