Author Topic: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!  (Read 43591 times)

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« on: March 10, 2015, 12:00:10 PM »
Atheism falsified once and for all. Sorry you were duped, all ye atheist stooges.

"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2015, 12:02:09 PM »
REJECTION OF EVOLUTION (ALONG WITH ATHEISM)
BTW the MAIN REASON people reject evolution is because
#1 there is NO proof for it
#2 it's recognized as a hoax
#3 anyone who really knows science knows that evolution has NOTHING to do with science
#4 99.99% of all evolutionists rely on logical fallacies, intimidation and insults as the main parts of their scientific arguments
#5 it's perfectly obvious that evolutionists are liars; they deny design, something that is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer
#6 the fossil record disproves evolution; it shows animals suddenly appeared full formed and never changed.
#7 in the entire existence of mankind there is not one reported case of a new animal appearing

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2015, 12:08:10 PM »
THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF EVOLUTION
There are several reasons for this.
1. The scientists cannot even agree on what it is.
2. There is no evidence for its ever having happened.
3. All the fossil evidence supports a creation event. Now tell me something, does a little contradiction to your dogmatically held unscientific beliefs cause your day to go sour?

The empirical evidence shows that evolution of chemicals turning into single-celled creatures who eventually turned into humans NEVER happened. So here they are stuck with a dozen theories about something that never even happened. HAR HAR HAR Gould is one of many who tell us, "a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and "fully formed".

"When objectively evaluated, the scientific evidence shows conclusively that evolution (of molecules to protozoa to fish to people) did not happen. The fact is that embryological and anatomical studies (for example, ear bones, bird lung, mammalian diaphragm, chimpanzee genitalia) show unequivocally that evolution is impossible." - Dr Vij Sodera

There is no theory of evolution only theories of evolution as in various "speculative hypotheses". The evolutionist Simon Conway Morris said the only thing the evolution scientists agree on is that it happened after that there is no agreement, when it comes to the speculative hypothesis of neo-Darwinism then that hypothesis is not acceptable to all evolutionists just like the speculative hypothesis of punctuated equilibrium is not acceptable to all evolutionists, For example, Coyne calls it bunk.

Goldschmidt laughed back at his evolution buddies who laughed that his theory of "Hopeful Monsters" had no evidence, because neither did theirs. So here they all are laughing at creationists while believing a hoax for which there is NO evidence and never happened. Not one of these evotard dumbasses knows what the theory of evolution is. Not one of them believes it the same way. They continually contradict each other. Some believe it's random and some don't.

Some believe in natural selection and mutations. Some only believe in mutations while others believe only in natural selection. Others combine it with genetic drift (a form of magic where a whole population changes at once). When you ask them which theory of evolution they believe in they get flustered and refuse to talk about it. Not one of them will admit that Darwinism and neo-Darwinism are two different theories.

They all believe in hoaxes that have been debunked. Don't believe me? Ask them. They still believe in Haeckel's embryos. And in the Peppered Moth Hoax, Lucy, the Java Man, the Peking Man, the Neanderthal Man and will defend them to the death even though they have all been debunked. Next, dinosaurs turning into birds is a myth that has been disproven for 10 years (it was idiotic in the 1st place and any idiot could see it was bullshit), but they will argue their asses off defending it.

What's funny is they then deny that evolution theorizes that one species will turn into another. Foxlake said "Were a horse to be born from another species, that would disprove evolution," but that's exactly what Punctuated Equilibrium claims. She will then defend the hypothesis of some wolf-like land animal turning into a whale. Folks these people are insane. But you can all relax now because we have successfully disproven that there is a scientific theory of evolution.

PWNED

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2015, 12:09:29 PM »
Atheism falsified once and for all. Sorry you were duped, all ye atheist stooges.

"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine


Hi Mcway,

You love that spontaneous generation non-sense don't you?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41103
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2015, 12:11:27 PM »
I've debated this evolution nonsense with the morons of this board many times over the years.  It's crazy how people that are so learned in some areas are so stupid (yes, stupid) in others.  This is what happens when you blindly trust a system.  Evolution....HAHAHAHAHAH AHA.  Fucking morons.  As I've stated many times before.

