Maybe you should try this info :
Yes, it is possible to tell that the jury determined Donald Trump falsified business records.
On May 30, 2024, a New York jury unanimously found him guilty on all 34 felony counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. Here is how that determination was made and how it can be verified:
1. The Verdict Sheet (Public Record)The jury filled out a public Verdict Sheet in the Manhattan criminal trial (Indictment No. 71543-23). The sheet clearly lists "GUILTY" for all 34 counts, which included:11 invoices from Michael Cohen to the Trump Organization.11 checks and stubs used to pay Cohen.12 general ledger entries from the Trump Organization.
2. What "Guilty" Specifically Means HereTo reach this verdict, the jury had to unanimously conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that:Trump created or caused false entries to be made in the business records of the Trump Organization.He did so with the intent to defraud.The falsification was done to conceal or commit a separate crime (making it a felony under New York law), such as violating tax or election laws.
3. Jury ConfirmationWhen the verdict was read in court, the jury foreperson stated "Guilty" 34 consecutive times. Following this, Judge Juan Merchan asked the jury if the verdict was unanimous, and each juror confirmed it individually.
That really was like a 3 second search.
I get that you are unable to understand what actually happened--and frankly you're just dishonest--but for the benefit of anyone else reading, no one knows what the underlying crime was. Here is a repost of I provided earlier:
Judge Merchan issued legally incorrect jury instructions
• Judge Merchan instructed the jurors that they “need not be unanimous as to
what those unlawful means were.”2
•
Judge Merchan provided the jury with three options of “unlawful means”: a
violation of Federal election law, violation of tax law, or falsification of records.
•
Under these instructions, the jury was not required to agree on the underlying
crime Trump committed. It could have been split 4-4-4 among the three vague,
distinct options provided by the judge.
• The jury was ultimately only unanimous with respect to half of the elements.
• The underlying crime and the jurors’ agreement on it remain entirely unknown.
https://aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Merged-One-Pagers.pdfIn other words, only one of the three options the jury was given included "falsification of records," but we don't know if that is the underlying crime they selected.
Recent Posts
