Trump = Winning

[Dos Equis]

It would have been the complete opposite if we had Biden or Harris.

2.5M Illegal Aliens Out of U.S. Since January
Catherine Salgado  | December 11, 2025
https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/12/11/25m-illegals-out-of-us-since-january-n4946939

[loco]

You come in proving Negrosis wrong with examples and he has to downplay your evidence and poopoo it in order to hold onto some liberal grudge he has against his future president (after we make canada #51)

 

[Necrosis]

Go away for another extended period Pronoun Boy.
You weren't missed or wanted back.

Just FUCK OFF & STAY FUCKED OFF.

free advice
HTH
👊🏻  😄

you looking for dick pics?

[Grape Ape]

It would have been the complete opposite if we had Biden or Harris.

I would love to ask Harris:

"You claimed you needed a bipartisan bill to close the border.  Trump did it in one day.  Why did you claim to need the bill?"

The bill has had billions for Ukraine, and normalized 5k illegal crossings per day.....but we wouldn't likely get to that.

[illuminati]

you looking for dick pics?

Thats you as you keep mentioning such things.

Are you going to threaten me with violence again    Pronoun Boy.
You must be so upset living in such a useless country - No 8 on that list.


Now run along & Fuck off.

[Necrosis]

Correct, still the #1 largest economy in the world under Trump.

ya but thats a meaningless metric. If the worlds strongest man gets weaker but is still the worlds strongest man is he doing good relative to his position? you would have to admit things were great under biden if this is your logic.

Powell just said inflation is up, you guys are likely losing 20k jobs a month and things are heading in the wrong direction due to tariffs aka his policies.

[LurkerNoMore]

Wrapping up a week of #winning huh?   Well for Letitia James it is.  Again.   

Second indictment attempt just got shit on and tossed.  You know, I have never seen anything so incompetent as these lawyers trying to appease the orange turd.   Oh wait.... yes I have.  In the Sidney Reid fiasco.  The DOJ failed THREE TIMES to obtain a felony indictment against her.  So in a complete bitch ass move, they reduced the case to a misdemeanor.  And then lost that case at trial.   

[LurkerNoMore]

Next up from the dumpster fire of an administration are these new "Trump Gold Cards".  Basically you pay $1M for a green card to the US.  No one wants to mention that just earlier this year, the cost was stated as $5M.

I don't know who the bigger idiot will be.  The orange twatcicle that has to explain why they are not selling like the hot cakes he promised.  Or the few idiots who actually purchase one and never receive it.      It's being mailed out with the Trumpy phones I suppose.   

[chaos]

How bored are you?

[Grape Ape]

Wrapping up a week of #winning huh?   Well for Letitia James it is.  Again.   

Second indictment attempt just got shit on and tossed.  You know, I have never seen anything so incompetent as these lawyers trying to appease the orange turd.   Oh wait.... yes I have.  In the Sidney Reid fiasco.  The DOJ failed THREE TIMES to obtain a felony indictment against her.  So in a complete bitch ass move, they reduced the case to a misdemeanor.  And then lost that case at trial.   

I don't care about her personal life.

The case needs to be overturned on the basis of it's own merit, and then she and the judge should be penalized for the weaponization of the judicial system.

[LurkerNoMore]

I don't care about her personal life.

The case needs to be overturned on the basis of it's own merit, and then she and the judge should be penalized for the weaponization of the judicial system.

I didn't say anything about her personal life.

Isn't what she, Comey and Reid went through a true definition of weaponization of the judicial system?  Unlike what the orange buffoon cries about, they actually were not found guilty. 

Should the Administration be penalized for multiple failed attempts to get a guilty verdict?   If this isn't the definition of legal harassment, then I don't know what is.  This is sort of the same thing that Fatso tried when he called GA and told them to "find me the votes".   

I bet you are going to cry when these people file legal motions of their own over the harassment. 

[Primemuscle]

I didn't say anything about her personal life.

Isn't what she, Comey and Reid went through a true definition of weaponization of the judicial system?  Unlike what the orange buffoon cries about, they actually were not found guilty. 

Should the Administration be penalized for multiple failed attempts to get a guilty verdict?   If this isn't the definition of legal harassment, then I don't know what is.  This is sort of the same thing that Fatso tried when he called GA and told them to "find me the votes".   

I bet you are going to cry when these people file legal motions of their own over the harassment.

Which they should definitely do... not that they will get anywhere with their lawsuits in our current political environment. Maybe they should wait a year or three when the tides have turned.

[LurkerNoMore]

Thursday... you know, yesterday....  was an EPIC day of winning.

The aforementioned James indictment being tossed was a follow through bitchslap.  The orange dust in the air hasn't settled yet.

Trumpy's power grab in Indiana failed hilariously spectacular.  Even funnier is when he tried to play it off like it was no big deal and he wasn't very involved with it.    Except by whining, begging, and threatening the GOP members that they better vote his way.  But they said "no".  And then sided with the Dem minority. 

House Republicans voted to approved a bipartisan measure to restore collective bargaining rights for nearly one million federal workers, effectively nullifying a prior Trump executive order.

And - to the surprise of no one - he failed again to share any details or offer any insight to his "concept of a plan" for the upcoming healthcare issue.

Prepare for a long weekend of social media screeching and lying.

[AbrahamG]

Thursday... you know, yesterday....  was an EPIC day of winning.

The aforementioned James indictment being tossed was a follow through bitchslap.  The orange dust in the air hasn't settled yet.

Trumpy's power grab in Indiana failed hilariously spectacular.  Even funnier is when he tried to play it off like it was no big deal and he wasn't very involved with it.    Except by whining, begging, and threatening the GOP members that they better vote his way.  But they said "no".  And then sided with the Dem minority. 

