Author Topic: Priest vs. Heath (Read 15067 times)

FOR REAL · « **Reply #25 on:** May 15, 2006, 09:17:06 PM »

Are we talking about bodybuilding? Midget toss or hotdog eating contests?

Bodybuilding- Heath

Midget Toss- Priest

Nathan's hotdog eating contest- Priest

See, 2 out of 3 aint bad..

Oh also how about runing your body with retarded tattoos.. Again Priest wins hands down!!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #26 on:** May 15, 2006, 09:19:34 PM »

Quote from: FOR REAL on May 15, 2006, 09:17:06 PM

Are we talking about bodybuilding? Midget toss or hotdog eating contests?

Bodybuilding- Heath

Midget Toss- Priest

Nathan's hotdog eating contest- Priest

See, 2 out of 3 aint bad..

Oh also how about runing your body with retarded tattoos.. Again Priest wins hands down!!

I must agree with you there, FOR REAL! I don't understand why people get out of control with ugly tattoos

phyxsius · « **Reply #27 on:** May 15, 2006, 09:23:09 PM »

Heath dwarts Lee..

And also Heath can slam dunk

FOR REAL · « **Reply #28 on:** May 15, 2006, 09:25:16 PM »

Lee can slam dunk a doughnut at dunkin doughnuts.. no prob..

he can also be an extra in willy wanka and the chocolate factory...

OOOMPA LOOMPA DOOOPITY DOOOOOOO

phyxsius · « **Reply #29 on:** May 15, 2006, 09:30:47 PM »

Quote from: FOR REAL on May 15, 2006, 09:25:16 PM

Lee can slam dunk a doughnut at dunkin doughnuts.. no prob..

he can also be an extra in willy wanka and the chocolate factory...

OOOMPA LOOMPA DOOOPITY DOOOOOOO

ROFL!!!

HowDog · « **Reply #30 on:** May 15, 2006, 11:06:05 PM »

No contest Heath. Why else do you think Lee went to PDI, guys like Heath will somke Lee. End of story and don't kid yourself hardcore b/c you know it is true.

Stavios · « **Reply #31 on:** May 16, 2006, 09:37:08 AM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 15, 2006, 09:15:06 PM

Lee has a soft lower body and is almost never able to dial in the glutes or the quads. Have your eyes been clawed out by eagles?

Lee's upper body hardness own phil

that is a fact

alexxx · « **Reply #32 on:** May 16, 2006, 09:55:40 AM »

Lee has Heath beat on nail texture and thats about it. They both have crappy pecs!

Man of Steel · « **Reply #33 on:** May 16, 2006, 09:58:31 AM »

Quote from: Lee_a_priest on May 15, 2006, 07:19:03 PM

SORRY TO TELL YOU HAD BLOOD WORK DONE THE OTHER DAY ALL IS GOOD.
SO DR FOX PLEASE TRY AGAIN

BLAH BLAH BLAH

Hey Lucius, what Lee is tryin to say is that you suck fat dick.

alexxx · « **Reply #34 on:** May 16, 2006, 09:59:13 AM »

Quote from: Man of Steel on May 16, 2006, 09:58:31 AM

Hey Lucius, what Lee is tryin to say is that you suck fat dick.

You you speack gay too?

Dingleberry · « **Reply #35 on:** May 16, 2006, 09:59:55 AM »

Quote from: CAPTAIN MARVEL on May 15, 2006, 07:24:42 PM

Heath has Lee on lats, chest(but his chest isn't great either), and conditioning thats it. Lee kills him on delts, tri's, bi's, forearms, calves and still beats him (but it is closer) on quads, hams, and spinal erectors. They both have structural flaws.

Agreed

Adam Empire · « **Reply #36 on:** May 16, 2006, 10:18:46 AM »

Can we see how Heath does in future contests before announcing him as the secong coming?

Remember Kamali got 4th in his first contest and qualified for the O - hasn't done crap since.
Remember Art Atwood won his first pro contest - he hasn't competed in a long time.
Remember Richard Jones was supposed to be the next O champ - he really didn't live up to his expectations yet.

I have seen threads comparing Heath to Lee, Flex, etc. It's only been one show so far - let's wait and see what happens. Le's see what he looks like compared to Jay and the other mass-ers...

IceCold · « **Reply #37 on:** May 16, 2006, 12:16:52 PM »

i was suprised to read that phil competed at under 220 lbs. i would have to give it to priest- esp. this year at the arnold, aussie, and san fran, when he showed up hard, full, and dry. there is just something freaky aboug lee that phil may never have.

if only lee was competing like he was in 98....

225 lbs. on a 5'4 frame and was one of the hardest guys in any show.

lee, what happened?

