Does waterboarding inflict pain? Sounds like it is more of a scare tactic than anything else:
The waterboarding technique, characterized in 2005 by former CIA director Porter J. Goss as a "professional interrogation technique,"[9] is described as follows by journalist Julia Layton:
Water boarding as it is currently described involves strapping a person to an inclined board, with his feet raised and his head lowered. The interrogators bind the person's arms and legs so he can't move at all, and they cover his face. In some descriptions, the person is gagged, and some sort of cloth covers his nose and mouth; in others, his face is wrapped in cellophane. The interrogator then repeatedly pours water onto the person's face. Depending on the exact setup, the water may or may not actually get into the person's mouth and nose; but the physical experience of being underneath a wave of water seems to be secondary to the psychological experience. The person's mind believes he is drowning, and his gag reflex kicks in as if he were choking on all that water falling on his face.[10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 acknowledged that "torture" is illegal.
The Act then defined what and what does not constitute torture:
The term ‘serious physical pain or suffering’ means bodily injury that involves—
(I) a substantial risk of death;
(II) extreme physical pain;
(III) a burn or physical disfigurement of a serious nature (other than cuts, abrasions, or bruises); or
(IV) significant loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.
The sly and disgusting 'clarification' above authorizes torture like waterboarding.
If the torture – let’s call it by its right name – involves a not-so-substantial risk of death, serious physical pain, burns and physical disfigurement of a minor nature (major laceration and bruises no problemo), and minor permanent mental and physical impairment – the administration can now do it in the open.
The Act ensures against torture by defining it away. The Act raises the bar for what the government considers torture so the government can deny it is torturing people – while it is torturing them.
http://ariwatch.com/MilitaryCommissionsAct.htmYou can thank Alberto Gonzales for giving the okey-dokey on defining torture this way.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4999148/site/newsweek/Gonzales is a man of torture.