Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on November 20, 2007, 02:12:53 PM
-
"Bush, Cheney, Rove were all involved in CIA leak coverup."
So, either the White House press secretary chose to make this up, or major crimes were committed by the Prez and VP.
Which is it, folks?
-
Wait a sec.. bodybuilding board... politics... "exclusive"....
... nobody gives a shit... ::)
-
White House press secretary Dana Perino said it wasn't clear what McClellan meant in the excerpt. "The president has not and would not ask his spokespeople to pass on false information," she said.
cont... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071120/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak_mcclellan
-
"Bush, Cheney, Rove were all involved in CIA leak coverup."
So, either the White House press secretary chose to make this up, or major crimes were committed by the Prez and VP.
Which is it, folks?
Bush, Cheney and company should be tried for treason and war crimes....death by firing squad...!!!
-
Bush, Cheney and company should be tried for treason and war crimes....death by firing squad...!!!
When the public found out about clinton/lewinsky. Was the public calling out for the impeachment of clinton or was it the republicans who had a hard on for busting clinton?
There doesn't seem to be any movement happening by getting bush and cheney impeached as if it's just a dream that it will never happen. Why?
-
When the public found out about clinton/lewinsky. Was the public calling out for the impeachment of clinton or was it the republicans who had a hard on for busting clinton?
There doesn't seem to be any movement happening by getting bush and cheney impeached as if it's just a dream that it will never happen. Why?
Hyprocrisy and special interests. I didn't like Clinton and thought he was a bad president but Bush makes him look like the Messiah. If the right people (aka. Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich) got into office there could an investigation but at the end of the day most of them are neo-cons, including Billary, they will protect the Bush regime from prosecution.
-
Hyprocrisy and special interests. I didn't like Clinton and thought he was a bad president but Bush makes him look like the Messiah. If the right people (aka. Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich) got into office there could an investigation but at the end of the day most of them are neo-cons, including Billary, they will protect the Bush regime from prosecution.
Bingo so why don't you fools quit talking about it
-
Bingo so why don't you fools quit talking about it
I'm glad our Founding Fathers didn't think like you.
-
McClellan is just saying what is already obvious to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass.
Seems like maybe he was a bit chapped that his friends/associates blatantly lied to his face or maybe he just angry, as any American should be, that the Bush/Cheney Crime Syndicate committed treason
-
Criminal Conspiracy:
A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. One person may be charged with and convicted of both conspiracy and the underlying crime based on the same circumstances.
-
I'm glad our Founding Fathers didn't think like you.
actually they did think like me...proud americans that would do anything to keep our country safe...and if they had known about telephones and internet they would have been in favor of wiretapping to catch criminals before the crime happened
-
actually they did think like me...proud americans that would do anything to keep our country safe...and if they had known about telephones and internet they would have been in favor of wiretapping to catch criminals before the crime happened
The first line of duty for any american is the protection of our constitution.
We do wiretap phones to catch criminals. We just ask for a little constitutional accountability AFTER the fact of the wiretap. Too bad Bush and Co. can't follow the law to save their lives.
-
The first line of duty for any american is the protection of our constitution.
We do wiretap phones to catch criminals. We just ask for a little constitutional accountability AFTER the fact of the wiretap. Too bad Bush and Co. can't follow the law to save their lives.
The problem that you lefties don't have the common sense to grasp is that times have changed in the last 200+ years. When the constitution was written it was pretty easy to catch an enemy riding horse cross country planning an attack on the newly founded US. But I can guarantee that is the british had had satellite phones back in the revolution, things would have been written different.
-
What does the outing of a covert agent by our President and Vice President have to do with illegal wire tapping? We're talking about treason and Bush/Cheney and company would have been hung
-
granted I got off track, was just replying to Benfun's comment
-
The problem that you lefties don't have the common sense to grasp is that times have changed in the last 200+ years. When the constitution was written it was pretty easy to catch an enemy riding horse cross country planning an attack on the newly founded US. But I can guarantee that is the british had had satellite phones back in the revolution, things would have been written different.
