You have shown yourself a shallow thinker plenty on here. Everything you disapprove of is "leftist." I didn't even say I disagree with what Trump is doing. If you've read my posts you might suspect I have some fascism sympathies, where's my liberalism? Call me a bigot, a racist, homophobe, right wing extremist, antisemite, fascist... the leftist or liberal label doesn't quite apply. I'm sure "fascist" is plenty bad in your world view 
I threw out the argument that fascism is the antidote to communism, liberalism, Marxism, mafias, crime in general.
Are you really saying Trump doesn't want as much freedom to act unilaterally as possible? Again note I'm not casting a value judgement on it in this argument. He wants to for example be able to start wars without congressional debate or wage sanctions wars without any constraints just on his own whims.
As I said, I wasn't saying it was good or bad what he's doing. I have read opposing views from the "right wing"... some saying hit the left hard now, take off the gloves and destroy them now when there's a chance and don't worry about the "civil liberties" so much. Others have cautioned that the strongman tactics will be turned on the wrong-thinking right wingers before long, imagine if the Dems get into power next go around and you have these new structures like militarized ICE in place. I think most people, on either side, would preferably not see a big police or military presence in cities or anywhere. It's like metal detectors and armed guards and armed teachers in schools, ideally it wouldn't be needed. It's not a nice atmosphere, or do you disagree? Hell, a big prison population is not a sign of a healthy society either, though I completely understand the "tough on crime" position too.
Regarding the gun debate you had with 38. I sympathize with the pro gun crowd like yourself and Coach. But on the other hand 38 actually shot someone with an illegal gun so I listen to him as well 
You thinking he’s a dictator, fascist, Nazi or whatever you’re brainwashed media is telling you means you’re not thinking at all by comparing it to a 30’s dictatorship and fascism.
Historically, fascism often involved illegal or extralegal actions to seize and maintain power, such as abolishing democratic institutions, banning opposition, and using violence to suppress dissent, as seen in regimes like Mussolini’s Italy or Hitler’s Germany. These actions typically violated existing legal frameworks or constitutions. In contrast, most modern right-wing movements in democratic countries operate within legal and constitutional bounds, participating in elections and adhering to established laws, even if their policies or rhetoric spark controversy.
Recent Posts
