Author Topic: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims  (Read 31494 times)

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #150 on: May 04, 2006, 04:32:46 AM »
Bob,

Really, count to 50 before you post, if you must post. 

You seem oblivious to the hole you continue to dig for yourself: you are 5 feet down and the walls are crumbling in around you.

You apology is half assed and lame.  You just can't let go.   You don't understand that there is no 'winning' in an internet argument.  The very fact that you continue to post in response makes you ' lose '.  The other guy wins every time you even respond. 

It's a very one sided medium when the two people involved are separated by an enormous gap of prestige or power.  The person on the lower rung of the ladder always wins over the person at the top.  I can't believe that you don't understand that. 

Calling people "fools", morons , retards and the peanut gallery, the inflation of your significance on BB.com, your weird def'n of a 'true fan' and just your defensive posturing in general amount to gross negligence in your performance as a representative for your company. 

These people should mean nothing to you.  Have you stopped to figure out why you are even responding?  or what you are trying to accomplish? 

just walk away.

gross negligence ?   LOL  what's next...high crimes?   :)

shortfatugly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #151 on: May 04, 2006, 04:41:25 AM »
gross negligence ?   LOL  what's next...high crimes?   :)

and misdemeanors? 

what is it that buddy says ?
 

"Callous indifference....."  usually to the " pain of suffering...." 

that too!

thought it would get a laugh... 

doesn't matter much really- Bob is the one who appears the fool when he should not be thought as such.  The rest of us are mere fools playing on a stage. 

A person is hired to be the front man for a company and shouldn't be involved in activities that make either himself or the company look bad or be cast in a bad/negative light.  It's usually a clause in a contract but doesn't necessarily have to be explicit as to the activities in which one can actively engage.

Bob could have done something to bring that clause to come into effect.

Thankfully this board is not popular and only 5 or 6 guys read it.  So Bob is safe for another day.

Santa Claus

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Getbig!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #152 on: May 04, 2006, 04:46:24 AM »
Does this mean he is on your "Naughty List". Add Shawn too.  You'll get the memo in a couple weeks.  Just giving you an advance notice.

I just have a disliking for suits, and it seems that Bob is very close to becoming one. I almost look forward to it, because now he is a suit in disguise, which seem to confuse people. One fixed win should not give him any cred at all. I guess that was their plan anyway. "What do you say now? The athlete's rep is a champion bodybuilder!" Champion my ass. I have nothing personally against Bob, I just think he isn't telling the whole story on a lot of things. And the debate of him being able to see personal info should be enough to take his athlete's rep status away immediately. Sickening.

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #153 on: May 04, 2006, 04:48:52 AM »
it's pathetic that he would feel so threatened to even say that.  what kind of powertrip is he on if his employer breaches security and discloses our personal information.  i'm glad i have filters galore for such internet sicko's.  you think they tap into who listens to the online radio broadcast and from what locations? 

shortfatugly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #154 on: May 04, 2006, 04:49:52 AM »
a degree a negligence perhaps

ok..

perhaps not a gross...

how about a dozen negligence?

:D

shortfatugly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #155 on: May 04, 2006, 04:53:18 AM »
I just have a disliking for suits, and it seems that Bob is very close to becoming one. I almost look forward to it, because now he is a suit in disguise, which seem to confuse people. One fixed win should not give him any cred at all. I guess that was their plan anyway. "What do you say now? The athlete's rep is a champion bodybuilder!" Champion my ass. I have nothing personally against Bob, I just think he isn't telling the whole story on a lot of things. And the debate of him being able to see personal info should be enough to take his athlete's rep status away immediately. Sickening.

just to keep this going and increase my post count,

i don't believe that it was entirely fixed: maybe he wasn't the clear winner but he was a good winner nonetheless.  It is debatable as to whether it was fixed or not.  What isn't debatable is that Rusty Jeffers deserved a better look and far more comparisons between the top guys than he received.  That is the point that many people are making.

Santa Claus

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Getbig!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #156 on: May 04, 2006, 05:04:42 AM »
Santa, take some deep breaths and relax... You are getting worked up for no reason at all. If  you believe that man is on top of the totem pole, cool. At the same time many others believe that the universe is too huge and marvelous to have happened by accident.

