Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: NarcissisticDeity on July 16, 2017, 07:17:02 AM
-
;D
This is actually original
-
Nope seen it before.
-
Really shitty work.
-
Really shitty work.
Hey Mr , He did for YOUR sins >:( You know you might want to show a little gratitude :(
-
That's going to make masturbating awkward. Jesus giving a hand job on the cross.
-
That's going to make masturbating difficult. Jesus giving a hand job on the cross.
LMFAO ;D
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
-
Hey Mr , He did for YOUR sins >:( You know you might want to show a little gratitude :(
Lol id give credit if it was good ink.
But it's pretty bad work. Look at the hand and arm :-\ :-\
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
he would've had an afro
-
Lol id give credit if it was good ink.
But it's pretty bad work. Look at the hand and arm :-\ :-\
for it to be in proportion he need lee priest forearms
-
Why does Jesus Have a flipper instead of his right arm?
-
Why does Jesus Have a flipper instead of his right arm?
Hence, shitty work.
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
Mohawk?
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
no, it would have looked like this
(http://www.mens-hairstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Thick-Afro-Hair-for-Black-Men.jpg)
-
Nope seen it before.
Pretty sure he was being facetious. If you Google "Jesus on cross forearm tattoo" you'll see it's been done a ton of times before.
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
but it's all interpretation
-
The right arm looks like a stick figure
-
but it's all interpretation
Agreed tattoo art and all art is basically interpretation.
-
no, it would have looked like this
(http://www.mens-hairstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Thick-Afro-Hair-for-Black-Men.jpg)
:)
-
Agreed tattoo art and all art is basically interpretation.
same with ancient writings
-
same with ancient writings
Sure that's true in some situations.
-
Mohawk?
Would be sweet but no. ;D
-
Agreed tattoo art and all art is basically interpretation.
So is religion. Especially man-made books on said religion.
-
So is religion. Especially man-made books on said religion.
Religion is interpretation. I don't follow religion. All books are man made.
-
I can tell many of you are bored right now.
-
Religion is interpretation. I don't follow religion. All books are man made.
But you consider yourself Christian, correct? Christianity is a religious sect.
-
The right arm looks like a stick figure
That is because its horrible tattooing.
I actually couldnt find a good tattoo of Jesus on the cross.
But I think this is a good depiction of how anatomical parts are supposed to be tattooed
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/d9/40/bb/d940bb54bec4bb24413a80b6e217043e--jesus-on-cross-tattoo-jesus-tattoo.jpg)
-
But you consider yourself Christian, correct? Christianity is a religious sect.
Religion is of man. Christians are of Jesus Christ. I follow him. People enjoy the comfort of definition and classification....puttin g a label on something helps folks cope with or invent justification to dismiss it.
-
Religion is of man. Christians are of Jesus Christ. I follow him. People enjoy the comfort of definition and classification....puttin g a label on something helps folks cope with or invent justification to dismiss it.
So you consider yourself "above" or more "enlightened" then most of the Christian rabble who just don't get it.
MOS, I say this with love........You are getting a bit full of yourself these days. You are no better than any other person who believes in Christianity.
Vanity is a sin, MOS.
-
But you consider yourself Christian, correct? Christianity is a religious sect.
A sect? So it's like a minority from the larger group that they belong? Just a simpleton statement.
-
That is because its horrible tattooing.
I actually couldnt find a good tattoo of Jesus on the cross.
But I think this is a good depiction of how anatomical parts are supposed to be tattooed
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/d9/40/bb/d940bb54bec4bb24413a80b6e217043e--jesus-on-cross-tattoo-jesus-tattoo.jpg)
SF it's hard to find a good tattoo of Jesus on the cross because there are no pictures of Jesus crucified. They didn't have camera back then because their technology was very primitive.
-
A sect? So it's like a minority from the larger group that they belong? Just a simpleton statement.
OK, I'll bite. Christianity is the tree from which many sects sprout branches. Better?
