Covid Lab Leak Theory

[chaos]

Typically, a group size of around twelve people is considered optimal for reaching consensus effectively, as larger groups can complicate the process.

[Primemuscle]

Typically, a group size of around twelve people is considered optimal for reaching consensus effectively, as larger groups can complicate the process.

This is the approximate number of folks sitting at the bargaining table in the multiple contract negotiations I participated in on behalf of Classified employees for many years. We liked to think reaching consensus as "getting to yes." Yes, being an agreed upon acceptable contract between the district (management representing the school board), and Union officers who represented Classified employees. If I remember correctly, there was only one contract negotiation requiring a moderator and we still did not reach consensus until we picked the district during a board meeting in front of the administration offices.   

[Dos Equis]

What kind of retard uses a 4 year old paper funded by the government? Same people that helped develop the virus. LOL nothing to see here!!
And still they left behind hints in their paid for "findings".

lol. You actually read it?  I bet he didn't.   

[Dos Equis]

In your view, how many people are needed to reach consensus? Would you agree that, technically, consensus can exist with as few as two people? It can also refer to a broader or more general agreement. Were you looking for a more formal consensus?

Your questions don't really have anything to do with this context.  We're not talking about two people.  Or a handful of people.  The context is the entire medical and scientific community.

I don't know where you got your consensus comment, which is why I asked.  There is very clear evidence that this virus came from a lab. 

[Necrosis]

Typically, a group size of around twelve people is considered optimal for reaching consensus effectively, as larger groups can complicate the process.

Do you really want to embarrass yourself again with this? last time you couldn't even read the paper nor understand what it said. I posted the paper and you post a line from the abstract as a gotcha when I clearly said it weighed multiple sides.

Come on man,  show some intelligence.

[Necrosis]

Tell us you lick the government boot without saying you lick the government boot. LOL dumbass

You are dumb and unfortunately in a cult it appears.

The W in WHO stands for world ftr.

Bro trusts pundits getting paid by the very same government over experts in the field from across the globe. Brilliant!! Thinks the democrats unleased the virus which has been categorized as zoonotic 100s of times in many variants to control us. The nations across the world- autocracies, dictatorships all bowed to the democrats wishes LOL

LOL. I gotta stop posting on here, it's making me dumber just interacting with these folks.

[chaos]

lol. You actually read it?  I bet he didn't.   

I read enough to see that only a moron would post that and think it reaffirmed his point of view.