Seems like my original post got deleted. I am not necessarily saying that man is on top of the totem pole, as you put it. It just seems strange to me that someone can practise christianity the way they were told in ground school. Waving the flag of Jesus, and wanting others to follow. And when you say that the universe is too huge and marvelous to happen by accident, really hurts your case, too. The fact that it is so huge dictates greater possibillity of life stastistically. Scientists are very much in agreement that we simply cannot be alone, that with all the planets in the different systems, life is statistically bound to exist somewhere else. Do these beings worship Jesus, too? I think not, and who is to say that you are right and they are wrong about that? You say it's a huge world, yet you can't seem to look longer than your own nose. Typical hidden elitist ways of christianity. Hearing what they want to hear, believing what they want to believe, and throwing the rest away. You better think twice before talking about science and reason when it comes to religion, because those three doesn't mix. Your quoted post is a classic example of christian quasi-science.

LifterChick

  • Guest
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #157 on: May 04, 2006, 05:20:49 AM »
I've been silenced by nobody.

I do apologize to the true fans here, (whatever that percentage is)....for continuing to recognize tools like 240, Sarcasm, Goatboy, etc...by responding to them and wasting my time.

I will no longer respond to the foolish posts, and give any satisfaction to the trolls that continue to post here, despite having nothing good to say, nothing worthwhile to offer, and certainly not bodybuilding fans...

I will continue to post information for the Pro's, and contribute to worthy discussions...and those who have demonstrated to have a genuine interest in the sport of BB.



To the fools...don't bother. Post what you want, you'll get nothing in return. I refuse to acknowledge your existence, as you have no lives to speak of anyway...almost all of the buffoons have one thing in common to prove this...thousands of worthless posts and a shitload of time to kill.

I suggest to the REAL fans of this board and BB, to follow in kind and take back what was once a great site to interact with the Pro's and talk shop about bodybuilding.

Please don't feed the animals!

Works for me... I guess

I hope Tosha gives you a good massage to relax you, and then slaps the taste out of your mouth for being an idiot.


LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #158 on: May 04, 2006, 06:28:05 AM »
Seems like my original post got deleted. I am not necessarily saying that man is on top of the totem pole, as you put it. It just seems strange to me that someone can practise christianity the way they were told in ground school. Waving the flag of Jesus, and wanting others to follow. And when you say that the universe is too huge and marvelous to happen by accident, really hurts your case, too. The fact that it is so huge dictates greater possibillity of life stastistically. Scientists are very much in agreement that we simply cannot be alone, that with all the planets in the different systems, life is statistically bound to exist somewhere else. Do these beings worship Jesus, too? I think not, and who is to say that you are right and they are wrong about that? You say it's a huge world, yet you can't seem to look longer than your own nose. Typical hidden elitist ways of christianity. Hearing what they want to hear, believing what they want to believe, and throwing the rest away. You better think twice before talking about science and reason when it comes to religion, because those three doesn't mix. Your quoted post is a classic example of christian quasi-science.

  Great points made in this post! They won't change my mind but they made me think.

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10925
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #159 on: May 04, 2006, 06:37:31 AM »
For those of you who don't know, Team Jesus is an attempted joke. 

Unfortunately satire and irony are not their strengths.. so they basically come off as useless christians with nothing interesting or funny to say

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #160 on: May 04, 2006, 06:41:25 AM »
For those of you who don't know, Team Jesus is an attempted joke. 

Unfortunately satire and irony are not their strengths.. so they basically come off as useless christians with nothing interesting or funny to say

  This is an outrage :D

will938

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
  • No Bull!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #161 on: May 04, 2006, 06:46:35 AM »
*not to buy them as long as a man who insults the fans like this represents your company.  *

You get that, Bob?  Not a boycott- a call to get rid of unprofessional hacks like you.  Clear enough?



240! What the f*ck is wrong with you? you want to cost a man part of his income because you don't like him or he doesn't like you? that is just f*cking sad!

