Now this thread is becoming LUDICROUS....
A white male has an IQ not much higher than a DOG....
Actually, the average I.Q of White Males is, by definition, 100. The average I.Q of Blacks is 85 in the U.S and 70 in Africa, which is on the borderline of mental dretardation. So not only do White Men have higher I.Qs than dogs, they aslo have higher I.Qs than Blacks as well.
As one looks into history it is evident based upon accomplishments that it is not the minority CAUCASIAN but the MAJORITY people of color who have the dominant intelligence.
Absurd conjecture.
The average I.Q of Indo-European Caucasians is higher than that of all groups except East Asians. Furthermore, this is irrelvant, since the majority of people of all races are not intelligent enough to create any major scientific advancement or grand theories in areas such as physics, mathematics and philosophy. However, due to their much higher average intelligence, Whites produce 30 times more people with I.Qs above 130, which is required for optimum performance in high paying jobs like being a high business executive, medical doctor, engineer or attorney. Furthermore, Caucasians produce 1000 times more people with I.Qs in excess of 160, which is required for creating grand theories in areas like physics, mathematics and philosoph. This explains why practically all Human civilization was created by Caucasians and East Asians.
Just exploring the ancient world and the accomplishments of the people shows who is GIFTED AND WHO IS NOT. The bulk of world history and the major accomplishments and therefore HIGHER THINKING AND IQ occurs in AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST.
The civilizations of Africa and the Middle East were created, respectively, by Hamites and Semites. Anthropology regards both as branches of Caucasians.
Be it the wonders of the world, ancient cities, mathematical knowledge, scientific knowledge, astronomy knowledge etc runs circles around what any white person could imagine....even today.
Practically all Fields Medal winners and physics Nobelists are White Males. The fact that many are Jewish is irrelvant, because Jews are a mixture of Indo-Europeans and Semites, and both groups are Caucasians. Furthermore, with the exception of Han China, all the great civilizations of the World were created by Caucasians.
To still see white male scientist stumbling around Egypt, Mexico, Peru etc wondering how the pyramids and other structures were built makes white so called intelligence a laughable matter.
The Mayan pyramids are extremely simple engineering projects. The Roman Coliseum represents a far more sophisticated achievement in engineering than any of the Meso-American buildings. Not only that, the Romans also build insulae that were 10 story high, and the World's first system of roads. The Mayans were primitive in comparison.
As for the Egyptians,they were Caucasians of Hamitic origin. They entered Egypt coming from Babylon around 3 500 B.C. The tombs of Egyptians pharaohs that were discovered, like that of Ramses and Amnhotep IV, show that they had wavy hair, olive skin and straight noses. All Caucasian features. Cleopatra was a descendant of Ptolomey, a Geek who was one of Alexander the Great's generals. The mummifieed remains of aristocratic Egyptians show the Hamitic type as dominant, followed by Semites.
Add in Mayan, Incan, Aztec, Babylonian, Persian, Egyptian, etc engineering feats and creations and whites become the laughing stock of the world.
The achievements of the Mayans and Aztec are pathetic in comparison to that of Caucasians. As for Babylon, they were and intermixture of Semites with Indo-Eauropean tribes that emmigrated down from the Caucasus era during the Neolithic era(8 000 B.C), and both groups were Caucasians.
White intelligence is PRIDE...and they having created nothing but WAR, VIOLENCE, DISEASE and CHAOS
The homicide rate for Caucasians is much lower than that of Blacks: at 6% of the total population, Black Males commit 50% of all violent crimes, including rape, assualt, homicide and latrocide.
As for war, Black Africa is by far the continent that has the most of it. Black Africa is notorious for having dictators that start war en absurdum. Blacks engage in never-ending tribal warfare. They are far more violent than Whites. As for disease, you got that wrong: practically all diseases that were cured was done by White Males. Conversely, Black Africa bestowed on Whites the curses of HIV, Ebola, rhantavirus and several other pathogens
. Caucasian countries engage in far less warfare than Blacks, but the wars tend to be far more destructive due to the White Man's vastly superior technological and organizational level.
he white male/people has nothing to show for his/their existence except aforementioned and include sexual deviance(especially whites called Greeks and Romans).
