Author Topic: now who has a better back..  (Read 13161 times)

Sir William Idol

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3543
  • you got a fight comin
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #25 on: May 16, 2006, 10:56:11 AM »
if you guys read my training book you can be built like me




im not sure how this would help us
its comin today

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #26 on: May 16, 2006, 11:21:05 AM »
coleman.   and in this shot its obvious how much bigger colemans arms are.


colemans got the back of a fucking teenage mutant ninja turtle.
dude that pic is in favour of coleman..coleman is closer to the camera...during that time yates blows him away..dude the year is 1996 and 1996 was dorians year..coleman is no fuckin match for yates in 1996..coleman is lookin like a fuckin small dick head. next to yates..i always liked coleman with size that he started to display after 2000,specially in 2003 and 2004 when coleman was almost 300lbs ripped..coleman loooked like shit in 1996....size suits coleman alot...coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass....but as far as this pic goes yates looks a 100000000000 times better than small dick head coleman
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83368
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #27 on: May 16, 2006, 11:31:17 AM »
dude that pic is in favour of coleman..coleman is closer to the camera...during that time yates blows him away..dude the year is 1996 and 1996 was dorians year..coleman is no fuckin match for yates in 1996..coleman is lookin like a fuckin small dick head. next to yates..i always liked coleman with size that he started to display after 2000,specially in 2003 and 2004 when coleman was almost 300lbs ripped..coleman loooked like shit in 1996....size suits coleman alot...coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass....but as far as this pic goes yates looks a 100000000000 times better than small dick head coleman

Quote
coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass

Smart man right here !!

Sir William Idol

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3543
  • you got a fight comin
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #28 on: May 16, 2006, 11:51:56 AM »
dude that pic is in favour of coleman..coleman is closer to the camera...during that time yates blows him away..dude the year is 1996 and 1996 was dorians year..coleman is no fuckin match for yates in 1996..coleman is lookin like a fuckin small dick head. next to yates..i always liked coleman with size that he started to display after 2000,specially in 2003 and 2004 when coleman was almost 300lbs ripped..coleman loooked like shit in 1996....size suits coleman alot...coleman is ain't a aesthetic bodybuilder and he never was...coleman is synomous with mass....but as far as this pic goes yates looks a 100000000000 times better than small dick head coleman

for the record, we're talking about THIS PICTURE here.

colemans back has to be at least two inches thicker than doz's (if you measured from spine outwards), and his back is also wider.

justify how hes closer to the camera, i dont see that

colemans muscles are rounder, his arms are bigger, and he IS more aesthetic than yates here.


as far as conditioning goes they look about even based on this picture  (this picture is also about the shittiest screen cap you can get)

based on the two pics, the one from this thread and the front shot from the other one, coleman beats yates
its comin today

HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #29 on: May 16, 2006, 12:16:20 PM »
What training book? all we need is Flex magazine

if you guys read my training book you can be built like me
Get Big, or Die Trying

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2006, 12:29:50 PM »
coleman owns yates in that pic... and this waas before his peak...
so at his peak ??? ??? ??? ???
choice is an illusion

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83368
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #31 on: May 16, 2006, 12:36:12 PM »
for the record, we're talking about THIS PICTURE here.

colemans back has to be at least two inches thicker than doz's (if you measured from spine outwards), and his back is also wider.

justify how hes closer to the camera, i dont see that

colemans muscles are rounder, his arms are bigger, and he IS more aesthetic than yates here.


as far as conditioning goes they look about even based on this picture  (this picture is also about the shittiest screen cap you can get)

based on the two pics, the one from this thread and the front shot from the other one, coleman beats yates

Yates leaves Coleman for dead in every espect of the back , from thickness , to hardness , to detail , and lower back , to having lower lats , to back width , this is from the same contest .

theonlyone

  • Guest
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #32 on: May 16, 2006, 12:46:44 PM »
Yates leaves Coleman for dead in every espect of the back , from thickness , to hardness , to detail , and lower back , to having lower lats , to back width , this is from the same contest .
Coleman is owned here though he ronster represents better asthetic

monte45

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 27
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #33 on: May 16, 2006, 01:47:28 PM »
hell my back is better and im 6feet6 im a foot taller than these juiced up bikini bitches IM ALL NATURAL
hahaha .....some people kill me "bikini bitches" lol if coleman and dorian, in his day were in that room together you wouldnt even be able to see you kitchen  lol.

Sir William Idol

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3543
  • you got a fight comin
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #34 on: May 16, 2006, 02:07:34 PM »
Yates leaves Coleman for dead in every espect of the back , from thickness , to hardness , to detail , and lower back , to having lower lats , to back width , this is from the same contest .

ND we're not talking about the contest, we're not talking about the picture you posted, we're talking about the original pic at the beginning of the thread.  i think overall in the picture you posted yates wins, but yates DOES NOT win in the original pic, thats just fact.
its comin today

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #35 on: May 16, 2006, 02:14:40 PM »
in this pic i would go with dorian yates.....

That's because you are BLIND!!!! Even an IDIOT can see RONNIE is light years ahead of Dorian.

In any case why are you even worried about Dorian now??? He is out of bodybuilding, weighs about 165 pounds now and will NEVER COMPETE AGAIN!!!

RONNIE COLEMAN is the now reigning MR OLYMPIA with NO COMPETITOR anywhere near him.

I hope this ends all of those Dorian Yates threads....the GREAT WHITE HOPE never was and NEVER WILL BE!!