SHOW ME THE TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS!
SHOW ME PROOF OF EVOLUTION....NOT MUTATIONS.  Mutations are non beneficial.  Adaptation is not evolution.  Define evolution when referring to how we "evolved" from slime, then show me this in nature.  It's always the same bullshit.  "Well Wiggs, this takes millions or billions of years" Get the fuck outta here with that shit. To this day none of the morons have showed one shred of proof to support this asinine theory.  


Why are there still apes?  Why are there still a large variety of animals and living creatures if we all evolved from the same thing.  It's because evolution is utter bullshit. 

THE BIBLE IS RIGHT...FACT!

Oh and before he chimes in...Shut up Adam. ::)
7

IronMeister

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3280
  • Übermacht
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2015, 12:13:08 PM »

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2015, 12:14:16 PM »
NEWSFLASH: RICHARD DAWKINS UNWITTINGLY DEBUNKS EVOLUTION!

On Sept. 29, 2009, Richard Dawkins was a guest on CBC's The Hour.
The host, George Stroumboulopoulos, asked Dawkins: "What is one single thing that you can say that definitively proves that evolution is a fact?"
Dawkins's response: "Comparing the genes molecularly across all animals and plants. It falls on a precise hierarchical pattern, which is obviously best interpreted as a family tree, and this becomes possible--becomes quantitatively possible--because all living creatures have the same genetic code, which means you have literally reams and reams of textual information, just like a book, in every cell of every body, of every creature, and every plant in the world."
So...a pattern of highly organized textual information, comparable to books, that were written by authors, is evidence there wasn't any intelligent design involved? Facepalm.

Henry M. Morris wrote: "A number of evolutionists have even argued that DNA itself is evidence for evolution, since it is common to all organisms. More often is the argument used that similar DNA structures in two different organisms proves common evolutionary ancestry."
"Neither argument is valid. There is no reason whatever why the Creator could not or would not use the same type of genetic code based on DNA for all His created life forms. This is evidence for intelligent design and creation, not evolution."

EVOLUTION PWNED

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41103
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2015, 12:15:36 PM »
BTW, thanks for the thread Ron.  8)
7

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2015, 12:16:52 PM »
LET'S LOOK AT WHAT THE EXPERTS SAY:
 
"All the larger groups of animals, e.g. fishes, amphibians, reptiles, mammals seem to have appeared suddenly on the earth, spreading themselves, so to speak, in an explosive manner in their various shapes and forms. Nowhere is one able to observe or prove the transition of one species into another, variation only being possible within the species themselves" Evolutionist, Max Westenhofer as quoted in Dewar's More Difficulties, p. 94
 
"The evidence of Geology today is that species seem to come into existence suddenly and in full perfection, remain substantially unchanged during the terms of their existence, and pass away in full perfection. Other species take their place, apparently by substitution, not by transmutation" Geologist, Joseph Le Conte
 
"Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." -- Charles Robert Darwin, The Origin of Species: The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st edition reprint. Avenel Books
 
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology (study of fossils). In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors, it appears all at once and fully formed." -- Dr. Stephen J. Gould, Prof of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University. Mentioned in one of his regular columns in Natural History Magazine (1977) and also in The Panda's Thumb, 1980, p. 181-182

"different species usually appear and disappear from the record without showing the transitions that Darwin postulated -- we are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn't changed much -- We have fewer examples of evolutionary transitions than we had in Darwins' time" Dr. David Raup, a paleontologist at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. Field Museum Natural History Bulletin 50:22- 29
 
"Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them" Dr. David B. Kitts, Paleontologist
 
"The known fossil record fails to document a single example of phyletic evolution accomplishing a major morphologic transition" Evolutionist, Dr. Steven M. Stanley
 
"The record certainly did not reveal gradual transformations of structure in the course of time. On the contrary, it showed that species generally remained constant throughout their history. New types or classes seemed to appear fully formed, with no sign of an evolutionary trend by which they could have emerged from an earlier type."
Bowler, 'Evolution: The History of an Idea', 1984, p. 187

DID YOU GET ALL OF THAT, FOLKS? I WILL SUMMARIZE HERE BELOW:

ALL OF THE CREATURES ON EARTH
1. Suddenly appeared
2. Exploded everywhere
3. Fully formed
4. No transitions
5. No gradualism
6. No previous ancestry
7. No sign of an evolutionary trend by which they could have emerged from an earlier type

CREATION PROVEN

Of course you atheists have no argument but you lor are going to stick to your pseudoscience bullshit anyway. Watch Dawkins lie his ass off about monkeys turning into humans.

