Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 03:40:15 PM

Title: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 03:40:15 PM
One of the best upper bodies
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Blockhead on August 30, 2009, 03:43:04 PM

 He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard!




 - Block!
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: andreisdaman on August 30, 2009, 03:43:13 PM
One of the best upper bodies



very nice shot....but everytime I look a t a nice shot of Lou I can't help but think about the lost potential....he could have been one of the all time greats
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 03:53:56 PM
He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard!




 - Block!

Nobody wanted his autograph back then lol
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 03:56:24 PM


very nice shot....but everytime I look a t a nice shot of Lou I can't help but think about the lost potential....he could have been one of the all time greats

He could have but he took the money and ran with The Hulk , I think I would have too
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on August 30, 2009, 04:01:16 PM
Maybe he was...eh...errrmm....... wise...after all.  ???
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: lax on August 30, 2009, 04:27:04 PM
He could have but he took the money and ran with The Hulk , I think I would have too

He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr. Magoo on August 30, 2009, 04:33:33 PM
.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: pellius on August 30, 2009, 04:41:18 PM
Wasn't he like just 23 years old or something in those pics? After Arnold retired I don't think anyone would have touched big Louie. Franco and Zane wouldn't have stood a chance.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 30, 2009, 05:04:08 PM
One of the best upper bodies

yes if you excluded his back..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: KevinP85 on August 30, 2009, 05:09:21 PM
Wasn't he like just 23 years old or something in those pics? After Arnold retired I don't think anyone would have touched big Louie. Franco and Zane wouldn't have stood a chance.


True, didn't he stop competing and started back in the 90's again. He could have done both, the so called "acting," and been Mr Olympia for god knows how many times after Arnold.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 05:22:40 PM
yes if you excluded his back..

You think his back sucked?  ???
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 05:22:51 PM
yes if you excluded his back..

Are you implying that Lou was the Nasser of his day?  ;)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 30, 2009, 05:27:17 PM
Are you implying that Lou was the Nasser of his day?  ;)

to some extent yes.. both had similar type of arms/shoulders combo too..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 30, 2009, 05:32:06 PM
.
Damn good pic there wonder how how much he would charge to autograph that?
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 05:33:58 PM
to some extent yes.. both had similar type of arms/shoulders combo too..

You know by agreeing, you sort of took the fun out of my little shot there.  ;)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 06:02:51 PM
yes if you excluded his back..

Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser

Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 06:06:52 PM
Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser



Back detail looks pretty good, actually.  Something seems off about the shot to me though, and I'm not taking about the calves.  Something just seems funky about his balance there.   
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: mass 04 on August 30, 2009, 06:09:22 PM
Back detail looks pretty good, actually.  Something seems off about the shot to me though, and I'm not taking about the calves.  Something just seems funky about his structure there.   
epic editing your post about Lou's junk in the trunk.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 06:10:06 PM
epic editing your post about Lou's junk in the trunk.
Am I crazy, or is his posterior enormous there?  Ok, I said it.  Unless it's his lower body, I don't know.  Something just doesn't seem to flow.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: 240 is Back on August 30, 2009, 06:13:22 PM
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.  he would have destroyed zane, franco, and

the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.

he left to make $ in acting.  Can't blame him, but you also don't buy into that mid-90s pity party of 'i never won the big one' or crying after losing the masters O.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 30, 2009, 06:31:08 PM
Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser



no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 06:32:37 PM
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.  he would have destroyed zane, franco, and

the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.

he left to make $ in acting.  Can't blame him, but you also don't buy into that mid-90s pity party of 'i never won the big one' or crying after losing the masters O.

Agreed, he was poised to take over after Arnold.  He would have destroyed little Franco in 1976.  Lou could have had long run on top.  Seeing shots of his conditioning around the time of making his Hercules movie gave a hint of what he could have brought to the table.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 06:34:28 PM
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..


It's a bit hard to gauge how truly large Lou is there, being no one else is in the shot.  Would be interesting to see others side by side to compare. 
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2009, 06:36:11 PM
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..


