Just Wanted to Get This Off My Chest

[wes]

Sadly, yes. - that's what happens in war.  I suppose bombing Dresden [which was nothing more than the Allies having a dick-measuring contest with a dead man at that point] was ok to you?  Tell me, friend - WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

The difference is - Jews own the mainstream media and Big Tech, and got you to think that one is wrong, while one you may never have heard of.

As Jews don't have a nation [well - at the time], you could say that for historic Jews in the diaspora, "their race was their nation".  Does that make sense?  So when the financial interests of England and France clashed, you'd get a war...right?  But when the interests of Jewish and White nobility clashed, you'd get a pogrom.

You can't exactly fight a war against a people that exist in no nation.  Hence all the "pogroms" Jews have been through.  This is hardly any different than my people [the English] having fought however many wars against the French throughout the years, and however many dying...but because Jews have no nation, they get attacked as a people.

But here's the thing - in the end, during war, we ALL get attacked as a people.  Jews simply use the historical fact that they exist in a diaspora to claim they have been victims of genocide more, but ALL WARFARE IS GENOCIDAL.  When France and England fought many of their wars, were the French not trying to kill as many of my people as possible?

Just to clarify the Jewish claims of being victims of genocide rather than warfare.  Yeah, tell my grandmother who lost one of her two brothers who fought in WWII that, I'm sure that will make her feel much better about his TERRIBLE DEATH. 

Here's the thing to remember, International Jewry [this was the term used at the time, equivalent today to "Negro" today, so you can call it "Jewish Elites", if you prefer] were giving more than ample warning from Hitler, from start to finish.  Examples:

[1] International Jewry boycotts all of Germany, permanently, in 1933.  Just look up "Judea Declares War on Germany", from March 24th, 1933.  Hitler - a vegetarian, who enacted some of the strongest animal rights laws in existence, because he was a good man, who loved his people - responded.  How did he respond?

By boycotting Jewish businesses for one day.  FOR ONE DAY.  Meanwhile, 1/3 of Germany's economy was now screwed because Jews used their international networks of White contacts to stop trading with Germans.  The Jewish loss alone would have been substantial, but fine - I take no issue with Jews ending their business with Germany over Hitler having realistic views on the consistent Jewish negative influence on White goyim society [because as we all know, if you don't spend your life kissing Jewish ass like me, you are "antisemitic"].  But to go and get other Whites around the world involved with this?  I'm sorry, but that's just agitation.  And, despite 1/3 of Germany's economy now crippled because of Jewish meddling, Hitler responded with ONE DAY of boycotts against Jewish businesses:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_boycott_of_Jewish_businesses

Quote
The Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses (German: Judenboykott) in Germany began on April 1, 1933 [AND ENDED ON THIS DATE - DO YOU SEE HOW THIS PIECE MISLEADS YOU?  THEY LEAVE THE DATE OPEN, TO BRAINWASH DUMB WHITES INTO THINKING THIS WAS WHEN JEWISH PERSECUTION STARTED IN GERMANY], and was claimed to be a defensive reaction [no shit - what the hell else would you call it?] to the Anti-Nazi Boycott, which had been initiated in March 1933. It was largely unsuccessful [LMAO!!!  I thought evil Germans hated Jews, and Hitler was an evil monster / Jew-hater?  Yet this was "largely unsuccessful"?  That's not consistent with the anti-German narrative - when you lie, heck, even when you tell the truth, always remember "The Law of Unintended Consequences"], as the German population continued to use Jewish businesses, but revealed the intent of the Nazis to undermine the viability of Jews in Germany.

HAHAHAHA, "Anti-Nazi" Boycott.  That term would actually make sense with some of the stigma it carried if the date was April 1, 1943.  But this was in 1933.  Hitler nor any German as a direct result or political allegiance with his party had not killed ONE JEW, or ordered the death or ANYTHING related to Jews at this point.  NOTHING.  So what this blurb about "Nazis" really means is "Jews hate any goyim who elect nationalistic leaders, so we're going to make up terms to smear them."

[2] Check out this one [and keep in mind that Jews ALWAYS overplay their hand]:

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild stayed in Austria far too long, and while attempting to flee, was arrested at the Austrian border:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild

Quote
After the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, he was arrested at the airport at Aspern and taken into custody by the Nazis because he was a distinguished member of the Jewish oligarchy. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.

And...do you know how much $21 million represented?  Well - $459 million in today's dollars.  How rich is this family to shell out almost half a billion dollars for a family member?  The Rothschild family controlled one billion in assets by 1850, but as I said, I strongly believe Hitler BADLY wrecked their banks, hence the NONSTOP lies and movies and filth said about this man.

I couldn't help but notice all these Jewish-produced movies about Hitler fail to point out that Germans were starving, and committing suicide in skyrocketing numbers because of debt owed to Jewish banks.  Just the AUDACITY of Jews not to mention this makes me sick.  When I learned all this - I was SHOCKED.  I went in a massive resentment phase I came out of in 2016, but have since gone back in.  But to say so many bad things about Germany, and to leave out [for example] THIS:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Seriously?  SERIOUSLY?  OH, SMALL LITTLE DETAIL - MOVE ALONG DUMB GOY.  GO BE A GOOD GOY.

Oh - but here's the kicker.  As I alluded to above, Germans were starving and dying/committing suicide due to the ridiculous amount of usury imposed on them from the Jewish investment banks.

Do you know how much Hitler asked back from the Rothschild bank?  Well - as shown above - $21 million.  But do you know what that represents?

IT REPRESENTS HOW MUCH MONEY THE AUSTRIAN BANK OF ROTHSCHILD RIPPED OFF FROM THE AUSTRIAN BRANCH IN THE COLLAPSE OF 1934.

Yet AGAIN, more evidence that Hitler was a good person.  He didn't FINANCIALLY EVISCERATE the Rothschild family [shit - he would have been WELL within his rights to have them all executed, but most took off as refugees while he rose to power].  But no - he simply asked for the money back that the Rothschilds STOLE from the Austrian people - that's it!

[3] Last one:

After Hitler captured France, and had 3x the power of the Allies, he STILL CALLED FOR PEACE.  He allowed England to drop bombs on Germany for 3-4 months before finally retaliating.  At that point, it was probably too late to win the war.  But Hitler's naivety, and wishing only for peace was ultimately what cost him the war.

So to answer your question:

In light of the 50,000 Germans who died in Danzig [Poland], despite Hitler's repeated calls for peace, despite asking that only the German women and CHILDREN be sent home [and was denied - FIVE ATTEMPTS AT PEACE FROM HITLER, ALL DENIED], and all his further attempts at peace denied...

It makes me sad to write this.  Just knowing that I was lied to by cognitively superior Jews.  Lies, lies, lies.  Jews never do anything bad - just ask a Palestinian.

I'll put it this way...

No, I won't, actually.

Go watch "The Hitler Speech They Don't Want you to Hear" on Bitchute.  It was removed from YouTube after hitting something like a million views, and 50,000 Likes, with a 95% Like to Dislike ratio.

I know I'm the only person willing to SAY these things, but I have been doing some mathematical calculating lately, and as of right now, I am confident that there are more White males with my views on Jews than there are...Jews.  Period.

Antisemitism truly is the highest since WWII, and now is not the time to do shit like have Biden give preferential treatment to non-White-owned businesses, etc.

Don't poke the White bear further than you already have.

But hey - just like in WWII: both sides are doubling down.  The difference is - it's been the left agitating and destroying property and demanding rights in the name of privileges for years, if not decades now.  White right-wing males have just sat back and taken it.

Remember last time, 65+ million people died, and only 15% were "Nazis" [or Italian Fascists, or anyone else from The Axis].

My suggestion is - don't.

But hey, it's just advice. 

tl;dr:

In all wars pregnant women get shot and killed.  The fact that you think of Jews as being special exceptions to this rule [they're NOT], is evidence of exactly what I'm talking about - which is just how psychologically controlled White goyim are by Jewish media.  AT LEAST 65 million people died during WWII.  For you to think of Jews as somehow special [when arguably, they were the agitators who caused BOTH world wars], is very typical of Jewish brainwashing of goyim.

That said, I acknowledge that Jews are intellectually superior to Whites.

So anything I say about Jewish power is said through the lens of "I acknowledge that Jews are smarter than Whites."

So for as much of a "White Supremacist" as I may be...I recognize high average Jewish IQ.  It's a fact.

[wes]

Haha, neither would group bashing White Americans would have been acceptable to me, but we only had one Black teacher at the school who came from Haiti.  For some reason, he studied in the USA, but ultimately settled in Canada.  Imagine coming from a dump like Haiti, and then migrant shopping until you get to Canada.  Like WTF problem did he have in the USA?  Probably too many Black people, lmao.

The teachers who taught this sort of rhetoric [in hindsight, only one I remember with certainty, but maybe a second or third one] annoyed me because we we clearly being taught at a young age that hating people based on group membership is wrong, AND THEN THEY WOULD GO ON HATING WHITE PEOPLE [specifically Americans, in the one prominent case I still distinctly remember].

I can't even tell you how annoying this was.  I felt like hipolita meija was shitting in my brain.  And you could still smell it from the Greater Columbus Convention Center. 

Sounds to me like you attending an even more batshit insane leftist school / school with more batshit insane leftist teachers.


HAHAHAHA.  At this point, who on earth thinks we had anything but a bad flu season this year, if that?

The excess mortality stats are coming out now, and it's not looking like we had any "pandemic".  We had a worse than average flu season, and quite a few extra suicides and other deaths due to economic loss.  From what I can tell, at least half the deaths are not in the same age group as those dying of COVID, so it's almost as if no pandemic happened at all, WHICH IS FUNNILY ENOUGH, EXACTLY WHAT MY LYING EYES TELL ME.

Does ONE Getbigger even feel like we've just been through a pandemic?  EVEN ONE?  If so - speak now or forever hold your peace.

Also, even if we did have X number of excess deaths of 85-year-old's...that's sad of course...but there is both excess mortality and "years lost".  The average 85-year-old is ALREADY OLDER THAN THE AVERAGE HUMAN LIFESPAN.