HERE ARE THE FACTS AS APPROVED BY EVOLUTION SCIENTISTS
All of the animals:
1. Suddenly appeared
2. Exploded everywhere
3. Were fully formed
4. No transitions
5. No gradualism
6. No change (stasis)
7. No sign of an evolutionary trend by which they could have emerged from an earlier type
 
THE PROOF: "The abrupt appearance of higher taxa in the fossil record has been a perennial puzzle. Not only do characteristic and distinctive remains of phyla appear suddenly, without known ancestors, but several classes of phylum, orders of a class, and so on, commonly appear at approximately the same time, without known intermediates." -*James W. Valentine and *Cathryn A. Campbell, "Genetic Regulation and the Fossil Record," in American Scientist, Vol. 63, November-December, 1975, p. 673.
This is backed by Gould, Patterson, Eldredge, etc. etc.

disco_stu

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4953
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2015, 12:18:37 PM »
oh my there are some daft members on GB.

despite the overwhelming evidence of fossils , and not a single piece of evidence for "god", the god believers still arent satisfied that something complex and proven (evolution) was going on, and continues to go on.

the uncountable examples of evolutionary development are conveniently ignored. virus' to vaccines, insects to insecticide, localised specialisations in isolated species...

over and over again, scores of smart people objectively study phenomenon and come up with the same findings, yet religion hasnt survived a single analysis. religion has anecdotes and ancient stories that are interpreted to suit. evolution has something that can be observed, and still stacks up.

so the creationists grasp at any straw they can. doesnt the bible state people riding on camels or something?- hundreds of years before they were domesticated?

lol.

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2015, 12:19:52 PM »
ATTENTION FOLKS PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

Posted by Gil Dodgen under Intelligent Design:
For me, despite 43 years of indoctrination in atheistic materialism and Darwinian orthodoxy, it was a very simple logical exercise to conclude that living systems are the product of intelligent design.

The simplest living cell includes highly sophisticated, functionally integrated information-processing machinery, with error-detection-and-repair algorithms and their implementation.

The notion that random errors, whether filtered by natural selection or not, can produce such technology, is a transparently absurd proposition.

It's really just that simple.

The great Arthur Eddington once said that, philosophically, the notion of an abrupt beginning to the present order of nature was repugnant (referring to the Big Bang). It might have been philosophically repugnant, but it was true.

Only those who find the notion that living systems are designed to be philosophically repugnant can deny the evidence.

I also found the evidence to be philosophically repugnant, but I considered the denial of obvious truth to be even more philosophically repugnant, so I changed my philosophy.

HAR HAR HAR HAR Gil just pwned evolution and evolutionists. Good for you, Gil

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2015, 12:21:23 PM »
BTW, thanks for the thread Ron.  8)

Evolution: THE ETIOLOGY OF MENTAL ILLNESS Hardcover – January 8, 2015
by John Jacobs, MD.
7 reasons why evolution is mental illness

I would like to propose that evolutionist beliefs be placed in the DSM as a category of mental illness for the following reasons:
(1) Hallucinations - the person sees evolution occurring although the record shows that there is no evolution.
(2) Delusions - the patient believes that the magical transitionals do exist and will eventually be found if enough searches are undertaken.
(3) Denial/Inability to learn - though the quest for evolution remains fruitless, even after hundreds of years, the patients persist with the same behaviour, each time expecting different results.
(4) Inability to distinguish fantasy from reality - the beliefs are contingent upon ancient pagan naturalist mythology being accepted as historical fact.
(5) Paranoia - the belief that anyone who does not share their fantastical conception of reality is "anti-science".
(6) Emotional abuse - ­ blackballing, name-calling and other types of emotional "abuse" which can scar the psyche for life.
(7) Violence - many patients insist that others should share in their evolutionist delusions, even to the extent of using violence.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41103
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2015, 12:21:39 PM »
These dumbfucks deny evolution because they want to deny God.  They know that if there is no evolution, then there is God.  And if there is a God, then there are rules and regulations on how we're supposed to live.  Which means you can't do what you want to do and think there are no consequences. Those rules and regulations come in the form of the Bible. FACT!
7

