I guess the Mr Olympia judges were brainwashed too , and the writers for all the bodybuilding magazines , bottom line , whether you like his physique or not , no one can deny Dorian was a winner , right from the get go , he entered 17 Pro contests and won 15 of them , thats a 88% win average , he never placed lower than second in a contest , and was only beaten twice , he dominated the sport at the time he competed , he changed the standard for years to come , he was so much better than he needed to be to win , to call him overrated his nonsense ,
if you don't like his physique thats fine but do say he was overrated shows your biased and your lack of knowlege , almost 10 years after he retired he is still being talked about.
see that is where you are dead wrong. I have a musclemag from 1994 and it TRASHES Yates in the 1994 Olympia. You can't believe everything you read, especially from WEIDER sources. You really think that Flex magazine is going to trash its Mr. Olympia?? I don't think so. You can't change this fact:
Yates in 1994, 1996 and 1997 was about as flawed as a Mr. Olympia can get. Far more glaring flaws than Ronnie ever had, even at his worst, and the flaws were on MAJOR bodyparts, like arms and legs, not minor ones that the judges and everyone else doesn't care about, like calves.. Refer to my list of 14-odd things if you need to refresh you memory.
And, I laugh at how you call me biased, this coming from someone who has argued the most BIZARRE arguments on bb message board history (and most of them involving trashing Ronnie (arms, quads etc) against people with clearly inferior ones (eg. Yates arms, whom you argued were better than Ronnie's, and arnolds toothpicks, just to name a few)
You have become so desparate in your attempt to argue that 1994 yates was amazing that you have to use quotes from a weider-owned publication to support your arguments.
You can't even use Yates actual physique.
That is the very definition of desperation