Meaning that these people lost maybe two years of their life, haha.

Again, I want ANY Getbigger who even sensed we are in a "pandemic" to say so.  Let's do a count.

I normally wait to watch 50% of any given video before giving it a thumbs down, but I make exceptions for tools calling everything and everyone "Nazis".

For example...yes, Germany did have a boycott of Jewish merchants within Germany for one day - FOR ONE F*CKING DAY.  And Hitler imposed that after the world Jewish community got together to use their clout to impose a worldwide PERMANENT boycott on German goods.

So Arnold fails to mention the fact that JEWS imposed a PERMANENT boycott on German goods, but has the audacity to blame Germans, because of Hitler responding to that boycott with a boycott of Jewish goods for ONE F*CKING DAY.

FOR ONE F*CKING DAY.

Arnold needs to read this article [written by a Jew, no less], and then go suck some more Jewish cock:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

If the USA is so "racist", WHY DO NON-WHITES KEEP STREAMING INTO IT AT RECORD-BREAKING LEVELS?!  Stay in your sh*t countries if the USA is so "racist", for f*ck's sake!  Is anyone forcing these people from living in a superior White country?  NO!

There's no way Arnold [someone here called him Trump's version of Lou  ], isn't aware of this:

[wes]

HAHAHAHA, WHO THE F*CK ANYTHING THAT LONG?

Has anyone here read "War and Peace"?  I haven't.

My phone...you may have noticed [or may not have noticed] the photos of my house I posted from my phone yesterday.  It's a piece of garbage Android.  Maybe I'm just saying that because the camera sucks though...but yeah, I should immediately start posting on here from my phone, to achieve my reduced post goal, as stated. 

It didn't take me very long to write [I type fast], and from time to time, I do wish to post a long spiel like that.

Thank you for reminding me to post from my phone though.    Yes, I should immediately.

I know I'm not the only one on here who went through a relationship that bad with a woman...in fact, I read the stats are something over 50% [depends on the study you look at, but most point to a majority].

And men keep getting into relationships for some reason?    I'm fairly sure the data is pretty clear that men who do not get married are happier.  The only time single men are less happy is among men only recently broken up, and the reason they are unhappy is NOT because they are single - but because they are getting over their breakup.

I cannot recommend any more strongly to NOT enter into a relationship with women [just f*ck them as needed].  But to each their own.

Lastly...if any Getbiggers have stopped watching porn, I don't think it's embarrassing to say.  My friend told me that it gives your brain a reward similar to sex, and acquiring sex is something which keeps us on track to achieve our goals.  For example, we work out partially due to the award being that we get more access to sex.  But if porn is freely given to us...our brains will stop being motivated to achieve other goals.

That's how he explained it.  Also, I think porn culture just seems vile...especially after watching 13 minutes of the revolting documentary on Netflix, Rocco.

[wes]

LOL!!!  That's actually funny, and it [plus R.A.M.'s post below yours] leads into another funny story:

I have mentioned [or whined about] here and there on Getbig that I have stopped talking to all new women [that I refuse to meet any new women - period, end of].  I did this starting January 1st, 2019, as a new year's resolution of sorts.  This was because of wretched, gaslighting, complete slut, drug-addicted [opiates and benzos] piece of garbage I was seeing from around Early April of 2018, and ending by the time October 2018 rolled around.  And she was out of my life by 2019-01-01, which is when I decided no new women EVER again.

Just take this example - she needed money to help get over her previous boyfriend, which included me buying her a queen size bed, among other things.  When I realized she had been using money on drugs [opiates - specifically Percocet], and was 10 days into a bender on them, I calmly/politely told her that had to stop.

Three days later, she asked me again.  I lost my sh*t.  Money had NOTHING to do with it.  I never held back from spending anything on her.  I simply didn't want her to potentially become addicted to drugs [likely to have already at the least started] because of access to my money.  I put my foot down in a stern way [which was swollen to the size of my shoe, and I had to go check it out at the Emergency Room later that night], and she started crying.  Because the lying sack of sh*t had "PTSD" from her previous ex-boyfriend, I couldn't give her a hug because I thought that would be pushing boundaries [later, I found that the b*tch had watched every rape-themed porn movie on my Amazon Prime account - and with that information, was able to get her to admit she watches ACTUAL rape porn].  Meanwhile, she was telling me how delicate she was, from years of being abused by men [AND she later told me, while drunk, that she slept with over 30+ men, and she was not yet 30 by the time of this happening].

The next day after telling her I would not be giving her more money that would ultimately go to fuel a growing drug habit, she said "If you talk to me like that, we can't advance as a couple."

Here's the thing, and here's what's so INSANE about this entire incident - I have only been "in love" twice in my life: once in high school in 2000 [age 18] which ended DISASTROUSLY, and then this incident, 18 years later [age 36] in 2018.

Had this been any other time with any other woman, and a woman essentially said "You need to give me money to buy drugs or we can't "advance as a couple" or "advance our relationship" " or whatever she said, I would have said "GO F*CK YOURSELF.  GTFO of my house, and come back when you are opiate-free, you piece of shit.

Then later, when it was clear she didn't want to be with me, I said [given that I was "in love" with her, which I now DEFINITIVELY see is no different than eating tacos, from the perspective of your brain chemistry], "When you said you didn't want to be with me, I guess I was happy you still needed to depend on me, because at least I got to see you."

Somehow, this garbage piece of sh*t human said "I have absolutely no doubt that you would have purposely made me depend on you for money for drugs, so that I would therefore be depending on on."

I was like "B*TCH - IF THAT WAS THE CASE, WHY WOULDN'T I HAVE INSISTED WE FUCK - YOU SPENT $20,000 OF MY MONEY AND WE DIDN'T EVEN HOLD HANDS BY THE TIME I HIT THE 10K MARK, AND MY MENTAL HEALTH WAS COLLAPSING OVER IT.  I COULD INSISTED WE FUCK, OR YOU WOULD HAVE *HAD* TO GO INTO OPIATE WITHDRAWAL, BUT I DIDN'T DO THAT, YOU PIECE OF SH*T.  AND THE FOUR MOST RECENT WOMEN I WAS SLEEPING WITH, I WASN'T TALKING TO, BECAUSE I WAS WAITING TO SEE WHERE THINGS WENT WITH US."

[plot twist: being annoyed with this whole situation, I fucked all four of those women in August of 2018 - but the POINT is, had I been "taking advantage" of her via her depending on me for money, wouldn't it have made sense that I used it to get sex from her?  In reality, we didn't even kiss or hold hands...she even said "after me spending $10K on her "Do you think spending money on me entitles you to hold my hand?"

I was like "WTF?!"  No, I didn't think "spending money" somehow entitles a man to intimacy with a woman, but I THINK SPENDING $10,000 ON SOMEONE AND GOING COMPLETELY OUT OF YOUR WAY TO HELP AN ALLEGEDLY BATTERED WOMAN START HER LIFE AGAIN AFTER BUYING HER A QUEEN SIZE BED AND BEING HER SHOULDER TO CRY ON DAY AFTER DAY WHILE DRIVING HER EVERYWHERE AND FOREGOING RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER WOMEN, WHEN THE WOMAN YOU ARE DOING THAT FOR EXPLICITLY SAID SHE IS INTERESTED IN YOU AND INTERESTING IN SEEING IF THINGS WILL WORK ENTITLES A MAN TO AT LEAST HOLD HER HAND TO GET THE MINIMUM PEACE OF MIND NEEDED TO KNOW HE ISN'T BEING USED FOR MONEY.

Also, having seen her reply to a post on "Feminist Daily" on Facebook, I asked if she was a Facebook, stating that if she was, we could not talk.  She then posted about Rape Culture, and that should have been it.  And normally, that WOULD have been it - and this is why I NEVER want to fall in love again, and this is why I will simply never meet any new women ever again - it's simply not worth the risk of falling in love with another piece of sh*t leach like her.

I mean - I can understand a woman being like "No, you can't f*ck me after just buying me lunch."  But to do everything in my power to ameliorate this woman's life and for her to deny HAND-HOLDING, which I only even asked for to get the peace of mind to know I wasn't being used...I think THAT is more than reasonable to ask for.  And to think I had female friends over the year I could have been sleeping with all the way through but I was holding out for her.

It just boggles my mind to think - what are the odds that both the woman I cared about more and did more for than ANY other woman in my life also happened to be the woman who did the LEAST for me, and took advantage of me in the most egregious way?  I can't pretend that me getting women has been much of a challenge in my adult life, because it hasn't been.  And yet THIS happened to me...it's so strange.

Oh...then later I found out she was with some bum.  On his Facebook, he was saying he couldn't pay back to a $264 tax bill because he spent the money on groceries, and that at the very least, he should be allowed to pay it back in two lump sums, since he got it in two lump sums.  I sent her a text, and at first she denied that her boyfriend had a Facebook [which was technically true, because this was an account he used a few years earlier...what a coincidence though - same name, same occupation, same mutual friends, LMAO].  So then I said "Oh hey, well I read on your boyfriend's old Facebook account that he's in a bit of a rut right now.  Does your boyfriend need my help buying his groceries?"  LMAO...and she LOST HER SH*T.

HAHAHAHAHAHA, all along, the f*cking loser was just looking for a man to control.  But she kept giving me one stupid reason after another for not dating me.  Oh - and being racist online was possibly the biggest reason.  But ultimately, had I just agreed to stop posting "controversial posts" [unlikely I would do that for a woman unless we were having children or something], the issue would have still been that I have my own house, car, rack of trophies from lightweight strongman contests, two university degrees and two minors [she's a janitor], etc.  And ultimately she was looking for a man who was "beneath" her.

For perspective, when she told her new boyfriend that she wanted to get married, he was a bit reserved about it.  She said "I can just  get another boyfriend then", and then apparently he had flowers delivered to her work.  HAHAHAHA, what a f*cking loser.

WHO SAYS THAT TO THEIR SPOUSE DURING THE HONEYMOON PHASE?!  I mean, how much must someone care about you in order to say that?