-
SF it's hard to find a good tattoo of Jesus on the cross because there are no pictures of Jesus crucified. They didn't have camera back then because their technology was very primitive.
lmao!! ;D ;D haha, good one, but you know what I meant. ;D ;D
-
So you consider yourself "above" or more "enlightened" then most of the Christian rabble who just don't get it.
MOS, I say this with love........You are getting a bit full of yourself these days. You are no better than any other person who believes in Christianity.
Vanity is a sin, MOS.
So is drunkenness.
Praying for you because I fear for your health.
-
SF it's hard to find a good tattoo of Jesus on the cross because there are no pictures of Jesus crucified. They didn't have camera back then because their technology was very primitive.
And some scientists are questioning whether it was a cross at all. The most efficient and practical way to crucify someone, was with something that resembled an X, rather than a t. The Cross (much like what MOS admits to Jesus's hair length) is more symbolism created by the early church. Much in the same way that many people see portraits of Jesus as a Pale, European man. The evidence is right in front of our faces.
-
So is drunkenness.
Praying for you because I fear for your health.
If vanity and drunkenness are true sins, then you joined hell the minute your Getbig account was approved. ;D
-
lmao!! ;D ;D haha, good one, but you know what I meant. ;D ;D
;D
And some scientists are questioning whether it was a cross at all. The most efficient and practical way to crucify someone, was with something that resembled an X, rather than a t. The Cross (much like what MOS admits to Jesus's hair length) is more symbolism created by the early church. Much in the same way that many people see portraits of Jesus as a Pale, European man. The evidence is right in front of our faces.
:o
You blasphem the name of WHITE Jesus.
If vanity and drunkenness are true sins, then you joined hell the minute your Getbig account was approved. ;D
Wrong. I am well known for my humility. And I'm not boasting when I say I'm very proud of this fact.
-
So you consider yourself "above" or more "enlightened" then most of the Christian rabble who just don't get it.
MOS, I say this with love........You are getting a bit full of yourself these days. You are no better than any other person who believes in Christianity.
Vanity is a sin, MOS.
Stop inventing arguments or situations because I can answer your questions and comments. Full of myself these days...barely on this board anymore LOL
-
And some scientists are questioning whether it was a cross at all. The most efficient and practical way to crucify someone, was with something that resembled an X, rather than a t. The Cross (much like what MOS admits to Jesus's hair length) is more symbolism created by the early church. Much in the same way that many people see portraits of Jesus as a Pale, European man. The evidence is right in front of our faces.
Rome perfected crucifixion. History of this and cross used is clear. These "scientists" are most likely cliche God haters looking for any reason to cast doubt.
-
Rome perfected crucifixion. History of this and cross used is clear. These "scientists" are most likely cliche God haters looking for any reason to cast doubt.
So if you readily believe that Italians in the Renaissance, perpetuated the long standing image of Jesus with long hair, why is it so hard to believe that the same couldn't be done about the shape of wood that Christ was crucified on, 1,500 years earlier?
-
So if you readily believe that Italians in the Renaissance, perpetuated the long standing image of Jesus with long hair, why is it so hard to believe that the same couldn't be done about the shape of wood that Christ was crucified on, 1,500 years earlier?
Already answered this. Regardless the shape of the cross/tree/wood is rather irrelevant to belief. God haters constantly search for any reason whatsoever to deny God and support their sin. That's all you're doing right now LOL. I'm just ruining the fun.
-
Already answered this. Shape of the cross, tree, wood is rather irrelevant to belief. God haters constantly search for any reason whatsoever to deny God and support their sin.
Oh So now your wavering? Wouldn't it be a bit ironic that the very image of Cristianity (The cross) could be nothing more than a hallucination of a Roman Emperor?
And the very symbol that billions of people worship, could actually be the wrong shape? Things that make you go hmmm.....
-
Oh So now your wavering? Wouldn't it be a bit ironic that the very image of Cristianity (The cross) could be nothing more than a hallucination of a Roman Emperor?
And the very symbol that billions of people worship, could actually be the wrong shape? Things that make you go hmmm.....
