Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: slacker on January 19, 2010, 09:05:11 PM

Title: rescue ink
Post by: slacker on January 19, 2010, 09:05:11 PM
Who watchs this program and what are you thoughts.     
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 20, 2010, 05:32:50 AM
i've watched it...if you can get buy the hard guy attitude of the rescuers it's a good show...it makes you realize how f**king rotten people can be to defenseless animals...
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: dan18 on January 20, 2010, 05:55:27 AM
Who watchs this program and what are you thoughts.     
just another fact that we will watch anything put before us, another reason these mindless shows will never end :-X

side note i would smash a hole in any fucker i saw hurting a dog 
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: allnatural on January 20, 2010, 06:45:46 AM
Actually George "Junior" is the brains behind this operation.  He actually used to be my boss at Chateau La Mer at Long Island, NY.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Stark on January 20, 2010, 07:08:04 AM
pretentious
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: dan18 on January 20, 2010, 08:15:05 AM
pretentious
word of the day
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Dr. Fist on January 20, 2010, 08:20:09 AM
What's that.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: saopl on January 20, 2010, 08:20:18 AM
are you fucking serious? that show sucks donkey balls. eat dick.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: TRIX on January 20, 2010, 05:39:24 PM
Whos the short bald freak bodybuilder who is seen with the rescue ink dude at powerhouse gym?
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 20, 2010, 05:44:35 PM
Saw the commercial. My impressions: Gay as fuck. Bunch of fat fucks worrying about dogs when there are people starving in the world.

It is proof that we'll watch anything put on television, though. Only a matter of time until we're all watching either paint dry or grass grow and arguing over it. :)
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: slacker on January 20, 2010, 07:37:21 PM
Saw the commercial. My impressions: Gay as fuck. Bunch of fat fucks worrying about dogs when there are people starving in the world.

It is proof that we'll watch anything put on television, though. Only a matter of time until we're all watching either paint dry or grass grow and arguing over it. :)
its not the animals fault they are starving.    People are stupid if they dont wanna go hungry they should get a fucking job and stop having bastard kids every year
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Flexb on January 20, 2010, 07:38:29 PM
its not the animals fault they are starving.    People are stupid if they dont wanna go hungry they should get a fucking job and stop having bastard kids every year

exactly
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: YngiweRhoads on January 20, 2010, 09:43:01 PM
its not the animals fault they are starving.    People are stupid if they dont wanna go hungry they should get a fucking job and stop having bastard kids every year

Bingo.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 21, 2010, 07:09:07 AM
its not the animals fault they are starving.    People are stupid if they dont wanna go hungry they should get a fucking job and stop having bastard kids every year

Total bullshit! It's just that people would rather help in situations that resolve immediately and make them feel important. Helping people requires more commitment and doesn't give that warm, fuzzy feeling these helpers need.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 21, 2010, 07:24:21 AM
Total bullshit! It's just that people would rather help in situations that resolve immediately and make them feel important. Helping people requires more commitment and doesn't give that warm, fuzzy feeling these helpers need.


so what are you saying? that people shouldn't help animals in need? how do you know those same people that help animals in need don't help humans also? i've been volunteering for three years with a local shelter..and the other volunteers are doctors, lawyers, nurses, truck drivers, salesman, accountants...people that everyday go out and serve others.....so your argument doesn't hold water..it's the typical response when rescuing animals is discussed--why worry about animals when there are so many people that need help--completely moronic. 
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 21, 2010, 07:52:55 AM

so what are you saying? that people shouldn't help animals in need? how do you know those same people that help animals in need don't help humans also? i've been volunteering for three years with a local shelter..and the other volunteers are doctors, lawyers, nurses, truck drivers, salesman, accountants...people that everyday go out and serve others.....so your argument doesn't hold water..it's the typical response when rescuing animals is discussed--why worry about animals when there are so many people that need help--completely moronic. 