Simple question, mm69----
are you 'okay' with Pres and VP being involved with leaking CIA operative's identify?
Yes or no?
-
Simple question, mm69----
are you 'okay' with Pres and VP being involved with leaking CIA operative's identify?
Yes or no?
I'm not going to get into this to much because I have spent hours of my life I will never get back talking about it in the past...buuuutttt....
There is disagreement in Plame's covertness....her 'ol man's trip is questionable seeing how it was his wife that sent him....and I don't know what if any role the pres and VP had in it. I will watch the news and see what comes of it before making conclusions...
as far as them being treasonists?
Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's government
Don't see how anyone did either of those things...
-
I'm not going to get into this to much because I have spent hours of my life I will never get back talking about it in the past...buuuutttt....
There is disagreement in Plame's covertness....her 'ol man's trip is questionable seeing how it was his wife that sent him....and I don't know what if any role the pres and VP had in it. I will watch the news and see what comes of it before making conclusions...
as far as them being treasonists?
Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's government
Don't see how anyone did either of those things...
There is no disagreement about her covert status. She was covert. CIA: Plame Was "Covert" http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2007/05/30/cia-plame-was-covert.htm
There is no question about the validity of her husband's trip. Whether his wife recommended him for the assignment is entirely irrelevant to the outing of Mrs. Plame's secret identity.
§ 2381. Treason: (US Code) Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Exposing the identity of a covert spy working on WMD proliferation in the middle east during a time of war with middle eastern factions is not treasonous to you?
You may be right. It depends.
But how does exposing a covert spy's identity during a time of war--a war predicated on controlling WMDs of middle eastern countries--serve the nation's interest?
-
mm69,
I'm not getting into the whole treason thing, if only because it's so unrealistic it's not worth wasting time on. Everyone knows that everyone gets away with everything when they're in the White House.
My point is - do you condemn the outing of a CIA agent? yes or no?
-
mm69,
I'm not getting into the whole treason thing, if only because it's so unrealistic it's not worth wasting time on. Everyone knows that everyone gets away with everything when they're in the White House.
My point is - do you condemn the outing of a CIA agent? yes or no?
the treason charge might be difficult to stomach but keep in mind that by exposing Plame the CIA asset of Brewster Jennings, it's personnel and methods were revealed to our enemy and that can be construed as providing them "aid and comfort".
-
mm69,
I'm not getting into the whole treason thing, if only because it's so unrealistic it's not worth wasting time on. Everyone knows that everyone gets away with everything when they're in the White House.
My point is - do you condemn the outing of a CIA agent? yes or no?
I don't believe she was covert, ( posted many links a few months ago that would go against Decker's ideas) so I don't feel she was "outed"
-
the treason charge might be difficult to stomach but keep in mind that by exposing Plame the CIA asset of Brewster Jennings, it's personnel and methods were revealed to our enemy and that can be construed as providing them "aid and comfort".
Wait wait wait....so you are up in arms about a supposed outing of a CIA agent because it "providing them aid and comfort". Yet I bet you are all for establishing and publicizing a pull out date aren't you.....Now that is providing aid and comfort
-
Wait wait wait....so you are up in arms about a supposed outing of a CIA agent because it "providing them aid and comfort". Yet I bet you are all for establishing and publicizing a pull out date aren't you.....Now that is providing aid and comfort
two totally different things that have nothing to do with each other.
-
I don't believe she was covert, ( posted many links a few months ago that would go against Decker's ideas) so I don't feel she was "outed"
She absolutey was covert - it's not even a subject of speculation or discussion any more
-
two totally different things that have nothing to do with each other.
Bullshit...you can't have it both ways. They are both providing aid to the enemy no matter how you want to look at it...
and I heard with my own ears/read transcripts with my own eyes of testimony from her superiors that she was not covert.....but I'm not wasting more time on that.....point is, like it or not nothing will come of that situation regardless....so why waste time discussing it...