How can I waver when it isn't the wrong shape, but regardless it's irrelevant to belief as I noted. We worship the man on the cross not the cross. The only hmmmmmm comes from the desperation of God haters grasping at anything to deny God.
-
How can I waver when it isn't the wrong shape, but regardless it's irrelevant to belief as I noted. We worship the man on the cross not the cross. The only hmmmmmm comes from the desperation of God haters grasping at anything to deny God.
I can't hate something that I do not believe in. I am not an atheist either.
-
Oh So now your wavering? Wouldn't it be a bit ironic that the very image of Cristianity (The cross) could be nothing more than a hallucination of a Roman Emperor?
And the very symbol that billions of people worship, could actually be the wrong shape? Things that make you go hmmm.....
Always wonder why atheists/agnostics like yourself care so much?
I find I hear more from atheists preaching ::) ??? non belief) and going off on crazy7 tangents more than religious people these days.
-
Always wonder why atheists/agnostics like yourself care so much?
I find I hear more from atheists preaching ::) ??? non belief) and going off on crazy7 tangents more than religious people these days.
It's Yin and Yang. I find ignorance in people who talk in absolutes. MOS talks like he is God's bodyguard at club Heaven.
-
Always wonder why atheists/agnostics like yourself care so much?
I find I hear more from atheists preaching ::) ??? non belief) and going off on crazy7 tangents more than religious people these days.
This is very much the truth nowadays.
-
It's Yin and Yang. I find ignorance in people who talk in absolutes. MOS talks like he is God's bodyguard at club Heaven.
Your comments/questions in this thread have been rudimentary/below ignorant (including this one).
-
isn't the fucken nail supposed to by in the palm of his hand?
-
Your comments/questions in this thread have been rudimentary/below ignorant (including this one).
Please elaborate.
-
I can't hate something that I do not believe in. I am not an atheist either.
Willful suppression of the reality of God that you know is real and masquerading that as casual disbelief is hatred of God....it's also woefully transparent.
-
It's Yin and Yang. I find ignorance in people who talk in absolutes. MOS talks like he is God's bodyguard at club Heaven.
Translation: I answer your questions quickly and easily and that's annoying to you because your quips that normally work to confuse and belittle the unprepared believer don't work at all. I have gotten these same comments many times before.
-
Translation: I answer your questions quickly and easily and that's annoying to you because your quips that normally work to confuse and belittle the unprepared believer don't work at all.
You are not enlightened, MOS. You are no better then I am as a human being.
Your problem is your arrogance. Not directly, but subtlety in the way that you talk down to non believers. You don't even realize that you do it.
-
You are not enlightened, MOS. You are no better then I am as a human being.
Your problem is your arrogance. Not directly, but subtlety in the way that you talk down to non believers. You don't even realize that you do it.
You're right. As a human being I am neither enlightened nor better than you. But in Christ I am better off.
I understand that I'm a nightmare for the coffee house atheist and generic God hater....because I answer questions and you recoil and call that arrogance. Yet never regard your initiation of attack in the same way.....childish double standard but God haters aren't typically known for consistency.
If you're afraid of the answer don't call me out with questions and ill intentioned comments. No I fully get why a God hater would be annoyed and resort to claims of arrogance by a confident believer.
You'll now reply with "there was no attack....I'm seeking dialogue and truth". ::)
-
You're right. As a human being I am neither enlightened nor better than you. But in Christ I am better off.
I understand that I'm a nightmare for the coffee house atheist....because I answer questions and you recoil and call that arrogance. Yet never regard your initiation of attack in the same way.....childish double standard but God haters aren't typically known for consistency.
If you're afraid of the answer don't call me out with questions and ill intentioned comments. No I fully get why a God hater would be annoyed and resort to claims of arrogance by a confident believer.
I am not an atheist. I do not believe in organized religion, or any God made from a book. A smart man would admit that he has no idea of what truly awaits us. It could be nothing, or it could be everything. You do not have the answer to that, MOS. You think you do, and that is what makes you arrogant.