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2015, 12:27:52 PM »



James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2015, 12:29:08 PM »
REJECTION OF EVOLUTION (ALONG WITH ATHEISM)
BTW the MAIN REASON people reject evolution is because
#1 there is NO proof for it - There's no proof of 'god'
#2 it's recognized as a hoax So is 'god'
#3 anyone who really knows science knows that evolution has NOTHING to do with science Everyone who knows religion knows there's no evidence of your fairy tales
#4 99.99% of all evolutionists rely on logical fallacies, intimidation and insults as the main parts of their scientific arguments 100% of religious nuts rely on blind faith
#5 it's perfectly obvious that evolutionists are liars; they deny design, something that is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer It's perfectly obvious that religious weirdos are simpleminded and will believe anything you tell them as long as the word 'god' appears in the sentence
#6 the fossil record disproves evolution; it shows animals suddenly appeared full formed and never changed. You think dinosaurs dropped from thin air into existence?
#7 in the entire existence of mankind there is not one reported case of a new animal appearing In the entire existence of mankind there's NEVER been any evidence of 'god'. Just fairy tales passed from one delusional generation to the next


FACT!

FACT I say!!
*

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #15 on: March 10, 2015, 12:32:12 PM »
EVOLUTION- FACT OR BELIEF?
by Laurence D Smart B.Sc.Agr., Dip.Ed., Grad.Dip.Ed
 
What do some scientists, who are experts in their field of research, think of evolution?
 
(1) LIFE ONLY COMES FROM LIFE, NOT NON-LIFE.
(Announcer - Peter Wilders)
Spontaneous generation was disproved by the scientific method despite scientists objections.
Viking Lander I & II showed that there isn't life on Mars.
There is no concrete proof that life evolved.
 
(2) THE FOSSILS DO NOT PROVE EVOLUTION.
(Interviewed Scientist - Dr Roberto Fondi - Palaeontologist).
Many eminent scientists don't believe that evolution occurred.
Life beginning with single cells hasn't been proved.
All groups appear suddenly without ancestors.
Possible transition fossils are rare and questionable. They should be abundant.
Real fossil transitions do not exist.
The evolution of humans from Australopithecus should not be accepted.
 
(3) MOLECULAR BIOLOGY DOES NOT PROVE EVOLUTION.
(Interviewed Scientist - Dr Guiseppe Sermonti - Microbiologist/Geneticist).
Mutation & natural selection have not been shown to cause evolution.
Present organisms are assumed to has come from similar extinct creatures.
Organisms have always been complex.
A single cell is already complex (eg bacteria).
Biochemical evolution has never taken place.
No evidence that humans evolved from primitive animals.
 
(4) GEOLOGY DOES NOT SUPPORT EVOLUTION.
(Interviewed Scientist - Guy Berthault - Sedimentologist).
Fossil trees 12m tall are found vertical in layers of rock.
Underwater sediment can form in thick banks.
Parts of banks are the same age.
Mount St Helens formed 200m of sediment in a few hours.
Mount St Helens formed a canyon 60m wide & 30m deep.
Sedimentary rocks don't take millions of years to form.
Joints represent drying cracks, not new deposits.
Sediment only hardens 300m below the sea bed.
Strata do not give an indication of rock age.
Strata can't be used to date rocks or fossils.
 
(5) RADIOMETRIC DATING DOES NOT ACCURATELY DATE ROCKS.
(Interviewed Scientist - Dr Edward Bourdreaux - Physical Organic Chemist).
Rocks & stone fossils don't contain Carbon-14.
Uranium dating is only theoretical as it is based on 3 assumptions.
Radio-dating by other elements is no more reliable.
Radio-dates of rocks from modern volcanoes are totally inaccurate.
Moon dust thickness does not agree with the radio-dated age of moon rocks.
Big Bang is an evolutionary hypothesis.

(6) GENETICS DOES NOT SUPPORT EVOLUTION.
(Interviewed Scientist - Dr Maciej Giertych - Geneticist).
Evolution's 'evidence' is not supported by science..
The belief in mutations and natural selection causes scientists to image evolution..
No beneficial mutations have been observed..
The variety within a species comes from the mixing of genes during reproduction..
Changes come from the selection of genes, not the formation of new genes.
Evolution can only be proved by the formation of new genes..
Genetic information requires an intelligence, not random chance.
Molecular biology shows that DNA must have been in existence from the beginning.
 
