Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Bhank: Latest news and misadventures
« Last post by wes on Today at 04:31:30 PM »
Get out holy fuck thats beyond crazy
He`s fucking delusional as all Hell !
22
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Random pics
« Last post by herne on Today at 04:24:05 PM »
.
23
Mo is angry , always complaining, always bitter - of course the beta male F@!$ likes her

Truth.  I only hear snippets of her podcast that nobody listens to and she is always complaining.  Ingrate.
24
Is Matt c still in prison

ya I believe so. Hes in federal which is over 2 years
25
Is Matt c still in prison
26
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Class Warfare
« Last post by Dos Equis on Today at 04:20:29 PM »
Bernie Sanders
@BernieSanders

According to a recent poll, 77% of voters support raising taxes on billionaires.

Maybe, just maybe, at a time of unprecedented income and wealth inequality, it’s time for Congress to listen to the American people and pass a wealth tax on billionaires.
10:30 AM · Apr 20, 2026

https://x.com/BernieSanders/status/2046325655101387022
27
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Better Boxing Skills BigRo or Josh?
« Last post by oldschoolfan on Today at 04:20:00 PM »
I think hes "been there done that" already...

Bwa ha ha yeah you are right has big ro ever had a real job
28
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: No kidding!!
« Last post by Dos Equis on Today at 04:18:06 PM »
https://caliberties.org/are-liberals-really-more-prone-to-mental-health-issues-a-data-driven-analysis/

Just look at any man who thinks he is a woman, and all of the people who support men in women's spaces. 
29
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: The 2026 Midterm Election
« Last post by Dos Equis on Today at 04:17:15 PM »
I was asked what the Democratic policy issues were and I provided a valid answer.

You, Dos and Chaos taking issue with where I may or may not have plagiarized the Democratic policy issues from while not discussing whether you agree or disagree with them is an obvious tactic of avoidance of the actual subject. This suggests that neither of you have anything of relative value to discuss or you would have done so.

What I posted is a summary of the Democratic policy issues which are based on the 2024 Democratic platform. This platform is updated every four years. For more detail on these policy issues, look it up yourselves. If I can find it, so can you. And, since this is of such importance to you, you can also easily find where I found exactly word for word what I posted.

I just wanted to know where you got it from.  If you used AI just say so.  When I'm asking for a link it's because I want to go read for myself.  I cannot do that if you are using AI to feed you info then telling us you got the info from some unsourced link, then providing links that don't say exactly what you posted. 
30
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: No kidding!!
« Last post by Dos Equis on Today at 04:15:03 PM »
You want me to do the work for you as per usual. You can easily read the actual paper as it's open access

I'll give you a hint, they used a well known questionnaire that has shown internal validity and is used quite often in political research. They used proper statistical analysis and found that in women it didn't matter.

High intelligence has been linked to openness and ability to tolerate complexity.

Your problem with this paper isn't even a reasonable one. There are many possible confounders which someone already outlined but you are focusing on how they defined conservatism, when they didn't, they used a tested metric for delineating that. They didn't make up their own as there would be no interstudy coherence nor anyway to determine if it's actual measuring what they claim (it would lack validity/veracity)

You just don't understand how research works and that's fine. Maybe, instead of railing against it automatically you could show some intellectual curiosity and try and understand it. I get my title was inflammatory and trolly but...

The article doesn't define "conservative views."  Your post doesn't define "conservative views."  The entire study is based on "conservative views," but you don't know what those actual "conservative views" are.  And this is from another country.  I know you are trolling as usual, but this one is particularly dumb. 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10