-
I am not an atheist. I do not believe in organized religion, or any God made from a book. A smart man would admit that he has no idea of what truly awaits us. It could be nothing, or it could be everything. You do not have the answer to that, MOS. You think you do, and that is what makes you arrogant.
Ready. Here's the answer. I know exactly what is going to happen after death. Why? I have had supernatural experience with the God of the bible. I have experienced and know God. When you experience the source of scripture you know with confidence the validity of scripture. Why did I have special revelation from God? Because I surrendered to his will and came to him on his terms as outlined in scripture.
You've never done that and therefore your position is grounded in willful ignorance....that position HATES confident belief.
I've just given you the exact map to understanding humanity's greatest mystery.....and you'll go right back to denial and suppression and never once entertain what I've said for years. You'll call me an ignorant fool and never in this life grasp the irony.
-
isn't the fucken nail supposed to by in the palm of his hand?
No, the wrist, if in hand then it wouldn't help to hold a body up. Also, a certain part of the feet were used, but they did it with one big nail to hold weight. Basically, the Romans seemed to have perfected things of this sort back in the day.
-
No, the wrist, if in hand then it wouldn't help to hold a body up. Also, a certain part of the feet were used, but they did it with one big nail to hold weight. Basically, the Romans seemed to have perfected things of this sort back in the day.
Exactly. Wrist was also considered as part of the hand.
-
Ready. Here's the answer. I know exactly what is going to happen after death. Why? I have had supernatural experience with the God of the bible. I have experienced and know God. When you experience the source of scripture you know with confidence the validity of scripture. Why did I have special revelation from God? Because I surrendered to his will and came to him on his terms as outlined in scripture.
You've never done that and therefore your position is grounded in willful ignorance....that position HATES confident belief.
I've just given you the exact map to understanding humanity's greatest mystery.....and you'll go right back to denial and suppression and never once entertain what I've said for years. You'll call me an ignorant fool and never in this life grasp the irony.
did you see him in your vision, if so what did he look like?
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
Yes, that image of Jesus is possibly modeled on Cesare Borgia whose father was a Pope at the time of Da Vinci and Machiavelli.
-
Jesus wouldn't have had long hair like a woman....that's an Italian renaissance interpretation...cool visual though.....never seen ink like that.
He probably did. Him being homeless and all. He probably didn't get a regular barber visit. Of course we can't know for certain either way. What's more, it doesn't matter if he did have long hair. For a man to have long hair was only considered a shame because in 55 A.D., in the land of Corinth, the pervert, sexual offender males had long hair. It would be like me writing a letter to someone today saying "Do you not know that it is a shame to wear and orange jumpsuit?" (referring to becoming a convict), and then other people in a different context, thousands of years from now thinking that wearing an orange jumpsuit is somehow sinful.
No, if long hair on a man were a problem you wouldn't have seen it on Jesus, Moses, John the Baptist, Samson, and all the other thousands of Nazarite men.
Judge not, lest you be judged. I damn sure wouldn't want to be judged over a haircut.
-
Why? I have had supernatural experience with the God of the bible. I have experienced and know God. When you experience the source of scripture you know with confidence the validity of scripture. Why did I have special revelation from God? Because I surrendered to his will and came to him on his terms as outlined in scripture.
-
For anyone that claims Jesus wouldn't have been white, or wouldn't have had that hair, what do you base these assertions on?
-
did you see him in your vision, if so what did he look like?
Wasn't a vision...more powerful than that. Changed me instantly to my core. Tangible presence of God.
-
For anyone that claims Jesus wouldn't have been white, or wouldn't have had that hair, what do you base these assertions on?
scripture and history
-
For anyone that claims Jesus wouldn't have been white, or wouldn't have had that hair, what do you base these assertions on?
What do you define as white? Jesus was born in the middle east, over 2,000 years ago. The hair length question is actually fascinating.
I have seen pics/paintings of Jesus with all lengths of hair. But you also have to include the beard in the discussion. Why is Jesus usually depicted as light-skinned, with long, straight hair, and a beard? Just another reason to speculate.