So what's your point? We are talking about scientific and cultural achievements here, and sexuality has nothing to do with it. The ancient Greeks and Romans were not Christians or Jews, so they had no problems with homosexuality. However, they did contribute to civilization infinitely more than Blacks. Besides, Blacks engage in lots of homosexuality, too. Ever heard of the Keleinjin tribe? Do you know how an adolescent becomes a man? By drinking the sperm of an adult man. So much for the homosexuality of the ancient Greeks and Romans!
So to make themselves appear intelligent they adopt the culture, history, accomplishments, ideas etc of other people....
The bulk of what the White Males created came from their own minds. All the aforementioned civilizations were Caucasian. When they did take an invention from another people, like the gunpowder, they usually are more creative about how to use it.
perfect example is the preponderance of African history being portrayed by white people...ever watch the TEN COMMANDMENTS...Africans and Israelites are DARK SKINNED...NOT WHITE.
Ancient hebrews had darker skin than modern European Caucasians, but they were Semitic, and Semites are Caucasian. I personally don't care about this, since I don't have a religion.
The recent 300 movie correctly showed the skin color of the Persians, but LIED about all of the rest of the history to make the white Greeks appear dominant and intelligent.
The Greeks were dominant and intelligent; their achievements in mathematics, lingustics and political science are unparalled. They invented geometry and trigonometry, and created the most beautiful works of art ever, such as the Parthenon . What the hell are you talking about?
As for Blacks in the Persian Empire, they were slaves or subjects of the state. The Persians believed in integration, and didn't descriminate. All the elite, however, were
Caucasians of Semitic, Hamitic and Indo-European stock.
The great African leader HANNIBAL (not the movie) who conquered Rome was recently portrayed as WHITE on a History Channel special...how crazy is that!!!!.
Hannibal was African because the city-state he was born in, Carthage, was located in Africa. The geographical region where he was born has nothing to do with his etchicity. Hannibal was a Semite, a Caucasian, from ancient Phoenician origin. So there's nothing wrong with showing him as White, because that's what he was.
.
Here is a particular funny thing...TARZAN...the supposed African is portrayed in movies and cartoons as WHITE even though he is supposed to be AFRICAN.
Tarzan was the son of a White Man and just born in Africa! Furthermore, the foremost reason why a White Man played Tarzan is because there weren't many Black actors available, since most Black Men prefered to chase whores in the ghetto and do drugs rather than get jobs.
The examples of stealing the history, culture, intelligence and ideas of other people is a notorious attribute of white people...even the mentioned Einstein, Pythagoras, DaVinci, Isaac Newton, etc etc are ALL LIARS and THIEVES who stole the ideas and accomplishments of others...PLAGURIST...SCU MBAGS AT BEST they all are.
All their achiements are without precedence, so they couldn't possibly have stolen them from anyone. Provide sources for your assertions that the aforementioned men stole this from people of color.
The knowledge of Algebra, Geomentry, Calculus etc was know in the ANCIENT WORLD....
The knowledge of geometry did exist in the Ancient World, and it was created by Pithagoras, a Greek male of Indo-European origin. The bust of Pithagoras, done during his lifetime, still exists in the Louvre, and it shows the features of a Caucasian male.
Algebra was developed by Arabians, who are Semitic, and, thus, Caucasians. They also created our numerical system.
As for calculus, it was developed simultaneously by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz in the Sixteenth Century. One was an Englishman, and the other, a German. Both were Caucasians. Differential calculus was developed latter, also by White European Males. Calculus could not possibly have been developed in the Ancient World, because if it had, it would have allowed a level of technology that the Ancients lacked. Since they lacked it, then there was no calculus in the Ancient World.
Understanding of the PERIODIC CHART/ELEMENTS was far better know in the ancient world than even today..how else could the refinement of Gold, Copper, Brass, Bronze, Silver and even Cast Iron be to levels of which no refinery can match today.
First of all, this is false. The steels of the Ancient World, like wootz and tamahagane, were very simple in complexity when compared with modern steels. Furthermore, they were all developed by Caucasians or East Asians. No Blacks. Secondly, the only elements that the ancients knew about were gold(Au), Iron(Fe), copper(Cu) and bronze and Silver. As for Brass, it is an alloy and not an element. ::)Today, there are close to 120 elements in the Periodic Table.