Dredlock Rasta · « **Reply #38 on:** May 16, 2006, 01:10:42 PM »

Quote from: cap86 on May 16, 2006, 07:55:58 AM

You guys are smoking crack. So I guess Franco Coulmbo was a shitty BBer because he was short? Dumbest fucking logic I have ever heard. How is it you think that taller guys with smaller measurements are more impressive than a shorter guy with better and bigger proportions? "It's pathetic!"-Lee. I'm thinking that you PMed Lee and he didn't respond so now you're pissed. I honestly think that if you both saw Lee face to face you would not say shit anout his height or physique. Would you? Ah, jealously thy name is dickhead 1 (FOR REAL) and dickhead 2 (HOW DOG).

Logic can be dumb?

gibberj2 · « **Reply #39 on:** May 16, 2006, 04:49:19 PM »

Priest is better. Heath needs to establish himself more first of all. Secondly the competition at the Colorado was weak exept for Darrem but Priest I think is better than Darrem when they're both in best shape.

phyxsius · « **Reply #40 on:** May 16, 2006, 05:22:43 PM »

Anyhow anyway, I wish both all the best in this coming mr.olympia..

HowieW · « **Reply #41 on:** May 16, 2006, 05:24:05 PM »

Quote from: Dredlock Rasta on May 15, 2006, 05:15:49 PM

who wins?

Both in top shape, Heath, if both are a bit off Lee P may get him due his overall mass and shape, guns, etc

Dredlock Rasta · « **Reply #42 on:** May 16, 2006, 05:53:50 PM »

Quote from: cap86 on May 16, 2006, 04:43:25 PM

Are you stoned? Probably considering your name.

Logic cannot itself be dumb, however an argument can be illogical.

buffbong · « **Reply #43 on:** May 16, 2006, 06:02:35 PM »

heath is more complete but priest if in shape and full cant beat anyone hes a freak and small waist. for the 98 225 i was thinking the same thing and was looking at some old mags lee was still tight at that wieght but he didnt display the condition he does now he came in at the ironman at 209 and tight as fuck...

3Dkiller · « **Reply #44 on:** May 16, 2006, 06:08:20 PM »

Phil is nothing more then a hype

Hendrix · « **Reply #45 on:** May 16, 2006, 06:08:52 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on May 16, 2006, 12:16:52 PM

i was suprised to read that phil competed at under 220 lbs. i would have to give it to priest- esp. this year at the arnold, aussie, and san fran, when he showed up hard, full, and dry. there is just something freaky aboug lee that phil may never have.

if only lee was competing like he was in 98....

225 lbs. on a 5'4 frame and was one of the hardest guys in any show.

lee, what happened?

Preist has never been 225 in contest shape more like 200 pounds.I think somebody has been lying about weight the sameway saying Arnold had 22 inch arms when in reality he had 20 inch arms.Though i give Lee credit he has guenuine 21 inch arms and is a better bodybuilder than Columbo ever was when comparing height to physique.
I find it impossible to say whos better Heath or Preist until theres a direct comparison on stage.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #46 on:** May 16, 2006, 06:24:18 PM »

I think we should hear it from the man himself. Lee can you tell us?

BroadStreetBruiser · « **Reply #47 on:** May 16, 2006, 06:26:15 PM »

Heath Ledger?

Hendrix · « **Reply #48 on:** May 16, 2006, 06:55:33 PM »

Quote from: cap86 on May 16, 2006, 06:22:45 PM

Wrong. He competed at about 225 in the 1990's. He didn't drop weight to 200 or under until he won his first pro victory in San Fran a few years back.

I Know he claimed 225 but it was never tested on a scale till the 2005 Ironman where he weighed 199.I cannot see 25 pounds of lost muscle when he took out the Iron Man in 2006 when compared to pitures of him in the 90s.To lose 25 pounds that equates to about 10% of lost muscle on a 5,4 frame.
When you compare Flex in the 90s to Preist in the 90s its somewhat confusing that Flex weighed in the region of 230 pounds and that Preist was 225.When you compare the photos Flex is visibly much bigger.
I say Preist never weighed 225 in contest shape as simple as that,If your reading this Lee please inform us of the truth.

Lee_a_priest · « **Reply #49 on:** May 16, 2006, 08:01:09 PM »

Quote from: cap86 on May 16, 2006, 06:22:45 PM

Wrong. He competed at about 225 in the 1990's. He didn't drop weight to 200 or under until he won his first pro victory in San Fran a few years back.

That is true --when the ripped ass started being the decideing factor which i still dont have and never will .Do i care ?f**k NO

Author Topic: Priest vs. Heath (Read 15067 times)

Stavios