-
Wasn't a vision...more powerful than that. Changed me instantly to my core. Tangible presence of God.
An illustration of what Jesus Christ did for MOS:
-
An illustration of what Jesus Christ did for MOS:
My brother in Christ loco absolutely nailed it!!
I will NEVER view this scene the same again! He's exactly right.....was at war with myself and in Christ I put that old, bad man to death! Praise God!!
-
I too just had a vision. They are called eyes.
-
I too just had a vision. They are called eyes.
I can see the lean towards "MOS had a vision" is slowly building steam.....not what I said. Someone else said that.
-
What do you define as white? Jesus was born in the middle east, over 2,000 years ago. The hair length question is actually fascinating.
I have seen pics/paintings of Jesus with all lengths of hair. But you also have to include the beard in the discussion. Why is Jesus usually depicted as light-skinned, with long, straight hair, and a beard? Just another reason to speculate.
I don't understand the significance of him supposedly being born in the middle east?
-
I too just had a vision.
-
I can tell many of you are bored right now.
what did you think about Spider-man: Homecoming?
-
what did you think about Spider-man: Homecoming?
Loved it....Tom Holland is an excellent Spidey and Michael Keaton was awesome as Vulture....dark, dark!
Although, I still love Raimi's SM2 with Toby Macquire a bit more.
-
Loved it....Tom Holland is an excellent Spidey and Michael Keaton was awesome as Vulture....dark, dark!
Although, I still love Raimi's SM2 with Toby Macquire a bit more.
I loved it too. Michael Keaton was AMAZING! I gotta say though,that I don't feel super compelled to see it a third time (I went a second time with some of my kids) It really is more of an origin story in tone, and I'm a bit burnt out on those.
-
I loved it too. Michael Keaton was AMAZING! I gotta say though,that I don't feel super compelled to see it a third time (I went a second time with some of my kids) It really is more of an origin story in tone, and I'm a bit burnt out on those.
I gotcha.....these reboots typically have a definite origin or the feel of an origin and I agree it's old.....we know who Spider-man is LOL!!
After I saw Homecoming I rewatched SM2 and then The Amazing Spider-man to compare.
For me I rank them:
1) SM2
2) Homecoming
3) The Amazing Spider-man
-
Willful suppression of the reality of God that you know is real and masquerading that as casual disbelief is hatred of God....it's also woefully transparent.
All atheists and non-Christians are willfully suppressing belief in the real God, correct?
-
All atheists and non-Christians are willfully suppressing belief in the real God, correct?
Absolutely!
I understand how hated that simple response will be too.
-
I gotcha.....these reboots typically have a definite origin or the feel of an origin and I agree it's old.....we know who Spider-man is LOL!!
After I saw Homecoming I rewatched SM2 and then The Amazing Spider-man to compare.
For me I rank them:
1) SM2
2) Homecoming
3) The Amazing Spider-man
Impressive!
Yes, I pulled out Spider-man 2 and watched it again. I felt like Marvel was so careful NOT to compete with that film that it was hard to compare. On a side note I was shocked that they made it so clear that Aunt May learned his identity in Spider-man 2. I thought it was merely hinted at but in the scene where she is moving out of her house it is very explicitly shown.
I don't know. Marvel Studios has essentially created a new character in this new Spider-man. One kind of similar to their animated line. The adult in me will always hold up Spider-man 2 as a kind of platonic ideal but the kid in me really likes Homecoming.
-
Absolutely!
I understand how hated that simple response will be too.
Not feeling anything yet, but what would I know. Not like I can be trusted feeling my own feelings or thinking my own thoughts. Will your "simple response" cause an explosive rage-type hate, where we should arrange to avoid friends for a while?
Or should we plan for a more lingering, rot-your-soul, gnawing-type hate; maybe move to Norway and start a black metal band? Also, when you read our minds, do we "sound" like you, or is it more like how you imagine we might sound?
Nah, dude, you don't sound arrogant at all. It IS written, after all.