RONNIE RULES!!!!
C

Dingleberry

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2408
  • My nuts, your chin, any questions?
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #36 on: May 16, 2006, 02:16:12 PM »
That's because you are BLIND!!!! Even an IDIOT can see RONNIE is light years ahead of Dorian.

In any case why are you even worried about Dorian now??? He is out of bodybuilding, weighs about 165 pounds now and will NEVER COMPETE AGAIN!!!

RONNIE COLEMAN is the now reigning MR OLYMPIA with NO COMPETITOR anywhere near him.

I hope this ends all of those Dorian Yates threads....the GREAT WHITE HOPE never was and NEVER WILL BE!!

RONNIE RULES!!!!

Holy M.e.l.t.d.o.w.n. batman!
tiny-tit bounty hunter

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #37 on: May 16, 2006, 02:24:46 PM »

Ronnie has the better taper and width, Dorian has a little better detail.
I would give the advantage to Ronnie because his taper (and arms and esp. delts from the back) is much better. Also, we cannot really see his hams and glutes in that shot, and we know that Ronnie had better hams and glutes than dorian when he was just 14 years old.

 However, This just goes to illistrate how much better Ronnie was in 98 and 99 than he was in 96.


here is how he looked in 1998.

Now compare the two shots.

Its obvious that ND's crazy argument that Ronnie was just as good in 96/7 as he was in 98/99 is totally retarded.


the standards simply progressed.  Not taking anything away from Dorian, its just that the bar was raised.

Here is a shot from 99:


Ronnie was even wider in 1999.

Ronnie in 1996 was not the Ronnie of 98/99.

ronnie at his peak would have crushed ND's favorite construction worker.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #38 on: May 16, 2006, 02:25:24 PM »
hahaha .....some people kill me "bikini bitches" lol if coleman and dorian, in his day were in that room together you wouldnt even be able to see you kitchen  lol.

the top of their nasty heads wouldnt even come up to my sholder. dare to compare
A

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #39 on: May 16, 2006, 02:28:35 PM »
haha, no shit. That lighting is perfect.
MY MUSCLES MAKE THE LIGHT PERFECT
A

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #40 on: May 16, 2006, 02:33:25 PM »
hey waddy you left you boyfriend hanging.. adonis is the man in your relationship!?  :-\
just push some weight!

HowieW

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3785
  • Getbig!
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #41 on: May 16, 2006, 02:43:17 PM »
How long did it take you to find the right light?

LOL  LMFAO, very funny reply...a classic get big zinger
Kelly Ryan married well!  Free Titus!

Deadpool

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14027
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #42 on: May 16, 2006, 02:45:28 PM »
really, looks like that was taken by candlelight.
X

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #43 on: May 16, 2006, 02:56:31 PM »
Dorian's middle back is unbelievable and will always be bigger than Ronnie's even at his peak. But everything else from lats, traps, lower back go to Ronnie both in this pic and in his peak.
~

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #44 on: May 16, 2006, 03:01:56 PM »
The only thing Ronnie destroys Yates on in those shots are arms....he definitely destroys Yates in arms.   Although, Coleman at the '01 Arnold and '03 Mr O would most likely defeat a prime Yates (circa '93) and a prime Haney....done and done.



SNB

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • check yo' self
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #45 on: May 16, 2006, 03:11:53 PM »
and ronnie's got no IQ.. dorian is a veritable einstein of bodybuildin compared to ronnie.  ::)

dorian did it all on his own .. ronnie is just an automatom of chad ..... ''heave that dumper .. heave it'

and the thing i love about dorian more than anyone else is his INTEGRITY!

he kept himself away from the 'land of the great satan' and as such went about his business unmolested .. theres no gay for pay in his resume'.  ;D

how many dicks has ronnie blown to get to the top??  ;D

any 'industry homos' tryin it on with dorian would have their heads ripped off hahahaha

'aint nothin but a peanut' .. thats was what ronnie would cry while takin it in the ass to take his mind off things ... hahaha fuckin depraved american losers!


ronnie is much smarter than you.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #46 on: May 16, 2006, 03:12:28 PM »
The only thing Ronnie destroys Yates on in those shots are arms....he definitely destroys Yates in arms.   Although, Coleman at the '01 Arnold and '03 Mr O would most likely defeat a prime Yates (circa '93) and a prime Haney....done and done.




agreed. 93 Flex would give 01 AC Ronnie a battle, so would 94 Shawn Ray in my opinion.

Width might tip the battle to Ronnie's favor.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #47 on: May 16, 2006, 03:18:50 PM »
agreed. 93 Flex would give 01 AC Ronnie a battle, so would 94 Shawn Ray in my opinion.

Width might tip the battle to Ronnie's favor.

Agreed, that whole class of bbs from the early '90s was outstanding.....even the 2nd and 3rd spots could give a prime Coleman a run for his money.....Coleman just happened to peak whey they were nearing retirement.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83368
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #48 on: May 16, 2006, 03:46:51 PM »
ND we're not talking about the contest, we're not talking about the picture you posted, we're talking about the original pic at the beginning of the thread.  i think overall in the picture you posted yates wins, but yates DOES NOT win in the original pic, thats just fact.
'

Ah not a fact just an opinion !!

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: now who has a better back..
« Reply #49 on: May 16, 2006, 03:48:10 PM »
agreed. 93 Flex would give 01 AC Ronnie a battle, so would 94 Shawn Ray in my opinion.

Width might tip the battle to Ronnie's favor.

93 Flex was probably the lowest body fat on stage, really amazing condition, but his long torso was not proportional to beat Ronnie 98.