Ahahahahah Nasser's back in 94 was wider than Lou's at 320 pounds ?? and you came to this conclusion how? your delusion knows no bounds
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 30, 2009, 06:51:24 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: saucetradomous on August 30, 2009, 06:52:41 PM
;)

What was that dudes full name again? 
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 30, 2009, 06:54:48 PM
Ahahahahah Nasser's back in 94 was wider than Lou's at 320 pounds ?? and you came to this conclusion how? your delusion knows no bounds

offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..

here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 30, 2009, 06:56:47 PM
What was that dudes full name again? 
Dont know man maybe Holmes?
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: noworries on August 30, 2009, 07:51:47 PM
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.

Back in the 70's that a ton of money.  That isn't that bad in today money
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hipolito mejia on August 30, 2009, 08:18:21 PM
He could have been Mr.O from 76 to probably 1990 and retire at just 38 years of age, just imagine the muscle maturity he would have developed had he competed at his best years non stop .....He never reached his potential....This was coming after 17 years !


BOOM
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: keanu on August 30, 2009, 08:25:25 PM
He could have been Mr.O from 76 to probably 1990 and retire at just 38 years of age, just imagine the muscle maturity he would have developed had he competed at his best years non stop .....He never reached his potential....This was coming after 17 years !


BOOM

Lou would never, ever touch Haney who was far too complete. Lou looked good in the 70's. He could have won from 76 until '83 (Samir was on fire in 83)if he came in ripped and balanced. In the 90's he competed 50 lbs heavier but the weight wasn't balanced. He had calf implants, a back that lacked thickness/ detail, small bi's and tri's, and shoulders. His waist had gotten much thicker competing at 300+. He looked like a mess. Take a look at the double-bi front and back.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Danimal77 on August 30, 2009, 08:34:47 PM
Lou was the uncrowned Mr. Olympia while filming Hercules in 1982. Had he not stopped bodybuilding 1975, he would have been indestructible by the time Haney came around. He had at least 5" on Haney and a ton of weight.

MULTIPLE TIMES uncrowned champ right there.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Eric2 on August 30, 2009, 08:34:54 PM
Big Louie is a douche bag.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 30, 2009, 09:53:13 PM
offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..

here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..


Lou, based on the pics, does seem to have a decided edge in detail and at over 300 pounds has the advantage in width, no doubt.  Nasser actually looks decent there, I'll concede that. 
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: TechnoViking on August 30, 2009, 09:54:44 PM
Cue someone to post up the Tom Platz Quad shot with Lou looking like a tiny tit...
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: dyslexic on August 30, 2009, 10:49:24 PM
(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/marku.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 31, 2009, 12:24:57 AM
Lou, based on the pics, does seem to have a decided edge in detail and at over 300 pounds has the advantage in width, no doubt.  Nasser actually looks decent there, I'll concede that. 

nasser's arms and shoulders are "relatively" bigger and his v taper is better.. then take a look at their lower bodies (hams/calves) to know that nasser takes is better in this pose hands down..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: nodeal on August 31, 2009, 12:30:02 AM
I wonder how much Lou got paid to appear in the new Hulk?
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 31, 2009, 12:47:46 AM
offfff... wider means you have to put in consideration the rest of him.. i mean to see his lats in relation with his other body parts and not separately.. sure nasser's was wider and so he had a better V taper.. most of lou's weight was because he was very tall and not because he was the biggest.. same as paul dillett who was tall and big but his back lacked a lot of size to go with the rest of him.. in 1993 dorian "looked" bigger than lou but he was much lighter so don’t tell me lou was 320 pounds and that was it!!..

here you can see that at its best nasser's back was better than lou's..



I don't see where you can claim his back is better and wider .  and we're not talking pound-for-pound either you think by making them the same height that means his back is just as good?  ::) they're not the same height , Nasser in 1994 wasn't wider than Ferrigno maybe when he was much heavier but then his back suffered for

In 94 he had a similar back neither have enough of a significant advantage like Dorian over the other but I think Lou is edging him out especially in the traps and Lou's back is more crisp

Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: lax on August 31, 2009, 04:48:22 AM
Back in the 70's that a ton of money.  That isn't that bad in today money

for being on one of the top tv shows?

that sucks then and now
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Pollux on August 31, 2009, 05:00:27 AM
Nobody wanted his autograph back then lol