-
These hateful God-suppressors deny the crucifixion because they don't believe in iron nails.
-
This God-hating monster worshipped dozens of goofy cartoon animals to suppress his innate belief. Loved his fucking sin, this one.
-
These hateful God-suppressors deny the crucifixion because they don't believe in iron nails.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=633816.0;attach=736271;image)
God suppressors? Indigenous people of South America are no Christians, but they're very religious. They believe in at least one deity, believe in the afterlife, forbid sex outside of marriage (adultery and fornication are punishable by death), believe marriage is between one man and one woman.
Oh yeah, some of them indigenous tribes believe in human sacrifice too. :-X
-
This God-hating monster worshipped dozens of goofy cartoon animals to suppress his innate belief. Loved his fucking sin, this one.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=633816.0;attach=736272;image)
God-hating monster? Mahatma Gandhi was no Christian, but he was deeply religious and a Christ admirer. To the British he said:
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
Mahatma Gandhi was also no saint. He slept naked with his naked grandnieces and other naked women to experiment and test his own celibacy. :-X
Pinche closet pedo. Whacks on, whacks off.
-
Not feeling anything yet, but what would I know. Not like I can be trusted feeling my own feelings or thinking my own thoughts. Will your "simple response" cause an explosive rage-type hate, where we should arrange to avoid friends for a while?
Or should we plan for a more lingering, rot-your-soul, gnawing-type hate; maybe move to Norway and start a black metal band? Also, when you read our minds, do we "sound" like you, or is it more like how you imagine we might sound?
Nah, dude, you don't sound arrogant at all. It IS written, after all.
How would you feel anything of God if you deny Christ? You can trust your own feelings and God's law is written upon your heart....it's instinctive and everyone knows it....they just resort to suppression of that truth.
I'm no longer worried about making friends with the world...I'd rather genuinely love the world and help them get out of the building they don't realize is burning.
Haters gonna hate....I have no control over how deep that hate goes. The gospel message is offensive to many...that will never change.
When did I read your minds? Scripture is clear that everyone knows God exists.
Yes, it is written and further it's been demonstrated as accurate, but God haters that remain in willful suppression won't ever understand that.
-
God suppressors? Indigenous people of South America are no Christians, but they're very religious. They believe in at least one deity, believe in the afterlife, forbid sex outside of marriage (adultery and fornication are punishable by death), believe marriage is between one man and one woman.
Oh yeah, some of them indigenous tribes believe in human sacrifice too. :-X
Exactly because God's law is written upon their hearts. They may have never heard the name of Jesus or read a word of scripture, but they know that God exists and they instinctively follow his commands.
-
God suppressors? Indigenous people of South America are no Christians, but they're very religious. They believe in at least one deity, believe in the afterlife, forbid sex outside of marriage (adultery and fornication are punishable by death), believe marriage is between one man and one woman.
Oh yeah, some of them indigenous tribes believe in human sacrifice too. :-X
How would they feel anything of God if they deny Christ?
-
How would they feel anything of God if they deny Christ?
U talkin 2 me? Not following your question.
-
U talkin 2 me? Not following your question.
He's riffing off my post...no worries.
They haven't denied Christ....they most likely don't know Christ. They do know that God is there even they don't realize that is Christ.
-
How would you feel anything of God if you deny Christ? .
I was supposed to hate your response, you said. I don't think I do, I'm saying. But if you say I'm hating, I must be hating. Because Scripture and all.
I'm no longer worried about making friends with the world...I'd rather genuinely love the world and help them get out of the building they don't realize is burning.
Haters gonna hate....I have no control over how deep that hate goes. The gospel message is offensive to many...that will never change.
You've covered this dozens of times already. We get it. Angry Christian now, fantastic.
When did I read your minds? Scripture is clear that everyone knows God exists.
Yes, it is written and further it's been demonstrated as accurate, but God haters that remain in willful suppression won't ever understand that.
When you tell me what I really believe. And then tell me WHY.