Likewise, I was treated terribly by this b*tch, and I should have known better - but that's the issue with "love", or even thinking maybe you might be in love.  It's a very dangerous emotion, IMO, and because I could NOT have done more for a person who could NOT have taken advantage of me more, I will NEVER meet a new woman ever again.

I AM ONLY NOW JUST RECOVERED!  Admittedly, if not for COVID...I'd probably be killing it.  In fact, things are going well for me in all areas BUT regular works [since they are not possible in Ontario right now].

Oh...and I spent $6,000 for this POS to reduce her Percocet addiction, and in the end, SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO REDUCE OR STOP.  I later [July 2019] found out from a mutual friend that she had been addicted for FIVE YEARS!!!  That means her guilt-trip comment about my essentially financing her addiction was even worse - it's like "B*TCH, YOU WERE ADDICTED FOR YEARS, *AND* YOU TOLD ME WE COULDN'T BE A COUPLE IF I DIDN'T CONTINUE TO GIVE YOU MONEY, AFTER I EXPLICITLY TOLD YOU I WANTED IT TO STOP, BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT YOU TO BECOME ADDICTED."

To think of how many times I was sad because of something she said was my fault which was SOLELY OPIOID-WITHDRAWAL-RELATED.  WOW.

She also asked me if she should tell her boyfriend that she uses Percocet.  I was still naively of the mind that she wasn't addicted.  I mean...she would always say she stopped for a few days, and on those days, get them elsewhere with her own money.  I didn't know she was straight up hooked for 5+ years.  I said that she wasn't obliged to tell him, if he just does them here and there.  Later when I learned from the mutual friend the extent of her addiction, it was him who said "That's a horrible thing to bring into a relationship."

NO SH*T!  Had I known that, it would have changed EVERYTHING.  And she purposely made herself out like she didn't sleep with very many men too.  She once asked me "If I got a vibrator, would that make me a bad person?"  Later on I texted her that and said "Why are you worried about buying a vibrator?  YOU F*CKED 30 GUYS!"  LMAO @ this slut fucking everything with a dick in her twenties, and trying to pretend to me she was chaste.

Oh...and the "abusive boyfriend" was actually just fulfilling HER demands for BDSM, the sick f*ck.  But conveniently, she failed to tell me any of that.    The fact is, I was lied to SO MUCH with this POS, that I will never, EVER meet a new woman ever again.  I am just SO HAPPY I managed to recover from this with my life, because she drove me THAT insane.  She was, without any doubt, the WORST thing to have ever happened to me.  THE WORST.  I guess when you care about someone, you are more vulnerable...and only to find out that she - this piece of garbage - was in a bad mood routinely because of opioid withdrawal?  WOW!  How many times did I believe her when she said it was something I did, and it was ONLY withdrawal that caused her mood swings.  My mom met her with powder in her nose [from snorting Percocet], and she said "Anyone could tell she was an addict".  I was like...uhh...if you see a drunk person, that doesn't tell you that they are an alcoholic, and if someone EXPLICITLY TELLS ME THEY ARE NOT ADDICTED, WTF am I supposed to think?

So yeah, my trust mechanism is now completely destroyed, and I cannot even FATHOM what I will do if any woman attempts to talk to me in person.  I can barely stand when a woman at a store approaches me WITH REASON to tell me anything.  I can't IMAGINE if any woman tries to push any conversation with me.

So the Cole's Notes are:

- Got treated like complete garbage by a leach.
- As of 2019-01-01, I stopped meeting new women F-O-R-E-V-E-R!!!

And in conclusion that is why it's easy for me to remember 2019-05-01 as the date I stopped watching porn forever.

I was talking to a friend who had told me multiple times that porn is a negative good.  This was late April of 2019 - maybe April 24th.

From there, it was pretty easy to just make my start date for stop watching porn May 1st, and that is why I remember that date. 

As to any Getbiggers who have girlfriends or wives...I admire you guys.  Seriously, I do.  But I don't know how you do it.  Even the BEST women, from my experience, still demand a tremendous amount of resources, in order to fulfill them emotionally.

Women are just WAY to needy.  And they complained about getting dick?    No, I mean - is that SERIOUSLY the biggest problem women have with men?  "Oh, he tried to offer dick to me!  He tried to give me an orgasm!"

HAHAHAHAHA!  WOW.  Complaining girls.  Could you IMAGINE men going around "My girlfriend wants to suck my dick ALL THE TIME!  Her pussy is wet, and she demands taking my dick 2-3 times a day!  OH - THE HORROR!!!"

HAHAHAHA, and we believe these dumb b*tches when they complain about this!

I can tell you - I will NEVER meet a new woman ever again.  There is a 0% chance I will ever meet a new woman, but there is a 5% chance I will murder one.  So in case you're wondering about me being serious about never meeting a new woman ever again.

OH - I'M F*CKING SERIOUS.

I have about 15 female friends [my "girlfriends", as I call them], and I can't even tell you how much I LIKED women, before trying to devote to one.  So here I was with female friends who I cared for, and was nice to, and got sex from any time, yet the first one [well - since the very short relationship I had in 2000] who I went out of my way for like no other...treated me worse than I can possibly describe, and has made me despise women so much that I look at them as less than human.

Never in my life did I do more for a human being, and never was I treated worse.

I can't even FATHOM taking $20,000 of someone's money, knowing they explicitly stated they cared about you, and asked you to give them the same assurance, and do nothing for them.

It would be akin to me being with a woman for 4-6 months, having her cook and clean from me, and say give me blowjobs daily, then say "I can't kiss you because I have PTSD over my ex", and continue to take these things from this woman, and then she asks just to hold hands to ensure I'm not using her, and finally she has a mental breakdown feeling taken advantage of.

ANYONE hearing such a story would say "That guy is a piece of trash for doing that."

Incidentally, I told two WAY HOTTER and younger women what happened, and the POS said "You shouldn't tell them what happened."  I said "Why?  You know I told them what happened in context, and that I would defend you."  She replied "Yeah, but that makes me look like the villain."

What that means is that this piece of sh*t KNEW what she did was bad.  Let me tell - at one point I sent this b*tch a text and said "Remember the time you implied I didn't provide enough for the first mother of my children [because at one time we got into a dispute where she had blocked me, so I couldn't send her spousal support which is NOT court-ordered, by the way, since I pay for 100% of my childrens' bills to begin with].  I should have never tolerated you saying that - implying I'm not doing my job as a dad.  I should have split your f*cking head open over that."

YEP - THAT'S WHAT I SAID TO THIS PIECE OF SH*T, and I would have NO PROBLEM telling that to the world.  THAT is how much of a piece of garbage this woman was.

Because I'm NOT ashamed of saying it - not at ALL.  I actually SHOULD have given her a massive open-hand slap for what she did to me.  Because her comment about how her actions "make her look like a villain" are indicative to me that she KNEW I was vulnerable and had feelings for her, and she was purposely doing everything she could to show me her worst side, because she had been abused in her life, and she was really just taking out her abuse on me.

Incidentally, a bit later, I was with a new girlfriend [LONG story how I met her, LOL, since I wasn't even meeting new women], and she was hot and amazing, and just wonderful...and I knew to make it clear from the very beginning that I had things I could offer her, but in my state of mind, it was not the ideal time to be in a relationship.

And what's the end result of that more recent relationship?  Well - I knocked her up, but she miscarried in late 2019, unfortunately, but ultimately dumped me on August 1st of 2020 because I was still talking to other women [literally talking/texting - NOT seeing in person].

But at the end of the day, because she didn't take advantage of me, and because she knows I wasn't with those women sexually, we are still on good terms.

I am 100% certain we will get back together in the future.

Whereas that b*tch from 2018 was a straight-up parasite.  You would just HAVE to know that a person is NEVER going to talk to you again if you use them to THAT extent.  Again, could you imagine if I was accepting blowjobs from a woman DAILY for six months, then telling her "I can't kiss you because I'm still distraught over my previous breakup", and thinking that would end in ANY way except for that woman HATING YOU?

Part of why this situation makes no sense to me is because I just can't even fathom how a person would want to completely DESTROY a friendship with someone as hugely supportive as I am?  I can tell you that I have one friend who is very worried about his health because heart disease runs in his family.  Let me tell you - this guy means a lot to me, and I would hate to lose him.  And I can't even fathom being in a situation where I take advantage of him to the point that he never wants to talk to me again.

Think of the person you did more for that any other person in your life.  Now imagine that person doing everything they can to hate on you, be negative towards you, and treat you like garbage.  Does that make ANY sense?

Hence why I will never meet a new woman ever again.

And I stopped watching porn because I want the remaining women in my life to be special to me.  I want to actually be grateful to have them, and to not adapt my brain to scrolling over 20 thumbnails of different [fishy] vaginas to pick the best one, since that's NOT how it works in real life.

Again, I think porn in general is a negative good.  I don't think my assessment is far off, but I could be wrong.

Either way, I will never be watching porn again - or meeting any new women EVER again.  And I couldn't be happier about both decisions.

[wes]

LOL!!!  Wow...that was similar to what I remembered.  At first I thought she said "bombing the White House" [page one of this thread].  But then I thought "Nah...she must have said "I've thought about bringing a bomb to the White House".", because that doesn't technically denote a crime.

But I guess the truth was in between my two guesses...she did technically say she wanted to blow up the White House - but she did not use the word "bomb".  Even had she said "I have thought about bombing the White House"...well...in the USA, that speech, as far as I am aware, is legal.

Had she said "I want each and every one of you to learn how to acquire or build a bomb, and bring it to a federal building and [I'm sure you see where I'm going here]", THAT would be illegal, as it would be direct incitement.

To simply say "I have thought about the world blowing up" is NOT ILLEGAL.

Left-wingers are so utterly brainwashed by social justice that they think "hurt feelings" is illegal, these sacks of shit.

My issue wit the university is that I mentioned on here before is that they threatened to sue me as my status on Facebook still said I was an employee of the university [because Facebook CONSTANTLY changes how to change anything, and I just went to change it one day, and it wasn't the same place as it was before, and I just didn't think anything about it].  I went to tell the university administration that I changed my status and that I didn't want any further threatening letters sent to me, and they expelled me, stating that "Canning's eyes were dating around".  Uh...excuse me?    I didn't realize that my eyes shifting in my head was a crime. 

We'll just ignore the bit about university security physically assaulting me in the process of all this too. 

This is what happens when we raise generations of pussies who seem to think it's ok to literally encourage or commit complete violence against people depending on what group they are a part of [White people, males, right-wingers...in recent times, Asians are being discriminated against in the USA too, RE: Ivy League lawsuits, where Asians needed 1600 SAT scores to get the same admission seat that a Black American only needed a 1350 SAT score to get].  Meanwhile, if you are a certain group, it is ILLEGAL to even defend yourself.  An example is in Thunder Bay, where a White female police officer was called in to deal with a belligerent Indigenous person.  The Indigenous female repeatedly spat on the White female police officer who finally slapped her.

There was an outrage in the press, and it was later reported that the police officer was "charged" for slapping her.  In reality, she was NOT charged - no Crown Attorney would touch the case, because the video evidence was clear, which was that the Indigenous female ASSAULTED the police officer, and the police officer acted in self-defense.  In reality, the 21-year-old Indigenous woman should have been charged.

But instead, the White female police officer was "charged" under the bullshit Police Services Act.

It's clearly gotten to the point where more or less, out of four White people, at least one will know this is where things are going, and that's why we're starting to see a reversal of this horseshit [hence more Trumps will be elected, and if that doesn't work...well...this may now be the time to remind left-wingers that all the evil stuff they say about White men and White people is TRUE].

Just to think of the morons in this thread, who actually think that Trump saying that people should "fight" is considered incitement.  Could you IMAGINE how these morons would feel if they posted on Facebook "Go out to vote today" [even as Democrats], but that the result was that Republicans won, and the next day, they found themselves fired from their job for having encouraged people to vote because, in hindsight, the suggestion ultimately resulted in a Republican victory?

Seriously, could you IMAGINE?  They would be the first to say that's bullshit!

These idiots only feel the way they do because they are in power.  It's shocking how unprincipled they were.

I would have still been marginally annoyed if Democrats won the presidency, knowing that they are only still getting any victories at all because they keep importing more non-Whites to vote Democrat...but this election wasn't even remotely fair and free, as far as I can tell.  THAT is what bothers me.  If you gave me ample proof of a Republican win being rigged, I would be bothered by it.  It seems like the Democrats in general [or at least the ones here on Getbig] don't care how they win at all.

Except the day that this stuff impacts them...I'd be curious what they say then.

[wes]

Exactly.  I would even say that some of the comments, on both sides, is legal speech.  If I recall correctly [this was years ago], Madonna said something like "I have thought about bringing a bomb to the White House".  I know leftists are too moronic to grasp nuance, but technically speaking, she could be referring to a pre-detonated bomb that she bought in a private sale from a WWI museum or something.

I don't know the exact laws, but it wouldn't surprise me if owning a rusted century-old antique bomb that has already exploded, or is otherwise unusable, is legal.  And stating you are going to bring a legal object somewhere is probably legally protected speech.

As I said, I don't expect leftists to understand this, but even IF their statements are true, it wouldn't take long doing a tally to figure out that Democrats have made WAY more statements like this than Republicans have.

Just look at what the Schmayor of Portland did - Trump offered federal assistance in response to the 100+ days of property destruction, looting, and arson civil disobedience, and THIS is how the prick responds:

https://twitter.com/tedwheeler/status/1299433988600156160

 

Just count the property damage by Democrats and by Republicans and make a strict comparison.  I'm sorry, but how on earth can anyone even claim the right-wing is causing the most damage right now?

I remember the only election in my life that mattered to me was Bush II.  And for good reason - he started a war based on BLATANT, DISGUSTING, AND OBVIOUS LIES.  Does it really take a genius to figure out that if Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction THAT HE WOULD HAVE USED THEM ON THE FIRST DAY OF BEING INVADED BY THE MOST POWERFUL MILITARY FORCE IN HUMAN HISTORY? 

That was a point in time where I would have never labelled myself as a conservative or right-winger in any way.  Additionally, lack of stem cell research was considered to be caused by the religious right in the USA, so it was a bit embarrassing to be associated with anything right-wing.

Now with BLM and batshit insane SJW's, and every other leftist loon out there, I could NEVER call myself leftist.  Even on things like drugs and prostitution, areas where I am libertarian, I find it difficult to make comments that will even REMOTELY get me associated with the left.  The far-far left has just gone so completely insane, that I don't know how a normal person can call themselves a liberal.

I mean, how the f*ck can someone be supportive of 100+ days of rioting in Portland?  And WHAT are these people even rioting?  The right to shoot loaded guns at police officers and survive the interaction?

I have NO IDEA what these people even want.  I just assume they are spiteful mutants, who presumably just hate existence itself.

Life ain't easy.  Every time I check out Britney Spears' updates on Instagram, I realize how life is almost a cosmic tragedy of sorts.  Maybe that's what it's about.  Otherwise, I really have no idea.  All they ever do is demand privileges in the name of "rights" and destroy property.

I no longer pretend that any left-winger is going to tell me, in clear terms, exactly what it is they support.

[wes]

Even if we used the high-end figure for COVID deaths yesterday [4,406], that would equal 1,608,190 deaths in the USA in a year.

The CDC states that only 6% of those deaths are COVID-only deaths.  Although if we include a comorbidity such as pneumonia, it would seem likely to me that COVID and pneumonia are associated in some way.

On the extreme end, let's take lung cancer.  Can that fairly be related to COVID in some way?  I would think that despite being a clear separate disease [in the case of lifetime smokers, for example - I acknowledge that not all lung cancer victims smoke/smoked], it may be related to COVID.

So my mathematical intuition tells me that about 12% of "COVID deaths" are actually COVID-only.  Obviously a person who had Stage IV cancer and died with COVID can't really be said to have died solely because of COVID, and playing fast and loose with the numbers like that is disingenuous at best.  I would call that medicine playing politics at worst.

So let's say that about 12% of the people who die of COVID this year [assuming yesterday's death toll becomes the daily average for 2021, which is unlikely, as these numbers will subside as the weather gets warmer], then we would have 192,983 deaths.

You posted the flu deaths last month in another thread [the Pfizer vaccine thread, IIRC], and you stated a figure of 22K, thinking I wouldn't catch you posting the low-end flu death figure.

The actual flu death figure varies, but is something like 22K to 64K...something like that.  So I applaud you for correcting the correct low-end flu death figure, but it was a bit disingenuous of you to use the low-end figure.

If your argument is so good, it will speak for itself, without having to use a low-end figure, which is approximately 1/3 of the high-end figure.  I mean, it's not like me rounding my height of 5'8.6" to 5'9" or anything [and in fairness - I don't do that.  I just tell people I am "5-8-and-a-1/2".

So...let's take an average of the flu death range and go with [22K + 64K]/2 = 43K.

43K flu deaths versus 192.9K COVID deaths is quite the disparity.  But keep in mind there is a flu vaccine...I don't think it's a big stretch to say that we would have 100K flu deaths if we had no vaccine.

Likewise, let's say my "adjusted" COVID death stat is off...ok, well how about 400K "COVID only deaths" as a more realistic estimation?

Therefore, I default to my previous position that COVID is Flu 3x or Flu 4x.

While at this point, the evidence seems to point me in the direction of stating that COVID is worse than the flu...it is not horrendously worse.  And one thing to consider would be the age demographic figures with respect to mortality.  Those being:

- COVID has a 99.73% survival rate for people under 70.
- 87% of COVID cases are among people over the age of 80.
- Long-term care home residents are 57x more likely to die of COVID than non-LTC home residents [stats as of 2020-12-11, in B.C., Canada].
- Only 26 Canadians under the age of 40 have died of COVID in Canada, out of a population of over 18 million in that age range, as of 2020-09-23, according to PHAC [the Public Health Agency of Canada].

American figures may be slightly worse than Canadian figures, but my suspicion about that is that since American hospitals are privatized, there is more incentive to rip off the federal government, like on March 23rd or 24th, when NY State Gov. Andrew Cuomo said that he needed 26,000 ventilators, and that Trump should "pick the 26,000 who die" if he doesn't give them to him.

Pretty snaky way to steal $1.5B to $3B worth of ventilators, IMO.

In any case, I'm curious to your thoughts on these figures, AbrahamG.

The impression I get about you is that you are a Democrat [leftist/liberal - or whatever left-"ish" label a person could give you], who is unwilling to lie to himself.

I was also thinking recently...this is like The Boy Who Cried Wolf...but one thing I forgot was that in the end, the wolf was real. 

[Hulkotron]

Is this a MattC post/novel?

[Marty Champions]

Wes you fagget how are u

[Kwon]

Sadly, yes. - that's what happens in war.  I suppose bombing Dresden [which was nothing more than the Allies having a dick-measuring contest with a dead man at that point] was ok to you?  Tell me, friend - WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

The difference is - Jews own the mainstream media and Big Tech, and got you to think that one is wrong, while one you may never have heard of.

As Jews don't have a nation [well - at the time], you could say that for historic Jews in the diaspora, "their race was their nation".  Does that make sense?  So when the financial interests of England and France clashed, you'd get a war...right?  But when the interests of Jewish and White nobility clashed, you'd get a pogrom.

You can't exactly fight a war against a people that exist in no nation.  Hence all the "pogroms" Jews have been through.  This is hardly any different than my people [the English] having fought however many wars against the French throughout the years, and however many dying...but because Jews have no nation, they get attacked as a people.

But here's the thing - in the end, during war, we ALL get attacked as a people.  Jews simply use the historical fact that they exist in a diaspora to claim they have been victims of genocide more, but ALL WARFARE IS GENOCIDAL.  When France and England fought many of their wars, were the French not trying to kill as many of my people as possible?

Just to clarify the Jewish claims of being victims of genocide rather than warfare.  Yeah, tell my grandmother who lost one of her two brothers who fought in WWII that, I'm sure that will make her feel much better about his TERRIBLE DEATH. 

