Author Topic: Ronnie Colemans downfall  (Read 5390 times)

Petrucci

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1969
  • Team Kratos!!!
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2007, 12:59:49 PM »
Won't be easy without a triceps and lat. ;)


did you ever heard of a guy named Dorian Yates??? if my memory isnt failing on me, he was on a similar situation, and won more than ONE olympia...

why cant Ronnie do the same? his injuries are not worse than Dorian...
!

D_1000

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2007, 01:01:39 PM »
Won't be easy without a triceps and lat. ;)

Yeah, Jay has also improved his symmetry this year.



Weightpit

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
  • Remember Sharon Tate...Carpe Diem
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2007, 03:57:14 PM »
Yeah, Jay has also improved his symmetry this year.




Right...

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2007, 04:05:42 PM »
Yeah, Jay has also improved his symmetry this year.




LOL!!

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2007, 05:19:16 PM »
very well said....

i myself are very weak but i can do 6 plates with better form than that BUT a lot less reps (4-8 maybe). THAT doesnt mean in like 1 year or even 2 i will be pulling 12 plates like nothing...
 There is a reason why you dont see anyone getting near 10 plates on T bar rows on regular gyms , even with bad form...
 Ronnie is a monster...You have a great physique Daddy, i would kill for you genetics...but no, i dont think any natural just 'bulking' can do that (and add that to a workout with MONSTER deadlifts, barbell rows, etc all with lots of weight...its a complete different situation)

  É, o Coleman destruiu o seu físico na minha opinião quando ele resolveu competir com 130 kg, o que só foi possível de ser alcançado treinando como um halterofilista, usando pesos enormes. O problema é que ele também ficou com a região abdominal de um halterofilista, com uma distenção enorme. Eu acho que ele estava um monstro em 2003, mas a sua massa não estava tão definida e densa como em anos prévios. Eu sou o tipo de cara que me impressiono mais com incrível qualidade muscular ao invés de tamanho. Se Coleman tivesse a cinturinha que ele tinha em 1998 no Olympia de 2003 e tivesse as costas, quadríceps e abdomem tão definidos, ele teria sido espetacular, mas o fato é que ele não apresentou a mesma qualidade que ele tinha com 112 kg aos 130, tanto em termos de definição muscular assim como em simetria. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #30 on: April 20, 2007, 05:24:00 PM »
everyone of you are in a fairy tail land ronnie looks like shit. who wants to look like him? i know plenty of big fat dudes with bellies who dont workout who look just like him
hahahahaha, i like you DW but this is the craziest thing i've ever read on here.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #31 on: April 20, 2007, 09:16:51 PM »
Im calling bullshit too.

The only way daddys wad could move 8 plates is by doing those upright/deadlift/shrug things I always see ego lifters doing. Daddyswad doesnt have enough muscle to move that sorta weight

DW is 6'6".


cheeksmaliod

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 107
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2007, 11:36:25 AM »
Right...


What always gets me is that lady who is smiling.

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: Ronnie Colemans downfall
« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2007, 11:37:14 AM »
Yeah, Jay has also improved his symmetry this year.




based on that pic, his V taper has improved
Here comes the money shot