You're too smart for this fallacious presup bullshit. If you can't first establish why your bible is any more relevant than the other 3,000+ holy books you instinctively dismiss, then maybe "Scripture" is just a scapegoat for you to judge.
Perhaps you're suppressing your intelligence? And maybe, Superman, we hate God the same way you hate Lex Luthor.
-
If you can't first establish why your bible is any more relevant than the other 3,000+ holy books you instinctively dismiss, then maybe "Scripture" is just a scapegoat for you to judge.
Bingo.
But many in here have stopped bothering with his holiness. It will just be the same old run around. Better to move on.
-
Bingo.
But many in here have stopped bothering with his holiness. It will just be the same old run around. Better to move on.
Yet entire threads are dedicated to him, and other threads derailed to make it all about him?
-
I was supposed to hate your response, you said. I don't think I do, I'm saying. But if you say I'm hating, I must be hating. Because Scripture and all.
You've covered this dozens of times already. We get it. Angry Christian now, fantastic.
When you tell me what I really believe. And then tell me WHY.
You're too smart for this fallacious presup bullshit. If you can't first establish why your bible is any more relevant than the other 3,000+ holy books you instinctively dismiss, then maybe "Scripture" is just a scapegoat for you to judge.
Perhaps you're suppressing your intelligence? And maybe, Superman, we hate God the same way you hate Lex Luthor.
I was speaking in generalities and you know that LOL.
How can I be angry when my intention is to love on people? Anger is akin to murder in the eyes of the Lord and ending someone's life is opposite to wanting to lead them to eternal life. No, you're simply misunderstanding my position of "I'm no longer going to engage certain members of this board and spend FAR less time on this board" with "angry Christian". One doesn't follow the other.
And I have said things dozens of times and at great length hence my responses today are more succinct and brief and direct.
I don't know everything you believe, but when it comes to God I know that you know he's real...everyone knows this. Scripture has made it clear that God's law is written upon people's hearts and that people recognize God through his creation. Why I know is covered in previous post above or years of post history.
All other holy books are inherently anti-Christ. That said, they're demonically influenced and not of God. Spiritual warfare at play and strategy by the enemy is employed to confuse and disrupt the gospel message of Christ. A flood of man-man religions standing opposed to absolute faith in Christ who holds individuals accountable for their actions/thoughts is more attractive for folks steeped in sin that want to remain there. Again, why I know is covered in previous posts above and years of post history.
-
I was speaking in generalities and you know that LOL.
How can I be angry when my intention is to love on people? &guy is akin to murder in the eyes of the Lord and ending someone's life is opposite to wanting to lead them to eternal life. No, you're simply misunderstanding my position of "I'm no longer going to engage certain members of this board and spend FAR less time on this board" with "angry Christian". One doesn't follow the other.
And I have said things dozens of times and at great length hence my responses today are more succinct and brief and direct.
I don't know everything you believe, but when it comes to God I know that you know he's real...everyone knows this. Scripture has made it clear that God's law is written upon people's hearts and that people recognize God through his creation. Why I know is covered in previous post above or years of post history.
All other holy books are inherently anti-Christ. That said, they're demonically influenced and not of God. Spiritual warfare at play and strategy by the enemy is employed to confuse and disrupt the gospel message of Christ. A flood of man-man religions standing opposed to absolute faith in Christ who holds individuals accountable for their actions/thoughts is more attractive for folks steeped in sin that want to remain there. Again, why I know is covered in previous posts above and years of post history.
I've kind of been peeking in on the periphery of this conversation. I'm a bit of an MOS fan so you can take my view with a grain of salt. But if you really take a wide angle view of our world, if you can step back and really take stock of our strange universe... taking the position that there can be no metaphysical component to reality really strikes me as naive in the extreme. Just my 2 cents.
-
I've kind of been peeking in on the periphery of this conversation. I'm a bit of an MOS fan so you can take my view with a grain of salt. But if you really take a wide angle view of our world, if you can step back and really take stock of our strange universe... taking the position that there can be no metaphysical component to reality really strikes me as naive in the extreme. Just my 2 cents.