Nobody really cares for it today.  :D
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr. Magoo on August 31, 2009, 05:04:59 AM
What was that dudes full name again? 

bobby sly
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Pet shop boys on August 31, 2009, 05:05:18 AM
Lou would never, ever touch Haney who was far too complete. Lou looked good in the 70's. He could have won from 76 until '83 (Samir was on fire in 83)if he came in ripped and balanced. In the 90's he competed 50 lbs heavier but the weight wasn't balanced. He had calf implants, a back that lacked thickness/ detail, small bi's and tri's, and shoulders. His waist had gotten much thicker competing at 300+. He looked like a mess. Take a look at the double-bi front and back.

Story would have been different and his physique too, Had he never retired.


WOOOOSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHh
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: lax on August 31, 2009, 05:11:05 AM
bobby sly

could someone please explain briefly whta that pic of Sly with the gun is all about?
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: RxBandit on August 31, 2009, 05:14:27 AM
(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/marku.jpg)

Lots of meat on display.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Playboy on August 31, 2009, 05:20:24 AM
People can talk shit all they want but Ferrigno was and always will be one of the best in the business. To this day he's still in good shape for his age while everyone else has floundered.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on August 31, 2009, 06:02:22 AM
Some great shots here:
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf403.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf576.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: spinnis on August 31, 2009, 06:08:04 AM
insane

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf403.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: spinnis on August 31, 2009, 06:09:22 AM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf365.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: spinnis on August 31, 2009, 06:11:14 AM
lol he looks like arnold here

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf471.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: noworries on August 31, 2009, 06:40:04 AM
for being on one of the top tv shows?

that sucks then and now

Was the Hulk ever rated #1.  I don't think so but maybe you can research that for me.  When was that show?  Was it after 76' I can't remember, can you research that for me too.  And yes $1500 a week for a show back then was really good.  The minimum weekly back in 03' was just over $2300.  I think it goes up like 3% a year after that but not sure.  Far above the SAG minimum if they even had one back then.  If I remember right they weren't paying residuals for shows prior to 76'.  Also, $6,000 a month is not a bad income.  not super great but not bad.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: rccs on August 31, 2009, 11:37:28 AM
insane

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf403.jpg)
And without the GH gut...  :o
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: FREAKgeek on August 31, 2009, 11:43:35 AM
Why didn't Lou and Serge come back for 76 Olympia? That midget Sardinian got a free ride.

 I know Lou was doing Hulk, but why couldn't he have trained concurrently for the O? I mean, after all, his role in the Hulk was all about the physique.

Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: andreisdaman on August 31, 2009, 11:48:58 AM
Better get your eyes checked sport this back is better than Nasser




Lou's physique could win the Olympia today...very nice back shot..and he is more striated than most guys today
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: andreisdaman on August 31, 2009, 11:50:25 AM
Am I crazy, or is his posterior enormous there?  Ok, I said it.  Unless it's his lower body, I don't know.  Something just doesn't seem to flow.

I think it's the posing trunks..they look awful..classic 1970's style
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: andreisdaman on August 31, 2009, 11:59:08 AM
Also a lot of people don't realize that Lou quit just as there was a big leap in chemical inhancements...stuff like HGH, insulin, and before the chemical guru's...Lou basically worked out on his own in a basement without a training partner.....and he had only his father to guide him..if he had one of those so-called "gurus" like all the guys do today and he had access to all the stuff they have today he would have been incredible for his size
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Playboy on August 31, 2009, 12:09:58 PM
Also a lot of people don't realize that Lou quit just as there was a big leap in chemical inhancements...stuff like HGH, insulin, and before the chemical guru's...Lou basically worked out on his own in a basement without a training partner.....and he had only his father to guide him..if he had one of those so-called "gurus" like all the guys do today and he had access to all the stuff they have today he would have been incredible for his size
Excellent point and one that is over looked. Especially the chemical warefare.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: noworries on August 31, 2009, 05:43:35 PM
Used to see Lou almost everyday at the gym back in the early 80's.  I remember seeing him training just before he left to do the Hercules movie.  He was HUGE.  He trained in a flannel shirt that just him look incredible.  He was pretty nice back then.  I trained arms with him a few times.  He had no problem you working in with him.  I guess he is alot different now.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: lax on August 31, 2009, 05:45:15 PM
Was the Hulk ever rated #1.  I don't think so but maybe you can research that for me.  When was that show?  Was it after 76' I can't remember, can you research that for me too.  And yes $1500 a week for a show back then was really good.  The minimum weekly back in 03' was just over $2300.  I think it goes up like 3% a year after that but not sure.  Far above the SAG minimum if they even had one back then.  If I remember right they weren't paying residuals for shows prior to 76'.  Also, $6,000 a month is not a bad income.  not super great but not bad.

