« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.  (Read 14137 times)

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #25 on: October 20, 2006, 01:02:41 PM »
Quote from: body88 on October 20, 2006, 12:59:12 PM
Dexter was another guy who looked awesome lighter. Same thing with branch. Check them out from the teen nationals.

Most bodybuilders look way better lighter.

What in the world did Branch look like? The way I see it, Branch has crossed the Rubicon and the die is cast for him.  He has destroyed himself. Got some pics of him before the disaster??
Logged

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #26 on: October 20, 2006, 01:05:44 PM »
2 more:

Logged

Playboy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11318
  • If the bar ain't bending, you're just pretending
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #27 on: October 20, 2006, 01:07:36 PM »
Quote from: The True Adonis on October 20, 2006, 12:21:50 PM
I find it highly amusing that the majority of idiots here would call this small. 
I stated this to be my overall goal 185 lbs at about the same height, which isn`t too far off.

I love how everyone who had something negative to say HAS NEVER EVEN TOUCHED 185 lbs RIPPED.

I find it highly amusing that they THINK they look better.  No reason why that is.  Anyone have any insight?

With that, I give you
Flex Wheeler, 5`10 185 lbs.


Flex Wheeler is one of the best and most symetrical/proportional bbdr's ever.

PB
Logged

sinbad

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
  • Chest like Arnold!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #28 on: October 20, 2006, 01:11:31 PM »
Quote from: body88 on October 20, 2006, 12:53:54 PM
I agree. Flex had amazing genetics for shape and proportion.

Yep, awesome genetics.
Logged

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #29 on: October 20, 2006, 01:14:06 PM »
No matter how stupid  and bad person he is, Flex is great when it comes to BBing.
Logged

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2006, 01:18:56 PM »
Quote from: Matt C on October 20, 2006, 01:14:37 PM
Incidentally, TP and some other fools on mayhem said Branch got his grainyness from balls-to-the-wall hardcore training.  Englighten me - since he is the only one who has this degree of grainyness and vascularity, can we conclude he is the only pro who trains hard?  ::)  How stupid to suggest that training, of all things, creates this look.  In reality, it is a combination of a lot of things, training being one of them, but moreso drugs and nutrition - hitting your peak right, etc.

Well, if Tom prince said so, it must be true...................




























LOL!  ;D
Logged
HAHA, RON.....

Rammer

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 203
  • Avatar by knny187
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2006, 01:23:24 PM »
Quote from: body88 on October 20, 2006, 12:59:12 PM
Dexter was another guy who looked awesome lighter. Same thing with branch. Check them out from the teen nationals.

Here's Dexter as a lightweight amateur:


As far as Flex looking better at 187?  I think he looks better at a heavier bodyweight.  With the structure that Flex is gifted with he looked great at any bodyweight.
Logged

stomper

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 198
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2006, 01:26:31 PM »
deputy sheriff eh.. but anyway flex is and always will be one of the greatest bb'ers ever ,great clip
Logged

bailey

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #33 on: October 20, 2006, 01:30:26 PM »
What are you smoking ! Dex looks like a cancer patient there.
Looks much better now. Not even close on that one.
Logged

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #34 on: October 20, 2006, 01:30:42 PM »
Here is wheeler 10 months after the 1989:
Logged
just push some weight!

wisconsinBB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2498
  • Sweep The Leg!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #35 on: October 20, 2006, 01:34:23 PM »
You mean 10 years??
Logged

body88

  • Guest
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #36 on: October 20, 2006, 01:36:06 PM »
Quote from: bailey on October 20, 2006, 01:30:26 PM
What are you smoking ! Dex looks like a cancer patient there.
Looks much better now. Not even close on that one.

Bodybuilding is subjective. That is not the time period I was talking about. That was from when dex was really young. The picture I was talking about he is older than that. I think Branch and Dex looked far better lighter. Matt do you have that shot of Dex in the front lat spread? From when he was younger.
Logged

body88

  • Guest
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #37 on: October 20, 2006, 01:39:27 PM »
Quote from: Rammer on October 20, 2006, 01:23:24 PM
Here's Dexter as a lightweight amateur:


As far as Flex looking better at 187?  I think he looks better at a heavier bodyweight.  With the structure that Flex is gifted with he looked great at any bodyweight.



THat is not the video I was talking about. That is from when he was a teen. I made a mistake. The picture of dex was from years ago but not when he was that young. It is a picture of him in a front lat spread.
Logged

chris_mason

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3216
  • Owner AtLarge Nutrition
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #38 on: October 20, 2006, 01:43:39 PM »
Quote from: The True Adonis on October 20, 2006, 12:34:19 PM
You are perfect evidence of what I will now call, Delusionus Obeseysus.

These creatures always think their bodyfat is 12-15 percent at all given times even though all evidence points to the contrary.