Here's the thing to remember, International Jewry [this was the term used at the time, equivalent today to "Negro" today, so you can call it "Jewish Elites", if you prefer] were giving more than ample warning from Hitler, from start to finish.  Examples:

[1] International Jewry boycotts all of Germany, permanently, in 1933.  Just look up "Judea Declares War on Germany", from March 24th, 1933.  Hitler - a vegetarian, who enacted some of the strongest animal rights laws in existence, because he was a good man, who loved his people - responded.  How did he respond?

By boycotting Jewish businesses for one day.  FOR ONE DAY.  Meanwhile, 1/3 of Germany's economy was now screwed because Jews used their international networks of White contacts to stop trading with Germans.  The Jewish loss alone would have been substantial, but fine - I take no issue with Jews ending their business with Germany over Hitler having realistic views on the consistent Jewish negative influence on White goyim society [because as we all know, if you don't spend your life kissing Jewish ass like me, you are "antisemitic"].  But to go and get other Whites around the world involved with this?  I'm sorry, but that's just agitation.  And, despite 1/3 of Germany's economy now crippled because of Jewish meddling, Hitler responded with ONE DAY of boycotts against Jewish businesses:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_boycott_of_Jewish_businesses

Quote
The Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses (German: Judenboykott) in Germany began on April 1, 1933 [AND ENDED ON THIS DATE - DO YOU SEE HOW THIS PIECE MISLEADS YOU?  THEY LEAVE THE DATE OPEN, TO BRAINWASH DUMB WHITES INTO THINKING THIS WAS WHEN JEWISH PERSECUTION STARTED IN GERMANY], and was claimed to be a defensive reaction [no shit - what the hell else would you call it?] to the Anti-Nazi Boycott, which had been initiated in March 1933. It was largely unsuccessful [LMAO!!!  I thought evil Germans hated Jews, and Hitler was an evil monster / Jew-hater?  Yet this was "largely unsuccessful"?  That's not consistent with the anti-German narrative - when you lie, heck, even when you tell the truth, always remember "The Law of Unintended Consequences"], as the German population continued to use Jewish businesses, but revealed the intent of the Nazis to undermine the viability of Jews in Germany.

HAHAHAHA, "Anti-Nazi" Boycott.  That term would actually make sense with some of the stigma it carried if the date was April 1, 1943.  But this was in 1933.  Hitler nor any German as a direct result or political allegiance with his party had not killed ONE JEW, or ordered the death or ANYTHING related to Jews at this point.  NOTHING.  So what this blurb about "Nazis" really means is "Jews hate any goyim who elect nationalistic leaders, so we're going to make up terms to smear them."

[2] Check out this one [and keep in mind that Jews ALWAYS overplay their hand]:

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild stayed in Austria far too long, and while attempting to flee, was arrested at the Austrian border:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild

Quote
After the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, he was arrested at the airport at Aspern and taken into custody by the Nazis because he was a distinguished member of the Jewish oligarchy. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.

And...do you know how much $21 million represented?  Well - $459 million in today's dollars.  How rich is this family to shell out almost half a billion dollars for a family member?  The Rothschild family controlled one billion in assets by 1850, but as I said, I strongly believe Hitler BADLY wrecked their banks, hence the NONSTOP lies and movies and filth said about this man.

I couldn't help but notice all these Jewish-produced movies about Hitler fail to point out that Germans were starving, and committing suicide in skyrocketing numbers because of debt owed to Jewish banks.  Just the AUDACITY of Jews not to mention this makes me sick.  When I learned all this - I was SHOCKED.  I went in a massive resentment phase I came out of in 2016, but have since gone back in.  But to say so many bad things about Germany, and to leave out [for example] THIS:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Seriously?  SERIOUSLY?  OH, SMALL LITTLE DETAIL - MOVE ALONG DUMB GOY.  GO BE A GOOD GOY.

Oh - but here's the kicker.  As I alluded to above, Germans were starving and dying/committing suicide due to the ridiculous amount of usury imposed on them from the Jewish investment banks.

Do you know how much Hitler asked back from the Rothschild bank?  Well - as shown above - $21 million.  But do you know what that represents?

IT REPRESENTS HOW MUCH MONEY THE AUSTRIAN BANK OF ROTHSCHILD RIPPED OFF FROM THE AUSTRIAN BRANCH IN THE COLLAPSE OF 1934.

Yet AGAIN, more evidence that Hitler was a good person.  He didn't FINANCIALLY EVISCERATE the Rothschild family [shit - he would have been WELL within his rights to have them all executed, but most took off as refugees while he rose to power].  But no - he simply asked for the money back that the Rothschilds STOLE from the Austrian people - that's it!

[3] Last one:

After Hitler captured France, and had 3x the power of the Allies, he STILL CALLED FOR PEACE.  He allowed England to drop bombs on Germany for 3-4 months before finally retaliating.  At that point, it was probably too late to win the war.  But Hitler's naivety, and wishing only for peace was ultimately what cost him the war.

So to answer your question:

In light of the 50,000 Germans who died in Danzig [Poland], despite Hitler's repeated calls for peace, despite asking that only the German women and CHILDREN be sent home [and was denied - FIVE ATTEMPTS AT PEACE FROM HITLER, ALL DENIED], and all his further attempts at peace denied...

It makes me sad to write this.  Just knowing that I was lied to by cognitively superior Jews.  Lies, lies, lies.  Jews never do anything bad - just ask a Palestinian.

I'll put it this way...

No, I won't, actually.

Go watch "The Hitler Speech They Don't Want you to Hear" on Bitchute.  It was removed from YouTube after hitting something like a million views, and 50,000 Likes, with a 95% Like to Dislike ratio.

I know I'm the only person willing to SAY these things, but I have been doing some mathematical calculating lately, and as of right now, I am confident that there are more White males with my views on Jews than there are...Jews.  Period.

Antisemitism truly is the highest since WWII, and now is not the time to do shit like have Biden give preferential treatment to non-White-owned businesses, etc.

Don't poke the White bear further than you already have.

But hey - just like in WWII: both sides are doubling down.  The difference is - it's been the left agitating and destroying property and demanding rights in the name of privileges for years, if not decades now.  White right-wing males have just sat back and taken it.

Remember last time, 65+ million people died, and only 15% were "Nazis" [or Italian Fascists, or anyone else from The Axis].

My suggestion is - don't.

But hey, it's just advice. 

tl;dr:

In all wars pregnant women get shot and killed.  The fact that you think of Jews as being special exceptions to this rule [they're NOT], is evidence of exactly what I'm talking about - which is just how psychologically controlled White goyim are by Jewish media.  AT LEAST 65 million people died during WWII.  For you to think of Jews as somehow special [when arguably, they were the agitators who caused BOTH world wars], is very typical of Jewish brainwashing of goyim.

That said, I acknowledge that Jews are intellectually superior to Whites.

So anything I say about Jewish power is said through the lens of "I acknowledge that Jews are smarter than Whites."

So for as much of a "White Supremacist" as I may be...I recognize high average Jewish IQ.  It's a fact.

Haha, neither would group bashing White Americans would have been acceptable to me, but we only had one Black teacher at the school who came from Haiti.  For some reason, he studied in the USA, but ultimately settled in Canada.  Imagine coming from a dump like Haiti, and then migrant shopping until you get to Canada.  Like WTF problem did he have in the USA?  Probably too many Black people, lmao.

The teachers who taught this sort of rhetoric [in hindsight, only one I remember with certainty, but maybe a second or third one] annoyed me because we we clearly being taught at a young age that hating people based on group membership is wrong, AND THEN THEY WOULD GO ON HATING WHITE PEOPLE [specifically Americans, in the one prominent case I still distinctly remember].

I can't even tell you how annoying this was.  I felt like hipolita meija was shitting in my brain.  And you could still smell it from the Greater Columbus Convention Center. 

Sounds to me like you attending an even more batshit insane leftist school / school with more batshit insane leftist teachers.


HAHAHAHA.  At this point, who on earth thinks we had anything but a bad flu season this year, if that?

The excess mortality stats are coming out now, and it's not looking like we had any "pandemic".  We had a worse than average flu season, and quite a few extra suicides and other deaths due to economic loss.  From what I can tell, at least half the deaths are not in the same age group as those dying of COVID, so it's almost as if no pandemic happened at all, WHICH IS FUNNILY ENOUGH, EXACTLY WHAT MY LYING EYES TELL ME.

Does ONE Getbigger even feel like we've just been through a pandemic?  EVEN ONE?  If so - speak now or forever hold your peace.

Also, even if we did have X number of excess deaths of 85-year-old's...that's sad of course...but there is both excess mortality and "years lost".  The average 85-year-old is ALREADY OLDER THAN THE AVERAGE HUMAN LIFESPAN.

Meaning that these people lost maybe two years of their life, haha.

Again, I want ANY Getbigger who even sensed we are in a "pandemic" to say so.  Let's do a count.

I normally wait to watch 50% of any given video before giving it a thumbs down, but I make exceptions for tools calling everything and everyone "Nazis".

For example...yes, Germany did have a boycott of Jewish merchants within Germany for one day - FOR ONE F*CKING DAY.  And Hitler imposed that after the world Jewish community got together to use their clout to impose a worldwide PERMANENT boycott on German goods.

So Arnold fails to mention the fact that JEWS imposed a PERMANENT boycott on German goods, but has the audacity to blame Germans, because of Hitler responding to that boycott with a boycott of Jewish goods for ONE F*CKING DAY.

FOR ONE F*CKING DAY.

Arnold needs to read this article [written by a Jew, no less], and then go suck some more Jewish cock:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

If the USA is so "racist", WHY DO NON-WHITES KEEP STREAMING INTO IT AT RECORD-BREAKING LEVELS?!  Stay in your sh*t countries if the USA is so "racist", for f*ck's sake!  Is anyone forcing these people from living in a superior White country?  NO!

There's no way Arnold [someone here called him Trump's version of Lou  ], isn't aware of this:

HAHAHAHA, WHO THE F*CK ANYTHING THAT LONG?

Has anyone here read "War and Peace"?  I haven't.

