Do You Have Any Questions About What Happened in 2001?

[Palumboism]

Highly experienced high rise building designer interview.  This guy is an expert he know his stuff inside and out.

@2:40 he describes the exterior construction the goes on to say "those planes were shredded the moment they started into the building".  Which is exactly what I was thinking when I saw the building design.

[Humble Narcissist]

^^^ "Conspiracy theorists" prove to be right more often than not.

[ProudVirgin69]

Google bird strikes on 747. Those are fucking seagulls smashing the front of fuselage and windscreens.
There is no way that those aluminium alloy wing would just glide right thru solid steed beams and structural glass.

Image that if the plane would be stationary and you swatted it with this huge skyscraper. What would happen. The plade would explode to pieces and debris would fly everywhere.
Not plane imbedding itself to the building.

Building 7, Flight93 are giveaways. Pentagon had a fuselage hole, not even holes for 8metric ton steel engines at wings.

Flight 93 left hardly any debris. Because it sunk into earth. Look at any crash site pics. It just won’t happen.

Obviously the planes got destroyed, I’m not saying the planes cut the towers in half.

Regardless - 300,000lbs of ANYTHING smashing into a structure at 500mph is going to compromise structural integrity to a massive degree.  A steel tower isn’t designed to withstand those kinds of lateral forces.  Compromised structural elements weakened by a fire (750F fire will ruin the heat treatment and soften the steel) and its pretty easy to imagine how the plane collisions could cause the collapse of those towers

[illuminati]

Obviously the planes got destroyed, I’m not saying the planes cut the towers in half.

Regardless - 300,000lbs of ANYTHING smashing into a structure at 500mph is going to compromise structural integrity to a massive degree.  A steel tower isn’t designed to withstand those kinds of lateral forces.  Compromised structural elements weakened by a fire (750F fire will ruin the heat treatment and soften the steel) and its pretty easy to imagine how the plane collisions could cause the collapse of those towers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-3FQtZnk2A[/youtube

Calmly & factually counter what he says in this video - he makes a lot of very valid points
About the design & structure of these buildings.
He wants answers as the 'official' narrative doesn't add up.

[Palumboism]

Obviously the planes got destroyed, I’m not saying the planes cut the towers in half.

Regardless - 300,000lbs of ANYTHING smashing into a structure at 500mph is going to compromise structural integrity to a massive degree.  A steel tower isn’t designed to withstand those kinds of lateral forces. 

These buildings were specifically designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 which has a maximum takeoff weight of 330,000 pounds, which is actually higher that the 767-200.  These buildings were designed to take the impact of a plane the size of the 767.

Compromised structural elements weakened by a fire (750F fire will ruin the heat treatment and soften the steel) and its pretty easy to imagine how the plane collisions could cause the collapse of those towers

None of the structural elements of this building were heat treated.  Heat treating is expensive and can result in a brittle material.  The chemical properties of the steel give it it's strength along with the rolling and forming processes when manufacturing.  You can put a cast iron pan in a hot oven and it doesn't weaken it.

All of the exterior columns on these buildings on the floor that was hit used .375" thick steel and the fuselage of the 767 uses .063" Aluminum. 

[Irongrip400]

These buildings were specifically designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 which has a maximum takeoff weight of 330,000 pounds, which is actually higher that the 767-200.  These buildings were designed to take the impact of a plane the size of the 767.


None of the structural elements of this building were heat treated.  Heat treating is expensive and can result in a brittle material.  The chemical properties of the steel give it it's strength along with the rolling and forming processes when manufacturing.  You can put a cast iron pan in a hot oven and it doesn't weaken it.

All of the exterior columns on these buildings on the floor that was hit used .375" thick steel and the fuselage of the 767 uses .063" Aluminum.

Your last sentence doesn’t necessarily hold up. It’s not like it was a spit ball, it was a 300,000 pound object hitting a building.

I once shot a potato through my grandmothers garage sheathing that was made out of T-111. Is wood harder than a potato or was it that it was traveling a few hundred miles an hour?