I'll bet right now there are some figuring out how to rescue dogs and cats in Haiti, LOL!

My point is simple: People take priority over animals. Mistaking that simple truth speaks volumes about people's ability to form lasting, healthy relationships with others.

Personally, I dislike animals and can't think of anything more disgusting than cats but wouldn't harm one. It costs to actually help people which is why so few invest in them.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Flexb on January 21, 2010, 07:55:17 AM
Personally, I'd save a dog over a man any day of the week.  :D
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Tapeworm on January 21, 2010, 07:59:38 AM
I feed the homeless to stray dogs.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 21, 2010, 07:59:53 AM
Personally, I'd save a dog over a man any day of the week.  :D

I respect your honesty but do feel valuing animals over humans is a sign of either mental disease/dysfunction or deep childhood issues.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 21, 2010, 08:05:18 AM
I'll bet right now there are some figuring out how to rescue dogs and cats in Haiti, LOL!

My point is simple: People take priority over animals. Mistaking that simple truth speaks volumes about people's ability to form lasting, healthy relationships with others.

Personally, I dislike animals and can't think of anything more disgusting than cats but wouldn't harm one. It costs to actually help people which is why so few invest in them.


You have no point...you completely ignore the fact that people who rescue animals are the same people who take care of human beings everyday...humans are capable of doing many things--like helping people and helping animals....

you don't like animals..that's the only reason why you state your idiotic point of view--you make it sound like people who rescue animals neglect and mistreat humans--no one ever said animals take precedent over humans--those people that take a neglected animal into their homes or into a shelter aren't neglecting anyone--their ability to help people isn't hindered because they help an animal in need.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Tapeworm on January 21, 2010, 08:06:56 AM

You have no point...you completely ignore the fact that people who rescue animals are the same people who take care of human beings everyday...humans are capable of doing many things--like helping people and helping animals....

you don't like animals..that's the only reason why you state your idiotic point of view--you make it sound like people who rescue animals neglect and mistreat humans--no one ever said animals take precedent over humans--those people that take a neglected animal into their homes or into a shelter aren't neglecting anyone--their ability to help people isn't hindered because they help an animal in need.


If you were in a life boat and there was only room for one more, would you save the dog or the person?

 ;D
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: allnatural on January 21, 2010, 08:07:50 AM

You have no point...you completely ignore the fact that people who rescue animals are the same people who take care of human beings everyday...humans are capable of doing many things--like helping people and helping animals....

you don't like animals..that's the only reason why you state your idiotic point of view--you make it sound like people who rescue animals neglect and mistreat humans--no one ever said animals take precedent over humans--those people that take a neglected animal into their homes or into a shelter aren't neglecting anyone--their ability to help people isn't hindered because they help an animal in need.

Totally agree!!!
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 21, 2010, 08:08:55 AM

If you were in a life boat and there was only room for one more, would you save the dog or the person?

 ;D

depends...who is the person??
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Tapeworm on January 21, 2010, 08:11:05 AM
depends...who is the person??

That's interesting.  I would have asked what kind of dog.  You must be a people person.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: FREDO on January 21, 2010, 08:13:23 AM
anyone who has raised a dog from a pup knows that dogs teach you so much........u end up realizing thay are much better than people
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 21, 2010, 08:14:38 AM
That's interesting.  I would have asked what kind of dog.  You must be a people person.

this sounds like that miller light commercial--with the dude and his bulldog...
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: Flexb on January 21, 2010, 09:30:07 AM
I respect your honesty but do feel valuing animals over humans is a sign of either mental disease/dysfunction or deep childhood issues.

I have neither, I've just seen what humans are capable over the past 30 years and it's sickening -- most people are fuking morons. People just don't have morals these days and the world only gets worse. Animals love unconditionally, something most humans don't know how to do. They're about as innocent and pure as it gets. Save a human and he'll probably rob you blind to repay you.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 21, 2010, 09:37:26 AM
I have neither, I've just seen what humans are capable over the past 30 years and it's sickening -- most people are fuking morons. People just don't have morals these days and the world only gets worse. Animals love unconditionally, something most humans don't know how to do. They're about as innocent and pure as it gets. Save a human and he'll probably rob you blind to repay you.