1977
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 31, 2009, 05:53:31 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 31, 2009, 06:19:33 PM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf135.jpg)

(http://digilander.libero.it/louferrign/lf37.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf576.jpg)

(http://digilander.libero.it/louferrign/fer13.jpg)

(http://digilander.libero.it/louferrign/fer60.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hipolito mejia on August 31, 2009, 07:39:23 PM
325 in shape all year round .
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hipolito mejia on August 31, 2009, 07:40:47 PM
Over a foot taller and with less drugs than Mutan Dexter
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hipolito mejia on August 31, 2009, 07:42:06 PM
Abs better than any mass monter.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hipolito mejia on August 31, 2009, 07:43:59 PM
One of the very few If not the only one who really made $$$ out of bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 31, 2009, 08:05:42 PM
Over a foot taller and with less drugs than Mutan Dexter

great physique for sure but his lats are relatively narrow as i mentioned before..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 31, 2009, 08:06:32 PM
Abs better than any mass monter.

paul dillett and nasser both had better abs, just to mention a few..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 31, 2009, 08:07:53 PM
paul dillett and nasser both had better abs, just to mention a few..
Clearly Nasser had better abs...Dillet ::)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: caseyviator on August 31, 2009, 08:14:45 PM
Am I crazy, or is his posterior enormous there?  Ok, I said it.  Unless it's his lower body, I don't know.  Something just doesn't seem to flow.


i think those trunks r alittle big n hes definately standing wronge  lots of guys mess up back poses back then..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 31, 2009, 08:18:01 PM
Clearly Nasser had better abs...Dillet ::)

you know i didnt want to mention nasser only to avoid some stupid comments from the idiots here so i just mentioned any other big guy with him ;D
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Stavios on August 31, 2009, 08:53:37 PM
awesome physique !
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Flex 215 on August 31, 2009, 10:29:11 PM
Also a lot of people don't realize that Lou quit just as there was a big leap in chemical inhancements...stuff like HGH, insulin, and before the chemical guru's...Lou basically worked out on his own in a basement without a training partner.....and he had only his father to guide him..if he had one of those so-called "gurus" like all the guys do today and he had access to all the stuff they have today he would have been incredible for his size

           Lou did go to a gym and his basement for his lifting, but his father didn't guide him. That was all made up for Pumping Iron.  After the 75 Olympia, Joe Weider offered to train Ferrigno in Cali, but his dad told him to give up bodybuilding and start in a real trade.  He had training in sheet metal, and moved to Columbus, Ohio and worked for Purdie Metals. I don't know if he knew that the Olympia was gonna start being there or it was just coincidence that he took a job here.

           A buddy of mine worked in a factory near the one Lou worked at, and the workers of both factories would eat their lunch together by some railroad tracks. My friend said Lou was the nicest guy, but that was before he was famous.  My buddy worked out with Lou at Otterbein College's weightroom, and it took 2 or 3 guys to spot him on the bench.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: rccs on September 01, 2009, 11:05:06 AM
paul dillett and nasser both had better abs, just to mention a few..
Dillet and Nasser are piles of shitty oil... Do not compare their physiques with Lou's...
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 01, 2009, 12:09:55 PM
Dillet and Nasser are piles of shitty oil... Do not compare their physiques with Lou's...

why?.. didnt low enhance his poor calves?? :-\ :-X
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Playboy on September 01, 2009, 12:27:26 PM
Dillet and Nasser are piles of shitty oil... Do not compare their physiques with Lou's...
Exactly.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: brooklynbruiser on September 01, 2009, 12:48:36 PM
Awesome Lou was shot? WTF? Who shot him? Was it someone bitching over autograph prices? What is vintage bodybuilding turning into?