My phone...you may have noticed [or may not have noticed] the photos of my house I posted from my phone yesterday.  It's a piece of garbage Android.  Maybe I'm just saying that because the camera sucks though...but yeah, I should immediately start posting on here from my phone, to achieve my reduced post goal, as stated. 

It didn't take me very long to write [I type fast], and from time to time, I do wish to post a long spiel like that.

Thank you for reminding me to post from my phone though.    Yes, I should immediately.

I know I'm not the only one on here who went through a relationship that bad with a woman...in fact, I read the stats are something over 50% [depends on the study you look at, but most point to a majority].

And men keep getting into relationships for some reason?    I'm fairly sure the data is pretty clear that men who do not get married are happier.  The only time single men are less happy is among men only recently broken up, and the reason they are unhappy is NOT because they are single - but because they are getting over their breakup.

I cannot recommend any more strongly to NOT enter into a relationship with women [just f*ck them as needed].  But to each their own.

Lastly...if any Getbiggers have stopped watching porn, I don't think it's embarrassing to say.  My friend told me that it gives your brain a reward similar to sex, and acquiring sex is something which keeps us on track to achieve our goals.  For example, we work out partially due to the award being that we get more access to sex.  But if porn is freely given to us...our brains will stop being motivated to achieve other goals.

That's how he explained it.  Also, I think porn culture just seems vile...especially after watching 13 minutes of the revolting documentary on Netflix, Rocco.

Fully agree Wes/MAtt C!

[wes]

Is this a MattC post/novel?

It`s a collection of some of Matts best work 

[wes]

Wes you fagget how are u

I`m doing OK queerbait how are you?

[wes]

Fucking Kwon ! LOL 

[Kwon]

Is this a MattC post/novel?

Just one of Mattys facebook-messages

[wes]

LETS NOT GFORGET THIS RECENT GEM.

Sadly, yes. - that's what happens in war.  I suppose bombing Dresden [which was nothing more than the Allies having a dick-measuring contest with a dead man at that point] was ok to you?  Tell me, friend - WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

The difference is - Jews own the mainstream media and Big Tech, and got you to think that one is wrong, while one you may never have heard of.

As Jews don't have a nation [well - at the time], you could say that for historic Jews in the diaspora, "their race was their nation".  Does that make sense?  So when the financial interests of England and France clashed, you'd get a war...right?  But when the interests of Jewish and White nobility clashed, you'd get a pogrom.

You can't exactly fight a war against a people that exist in no nation.  Hence all the "pogroms" Jews have been through.  This is hardly any different than my people [the English] having fought however many wars against the French throughout the years, and however many dying...but because Jews have no nation, they get attacked as a people.

But here's the thing - in the end, during war, we ALL get attacked as a people.  Jews simply use the historical fact that they exist in a diaspora to claim they have been victims of genocide more, but ALL WARFARE IS GENOCIDAL.  When France and England fought many of their wars, were the French not trying to kill as many of my people as possible?

Just to clarify the Jewish claims of being victims of genocide rather than warfare.  Yeah, tell my grandmother who lost one of her two brothers who fought in WWII that, I'm sure that will make her feel much better about his TERRIBLE DEATH. 

Here's the thing to remember, International Jewry [this was the term used at the time, equivalent today to "Negro" today, so you can call it "Jewish Elites", if you prefer] were giving more than ample warning from Hitler, from start to finish.  Examples:

[1] International Jewry boycotts all of Germany, permanently, in 1933.  Just look up "Judea Declares War on Germany", from March 24th, 1933.  Hitler - a vegetarian, who enacted some of the strongest animal rights laws in existence, because he was a good man, who loved his people - responded.  How did he respond?

By boycotting Jewish businesses for one day.  FOR ONE DAY.  Meanwhile, 1/3 of Germany's economy was now screwed because Jews used their international networks of White contacts to stop trading with Germans.  The Jewish loss alone would have been substantial, but fine - I take no issue with Jews ending their business with Germany over Hitler having realistic views on the consistent Jewish negative influence on White goyim society [because as we all know, if you don't spend your life kissing Jewish ass like me, you are "antisemitic"].  But to go and get other Whites around the world involved with this?  I'm sorry, but that's just agitation.  And, despite 1/3 of Germany's economy now crippled because of Jewish meddling, Hitler responded with ONE DAY of boycotts against Jewish businesses:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_boycott_of_Jewish_businesses

Quote
The Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses (German: Judenboykott) in Germany began on April 1, 1933 [AND ENDED ON THIS DATE - DO YOU SEE HOW THIS PIECE MISLEADS YOU?  THEY LEAVE THE DATE OPEN, TO BRAINWASH DUMB WHITES INTO THINKING THIS WAS WHEN JEWISH PERSECUTION STARTED IN GERMANY], and was claimed to be a defensive reaction [no shit - what the hell else would you call it?] to the Anti-Nazi Boycott, which had been initiated in March 1933. It was largely unsuccessful [LMAO!!!  I thought evil Germans hated Jews, and Hitler was an evil monster / Jew-hater?  Yet this was "largely unsuccessful"?  That's not consistent with the anti-German narrative - when you lie, heck, even when you tell the truth, always remember "The Law of Unintended Consequences"], as the German population continued to use Jewish businesses, but revealed the intent of the Nazis to undermine the viability of Jews in Germany.

HAHAHAHA, "Anti-Nazi" Boycott.  That term would actually make sense with some of the stigma it carried if the date was April 1, 1943.  But this was in 1933.  Hitler nor any German as a direct result or political allegiance with his party had not killed ONE JEW, or ordered the death or ANYTHING related to Jews at this point.  NOTHING.  So what this blurb about "Nazis" really means is "Jews hate any goyim who elect nationalistic leaders, so we're going to make up terms to smear them."

[2] Check out this one [and keep in mind that Jews ALWAYS overplay their hand]:

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild stayed in Austria far too long, and while attempting to flee, was arrested at the Austrian border:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild

Quote
After the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, he was arrested at the airport at Aspern and taken into custody by the Nazis because he was a distinguished member of the Jewish oligarchy. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.

And...do you know how much $21 million represented?  Well - $459 million in today's dollars.  How rich is this family to shell out almost half a billion dollars for a family member?  The Rothschild family controlled one billion in assets by 1850, but as I said, I strongly believe Hitler BADLY wrecked their banks, hence the NONSTOP lies and movies and filth said about this man.

I couldn't help but notice all these Jewish-produced movies about Hitler fail to point out that Germans were starving, and committing suicide in skyrocketing numbers because of debt owed to Jewish banks.  Just the AUDACITY of Jews not to mention this makes me sick.  When I learned all this - I was SHOCKED.  I went in a massive resentment phase I came out of in 2016, but have since gone back in.  But to say so many bad things about Germany, and to leave out [for example] THIS:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Seriously?  SERIOUSLY?  OH, SMALL LITTLE DETAIL - MOVE ALONG DUMB GOY.  GO BE A GOOD GOY.

Oh - but here's the kicker.  As I alluded to above, Germans were starving and dying/committing suicide due to the ridiculous amount of usury imposed on them from the Jewish investment banks.

Do you know how much Hitler asked back from the Rothschild bank?  Well - as shown above - $21 million.  But do you know what that represents?

IT REPRESENTS HOW MUCH MONEY THE AUSTRIAN BANK OF ROTHSCHILD RIPPED OFF FROM THE AUSTRIAN BRANCH IN THE COLLAPSE OF 1934.

Yet AGAIN, more evidence that Hitler was a good person.  He didn't FINANCIALLY EVISCERATE the Rothschild family [shit - he would have been WELL within his rights to have them all executed, but most took off as refugees while he rose to power].  But no - he simply asked for the money back that the Rothschilds STOLE from the Austrian people - that's it!

[3] Last one:

After Hitler captured France, and had 3x the power of the Allies, he STILL CALLED FOR PEACE.  He allowed England to drop bombs on Germany for 3-4 months before finally retaliating.  At that point, it was probably too late to win the war.  But Hitler's naivety, and wishing only for peace was ultimately what cost him the war.

So to answer your question:

In light of the 50,000 Germans who died in Danzig [Poland], despite Hitler's repeated calls for peace, despite asking that only the German women and CHILDREN be sent home [and was denied - FIVE ATTEMPTS AT PEACE FROM HITLER, ALL DENIED], and all his further attempts at peace denied...

It makes me sad to write this.  Just knowing that I was lied to by cognitively superior Jews.  Lies, lies, lies.  Jews never do anything bad - just ask a Palestinian.

I'll put it this way...

No, I won't, actually.

Go watch "The Hitler Speech They Don't Want you to Hear" on Bitchute.  It was removed from YouTube after hitting something like a million views, and 50,000 Likes, with a 95% Like to Dislike ratio.

I know I'm the only person willing to SAY these things, but I have been doing some mathematical calculating lately, and as of right now, I am confident that there are more White males with my views on Jews than there are...Jews.  Period.

Antisemitism truly is the highest since WWII, and now is not the time to do shit like have Biden give preferential treatment to non-White-owned businesses, etc.

Don't poke the White bear further than you already have.

But hey - just like in WWII: both sides are doubling down.  The difference is - it's been the left agitating and destroying property and demanding rights in the name of privileges for years, if not decades now.  White right-wing males have just sat back and taken it.

Remember last time, 65+ million people died, and only 15% were "Nazis" [or Italian Fascists, or anyone else from The Axis].

My suggestion is - don't.

But hey, it's just advice. 

tl;dr:

In all wars pregnant women get shot and killed.  The fact that you think of Jews as being special exceptions to this rule [they're NOT], is evidence of exactly what I'm talking about - which is just how psychologically controlled White goyim are by Jewish media.  AT LEAST 65 million people died during WWII.  For you to think of Jews as somehow special [when arguably, they were the agitators who caused BOTH world wars], is very typical of Jewish brainwashing of goyim.

That said, I acknowledge that Jews are intellectually superior to Whites.

So anything I say about Jewish power is said through the lens of "I acknowledge that Jews are smarter than Whites."

So for as much of a "White Supremacist" as I may be...I recognize high average Jewish IQ.  It's a fact.

[wes]

I think Matt should quit getbig and join Stormfront. 