The Periodic Table was created by Mendeleyev, a Russian White Male. All the elements of the perioric table were discovered by White Males. Not only that, White Males have manufactured several new elements, like Plutonium, Rhodium, Ununpentium, etc, somthing that dwarfs even the discovery of elements.
When was the last time you saw a quarry move 4 MILLION pound stones 200 Miles and erect buildings with them? The knowledge of physics, geology, mathematics, engineering, construction etc had to be so phenomenal that it would be off the chart.
Not really. The knowledge of engineering requirted to build a pyramid is primary. Not only that, the Egyptians were Caucasians, so you have no argument. The White Male is able to build scyscrappers that are as tall as the pyramids, but with far more sophisticated engineering. As for how they build it, the explanation is simple: when you have millions of slaves that you can work to death and centuries to build something, then moving and pilling up big rocks is not that hard. The only roles that the Blacks played in Egyptian civilization were as slaves.
his knowledge held in those days seemed to have been quite common given the multitude and magnitude of engineering marvels in the world...non of which exists in the white world. Even stretching into SouthEast Asian, India, The Middle East, Africa and most of Central and South America these great inventions, engineering feats and HIGH INTELLIGENCE exist.
The engineering is actually very simple in all these buildings. Modern building are much, much harder to build. As for the Middle East, they were Semites, Hamites and Indo-Europeans. Building a scyscraper is much, much harder than building a pyramid, and involves far more sophisticated engineering.
Another poster made the STUPID mistake of claiming everything from the combustion engine, airplane, car, etc are white creations....better let your PRIDE go and do some research...these inventions were/are NOT WHITE INVENTIONS....
Yes, they were. If the Blacks had developed all these things independently as you say, then they wouldn't have been defeated and enslaved by the Caucasians so easily. The Blacks of Africa were not even in the Neolithic Era when the European cames, but still in the Paleolithic one. In other words, they were still in the Stone Age. They hunted with stone spears.
but just like Einstein a white thief stole the idea and presented it as their own. Ever read the history of Thomas Edison or the court battle between him and Lewis Lattimer (the Black man that invented the light bulb)...Edison was ordered to court and when asked to explain how the light bulb worked he said he couldn't, but needed Mr lattimer to explain it. Now if the white bastard had invented the light bulb, then why would he need Mr Lattimer to explain how it worked? WHITE FRAUD REVEALED!!!!! This is just one of MANY cases of white FRAUD...
Nothing is revealed, except that maybe, just maybe, Edison didn't invent the light bulb. It is simply conjecture and expeculation. And even if it is true, you can still cannot explain the other hundreds of inventions that Edison came up with and claim it for Blacks. It does not, in any way, diminish his merit. Considering that Edison demonstrated his genius several times, it is safe to say that he was the one who invented the light bulb and not Lattimer, since the latter's track record is pathetic in comparison. Geniuses show consistent levels of genius; Edison showed it, Lattimer ddin't.
And as for white intelligence today....how come america ranks so low against other nations when it comes to intelligence..
This is not true. The average I.Q of the U.S is 98, which puts it among the highest average I.Qs in the World. The average I.Q of European nations is above 100, and the only reason why the U.S is lower is because of the large number of Blacks and Latinos that drag the average down.
I believe out of a scale of 50 top nations america is at 49. How come doctors, teachers, lawyers, scientist, inventors and the intelectually gifted are from every nation of people EXCEPT caucasians?
Wrong, again. The majority of foreigners doing research in the U.S are European, followed by East Asians. As for the Indians, they are Caucasians of Neolithic stock.
As for lawyers, scientists, inventors and general intellectual elite, the overwhelming majority are White, followed by East Asians.
This Langan guy is just like america A PHONEY LYING SELF CENTERED BULLSHITTER, looking for attention and sadly when question/exposed he is just like the WIZARD in OZ...a little lonely old man with nothing but a smoke and mirrors game trying to make himself look great....HOW SAD.
trust me: Langan would make you feel like a monkey if you tried to argue with him.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
