Dennis Wolf 3 weeks out from the Olympia

[suckmymuscle]

hahahhaha, watch your blood pressure. im correct on ALL points i made. lee priest has small chest cuz its overtrained....?   

and it not quoting out of context, as the context was mr dillet.

  Paul Dillet's muscles were the result of genes and drugs, not of hard training. Saying that he achieved his body because he trained hard is an insult to every guy who trains 10 times harder than he did and were still much smaller than him.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

he does have a tendency to say some really ridiculous things.. lets see here:  Kovacs pressing the 300's,

  Kovacs did press 300 lbs dummbells for pecs...

Lee overtraining his chest,

  Lee does overtrain his chest...

Dillet lacking thickness etc

  Dillet did lack thickness except in his arms and legs...

oh and lets not forget Dorian > Ronnie 

  Dorian would defeat  Ronnie, and I have provided ample evidence for that in the bitch thread...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

1  you don't know whether lee would have responded better to "fewer" sets...its very presumptuous to think you KNOW what would work someone other than YOURSELF.  especially lee, who has probably tried all different variations and techniques to make his chest grow. 

  No, everyone responds better to fewer sets. Overtraining works for everyone. Priest would definitely see better results if he did fewer sets. The only reason why he has any pec thickness at all is because he is an anabolic user. Most people would lose pec mass if they did 30 sets. And who said that Lee tried all training types? This might be the only one he ever did.

2  the statement about machines and dumbbells is IGNORANT.  muscles dont know the difference between machines and free weights.  they respond to overload, whether it be from any source.  there ARE differences of course between the two, but the statement that machines just make you wider and more shapely, and free weights make you more beefy?  WAY off the deep end with that statement. 

  Don't pretend to know more about this than I do, because I'm majoring in exercise physiology and I am smarter than you. Muscles can't tell the difference between machines and barbell&dumbbells? You bet they can't, but they can certainly tell the difference between the stimulus caused by a machine from the one caused by barbells&dumbbells. You're probably not awar of the recent studies done with MRI, which shows that far more muscle fibers are activated in a set of flat bench press than in a set of machine flyes. Not more fibers, but much more. Barbells require you to balance the weight, and that activates moe fibers and more nerve firing than what mahines do. Furthermore, with the exception of barbell and dumbbell curls, most barbell&dumbbell eercises are multi-joint, which means that they work several muscles at the same time, thus being more productive.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[haider]

  Kovacs did press 300 lbs dummbells for pecs...

Where is the evidence for this? I can't believe you would even think it would even be possible for him to do that.

  Lee does overtrain his chest...

He maybe, but for all we know he may not be considering he takes anabolic drugs, and individual capacities for volume and workload.

  Dillet did lack thickness except in his arms and legs...

What about his monstrous shoulders and traps? His weaknesses were chest and back so I guess he would lack thickness there, but I don't think his lack of density is all that visible until he turns around and hits those back shots.

 

Dorian would defeat  Ronnie, and I have provided ample evidence for that in the bitch thread...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I've seen a lot of PICTORAL evidence to the contrary which makes me beleive otherwise. Both have their weaknesses and strengths, and as much as they add up on paper, they don't mean much until you see the comprehensive picture. This is beyond argumentation, it is visual evidence.

[slaveboy1980]

  Paul Dillet's muscles were the result of genes and drugs, not of hard training. Saying that he achieved his body because he trained hard is an insult to every guy who trains 10 times harder than he did and were still much smaller than him.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

did dillet fuck your imaginary gf? 
i never claimed dillet was the hardest working guy around, infact like i said in several earlier posts in this thread he was lazy compared to the likes of yates.

but still dillet>yates.

[slaveboy1980]

  No, everyone responds better to fewer sets. Overtraining works for everyone. Priest would definitely see better results if he did fewer sets. The only reason why he has any pec thickness at all is because he is an anabolic user. Most people would lose pec mass if they did 30 sets. And who said that Lee tried all training types? This might be the only one he ever did.

bullshit, Lee has been working out for more than 20 years, his chest is small because he doesnt have good chest genetics and possibly due to his shoulders getting activated too much in his chest pressing movement. His chest is not overtrained, his chest is big as it ever will be. if he used less sets he would look exactly the same as he does today.
 
SUCKMYMUSCLE

[slaveboy1980]

  Kovacs did press 300 lbs dummbells for pecs...
no he didnt
  Lee does overtrain his chest...
no he doesnt, he took his chest genetics as far as he could. his lagging chest doesnt have anything to do with overtraining
  Dillet did lack thickness except in his arms and legs...
dillet had very thick legs, shoulders, arms and calves .and yes he lagged some thickness in chest and back. but was still better than Yates, and among 5 best bodybuilders ever.
  Dorian would defeat  Ronnie, and I have provided ample evidence for that in the bitch thread...
dorian did defeat ronnie, but when ronnie was at his best, dorian wouldnt even be close, specially with his torn left bicep.
SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

  I will just ignore this troll. That'll probably piss him off.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[slaveboy1980]

  No, everyone responds better to fewer sets. Overtraining works for everyone. Priest would definitely see better results if he did fewer sets. The only reason why he has any pec thickness at all is because he is an anabolic user. Most people would lose pec mass if they did 30 sets. And who said that Lee tried all training types? This might be the only one he ever did.


  Don't pretend to know more about this than I do, because I'm majoring in exercise physiology and I am smarter than you. Muscles can't tell the difference between machines and barbell&dumbbells? You bet they can't, but they can certainly tell the difference between the stimulus caused by a machine from the one caused by barbells&dumbbells. You're probably not awar of the recent studies done with MRI, which shows that far more muscle fibers are activated in a set of flat bench press than in a set of machine flyes. Not more fibers, but much more. Barbells require you to balance the weight, and that activates moe fibers and more nerve firing than what mahines do. Furthermore, with the exception of barbell and dumbbell curls, most barbell&dumbbell eercises are multi-joint, which means that they work several muscles at the same time, thus being more productive.


irrelevant, as dillet did use free weights but just didnt work hard enough on bringing up his weak points. dillet used both machines and free weights. and even if he had only used machines (which he didnt) he could have increased his torso mass had he worked hard enough on those body parts.
SUCKMYMUSCLE

[slaveboy1980]

  I will just ignore this troll. That'll probably piss him off.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

 ..why you posting then?...and im correct on every point i have written.

how does it feel to be wrong 

[suckmymuscle]

..why you posting then?...and im correct on every point i have written.

how does it feel to be wrong 

   

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[haider]

SMM do you mind me asking where you are from?