This thread derailed from its original topic.

If he was ever banned in the past, it would mean any new screen names would also be banned.

Any time he has been back should have been considered temporary.

Are not those who are just two steps away from fanaticism simply echoing Trump, who alternates between calling for Iran’s destruction and offering a settlement to end the war? Trump/TACO has made apocalyptic threats such as, “An entire civilization could die tonight, never to return.” He has also issued diplomatic ultimatums: “The clock is ticking... They better get moving, or there won’t be anything left.” About ending the conflict, he said, “We’re blowing everything away, and we’re going to end that war very quickly.” Yet he often quickly walks back these threats. As a result, it is becoming harder for anyone to take him seriously.

Yeah, we've over that quote multiple times already.

I don't know who the 2-step folks are, outside of something in his head.  Hence the question.

Spoke with Scott this morning. He's doing good. He's a very good man. He's one of the extremely few I trust on here.

Yes, I can. Awesome.

Didn’t Bono run into a tree while skiing?

Babe, I hit the tree babe

In your view, how many people are needed to reach consensus? Would you agree that, technically, consensus can exist with as few as two people? It can also refer to a broader or more general agreement. Were you looking for a more formal consensus?

Your questions don't really have anything to do with this context.  We're not talking about two people.  Or a handful of people.  The context is the entire medical and scientific community.

I don't know where you got your consensus comment, which is why I asked.  There is very clear evidence that this virus came from a lab.