I realize petwits are given to anthropomorphizing but animals can't love.

I'm not arguing that people are perfect. Let's be honest, most people suck ass. That being said, we still have an obligation to other humans and relieving their suffering even if it is simply to protect our own individual way of life.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 21, 2010, 10:12:57 AM
I realize petwits are given to anthropomorphizing but animals can't love.

I'm not arguing that people are perfect. Let's be honest, most people suck ass. That being said, we still have an obligation to other humans and relieving their suffering even if it is simply to protect our own individual way of life.


i thought we have an obligation to all living creatures...human and animal alike...at least thats what just about every religion practiced on all parts of the globe seems to think.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 21, 2010, 10:23:36 AM

i thought we have an obligation to all living creatures...human and animal alike...at least thats what just about every religion practiced on all parts of the globe seems to think.

You should brush up on religion. The bible (depending upon translation) says something along the lines of 'dominion or rule over creatures' not "obligation" I'd never argue (unless seriously bored :) ) that Obligation and responsibility do not go hand in hand with power. That's not my point and someone who has taken an animal into their home should be a responsible pet owner. That responsibility is for their pets and I really can't justify interfering in someone else's interpretations of responsibility and obligation when there are so many real problems in the US.

There are also religions that believe animals shouldn't be killed or eaten due to them being people who were reincarnated as lower life forms.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: rockyfortune on January 21, 2010, 11:07:28 AM
You should brush up on religion. The bible (depending upon translation) says something along the lines of 'dominion or rule over creatures' not "obligation" I'd never argue (unless seriously bored :) ) that Obligation and responsibility do not go hand in hand with power. That's not my point and someone who has taken an animal into their home should be a responsible pet owner. That responsibility is for their pets and I really can't justify interfering in someone else's interpretations of responsibility and obligation when there are so many real problems in the US.

There are also religions that believe animals shouldn't be killed or eaten due to them being people who were reincarnated as lower life forms.


i think you need to do the brushing up...dominion doesn't mean leaving it out on the street to die..i think you are a bit confused...

in the jewish faith...a common mitzvah (good deed) is caring for an animal who is suffering...

In the words of Maimonides, "If one encounters one's friend on the road and sees that that person's animal is suffering from its burden, whether the burden is appropriate for the animal or is excessive, it is a mitzvah to remove this burden (Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Rotzeah 13:1)."  I think an animal suffering on the street can qualify as an excessive burden to an animal.

you need to brush up yourself..read the torah fully before you talk about dominion over the animals being the only mention in the bible.

Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: drkaje on January 21, 2010, 11:14:07 AM

i think you need to do the brushing up...dominion doesn't mean leaving it out on the street to die..i think you are a bit confused...

in the jewish faith...a common mitzvah (good deed) is caring for an animal who is suffering...

In the words of Maimonides, "If one encounters one's friend on the road and sees that that person's animal is suffering from its burden, whether the burden is appropriate for the animal or is excessive, it is a mitzvah to remove this burden (Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Rotzeah 13:1)."  I think an animal suffering on the street can qualify as an excessive burden to an animal.

you need to brush up yourself..read the torah fully before you talk about dominion over the animals being the only mention in the bible.



You're silly. I could easily find a book that justifies sacrificing animals.
Title: Re: rescue ink
Post by: slacker on January 21, 2010, 12:36:52 PM
I respect your honesty but do feel valuing animals over humans is a sign of either mental disease/dysfunction or deep childhood issues.
YOUR HIGH. quit acting like and assclown.  People for the most part create their own misery. where as animals are helpless victims. 
If I were in Haiti my priority would be to the human element first. 

Fuck sakes Ricki Haiti is no place for a kittie right now