 ??? At least make a sensible comment...
Logged
w

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #39 on: October 20, 2006, 01:46:09 PM »
Quote from: chris_mason on October 20, 2006, 01:43:39 PM
??? At least make a sensible comment...

I made a sensible comment.  Do YOU think you will be ripped at 185 lbs?

Logged

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #40 on: October 20, 2006, 02:03:38 PM »
Quote from: The True Adonis on October 20, 2006, 01:46:09 PM
I made a sensible comment.  Do YOU think you will be ripped at 185 lbs?



My guess is that Chris Mason is in the high teens as far as body fat.

But lets for arguments sake suggest that he is at 25%.

He weighs 230 lbs.

To be ripped, he would have to get to 5%.

Meaning shredding 20 %.

46 lbs.

You claim it is possible to diet down without losing one ounce of muscle. Ok.

230-46=184

If Mason would be as high as 25, which I highly doubt, he still would be ripped at more or less 185 lbs.

YIP
Zack
Logged
As empty as paradise

hangclean

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2246
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #41 on: October 20, 2006, 02:08:49 PM »
Right now I am 280 with 35 pecent bodyfat.  I got it checked in one of those water tank things at a gym.  Doesnt that mean I could be fairly ripped at 185?  Not like I ever will do it but wouldnt it be possible?  Also dont worry I know I am a fatass I'm not trying to prove anything.
Logged

SquatAss

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #42 on: October 20, 2006, 02:09:46 PM »
Quote from: Hedgehog on October 20, 2006, 02:03:38 PM
My guess is that Chris Mason is in the high teens as far as body fat.

But lets for arguments sake suggest that he is at 25%.

He weighs 230 lbs.

To be ripped, he would have to get to 5%.

Meaning shredding 20 %.

46 lbs.

You claim it is possible to diet down without losing one ounce of muscle. Ok.

230-46=184

If Mason would be as high as 25, which I highly doubt, he still would be ripped at more or less 185 lbs.

YIP
Zack

Great!
Logged

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #43 on: October 20, 2006, 02:10:52 PM »
Quote from: Hedgehog on October 20, 2006, 02:03:38 PM
My guess is that Chris Mason is in the high teens as far as body fat.

But lets for arguments sake suggest that he is at 25%.

He weighs 230 lbs.

To be ripped, he would have to get to 5%.

Meaning shredding 20 %.

46 lbs.

You claim it is possible to diet down without losing one ounce of muscle. Ok.

230-46=184

If Mason would be as high as 25, which I highly doubt, he still would be ripped at more or less 185 lbs.

YIP
Zack

He is higher than 25 percent bodyfat.  I wish he would diet down so he would realize this.

Same thing with you Zack.  You need to diet down so you will realize.
Logged

SquatAss

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #44 on: October 20, 2006, 02:11:44 PM »
Quote from: hangclean on October 20, 2006, 02:08:49 PM
Right now I am 280 with 35 pecent bodyfat.  I got it checked in one of those water tank things at a gym.  Doesnt that mean I could be fairly ripped at 185?  Not like I ever will do it but wouldnt it be possible?  Also dont worry I know I am a fatass I'm not trying to prove anything.

Yes it's possible. You will have to eat a LOT of icecream though.
Logged

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #45 on: October 20, 2006, 02:12:11 PM »
Quote from: hangclean on October 20, 2006, 02:08:49 PM
Right now I am 280 with 35 pecent bodyfat.  I got it checked in one of those water tank things at a gym.  Doesnt that mean I could be fairly ripped at 185?  Not like I ever will do it but wouldnt it be possible?  Also dont worry I know I am a fatass I'm not trying to prove anything.

You are way higher than 35 percent.

Please post a picture.
Logged

SquatAss

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #46 on: October 20, 2006, 02:12:30 PM »
Quote from: The True Adonis on October 20, 2006, 02:10:52 PM
He is higher than 25 percent bodyfat.  I wish he would diet down so he would realize this.

Same thing with you Zack.  You need to diet down so you will realize.

Yes he's at least 50%.
Logged

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #47 on: October 20, 2006, 02:13:30 PM »
Quote from: SquatAss on October 20, 2006, 02:12:30 PM
Yes he's at least 50%.

In the 30s-40s.
Logged

SquatAss

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #48 on: October 20, 2006, 02:14:51 PM »
Quote from: The True Adonis on October 20, 2006, 02:13:30 PM
In the 30s-40s.

Haha please that's insanely obese.
Logged

Zach Trowbridge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Flex Wheeler 5`10 187. The IDIOTS HERE would call that Small.
« Reply #49 on: October 20, 2006, 02:24:01 PM »
I get the feeling that guys like TA and others claiming people have these ridiculous bodyfat numbers like 30 and 40% have never learned how to take a bodyfat measurement themselves, or had theirs done professionally.  There are few people on this board that I would readily put at over 30%, and these are the same people that you would be claiming to be in the 50's.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »