21
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Bhank: Latest news and misadventures
« Last post by wes on Today at 04:31:30 PM »Get out holy fuck thats beyond crazyHe`s fucking delusional as all Hell !
Get out holy fuck thats beyond crazyHe`s fucking delusional as all Hell !
Mo is angry , always complaining, always bitter - of course the beta male F@!$ likes her
Is Matt c still in prison
I think hes "been there done that" already...
https://caliberties.org/are-liberals-really-more-prone-to-mental-health-issues-a-data-driven-analysis/
I was asked what the Democratic policy issues were and I provided a valid answer.
You, Dos and Chaos taking issue with where I may or may not have plagiarized the Democratic policy issues from while not discussing whether you agree or disagree with them is an obvious tactic of avoidance of the actual subject. This suggests that neither of you have anything of relative value to discuss or you would have done so.
What I posted is a summary of the Democratic policy issues which are based on the 2024 Democratic platform. This platform is updated every four years. For more detail on these policy issues, look it up yourselves. If I can find it, so can you. And, since this is of such importance to you, you can also easily find where I found exactly word for word what I posted.
You want me to do the work for you as per usual. You can easily read the actual paper as it's open access
I'll give you a hint, they used a well known questionnaire that has shown internal validity and is used quite often in political research. They used proper statistical analysis and found that in women it didn't matter.
High intelligence has been linked to openness and ability to tolerate complexity.
Your problem with this paper isn't even a reasonable one. There are many possible confounders which someone already outlined but you are focusing on how they defined conservatism, when they didn't, they used a tested metric for delineating that. They didn't make up their own as there would be no interstudy coherence nor anyway to determine if it's actual measuring what they claim (it would lack validity/veracity)
You just don't understand how research works and that's fine. Maybe, instead of railing against it automatically you could show some intellectual curiosity and try and understand it. I get my title was inflammatory and trolly but...