 
The Overall Conclusions.
(1) Evolution is a philosophy, not a science.
(2) Evolution is not even an acceptable hypothesis.
(3) Life could be measured in thousands of years, if evolution is ignored.
(4) Evolution is a fairytale for adults.
 
PWNED

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #16 on: March 10, 2015, 12:34:39 PM »
1) The Bible : The earth is a sphere
(Isaiah 40:22)

Science Then : The earth is a flat disk

Science Now : The Earth is a sphere

2) The Bible: Innumerable stars
(Jeremiah 33:22 )

Science Then : 1100 stars

Science Now : Innumerable Stars

3) The Bible: Air has weight
(Job 28:25)

Science Then : Air is weightless

Science Now: Air has weight

4) The Bible : Each star is different
(1 Corinthians 15:41)
Science Then : All stars were the same

Science Now: Each star is different

5) The Bible : Light moves
(Job 38:19-20)
Science Then : Light was fixed in place

Science Now : Light Moves

6) Free Float Of Earth In Space
(Job 26:7)

Scientists Then : Earth sat on a large animal (hahaha sorry atheists make the best comedians)

Science Now : Free float of earth in space

7) The Bible : Winds Blow In Cyclones
(Ecclesiastes 1:6)

Science Then : Winds blew straight

Science Now : Winds blow in cyclones

8) The Bible : Ocean Floor contains deep valleys and mountains
(2 Samuel 22:16; Jonah 2:6)

Science Then : The ocean floor was flat

Science Now : Ocean floor contains deep valleys and mountains

9) The Bible : Blood is the source of life and health
(Leviticus 17:11)

Science Then : Sick people must be bled

Science Now: Blood is the source of life and health

10) Creation Made Of Invisible Elements
Hebrews 11:3

Science Then: Mostly ignorant on the subject

Science Now Creation made of invisible elements

Can you people see how many times science has been wrong over and over again??? LOL Probably not because you atheists are blind hahahahah So I'll list a one more just for every atheist on this post.

11) The Bible: Ocean Contains springs
(Job 38:16)

Science Then : Ocean fed only by rivers and rain

Science now : Ocean Contains springs

All I know is one more is coming LOL
The Bible: There is a God
Atheists Then : There is no God
Atheists Soon : There is a God But wait it's too late!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41103
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #17 on: March 10, 2015, 12:34:52 PM »
Kill em Ron.  I'm going to lunch.  8)
7

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #18 on: March 10, 2015, 12:37:03 PM »
No Evidence of Evolution: Letter to Editor of Christchurch Press

Philip Maxwell's letter to the Editor of February 19 said that my assertion that there is no fossil evidence for evolution is completely untrue. I challenged him to provide even one universally recognized bona fide case of evolution from one species to another.

Mr. Maxwell became somewhat insulting by claiming that those who subscribe to the 'bizarre world-view' of creationism are not scientists at all or have degrees from obscure Bible colleges. I suggest Mr. Maxwell is ill-informed. Let's look the comments of just a few and note their qualifications:

Charles Darwin: “Toward the end of his life, Darwin openly admitted: “Not one change of species into another is on record…. We cannot prove that a single species has changed into another.” Darwin, Charles, My life and Letters, Vol. 1. Page 210.

Dr. Austin H. Clark, noted biologist of the Smithsonian Institute, stated: “There is NOT THE SLIGHTEST EVIDENCE THAT ANY ONE OF THE MAJOR GROUPS AROSE FROM ANY OTHER. Each is a special animal complex, related more or less closely to all the rest, and appearing therefore as a species and distinct creation.” Meldau, Fred John, Witness Against Evolution, Christian Victory Publishing Co., Denver, Colo., 1953, page 39, 40, 73.
No Evidence of Evolution: Letter to Editor of Christchurch Press
Philip Maxwell's letter to the Editor of February 19 said that my assertion that there is no fossil evidence for evolution is completely untrue. I challenged him to provide even one universally recognized bona fide case of evolution from one species to another.

