Do You Have Any Questions About What Happened in 2001?

[Palumboism]

Highly experienced high rise building designer interview.  This guy is an expert he know his stuff inside and out.

@2:40 he describes the exterior construction the goes on to say "those planes were shredded the moment they started into the building".  Which is exactly what I was thinking when I saw the building design.

[Humble Narcissist]

^^^ "Conspiracy theorists" prove to be right more often than not.

[ProudVirgin69]

Google bird strikes on 747. Those are fucking seagulls smashing the front of fuselage and windscreens.
There is no way that those aluminium alloy wing would just glide right thru solid steed beams and structural glass.

Image that if the plane would be stationary and you swatted it with this huge skyscraper. What would happen. The plade would explode to pieces and debris would fly everywhere.
Not plane imbedding itself to the building.

Building 7, Flight93 are giveaways. Pentagon had a fuselage hole, not even holes for 8metric ton steel engines at wings.

Flight 93 left hardly any debris. Because it sunk into earth. Look at any crash site pics. It just won’t happen.

Obviously the planes got destroyed, I’m not saying the planes cut the towers in half.

Regardless - 300,000lbs of ANYTHING smashing into a structure at 500mph is going to compromise structural integrity to a massive degree.  A steel tower isn’t designed to withstand those kinds of lateral forces.  Compromised structural elements weakened by a fire (750F fire will ruin the heat treatment and soften the steel) and its pretty easy to imagine how the plane collisions could cause the collapse of those towers

[illuminati]

Obviously the planes got destroyed, I’m not saying the planes cut the towers in half.

Regardless - 300,000lbs of ANYTHING smashing into a structure at 500mph is going to compromise structural integrity to a massive degree.  A steel tower isn’t designed to withstand those kinds of lateral forces.  Compromised structural elements weakened by a fire (750F fire will ruin the heat treatment and soften the steel) and its pretty easy to imagine how the plane collisions could cause the collapse of those towers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-3FQtZnk2A[/youtube

Calmly & factually counter what he says in this video - he makes a lot of very valid points
About the design & structure of these buildings.
He wants answers as the 'official' narrative doesn't add up.

[Palumboism]

Obviously the planes got destroyed, I’m not saying the planes cut the towers in half.

Regardless - 300,000lbs of ANYTHING smashing into a structure at 500mph is going to compromise structural integrity to a massive degree.  A steel tower isn’t designed to withstand those kinds of lateral forces. 

These buildings were specifically designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 which has a maximum takeoff weight of 330,000 pounds, which is actually higher that the 767-200.  These buildings were designed to take the impact of a plane the size of the 767.

Compromised structural elements weakened by a fire (750F fire will ruin the heat treatment and soften the steel) and its pretty easy to imagine how the plane collisions could cause the collapse of those towers

None of the structural elements of this building were heat treated.  Heat treating is expensive and can result in a brittle material.  The chemical properties of the steel give it it's strength along with the rolling and forming processes when manufacturing.  You can put a cast iron pan in a hot oven and it doesn't weaken it.

All of the exterior columns on these buildings on the floor that was hit used .375" thick steel and the fuselage of the 767 uses .063" Aluminum. 

[Irongrip400]

These buildings were specifically designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 which has a maximum takeoff weight of 330,000 pounds, which is actually higher that the 767-200.  These buildings were designed to take the impact of a plane the size of the 767.


None of the structural elements of this building were heat treated.  Heat treating is expensive and can result in a brittle material.  The chemical properties of the steel give it it's strength along with the rolling and forming processes when manufacturing.  You can put a cast iron pan in a hot oven and it doesn't weaken it.

All of the exterior columns on these buildings on the floor that was hit used .375" thick steel and the fuselage of the 767 uses .063" Aluminum.

Your last sentence doesn’t necessarily hold up. It’s not like it was a spit ball, it was a 300,000 pound object hitting a building.

I once shot a potato through my grandmothers garage sheathing that was made out of T-111. Is wood harder than a potato or was it that it was traveling a few hundred miles an hour?

[Palumboism]

Your last sentence doesn’t necessarily hold up. It’s not like it was a spit ball, it was a 300,000 pound object hitting a building.

I once shot a potato through my grandmothers garage sheathing that was made out of T-111. Is wood harder than a potato or was it that it was traveling a few hundred miles an hour?

Aircraft aren't designed to be a battering ram.  It may be 300,000 pounds, but it has a structural skin that's only 0.063" thick.  It also has a height of 17'9" meaning it's not just hitting one floor, it's hitting two floors.

It's hitting five vertical columns, three horizontal beams, and two steel reinforce concrete slabs and it's only 0.063" thick.  It was just shredded.

I think explosives were used to take the building down and were also used on the impact zone.  It's the number of columns they show cut as well as how they were cut.  The ends of the wings would not be able to cut through the columns and it's showing they were cut right through.  They used massive amounts of explosives and massive amounts of Thermite on all three buildings. 

[chaos]

Aircraft aren't designed to be a battering ram.  It may be 300,000 pounds, but it has a structural skin that's only 0.063" thick.  It also has a height of 17'9" meaning it's not just hitting one floor, it's hitting two floors.

It's hitting five vertical columns, three horizontal beams, and two steel reinforce concrete slabs and it's only 0.063" thick.  It was just shredded.

Are you saying 300,000#'s of 1/16" thick aluminum, steel and fuel traveling at close to 500mph didn't cause any damage?

[Palumboism]

Are you saying 300,000#'s of 1/16" thick aluminum, steel and fuel traveling at close to 500mph didn't cause any damage?

No, I'm saying the front of the fuselage crumpled on impact like the crumple zone in a car, but even more so.  When it hit the wing box and engines, and wing spars it ran into some heavy material.  Engine are cast and weigh about 20,000 pound.

The absolute heart of the matter is the first thing that went down when the first tower collapsed was the antenna at the top.  That's critical because that was bolted to all the strong center columns in the middle of the buildings. It free fell meaning all those massive columns had no resistance.  That can only happen if they were detonated and cut using Thermite.  It was the design engineer of the building that was questioning how that was possible.

This was an expert job and I believe they used explosive and Thermite on the impact zone as well.

The smoking gun is how fast it fell with no resistance from the massive steel columns below.

[chaos]

No, I'm saying the front of the fuselage crumpled on impact like the crumple zone in a car, but even more so.

So there is no thicker support/bracing behind the fuselage?
For the record I question the official narrative all day but to minimize the damage cause by 300,000+lbs moving at 500mph and the subsequent fire that burned for an hour to an hour and a half would be dismissive.
Question for you...how many people would it take to run all that thermite in 3(?) buildings? Who would detonate that? Where are the installers or even the manufacturers that sell thermite to talk about the increase in sales?