I seem to recall people having problems with you in the past, how about we call for a boycott on your web sites? or do you think that would be just a tad pathetic? grow the f*ck up and end your sad fued ::)
Team Efferding

will938

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
  • No Bull!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #162 on: May 04, 2006, 06:52:51 AM »
I am 100 percent sure, The majority population would rather look like me than you anyways.

hahahaha  Thought I would throw that in there.

Me and Sarcasm hahhah,Bast,BroadstreetBruiser, 240 and The Squad could outsell you any day of the week if we were approached with a product to push.  That ought to tell you something...

And I'm convinced you must be on something to give you such illusions of granduer! let me make it clear for you Anus, People as ugly as yourself(and you are ugly) should just sit in a corner and not draw attention to themselves ;D
Team Efferding

Santa Claus

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Getbig!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #163 on: May 04, 2006, 07:04:43 AM »
  Great points made in this post! They won't change my mind but they made me think.

That response in itself shows that your christianity scheme doesn't go very deep. Real christians would never admit to such things, so you are in the clear. Good for you. I don't even care if you are really religious or not, I just like a good discussion.

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10925
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #164 on: May 04, 2006, 07:10:46 AM »
Like I said, he really does think he's parodying christianity.

Unfortunately he forgot to actually come up with the irony :)

Honestly, until warhorse let me know about his fantastic scheme of "team jesus", the new great satire - which would of course replace the dearly timeoutted spanky capone's fabulous reign of race terror I had no idea. 

I just thought intenseone had been cloned.

Santa Claus

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Getbig!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #165 on: May 04, 2006, 07:15:59 AM »
Like I said, he really does think he's parodying christianity.

Unfortunately he forgot to actually come up with the irony :)


I know, I have seen enough here my four years to know that this Jesus thing isn't the real deal, I just couldn't resist.

Tre

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16548
  • "What you don't have is a career."
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #166 on: May 04, 2006, 07:37:08 AM »
so they basically come off as useless christians

As opposed to the other kind?

will938

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
  • No Bull!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #167 on: May 04, 2006, 08:05:44 AM »
If Bob loses part of his income over his pathetic and childish statements on the board, he's got nobody to blame but himself. That would be like a corporate executive punching out one of his employees, getting fired, then trying to blame the guy he hit because he "provoked" him.

That's true but if 240 didn't continually hound the guy then these things wouldn't get said. 240 just wants to keep pushing because he thinks he's some champion of a great cause, but to the majority(I would hope) it just looks pathetic! 240 enjoy your small dose of popularity while you can, it won't last forever and I'm sure you'll find yourself on the wrong end of these continued "ownings" at some point not too far away ;)
Team Efferding

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #168 on: May 04, 2006, 08:10:42 AM »
fear not, will938.  Everyone knows I've been owned up and down here.  Owning breeds humility, and I am definitely humble.  I'm not gloating on here. 

Also, you'll notice I asked Bob a series of questions, then I stepped back and let him dig that hole for himself.  He had a million chances to end it, to explain his words, to just walk away, to back off from his original statement.  Instead, he just kept boldly insulting everyone here, and standing behind his erroneous statements.  And all I did was walk away and let him do it.  I've been very quiet since it happened.

Bottom line: He lied to us to scare us.  I called him out on it.  He got very angry and made it a huge spectacle of it.  All we did was get Bob to show his true colors.

will938

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
  • No Bull!
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #169 on: May 04, 2006, 08:14:22 AM »
I'm not gloating on here. 


Well I'll tell you what mate, this certainly does not come across in the many post' you keep on generating
Team Efferding

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #170 on: May 04, 2006, 08:16:24 AM »
I've been silenced by nobody.

I do apologize to the true fans here, (whatever that percentage is)....for continuing to recognize tools like 240, Sarcasm, Goatboy, etc...by responding to them and wasting my time.

I will no longer respond to the foolish posts, and give any satisfaction to the trolls that continue to post here, despite having nothing good to say, nothing worthwhile to offer, and certainly not bodybuilding fans...

I will continue to post information for the Pro's, and contribute to worthy discussions...and those who have demonstrated to have a genuine interest in the sport of BB.



