Moron is my new default for everyone on here that doesn't agree with me.
I'm interested in hearing the reason why you think what I said it's flawed, as there are several different arguments that can easily be put forward.
It is possible I misunderstood what you wrote. Assuming I did not, this is my reason for saying your thought was flawed:
Assuming there is a relationship between good health and life span, would not a shorter life mean that the onset of age related compromised health also occur at a younger age? My take is that you meant since people did not live as long there would be much fewer getting sick and/or dying from covid.
It is my opinion that there indeed would have been fewer cases and fatalities in terms of the actual number of people This would be because the population was much less and perhaps because fewer people lived in crowded conditions. It would not be because they didn't live as long. Percentage-wise the relative number of those getting sick and dying would actually have been greater because medical science is more advanced now then it was in earlier times.
Since we cannot change history and a far as we know covid did not exist, this issue makes almost no difference in today's prevention and treatment today. I am not sure what we would learn from exploring this.