House Republicans voted to approved a bipartisan measure to restore collective bargaining rights for nearly one million federal workers, effectively nullifying a prior Trump executive order.

And - to the surprise of no one - he failed again to share any details or offer any insight to his "concept of a plan" for the upcoming healthcare issue.

Prepare for a long weekend of social media screeching and lying.

You must be binge watching Rachel Maddow.   

[Grape Ape]

I didn't say anything about her personal life.

Isn't what she, Comey and Reid went through a true definition of weaponization of the judicial system?  Unlike what the orange buffoon cries about, they actually were not found guilty. 

Should the Administration be penalized for multiple failed attempts to get a guilty verdict?   If this isn't the definition of legal harassment, then I don't know what is.  This is sort of the same thing that Fatso tried when he called GA and told them to "find me the votes".   

I bet you are going to cry when these people file legal motions of their own over the harassment.

No.  Not even close.

Comey may have been a piece in a scheme by the left to remove a sitting President, based on a known phony dossier.

Trump is now investigating his role.

So, in your mind, example one is not weaponization, but but example two is?

If I have that wrong, can you explain your position here?

Also, the James' real estate was not thrown out on it's merit, but by a judge who deemed the appointment of the specific prosecutor illegal.  It doesn't mean she was innocent. But like I said, I don't care.  She should be punished if the real estate case against trump gets overturned.  Reports were that in appeal it was going very poorly for the prosecution, to the point where he attorneys were worried about getting sanctioned.  I'd have to dig in a bit to confirm though, as I'm going off memory there.

[Grape Ape]

Which they should definitely do... not that they will get anywhere with their lawsuits in our current political environment. Maybe they should wait a year or three when the tides have turned.

Why is Comey being harassed?

Should the admin not investigate his role?

[LurkerNoMore]

You must be binge watching Rachel Maddow.   

Direct from The Onion.  Except it's not.

[LurkerNoMore]

No.  Not even close.

Comey may have been a piece in a scheme by the left to remove a sitting President, based on a known phony dossier.

Trump is now investigating his role.

So, in your mind, example one is not weaponization, but but example two is?

If I have that wrong, can you explain your position here?

Also, the James' real estate was not thrown out on it's merit, but by a judge who deemed the appointment of the specific prosecutor illegal.  It doesn't mean she was innocent. But like I said, I don't care.  She should be punished if the real estate case against trump gets overturned.  Reports were that in appeal it was going very poorly for the prosecution, to the point where he attorneys were worried about getting sanctioned.  I'd have to dig in a bit to confirm though, as I'm going off memory there.

No, what I am saying is that based on your claim about weaponization, both cases would meet that distinction.  As far as merits go, Trumpy was convicted on the merits of his case. 

These morons now can't even get a case to court it seems.  But then again, you kind of expect that because no half way decent attorney is going to work with a corrupt client like he is.

[Grape Ape]

No, what I am saying is that based on your claim about weaponization, both cases would meet that distinction.  As far as merits go, Trumpy was convicted on the merits of his case. 

These morons now can't even get a case to court it seems.  But then again, you kind of expect that because no half way decent attorney is going to work with a corrupt client like he is.

He was convicted, and the amount levied against him was thrown out because it was so excessive it was deemed unconstitutional.   So that right there should be a red flag.

If it was someone else besides Trump who did the exact same thing, do you believe this case would have been tried?

[Primemuscle]

Why is Comey being harassed?

Should the admin not investigate his role?

James Comey was investigated multiple times by the Justice Department and the IRS during and after Trump's first term, stemming from the Russia investigation and his handling of sensitive information.

[Grape Ape]

James Comey was investigated multiple times by the Justice Department and the IRS during and after Trump's first term, stemming from the Russia investigation and his handling of sensitive information.

Yes, he was investigated and testified in 2020.

Now he's being indicted for lying and therefore obstruction during it.

Why is that harassment?

Should they let it slide?

[Primemuscle]

Yes, he was investigated and testified in 2020.

Now he's being indicted for lying and therefore obstruction during it.

Why is that harassment?

Should they let it slide?

The November indictment was voided. He may be indicted again if the proscution refiles and if the statute of limitations has not expired.

[Grape Ape]

The November indictment was voided. He may be indicted again if the proscution refiles and if the statute of limitations has not expired.

It was overturned based on the appointment of the specific prosecutor, not on the basis of its own merit.  We know this.

But that's not what I asked you - do you think they should not bring charges against Comey, and that they're just harassing him? 

If the Grand Jury felt there was enough evidence to bring two charges against him, before the judge ruled the prosecuting attorney was not appointed legally, why would you feel it's harassment?.

[illuminati]

It was overturned based on the appointment of the specific prosecutor, not on the basis of its own merit.  We know this.

But that's not what I asked you - do you think they should not bring charges against Comey, and that they're just harassing him? 

If the Grand Jury felt there was enough evidence to bring two charges against him, before the judge ruled the prosecuting attorney was not appointed legally, why would you feel it's harassment?.

Wasting your time asking him anything - he's just not mentally capable of giving a straigh
Honest answer ,  he'll word salad the reply / Feign ignorance/ stupidity or just ignore.

Helpless case - The TDS has destroyed any semblance of normal functioning brain cells.

[Grape Ape]

Wasting your time asking him anything - he's just not mentally capable of giving a straigh
Honest answer ,  he'll word salad the reply / Feign ignorance/ stupidity or just ignore.

Helpless case - The TDS has destroyed any semblance of normal functioning brain cells.

I try to ask because I think at the root of this stuff, we do want the same things.

I would think that anyone would be fundamentally against an attempted removal of a duly elected sitting American President, regardless of who it was.

But because it's Trump, everything seems to get thrown out the window.