To the fools...don't bother. Post what you want, you'll get nothing in return. I refuse to acknowledge your existence, as you have no lives to speak of anyway...almost all of the buffoons have one thing in common to prove this...thousands of worthless posts and a shitload of time to kill.

I suggest to the REAL fans of this board and BB, to follow in kind and take back what was once a great site to interact with the Pro's and talk shop about bodybuilding.

Please don't feed the animals!
so basically the only people you're going to respond to you is people who idolize you and just blindly accept anything you have to say without question, you need to go over to mayhem, all the Bob Chick Kool Aid drinkers you want over there.
Jaejonna rows 125!!

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #171 on: May 04, 2006, 01:21:11 PM »
That response in itself shows that your christianity scheme doesn't go very deep. Real christians would never admit to such things, so you are in the clear. Good for you. I don't even care if you are really religious or not, I just like a good discussion.

 You're a bit too insightful for my taste ;D

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #172 on: May 04, 2006, 01:33:00 PM »
Hahahahaha, your so pathetic.

Gee thanks 240, you're so brave to rise to the occasion for the people who were shitting their pants over Chick's comments. I bet they couldnt sleep at night knowing Chick might find them and beat them up but now that you yeilded your mighty keyboard and put him in his place the little people can go on with our lives without fear.  ::)

Are you always such a drama queen?

 240 is a drama queen, but that is sometimes a good thing ;D

RAT MCBAT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 453
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #173 on: May 04, 2006, 01:38:22 PM »
The Fans of Bodybuilding are sick and tired of the overt gayness, the lack of quality contests, the bullshit lies.  

For a few years now, there has been no real reason to support bodybuilding in its current state.  

The FANS dictate that it needs to change and now the time has come.

We are more important than any Pro.  


Well said !
forget what you know

shortfatugly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
Re: BBing.com disputes Bob Chick's claims
« Reply #174 on: May 05, 2006, 04:13:43 AM »
You're a bit too insightful for my taste ;D

since you are bringing up insight over here, I'll repost this schtick here for your perusal.  Lame lame lame brother...since you go on about being team Jesus, then you are Brother Lame...   

Quote
Lucius,

I made the comment that you flip flop on the issues as you certainly do.  You appear to be a sychophant; a Smithers character.

You latch on to certain posts from people in order to post your attempts at ironic sarcasm or humor.  it doesn't matter which person posts: you'll interject some often lame comment in order to get a laugh in spite of the fact that you often will quote people on opposing sides or having opposing views. 

However, like most people who resort to this form of humor- you fail to see when someone else does it. 

You see yourself as endlessly amusing and infinitely droll yet when someone else does the same thing, your automatic response is to assume that they are an idiot. 

Although I certainly am an idiot- that was sheer coincidence. 

Like I said, it was too easy to get you to comment on my purposeful misuse of the negative in my post.   

I don't believe that you have had any significant insights on this board as yet although I haven't read all of your posts. 

I also don't believe that you have had an original thought- although randomness and free association could be original.  Family guy does it and it works quite well. 

What you actually do is steal other people's ideas and pass them off as your own.  Probably your use of " me. lt. do . wn" was prompted by the fact that you saw several other people ( probably the squad ) use this in their posts and you tried it in order to fit in. 

You used it so much and so often that you more than most, caused the admin to alter the program. 

This " insert name here  dwarfs you " schtick was also lame and quite likely, not an original idea either.  This was equally as lame as the previous one.

Then you started with the  smiley.   

Now you seem intent on appropriating " deflection" as part of your posts.  Neither this nor any of the previous catch phrases was original.  And now, their use has cast them into the " lame" category. 

you seem desperate to fit in.  Do you fit in anywhere? 

This is what I was talking about when I posted that you are still beating that dead horse.  And that I thought that you were better than this.  And I still do.  But try to have originality.  Because you aren't able to do it better.  Although if repetition counts for anything, you are working yourself into it. 

I don't wish this to be hateful nor an attempt at owing you.  My comment about your Bruce lee post was not about owning you. 

now back to our regularly scheduled program.