That is why I am agnostic instead of atheist.
-
Your comments/questions in this thread have been rudimentary/below ignorant (including this one).
Please elaborate.
I don't think he can "type" any slower.
-
I don't think he can "type" any slower.
His comment added nothing to the discussion. Why did he think my comments were rudimentary and below ignorant? What are his views on the topic? So I was absolutely correct in asking him to elaborate his position. Feel free to add your opinions.
-
Funny how people on both sides get bent out of shape about their beliefs like their opinion really fucking matters to the opposite side in the end.
I dunno, maybe it is just me, but I don't feel anyone needs to explain, or as shizzo loves to annoyingly point out ad nauseum, to "Please elaborate" as to why they believe/don't believe in a sky wizard of their own understanding.
and again, I point out how ironic it is that the atheist/agnostics are the ones doing the most preaching these days. Funny how they squawk about religion being shoved down our throats when all they do is try to do the same with their non beliefs.
I find both pontificating religious fanatics, atheists, and agnostics to be all of the same ilk. And honestly the oven should be fired up again with those 3 groups in general. Use the SJW's as kindling
-
Please berate.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=633816.0;attach=736402;image)
Not many people realize that Pat Morita was principally a comedian...
-
I've kind of been peeking in on the periphery of this conversation. I'm a bit of an MOS fan so you can take my view with a grain of salt. But if you really take a wide angle view of our world, if you can step back and really take stock of our strange universe... taking the position that there can be no metaphysical component to reality really strikes me as naive in the extreme. Just my 2 cents.
You must have peeked on the periphery of a different thread, MB. No one here's addressed metaphysics at all. This discussion is about willful ignorance and arrogance.
See, claiming with 100% certainty that your book - though riddled with historical/scientific inaccuracies, recycled mythology, and a multitude of inconsistencies, contradictions and logical impossibilities - is the inerrant, divinely-inspired Word of the one true God requires a shitload of both.
And dismissing all the other believers of all the other gods from all the other books of all the other religions (from time immemorial) with "I know Scripture is true because Scripture tells me that Scripture is true" isn't really the height of intellectual diligence/honesty or humility.
-
That is why I am agnostic instead of atheist.
They're not mutually exclusive, as they answer different questions:
Do you know God exists? No = Agnostic
Do you believe God exists? No = Atheist
More specifically, though, atheism is merely an "I don't believe you've made your case" to any given god proposition. Agnosticism, on the other hand, is utterly meaningless. Everyone is agnostic - no one KNOWS the reality of any god.
-
They're not mutually exclusive, as they answer different questions:
Do you know God exists? No = Agnostic
Do you believe God exists? No = Atheist
More specifically, though, atheism is merely an "I don't believe you've made your case" to any given god proposition. Agnosticism, on the other hand, is utterly meaningless. Everyone is agnostic - no one KNOWS the reality of any god.
I Don't think that atheists believe that any higher being/power/force exists. They just think that it's a guaranteed dirt nap.
While I do not believe in organized religion or texts, I can't help but look into the night sky, and wonder why I am living on one of a trillion planets in the universe. Agnostics at least represent the middle ground.
-
I Don't think that atheists believe that any higher being/power/force exists. They just think that it's a guaranteed dirt nap.
While I do not believe in organized religion or texts, I can't help but look into the night sky, and wonder why I am living on one of a trillion planets in the universe. Agnostics at least represent the middle ground.
I gave you the definitions. Agnostics represent every person who's ever breathed oxygen.
-
I gave you the definitions. Agnostics represent every person who's ever breathed oxygen.
Thank you, Jesus.
-
I've kind of been peeking in on the periphery of this conversation. I'm a bit of an MOS fan so you can take my view with a grain of salt. But if you really take a wide angle view of our world, if you can step back and really take stock of our strange universe... taking the position that there can be no metaphysical component to reality really strikes me as naive in the extreme. Just my 2 cents.
Well if it's so naive, then why can't you set the record straight with some hardcore evidence?