Author Topic: 100m in 9.74 seconds  (Read 8191 times)

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
100m in 9.74 seconds
« on: September 13, 2007, 11:27:30 AM »


Asafa looks great...what do you guys think he is stacking?

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2007, 11:31:45 AM »


Asafa looks great...what do you guys think he is stacking?

Oh no he's completely natural. That's why he beat ben johnson's time.  ::)

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31828
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2007, 11:33:53 AM »
damn he can sure run fast.  Whatever he's on will be known in a year or two from now as the next big drug that athletes took to cheat.  Probably same shit A-Rod is on.

Knives

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 833
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2007, 11:35:59 AM »
He claims to be natural for obvious reasons...

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2007, 11:36:46 AM »
GH and non-ester gells

HUTCH

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 706
  • Mr. Arizona 2007
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2007, 11:37:56 AM »
A friend I ran with in college now runs for the Canadian National team and he tells that most sprinters are using a lot af anavar and halo and of course GH....

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2007, 11:39:10 AM »

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2007, 11:43:55 AM »
one way or the other... i think steroids to sprinting is like steroids to home run hitting

you are either born fast or you're not... steroids might make you 3-5% better but the other 95-97% is natural talent

HUTCH

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 706
  • Mr. Arizona 2007
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2007, 11:45:19 AM »
But dont think its impossible to run sub 10 sec or be a world champion without juice...Look here at my teamate from college Kim Collins...He won the world championships and has run under 10 many times and he has never even touched protien!!!!  This guy use to come to practice in cutoff jean shorts do half the workout and leave...hahah...Skinny as hell and weak as hell in the weight room...no joke he would do curls with 10 lbs and be bitchin how is arms hurt...Pure talent...

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2007, 11:48:26 AM »
sfast

Hunter86

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2007, 11:49:34 AM »
But dont think its impossible to run sub 10 sec or be a world champion without juice...Look here at my teamate from college Kim Collins...He won the world championships and has run under 10 many times and he has never even touched protien!!!!  This guy use to come to practice in cutoff jean shorts do half the workout and leave...hahah...Skinny as hell and weak as hell in the weight room...no joke he would do curls with 10 lbs and be bitchin how is arms hurt...Pure talent...

damn look at those chicken legs

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2007, 11:50:07 AM »
one way or the other... i think steroids to sprinting is like steroids to home run hitting

you are either born fast or you're not... steroids might make you 3-5% better but the other 95-97% is natural talent

true, but that 3% is the difference between winning a gold medal...and being a highschool gym teacher
Here comes the money shot

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2007, 11:55:29 AM »
damn look at those chicken legs


More like ostrich legs...look at their length relative to his torso, some people are just built for this sh1t

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2007, 11:56:29 AM »
true, but that 3% is the difference between winning a gold medal...and being a highschool gym teacher


maybe  8)

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2007, 11:57:46 AM »
possible without drugs? maybe
possible without being black? never
Z

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2007, 12:00:39 PM »
possible without drugs? maybe
possible without being black? never


thread owned ;D

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2007, 12:07:51 PM »
But dont think its impossible to run sub 10 sec or be a world champion without juice...Look here at my teamate from college Kim Collins...He won the world championships and has run under 10 many times and he has never even touched protien!!!!  This guy use to come to practice in cutoff jean shorts do half the workout and leave...hahah...Skinny as hell and weak as hell in the weight room...no joke he would do curls with 10 lbs and be bitchin how is arms hurt...Pure talent...

but if he took gear..he might not be a "nobody"

one day kevin powell (sp) was a  nobody...next day he breaks the long jump distance..become a millionare

oddly enough he never approached that distance again..makes you wonder what he did different for that event ;)
Here comes the money shot

biceps

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 538
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2007, 12:16:36 PM »
A friend I ran with in college now runs for the Canadian National team and he tells that most sprinters are using a lot af anavar and halo and of course GH....

GH and 5 IU Insulin (man)
GH and 3 IU Insulin (women)
4 times per week.



WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2007, 12:16:49 PM »
i don't think you believe that... it still takes years of dedicated training and eating and shiting  :)

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2007, 12:20:16 PM »
i don't think you believe that... it still takes years of dedicated training and eating and shiting  :)

no one ever said that it didn't take hard work and superior genetics..

all we are saying is that a 3% improvement is the difference between being celebrated on Jay Leno and watching at home while eating a bowl of cereal as you multi-tasking by posting on getbig..waiting for your mother to tell you to turn off the TV.
Here comes the money shot

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2007, 12:21:39 PM »
agree

musclehedz

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1840
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2007, 12:31:08 PM »
Believe it or not, steroids can easily make you like 25/40% faster/bigger etc. Depends on genetics and all the other stuff around it. Try it out and see.

Ah well as long as you know how to beat the stupid doping tests you are "clean"

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #22 on: September 13, 2007, 12:36:23 PM »
They have also been "speeding up" the tracks in an effort to erase Ben Johnson's Record. Much to the dismay of long distance runners. If Ben were running on the tracks today, using the same shit he used back then, 9.74 would easily be in his pocket, if not quicker than that. Ben was so far ahead of his time, that took till 21st century for his record to be broken.

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #23 on: September 13, 2007, 12:42:42 PM »
They have also been "speeding up" the tracks in an effort to erase Ben Johnson's Record. Much to the dismay of long distance runners. If Ben were running on the tracks today, using the same shit he used back then, 9.74 would easily be in his pocket, if not quicker than that. Ben was so far ahead of his time, that took till 21st century for his record to be broken.

Ben's problem is that he was too good..he looked too good..dude was muscular and ripped for a runner.
Here comes the money shot

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: 100m in 9.74 seconds
« Reply #24 on: September 13, 2007, 12:48:49 PM »
They have also been "speeding up" the tracks in an effort to erase Ben Johnson's Record. Much to the dismay of long distance runners. If Ben were running on the tracks today, using the same shit he used back then, 9.74 would easily be in his pocket, if not quicker than that. Ben was so far ahead of his time, that took till 21st century for his record to be broken.

this makes a lot of sense.  I think they made a big fuss about Ben because they were trying to make it seem like they were intollerant of doping.