PT'S BACK !!
Seeming as you wish to talk on the 'JFK' incident, I will peruse this.
I don't like to bail on debates I know inside & out (with the exception of 9/11 
), bores the fucking tits of me, & there is no resolution to the whole affair, other than the 1 planned by the 'Zionist foreign policy agenda', that we know see play out before our very eyes. 
Just to be clear here, are you saying that the shots that killed 'JFK' came from the book depository ??
What was the distance from that window to the motorcade - do you know in ft ??
Oh, & yes the 3 shots in the time available, from that weapon are well within reason, but that is not the issue here, & you know it, as well as I.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5770984395481454022&ei=DVLmSeznGoKO-AamlK3ABA&hl=en
Enjoy
I look for conspiracies.
A theory is some-thing that is yet be classified, as definitive !!
3 issues, 'Green backs' - 'smash the 'CIA' (yeah, good one Johnny make enemies of the, Dulles, brothers grim) & their over-seas shenanigans' - 'Vietnam' & all the smack that was getting shippped to the states from the 'Golden Triangle'
In 1953, 'Dulles' became the first civilian Director of Central Intelligence, (these brothers get in a lot of pies from 53 onward) which had been formed as part of the National Security Act of 1947; earlier directors had been military officers.
I'm sure other sources are out there. i have some in book form at home. but wiki is convenient.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_bullet_theoryafter an initial supersonic rifle exit muzzle velocity of 1,850 to 2,000 feet per second (560 to 610 m/s), very slightly ballistically arced while traveling
189 ft (58 m) in a downward net angle of 25 degrees (allowing for the 3 degrees downward of Elm Street) then entered President Kennedy's rear suit coat at about 1,700 feet per second (518 m/s),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifleDuring his Marine Corps service in December 1956, Oswald scored a rating of sharpshooter (twice achieving 48 and 49 out of 50 shots during rapid fire at a stationary target
200 yards (180 m) [183 m] away using a standard issue M1 Garand semi-automatic rifle). Although, in May 1959, he qualified as a marksman (a lower classification than that of sharpshooter), military experts, after examining his records, characterized his firearms proficiency as "above average" and said he was, when compared to American civilian males of his age, "an excellent shot".
In 2008, The History Channel produced a documentary on the Kennedy Assassination that would seem to have settled the matter of Oswald's ability to make the shots once and for all. Duplicating the range, elevation and windspeed of the Presidential limousine at the moment of Oswald's firing at a desert firing range, a retired British Army sniper had no difficulty in making the number of shots with the same level of accuracy within the time frame established by the Zapruder Film with a scoped Carcano identical to Oswald's gun, firing the same type of ammunition, on his first attempt. The documentary also established that the hits in a specially constructed target 'head' that exactly emulates a human head, produced the same splatter pattern and flying pieces of bone and scalp visible in the Zapruder Film.
So basically, he's at marksman or sharpshooter level at 200 yards and he needs to hit a moving target he's pre-sighted at 60 some yards. Very do-able
Oh, & yes the 3 shots in the time available, from that weapon are well within reason, but that is not the issue here, & you know it, as well as I.
I beg to differ old chasp.
You may as well just go get the 'Warren commission" & try & convince us that 'Oswald' shot 'JFK' from a window in the book depository building, with a 'single bolt action 6.5 mm caliber Carcano rifle', a shot that 'Verille Zaitsev' himself could not have made !!
I mean, come on.
It thought is was "your" issue. sorry.
Seems like you are completely wrong about your single bolt action assertion and it being a possible shot.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5770984395481454022&ei=DVLmSeznGoKO-AamlK3ABA&hl=en
I watched the 2 minute video produced with final cut pro seemingly by amateur film makers.
Here's what i would ask off the top of my head:
- Where and when on the route did this happen?
- What was being said by both agents?
- Were the agents ever interviewed?
- Were the agents breaking protocol by not being on the back?
Until then it doesn't really prove anything.
Aside from that, its stupid reasoning to think that an organization who's sole purpose it to protect the protect the president with their lives would be in on this conspiracy.