PPIP* Lou.

* Penny-pinch in purgatory.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 01, 2009, 02:07:17 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 01, 2009, 02:51:46 PM
Awesome Lou was shot? WTF? Who shot him? Was it someone bitching over autograph prices? What is vintage bodybuilding turning into?

PPIP* Lou.

* Penny-pinch in purgatory.
::)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 01, 2009, 07:19:44 PM
Exactly.

and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 01, 2009, 07:23:05 PM
and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..

In that regard, I have no idea what Lou was thinking.  Why did he feel the need to resort to implants?  Calves don't matter, look at Ronnie.  :-X
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: tbombz on September 01, 2009, 07:33:31 PM
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.
its enough for a ferrari payment  ::)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 01, 2009, 07:58:23 PM
In that regard, I have no idea what Lou was thinking.  Why did he feel the need to resort to implants?  Calves don't matter, look at Ronnie.  :-X

ronnie is black so he has an excuse 8)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 02, 2009, 02:46:05 AM
ND, this pic. of nasser and kevin had been scanned by you and was posted here few months ago.. could you plz tell me from which contest it's??.. it seems to be mr. o. 96 but i am not sure.. thx..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Gino30 on September 02, 2009, 04:40:59 AM
no not better than nasser of 1994.. post nasser's back from the NOC 94 and you will see.. also nasser's lats were wider..

i still see lou's back was small for the rest of his upper body.. his relatively narrow lats was taking a lot from his FLS pose..


the pakistani terrorist
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Playboy on September 02, 2009, 05:03:53 AM
and what about lou's enhanced calves?.. at least both nasser and dillett had great quads and calves while lou's whole lower body was relatively weak..
But they both had delts full of oil.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 02, 2009, 05:19:34 AM
But they both had delts full of oil.

here is nasser of 95 and his delts were not filled with anything but pure muscles!
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 02, 2009, 10:47:06 AM
here is nasser of 95 and his delts were not filled with anything but pure muscles!
Stop ruining good threads with Nasshole please.
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf150.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf180.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf466.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: challenge on September 02, 2009, 10:55:14 AM
Damn great bodybuilder!
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 02, 2009, 10:55:59 AM
Damn great bodybuilder!
Lou was a great bb.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: delta9mda on September 02, 2009, 11:29:18 AM
He stated in People magazine that he was paid $1,500.00 per week for the hulk.

of course, to many of you here, that is likely life-changing $.
GOOD PAY FOR THE 70'S.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 02, 2009, 12:23:13 PM
ND, this pic. of nasser and kevin had been scanned by you and was posted here few months ago.. could you plz tell me from which contest it's??.. it seems to be mr. o. 96 but i am not sure.. thx..

Not the Olympia Grand Prix Czech Republic 1996 a contest Nasser won
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 02, 2009, 12:38:51 PM
One of the best upper bodies

  Awesome pecs. Arguably the best ever. Besides that, massively overrated in every way.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 02, 2009, 12:41:15 PM
he could hae won 3 or 5 olympias when arnold left.

  No.

Quote
he would have destroyed zane, franco, and


  No.

Quote
the 1980 arnold could have been 6-time winner arnold against 4 time winner ferrigno.

  Nope.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 02, 2009, 01:25:46 PM
  No.
 

  No.

  Nope.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Have to disagree. Lou would have wiped the floor with zane, franco etc
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 02, 2009, 02:33:42 PM
Have to disagree. Lou would have wiped the floor with zane, franco etc

  Hm...let me think...no.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Stark on September 02, 2009, 02:34:23 PM
He was back then and always will be a momo greaseball pile of shit tard!




