In his interview with Nick on the subject of antisemitism Piers said it's fine to be critical of Israel and he has been critical himself due to the situation there. I don't watch Piers' whole programs but see clips through X and so on and his criticism only came when it was safe to do so and most others had started to sour on Israel. These types only feel where the wind is blowing and follow along safe politically correct paths and it's sickening. Sure I get that once you're in a position like he is it's dangerous to veer off script and he's afraid of losing his position in case he says something unacceptable but it's sickening nonetheless. Probably most of us would or could be corrupted in a similar way, hard to say in advance. Money and power corrupts everything. But it's not very manly.

Regarding Nick, some feel he is compromised, that he's controlled opposition and it's strange that suddenly he's been given so much air time and articles in media like the NY Times. Even if critical it elevated his profile like crazy and he's finally making lots of money. Musk just called him a Fed on X. Though Musk is one to talk as he's part of the government. Tucker said to Nick that he used to think Nick was a Fed and Nick replied I assumed the same of you LOL. As far as I know there's lots of reasons to believe Tucker is controlled, perhaps a CIA asset, considering his upbringing, what his father did for work and so on. Just saying you have to be suspicious of everyone, psy-ops everywhere LOL. I wonder if Nick can get on a plane now; he was put on a no-fly list a few years ago and shut out of payment systems and so on.

In case someone is a bit curious... I think Nick obviously "won" the debate. Didn't get flustered and didn't apologize. Regarding Holocaust numbers Piers pressed him on the 6 million and Nick goes, "Oh I think it was probably more, 6-7-8 million... maybe even 100 million." Later Piers embarrassingly says at least I got you to admit at least 6 million Jews died, totally missing the sarcasm

Libelous.

fuck off fag 

https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20251104_mater-populi-fidelis_en.html

Supposedly this text clarifies the "new"(?)  position of the Vatican on Mary. Did not read yet, wall of text of peace

As usual hey have to write an entire convoluted thesis to somehow 'explain' why they follow pagan traditions which have nothing to do with the actual texts of the Christian religion.