-
Bullshit...you can't have it both ways. They are both providing aid to the enemy no matter how you want to look at it...
and I heard with my own ears/read transcripts with my own eyes of testimony from her superiors that she was not covert.....but I'm not wasting more time on that.....point is, like it or not nothing will come of that situation regardless....so why waste time discussing it...
have what both ways? - you say that the two are equivalent and I MUST agree with you?
The two are completely different issues - one is the outing of a COVERT agent by the White House and can gave you an example of how that could be viewed as treason.
The other is a "what if" on the future of an ongoing occupation. It might be treason if we had a secret date to withdraw and the White House LEAKED it. Yeah - then I might see that as treason.
Other than that we'd have to have long coversation about how to wind down this occupation and how it should be done but that's a completely different topic and has nothing to do with the outing of Plame.
If you would humor me - I'd be glad to see some of your proof that Plame was not covert when she was outed by the White House.
-
Straw feel free to search my history of posts concerning Plame, but serisouly I wasted many hours debating that issue and as far as I am concerned it is a dead issue now. Nothing will come of it either way......
-
Straw feel free to search my history of posts concerning Plame, but serisouly I wasted many hours debating that issue and as far as I am concerned it is a dead issue now. Nothing will come of it either way......
MM69 - I've wasted too many hours myself. There is no doubt in my mind that Plame was covert. That's a proven fact by now. I'd be glad to look at your "evidence" to the contrary but I'm not going to waste my time looking for it.
-
MM69 - I've wasted too many hours myself. There is no doubt in my mind that Plame was covert. That's a proven fact by now. I'd be glad to look at your "evidence" to the contrary but I'm not going to waste my time looking for it.
I just tried to dig up some of my other posts...to much searching....and it just isn't worth it.....
-
Here since I am bored out of my gourd waiting for the bell to ring:
The trial has provided convincing evidence that there was no conspiracy to punish Mr. Wilson by leaking Ms. Plame's identity -- and no evidence that she was, in fact, covert.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/06/AR2007030602020.html
Toensing testified that Plame was not a covert operative as defined by the Intelligence Identities Protection Act (which she had helped draft as a Senate staffer in 1982) if only because she was not stationed overseas for the CIA the past five years.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/03/was_valerie_covert.html
In fact the only person that i can find a quote from saying that Plame was covert was Mrs. Plame herself. The CIA refused to answer....So it is basically one word against the other.
-
oh and to pre-empt you... Hayden's "testimony" was given to the jury..wait for it.....SECOND HAND!!....hmmmmm
-
Here since I am bored out of my gourd waiting for the bell to ring:
The trial has provided convincing evidence that there was no conspiracy to punish Mr. Wilson by leaking Ms. Plame's identity -- and no evidence that she was, in fact, covert.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/06/AR2007030602020.html
Toensing testified that Plame was not a covert operative as defined by the Intelligence Identities Protection Act (which she had helped draft as a Senate staffer in 1982) if only because she was not stationed overseas for the CIA the past five years.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/03/was_valerie_covert.html
In fact the only person that i can find a quote from saying that Plame was covert was Mrs. Plame herself. The CIA refused to answer....So it is basically one word against the other.
the trial was not about proving or disproving Plame's covert status and the veracity of statements by Toensing have been questioned by many people.
All that aside - recently de-classified CIA documents show that she Plame met the test of covert status:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18924679/
-
Just for future reference...I will never look at anything that is from MSNBC or FOX news....not credible
-
Just for future reference...I will never look at anything that is from MSNBC or FOX news....not credible
hah! - well I agree with you about Fox and I can see why you might feel that way about MSNBC (though I don't share that opinion).
I won't read anything by Robert Novak for the same reason.
Here's a copy of the declassified CIA doc that was referenced in the article - couldn't find a way to scale down the file so it will be in multiple pages posted separately.
-
second page
-
third page