 - Block!

lol you still makle me fuckin laugh :D
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 02, 2009, 02:39:24 PM
  Hm...let me think...no.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Good argument
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 02, 2009, 02:41:40 PM
Good argument

  The thing is that when I write paragraphs explaining why I believe something no one reads them, so I recently decided to be more succint in my replies.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 02, 2009, 02:47:34 PM
  The thing is that when I write paragraphs explaining why I believe something no one reads them, so I recently decided to be more succint in my replies.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Haha. I would have read it.  ;D

I believe Franco and co would have looked like kids next to Lou if he had continued training hard and dieted correctly. Lou was massive and had no real weak points(by 70's standards)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf576.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: andreisdaman on September 02, 2009, 05:34:08 PM
Haha. I would have read it.  ;D

I believe Franco and co would have looked like kids next to Lou if he had continued training hard and dieted correctly. Lou was massive and had no real weak points(by 70's standards)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf576.jpg)




DEFINITELY AGREE...YOU ARE DEAD RIGHT ABOUT THIS//would have destroyed anyone in his path back then..Franco would have looked like a midget and Zane would have looked like a toothpick
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 02, 2009, 05:56:53 PM
yup..ferrigno would have won the mr o..if he hadnt gone green.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 02, 2009, 06:04:07 PM
Stop ruining good threads with Nasshole please.
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf150.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf180.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf466.jpg)

come on!!.. check my first comment in this thread!!.. it was about lou only then some idiots kept comparing him to nasser to push me to talk about the wizard so i gave them what they wanted!!..

so go and ask them not to mention nasser in every thread!!.. he owns their minds in a pathetic way..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 02, 2009, 06:05:57 PM
Not the Olympia Grand Prix Czech Republic 1996 a contest Nasser won

thank you very much!
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: noworries on September 02, 2009, 06:09:16 PM
  The thing is that when I write paragraphs explaining why I believe something no one reads them, so I recently decided to be more succint in my replies.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

You would have thought you got the point.  What you say or write doesn't matter to anyone but you.  Hope this helps
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 02, 2009, 06:14:03 PM
You would have thought you got the point.  What you say or write doesn't matter to anyone but you.  Hope this helps

  Aw...still licking your wounds from the beating I gave you in the gorilla vs bear debate, huh? I understand. 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: 3Dkiller on September 02, 2009, 09:54:54 PM


Lou is playing in i love u man same goes for bob the chick  ;D
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Tyr on September 02, 2009, 11:55:00 PM
yup..ferrigno would have won the mr o..if he hadnt gone green.

All things considered he did pretty well after moving away from bodybuilding. Next to Arnold he's probably the 2nd well known bodybuilder/actor. Arnold is probably the only Mr O to make a successful transition into movies.
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: andreisdaman on September 03, 2009, 05:52:31 AM
All things considered he did pretty well after moving away from bodybuilding. Next to Arnold he's probably the 2nd well known bodybuilder/actor. Arnold is probably the only Mr O to make a successful transition into movies.


I hate to say the name, but Lou DOES look like Nasser's Brother..kinda..they both have that same look..although Lou is italian
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Pet shop boys on September 04, 2009, 05:43:27 AM
Stop ruining good threads with Nasshole please.
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf150.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf180.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/ferrigno/lf466.jpg)

Imagine if Lou was in that shape when they did the last Hulk movie using Lou instead that Funny CG cartoon!!!


WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hench on September 04, 2009, 03:33:44 PM
I dunno why they didnt just use a bodybuilder like Lee Priest with short proportions which is what they went for and just enlarge the scale honey i blew up the kid style etc. woulda looked far more realistic and impressive
Imagine if Lou was in that shape when they did the last Hulk movie using Lou instead that Funny CG cartoon!!!


WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 06, 2009, 08:15:50 PM
(http://emusclemag.com/content/we/lou_lead.jpg)
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 01:04:33 AM
lou always looked better in the gym pictures and the other shots than in the contests pictures!!..
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 07, 2009, 07:55:50 AM
lou always looked better in the gym pictures and the other shots than in the contests pictures!!..
Spot on Sheriff
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: hipolito mejia on September 07, 2009, 08:37:07 AM
lou always looked better in the gym pictures and the other shots than in the contests pictures!!..

You got a point since Lou lost like 30 pounds for his last show, considering that he looked great all year round 94' not only in gym pics, had he kept more mass he would have taken the Master easily that year (wich he almost did btw).
Title: Re: Awesome Lou Ferrigno shot
Post by: TechnoViking on September 07, 2009, 07:34:01 PM
Lou Ferrigno for the loss