Not stupid at all. It seems like the person who originally posted it was trying to imply it was recent.
Are you Black Colombu now?
How do you figure that, based on anything I wrote? This was the extent of my post:
And it goes on like this...
https://www.instagram.com/p/CNDO2UdnhcV/
So I had a short post that included a [...], which would encourage anyone to click on the link to see it for themselves.
Next I included the actual link which had the date visible, and I only cut the post off where I did because that's the biggest screenshot my phone allowed.
At no point was it suggested that THIS experience with Steve caused her to become religious. In fact, on sway's post on page two, it looked like Amanda's religious awakening happened as a function of her age [approaching, and then turning, 40], explicitly distinct and prior to her meeting Steve in the first place:
Lol for anyone defending Amanda. Girl dated a lot of guys when she lived here in Vegas. Including Jays boy Mark Anthony. Girl got around big time…… was getting close to the 40th b-day, then turned super Christian, then ran off with Kuclo to Texas. Shes got a temper, this won’t end well for him.
^ Looks pretty clear to me that Amanda's religiosity predated Steve [and this Dan Bongino incident], so on what basis are you suggesting that I was intentionally trying to hide the date of Amanda's Instagram post?
I linked to her post and stated that it continued [as in - "click this link
that has the Instagram post date on it, for those who want to read more"].
The date wasn't exactly incognegro. Quite the opposite, I would say.
I love how I made a post comprising only three components, only one of which would suggest I was purposely trying to mislead people about the date [the fact that the picture I attached had the date cut off - and only because it literally didn't fit on my phone, so I couldn't screenshot it], and yet you assumed that.
Again, are you a Black Colombu?
Rhetorical question. The answer is yes.