I stated a fact. It wasn't an insult.
Why would a moderator try to discredit someone knowledgeable on this forum? Maximum human hypertrophy is not an academic discipline because no scientist is doing research re the phenomenon.
I published an original theory of maximum hypertrophy which helped explain some important issues. No one has refuted my theory so that suggests it is probably true. The theory also explains the lack of hypertrophy in so many gym rats all over the world.
Excellent Vince! Now, can we know in what peer-reviewed journal you published said theory?
You claim that a lot of Broscience is flung across the forum, but if you published something, I am assuming it was published in a science journal of some sort where other specialists in the field of Human Anatomy & Physiology could comment/critique (You know, Physiologists, Doctors respective of their own disciplines, Scientists, Biologists) your work.
Can you give us a link to the published article?
Folks, let's also leave out the defamatory comments. Vince's reputation shouldn't be attacked and he shouldn't be called names. One thing is to refute his theory, another thing is to call him names. I think this is a good medium for Vince to present his theory and potentially have us critique it a bit as to try and learn something in the process.
"
1"
