No one in their right mind would believe Mike was natural. If so, you are saying that Mike Ashley had the greatest genetics of all-time. The guy went head-to-head with a roided out Strydom in his prime and consistently crushed other admitted users. He took second to Shawn Ray at the Arnold when Shawn failed his drug test. Ask yourself: Why in the world would a superior genetically gifted bodybuilder like Shawn have to take drugs to beat a natural guy like Mike Ashley?? If you really believe Mike had more muscle, better density, and was in better condition and came in drier than 99% of his competitors without juice, you truly have no understanding of what drugs do.
Think about it. The Ashley of 1986 was light years ahead of the absolute best natural competitor in 2006 - TWENTY YEARS of knowledge, superior supplementation, more efficient machines, and egg whites in a jar, and no one even remotely resembles this guy's level of muscle, density and condition. Bitch please!
Shawn would set you straight, but he's afraid Mike might skip out on the Colorado Pro.
Special "SeaGullible" Ed
No question about it , drugs do add size and a freaky look that is needed to win today.
If shawn failed the test at that ASC, how come at least Mike passed it, if he was on. Hmmm, no matter, Shawn stayed in the game and ended his involvement sport with one of the most impressive careers or any top pro, even better than a a couple Mr O's like Dickerson or Sammir.
GENETICS is the real "secret" to being a top bodybuilder, singer or pro athlete. Drugs can't turn a horse jockey into Mr O , can they? hehe
On a serious note, unlike most sports , the drug myth keeps the insane dream alive for a lot of wannabe pros out there with lousy genetics. The truth and reality is a tough pill to swallow for some, kinda like W and his belief on how great Iraq is going