Professor Albert Fleishman, professor of Comparative Anatomy at Erlangen University, said, “The theory of evolution suffers from grave defects, which are becoming more and more apparent as time advances. It can no longer square with practical scientific knowledge, nor does it suffice for our theoretical grasp of the facts. The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination.” Fleishman, Albert, Victoria Institute, Vol. 65, pages 194, 195.

Sir William Dawson, Canada’s great geologist, said of evolution: “It is one of the strangest phenomena of humanity; it is utterly destitute of proof.” Dawson, Sir William, Story of Earth and Man, page 317.

Dr. Robert A. Millikan, famous physicist and Nobel prize winner, said, “Everyone who reflects believes in God.” Millikan, Robert A., The Commentator, June 1937. In an address to the American Chemical Society, he said: “The pathetic thing about it is that many scientists are trying to prove the doctrine of evolution, which no scientists can do.”

Dr. George Wald, a Nobel prize winner, chooses to believe in evolution even though he said he regards it as a scientific impossibility. He says, “The only alternative to a spontaneous generation is a belief in supernatural creation….” Wald, George, “Innovation and Biology,” Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 195 8, page 100.

Dr. Werner Von Braun, who masterminded the V2 rocket of Germany in World War II and the space program of the United States for two decades, said in a speech at Taylor University: “The idea of an orderly universe is inconceivable without God — the grandeur of the cosmos confirms the certainty of creation. One can’t be exposed to the law and order of the universe without becoming aware of a divine intent.” Keith, Bill, Scopes II the Great Debate, Huntington House, 1985, page 55.

Richard Goldschmidt, Ph.D., professor of zoology, University of California, said, “Geographic variation as a model of species formation will not stand under thorough scientific investigation. Darwin’s theory of natural selection has never had any proof .. yet it has been universally accepted. There may be wide diversification within the species … but the gap (between species) cannot be bridged …. Sub-species do not merge into the species either actually or ideally.” .” Keith, Bill, Scopes II the Great Debate, Huntington House, 1985, pages 55-56.

Dr. Warren Weaver, formerly chairman of the board of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said, “Every new discovery of science is a further ‘revelation’ of the order which God has built into His universe.” Weaver, Warren, Look Magazine, April 5, 1955, page 30.

Dr. Michael Behe, author of Darwin's Black Box, Associate Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University, is not a creationist. He notes that biochemistry unlocked the secrets of the cell when Watson and Crick discovered the double-helical shape of DNA. Behe demonstrates, using the examples of vision, blood-clotting, cellular transport, and more, the biochemical world comprises an arsenal of chemical machines, made up of finely calibrated, interdependent parts. With the knowledge now available about the complexity of the cell, Behe concludes Darwinian evolution is impossible.


James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2015, 12:43:26 PM »
Jeez,

After all that 'god' is still a c,unt and still don't exist  :-X
*

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2015, 12:44:16 PM »
Not only is it slightly incorrect, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION.

Every fossil is a transitional fossil, show me the half bird half human peanut butter? where is that.

James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #21 on: March 10, 2015, 12:44:50 PM »
Not only is it slightly incorrect, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION.

Every fossil is a transitional fossil, show me the half bird half human peanut butter? where is that.

Show me evidence of your fairy. Any evidence. Anything will do.
*

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2015, 12:46:48 PM »
Show me evidence of your fairy. Any evidence. Anything will do.

You aren't all that bright are you. I could go in several directions here, let's try insult.

There is no evidence of evolution moron, why are there still monkeys?

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2015, 12:48:32 PM »
You aren't all that bright are you. I could go in several directions here, let's try insult.

There is no evidence of evolution moron, why are there still monkeys?
because a branch evolved and another didnt? Why two similar branch of evolution couldnt coexist ?

Most dinosaurs evolved to become birds, while other reptilian branches of evolution like crocodiles and snakes stayed similar -althought they decreased in size over time- and coexisted until now.

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #24 on: March 10, 2015, 12:50:36 PM »
Not only is it slightly incorrect, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION.

Every fossil is a transitional fossil, show me the half bird half human peanut butter? where is that.

Prototype of evolutionist argument:
[Insert comic book representation of how science works]
[insert red herring]
Creationism says [insert strawman]
We actually observe [evolutionist misrepresentation of the facts]
Therefore [insert non sequitur]
Insert [dishonest allegation of creationist quote-mining]
And so the only conceivable explanation is [argument from atheist ignorance]
Q. E. D.