[Griffith]

The opinions at the time from Italians was that Hitler acted against the Jews because they were financially boycotting Germany. That was the understanding or reason given to them at the time.

[Van_Bilderass]

I started reading a few lines down of the first post,

"The difference is - Jews own the mainstream media and Big Tech, and got you to think that one is wrong, while one you may never have heard of..."

...and I was like, wow, wes has finally seen the light, I always knew he was one of the good ones 

[Van_Bilderass]

The opinions at the time from Italians was that Hitler acted against the Jews because they were financially boycotting Germany. That was the understanding or reason given to them at the time.

Of course now it's a crime to boycott Israeli wares in several US states and European countries. A bit strange, "you have to buy from Israel" 

[Kwon]

I think Matt should quit getbig and join Stormfront. 

Me and Matty came to Getbig FROM Stormfront

[Matt]

Me and Matty came to Getbig FROM Stormfront

It's funny about that...in 2009 through to 2011, I browsed Stormfront.  I read it more than anything, but I posted on an account, here and there.  I don't mind saying that - and just so everyone knows this about leftists - just "dox" yourself.  I shouldn't say this in case some of you will be fired for doing so, but I share no such concerns so I don't give a shit.  I post whatever I want.

Of course, leftists - vile bastards that they are - will get you fired even for a job you are only doing essentially as a volunteer or to fill your time, because they want to bully everyone in to agreeing with them, so if you dox yourself and literally post online that you love Hitler, they stop going after you.

I think WWII is massively misrepresented [guess Jew owns the media?], but I don't love Hitler as much as I claim.  Don't get me wrong - I think he did everything right, but I have no reason to love the man.  It would make more sense for me to love Mussolini, since I have direct ancestry from Italy at that time.

So anyway...why did I stop reading Stormfront?

Because, truth be told, by 2011, many comments' sections were already starting to look like Stormfront, and by 2013, ALL COMMENTS' SECTIONS started to look like Stormfront. 

Then, mysteriously, by 2016, comments' sections started disappearing online.    Gee, I wonder why. 

I mean, is it REALLY that much of a stretch to say that mainstream YouTube comments' sections represent public thought?

Go watch ANY CBC/CTV/Global News coverage of Covid-19 RIGHT NOW, and go look at the Like to Dislike ratio, and the comments.

How is that not Canadian public opinion?  These are the three MAJOR news outlets we have...AND NOBODY IS BUYING IT.

I love comments' sections for this reason.

And for this reason, I know I could tell any woman that I love Hitler, and 99% don't give a shit.  The only exception would be a woman I didn't know was a Jew.

I used to be somewhat kowtoed into sucking Jew dick in my personal beliefs - it sure as FUCK will not be happening again.

I'll toe the leftist or Jewish line - if:

[1] You point a gun to my head.
[2] Otherwise threaten my life.
[3] Torture me.

Otherwise, go fuck yourselves.  This includes general leftist thought on anything.  I don't believe your bullshit anymore, and you shouldn't have ever expected filling people's heads with lies would last forever.

I mean, 72 genders [like "72 virgins"], and pushing for biological males to fight in women's sports, and you didn't think the day would come where people would stop buying this shit?    Fucking dumb idiots are even dumber than I thought [leftists].  Sometimes with Jews, I think this too.

Like the recent Jacob Rothschild video on YouTube from Bloomberg Market News...it shows a giant house, and he says "My family lived in a small one-story house."  I'm like "Are you the dumbest fuck on the planet, or am I missing something."

Hitler plundered 4 out of 5 of the Rothschild banks, which is why they are so mad at him.  MY response to Hitler ruining the Rothschild family banks is this:

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good.  Next time, don't rape the German people with 71 years of interest, and you won't get push-back.  WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU THINK WOULD HAPPEN?

This is also why I don't understand WWII.  You'd have to be a moron to NOT think a Hitler character would respond in response to the massive Jewish financial exploitation/rape of White people...yet I have a hard time believing he was just a pressure release valve, since he ultimately almost won the war.

I would ask any Jew to debate me ANYWHERE on the topic of Hitler, but let's be honest - you'd have nothing to say but "OH VEY, SOMEONE IN MY FAMILY DIED IN WWII [Oh GEE, REALLY?  WOW!!!  Get in line...]", and "You racist Nazi!", etc.

If Jews had actual facts proving any of the shit they claim, they would have said it already.

Also, arresting people in 13 EU countries for even DISCUSSING The Holocaust.

Real classy.

Really makes people come around to believing your bullshit story. 

[Matt]

As for Les Grossman, and any other Jewish Getbiggers who hate my posts, how about this?:

Address or refute anything I just said.

NOVEL CONCEPT.  AMAZING!!!

But you're so used to White goy sucking your cock, the concept is alien to you, isn't it?

It is epic proof you have no rebuttal.  Which means that you either know you are lying or that Jews, like Whites, are simply brainwashed to believe this agendas, and for obvious reasons have never questioned them.

I would LOVE to debate any Jew on The Holocaust.

Back in the day, they used to put stuff like that on Donahue.  These days, with so few Whites who are even aware of The Holocaust still buying it, they just bury the story. 

It's safe to say they know their narrative is bullshit.  And even at the peak of Holocaust Guilt with Schindler's List...do you REALLY think you have a good point if you need to censor your opposition?

No explanation I've heard for that is sufficient to me.  Jews are just lying.

And they know it.

[pamith]

Sadly, yes. - that's what happens in war.  I suppose bombing Dresden [which was nothing more than the Allies having a dick-measuring contest with a dead man at that point] was ok to you?  Tell me, friend - WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

The difference is - Jews own the mainstream media and Big Tech, and got you to think that one is wrong, while one you may never have heard of.

As Jews don't have a nation [well - at the time], you could say that for historic Jews in the diaspora, "their race was their nation".  Does that make sense?  So when the financial interests of England and France clashed, you'd get a war...right?  But when the interests of Jewish and White nobility clashed, you'd get a pogrom.

You can't exactly fight a war against a people that exist in no nation.  Hence all the "pogroms" Jews have been through.  This is hardly any different than my people [the English] having fought however many wars against the French throughout the years, and however many dying...but because Jews have no nation, they get attacked as a people.

But here's the thing - in the end, during war, we ALL get attacked as a people.  Jews simply use the historical fact that they exist in a diaspora to claim they have been victims of genocide more, but ALL WARFARE IS GENOCIDAL.  When France and England fought many of their wars, were the French not trying to kill as many of my people as possible?

Just to clarify the Jewish claims of being victims of genocide rather than warfare.  Yeah, tell my grandmother who lost one of her two brothers who fought in WWII that, I'm sure that will make her feel much better about his TERRIBLE DEATH. 

Here's the thing to remember, International Jewry [this was the term used at the time, equivalent today to "Negro" today, so you can call it "Jewish Elites", if you prefer] were giving more than ample warning from Hitler, from start to finish.  Examples:

[1] International Jewry boycotts all of Germany, permanently, in 1933.  Just look up "Judea Declares War on Germany", from March 24th, 1933.  Hitler - a vegetarian, who enacted some of the strongest animal rights laws in existence, because he was a good man, who loved his people - responded.  How did he respond?

By boycotting Jewish businesses for one day.  FOR ONE DAY.  Meanwhile, 1/3 of Germany's economy was now screwed because Jews used their international networks of White contacts to stop trading with Germans.  The Jewish loss alone would have been substantial, but fine - I take no issue with Jews ending their business with Germany over Hitler having realistic views on the consistent Jewish negative influence on White goyim society [because as we all know, if you don't spend your life kissing Jewish ass like me, you are "antisemitic"].  But to go and get other Whites around the world involved with this?  I'm sorry, but that's just agitation.  And, despite 1/3 of Germany's economy now crippled because of Jewish meddling, Hitler responded with ONE DAY of boycotts against Jewish businesses:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_boycott_of_Jewish_businesses

Quote
The Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses (German: Judenboykott) in Germany began on April 1, 1933 [AND ENDED ON THIS DATE - DO YOU SEE HOW THIS PIECE MISLEADS YOU?  THEY LEAVE THE DATE OPEN, TO BRAINWASH DUMB WHITES INTO THINKING THIS WAS WHEN JEWISH PERSECUTION STARTED IN GERMANY], and was claimed to be a defensive reaction [no shit - what the hell else would you call it?] to the Anti-Nazi Boycott, which had been initiated in March 1933. It was largely unsuccessful [LMAO!!!  I thought evil Germans hated Jews, and Hitler was an evil monster / Jew-hater?  Yet this was "largely unsuccessful"?  That's not consistent with the anti-German narrative - when you lie, heck, even when you tell the truth, always remember "The Law of Unintended Consequences"], as the German population continued to use Jewish businesses, but revealed the intent of the Nazis to undermine the viability of Jews in Germany.

HAHAHAHA, "Anti-Nazi" Boycott.  That term would actually make sense with some of the stigma it carried if the date was April 1, 1943.  But this was in 1933.  Hitler nor any German as a direct result or political allegiance with his party had not killed ONE JEW, or ordered the death or ANYTHING related to Jews at this point.  NOTHING.  So what this blurb about "Nazis" really means is "Jews hate any goyim who elect nationalistic leaders, so we're going to make up terms to smear them."

[2] Check out this one [and keep in mind that Jews ALWAYS overplay their hand]:

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild stayed in Austria far too long, and while attempting to flee, was arrested at the Austrian border:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild

Quote
After the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, he was arrested at the airport at Aspern and taken into custody by the Nazis because he was a distinguished member of the Jewish oligarchy. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.

And...do you know how much $21 million represented?  Well - $459 million in today's dollars.  How rich is this family to shell out almost half a billion dollars for a family member?  The Rothschild family controlled one billion in assets by 1850, but as I said, I strongly believe Hitler BADLY wrecked their banks, hence the NONSTOP lies and movies and filth said about this man.

I couldn't help but notice all these Jewish-produced movies about Hitler fail to point out that Germans were starving, and committing suicide in skyrocketing numbers because of debt owed to Jewish banks.  Just the AUDACITY of Jews not to mention this makes me sick.  When I learned all this - I was SHOCKED.  I went in a massive resentment phase I came out of in 2016, but have since gone back in.  But to say so many bad things about Germany, and to leave out [for example] THIS:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Seriously?  SERIOUSLY?  OH, SMALL LITTLE DETAIL - MOVE ALONG DUMB GOY.  GO BE A GOOD GOY.

Oh - but here's the kicker.  As I alluded to above, Germans were starving and dying/committing suicide due to the ridiculous amount of usury imposed on them from the Jewish investment banks.

Do you know how much Hitler asked back from the Rothschild bank?  Well - as shown above - $21 million.  But do you know what that represents?

IT REPRESENTS HOW MUCH MONEY THE AUSTRIAN BANK OF ROTHSCHILD RIPPED OFF FROM THE AUSTRIAN BRANCH IN THE COLLAPSE OF 1934.

Yet AGAIN, more evidence that Hitler was a good person.  He didn't FINANCIALLY EVISCERATE the Rothschild family [shit - he would have been WELL within his rights to have them all executed, but most took off as refugees while he rose to power].  But no - he simply asked for the money back that the Rothschilds STOLE from the Austrian people - that's it!

[3] Last one:

After Hitler captured France, and had 3x the power of the Allies, he STILL CALLED FOR PEACE.  He allowed England to drop bombs on Germany for 3-4 months before finally retaliating.  At that point, it was probably too late to win the war.  But Hitler's naivety, and wishing only for peace was ultimately what cost him the war.

So to answer your question:

In light of the 50,000 Germans who died in Danzig [Poland], despite Hitler's repeated calls for peace, despite asking that only the German women and CHILDREN be sent home [and was denied - FIVE ATTEMPTS AT PEACE FROM HITLER, ALL DENIED], and all his further attempts at peace denied...

It makes me sad to write this.  Just knowing that I was lied to by cognitively superior Jews.  Lies, lies, lies.  Jews never do anything bad - just ask a Palestinian.

I'll put it this way...

No, I won't, actually.

Go watch "The Hitler Speech They Don't Want you to Hear" on Bitchute.  It was removed from YouTube after hitting something like a million views, and 50,000 Likes, with a 95% Like to Dislike ratio.

I know I'm the only person willing to SAY these things, but I have been doing some mathematical calculating lately, and as of right now, I am confident that there are more White males with my views on Jews than there are...Jews.  Period.

Antisemitism truly is the highest since WWII, and now is not the time to do shit like have Biden give preferential treatment to non-White-owned businesses, etc.

Don't poke the White bear further than you already have.

But hey - just like in WWII: both sides are doubling down.  The difference is - it's been the left agitating and destroying property and demanding rights in the name of privileges for years, if not decades now.  White right-wing males have just sat back and taken it.

Remember last time, 65+ million people died, and only 15% were "Nazis" [or Italian Fascists, or anyone else from The Axis].

My suggestion is - don't.

But hey, it's just advice. 

tl;dr:

In all wars pregnant women get shot and killed.  The fact that you think of Jews as being special exceptions to this rule [they're NOT], is evidence of exactly what I'm talking about - which is just how psychologically controlled White goyim are by Jewish media.  AT LEAST 65 million people died during WWII.  For you to think of Jews as somehow special [when arguably, they were the agitators who caused BOTH world wars], is very typical of Jewish brainwashing of goyim.

That said, I acknowledge that Jews are intellectually superior to Whites.

So anything I say about Jewish power is said through the lens of "I acknowledge that Jews are smarter than Whites."

So for as much of a "White Supremacist" as I may be...I recognize high average Jewish IQ.  It's a fact.

I'm not reading a book

[MAXX]

It's funny about that...in 2009 through to 2011, I browsed Stormfront.  I read it more than anything, but I posted on an account, here and there.  I don't mind saying that - and just so everyone knows this about leftists - just "dox" yourself.  I shouldn't say this in case some of you will be fired for doing so, but I share no such concerns so I don't give a shit.  I post whatever I want.

Of course, leftists - vile bastards that they are - will get you fired even for a job you are only doing essentially as a volunteer or to fill your time, because they want to bully everyone in to agreeing with them, so if you dox yourself and literally post online that you love Hitler, they stop going after you.

I think WWII is massively misrepresented [guess Jew owns the media?], but I don't love Hitler as much as I claim.  Don't get me wrong - I think he did everything right, but I have no reason to love the man.  It would make more sense for me to love Mussolini, since I have direct ancestry from Italy at that time.

So anyway...why did I stop reading Stormfront?

Because, truth be told, by 2011, many comments' sections were already starting to look like Stormfront, and by 2013, ALL COMMENTS' SECTIONS started to look like Stormfront. 

Then, mysteriously, by 2016, comments' sections started disappearing online.    Gee, I wonder why. 

I mean, is it REALLY that much of a stretch to say that mainstream YouTube comments' sections represent public thought?

Go watch ANY CBC/CTV/Global News coverage of Covid-19 RIGHT NOW, and go look at the Like to Dislike ratio, and the comments.

How is that not Canadian public opinion?  These are the three MAJOR news outlets we have...AND NOBODY IS BUYING IT.

I love comments' sections for this reason.

And for this reason, I know I could tell any woman that I love Hitler, and 99% don't give a shit.  The only exception would be a woman I didn't know was a Jew.

I used to be somewhat kowtoed into sucking Jew dick in my personal beliefs - it sure as FUCK will not be happening again.

I'll toe the leftist or Jewish line - if:

[1] You point a gun to my head.
[2] Otherwise threaten my life.
[3] Torture me.

Otherwise, go fuck yourselves.  This includes general leftist thought on anything.  I don't believe your bullshit anymore, and you shouldn't have ever expected filling people's heads with lies would last forever.

I mean, 72 genders [like "72 virgins"], and pushing for biological males to fight in women's sports, and you didn't think the day would come where people would stop buying this shit?    Fucking dumb idiots are even dumber than I thought [leftists].  Sometimes with Jews, I think this too.

Like the recent Jacob Rothschild video on YouTube from Bloomberg Market News...it shows a giant house, and he says "My family lived in a small one-story house."  I'm like "Are you the dumbest fuck on the planet, or am I missing something."

Hitler plundered 4 out of 5 of the Rothschild banks, which is why they are so mad at him.  MY response to Hitler ruining the Rothschild family banks is this:

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good.  Next time, don't rape the German people with 71 years of interest, and you won't get push-back.  WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU THINK WOULD HAPPEN?

This is also why I don't understand WWII.  You'd have to be a moron to NOT think a Hitler character would respond in response to the massive Jewish financial exploitation/rape of White people...yet I have a hard time believing he was just a pressure release valve, since he ultimately almost won the war.

I would ask any Jew to debate me ANYWHERE on the topic of Hitler, but let's be honest - you'd have nothing to say but "OH VEY, SOMEONE IN MY FAMILY DIED IN WWII [Oh GEE, REALLY?  WOW!!!  Get in line...]", and "You racist Nazi!", etc.

If Jews had actual facts proving any of the shit they claim, they would have said it already.

Also, arresting people in 13 EU countries for even DISCUSSING The Holocaust.

Real classy.

Really makes people come around to believing your bullshit story. 

It is true. Hitler never instigated war. His call to action was Always, and ALWAYS responsive action, A compensating measure of justice. Remember, Hitler was always in favour "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" motto.

For example as in the case of England, he saw them as germanic brothers and reached out for them to be allies. As he did for Japan and Italy. But I guess England was far to "internationally-controlled" already back then. And Englands response to Hitler reaching out for peace, was bombing German cities of civilized. Hitler never intentionally targeted civilians. Another Fact, that shows what a "monster" ( ) Hitler was...


Listen here:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zaC1MiIeBvBJ/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UVwXtWyeMZnJ/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hEIpwHpgZX3t/

[Tapeworm]

As for Les Grossman, and any other Jewish Getbiggers who hate my posts, how about this?:

Address or refute anything I just said.

NOVEL CONCEPT.  AMAZING!!!

But you're so used to White goy sucking your cock, the concept is alien to you, isn't it?

It is epic proof you have no rebuttal.  Which means that you either know you are lying or that Jews, like Whites, are simply brainwashed to believe this agendas, and for obvious reasons have never questioned them.

I would LOVE to debate any Jew on The Holocaust.

Back in the day, they used to put stuff like that on Donahue.  These days, with so few Whites who are even aware of The Holocaust still buying it, they just bury the story. 

It's safe to say they know their narrative is bullshit.  And even at the peak of Holocaust Guilt with Schindler's List...do you REALLY think you have a good point if you need to censor your opposition?

No explanation I've heard for that is sufficient to me.  Jews are just lying.

And they know it.

You can't categorically condemn all Jews alive today for the shit some Jew bankers did 100 years ago in Europe. Unless, of course, I'm to be held to account for slavery in the US along with every other whitey on the planet.

Yes, Zionist thievery from the Arabs happened back then as well, plus jew-heavy Bolshevism, the modern media horseshit, and any list of complaints you've got. For the sake of argument, lets say it's all true. That doesn't mean that some Jewish guy you meet walking down the street is in on it. He's almost certainly just some dude same as you.

If you threaten him, you chase him into the arms of people who aren't wanting to kill him. Other Jews. They'll accept him and radicalize him. This is the same thing you talk about happening with the coalescence of whites from anti-white racism. Whether this happens under Biden remains to be seen. You could argue that Hitler did more to bolster Jewish unity than any of the founders of Israel.


I hesitate to bring it up, but neither can you condemn all women on the basis of one lousy shitcunt's misbehavior. It's unsound reasoning which just so happens to let the person who tolerated the misbehavior completely off the responsibility hook. I get where you're coming from,  and I have put up with a crap woman in the past myself. Ultimately, however, if you're getting walked on then you're responsible for allowing it to happen. Yeah, there are plenty of horrid women and whores out there but it's up to you to set selection criteria which exclude them and welcome a higher quality applicant. Based on the history you related, by your late 30s it's fine to not fix someone. Expecting a woman to behave like a fully formed adult who doesn't need rescuing is not unreasonable, so when one arrives with drug or lunacy issues, just politely excuse yourself from her continued company.

Had to get that off my chest.